JCoz wrote:Really gnati? That's whats straight? Admin, Coaches, Schools, Conferences, the NCAA,ESPN and the like all continue on the gravy train while no changes come for the players?
What a deal for the establishment.
Meh.
Moderators: peeker643, swerb, danwismar, furls
by e0y2e3 » Thu Aug 18, 2011 6:39 pm
JCoz wrote:Really gnati? That's whats straight? Admin, Coaches, Schools, Conferences, the NCAA,ESPN and the like all continue on the gravy train while no changes come for the players?
What a deal for the establishment.

by JCoz » Thu Aug 18, 2011 6:43 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:JCoz wrote:Really gnati? That's whats straight? Admin, Coaches, Schools, Conferences, the NCAA,ESPN and the like all continue on the gravy train while no changes come for the players?
What a deal for the establishment.
Meh.
by e0y2e3 » Thu Aug 18, 2011 6:45 pm

by JCoz » Thu Aug 18, 2011 6:47 pm
by e0y2e3 » Thu Aug 18, 2011 6:49 pm

by JCoz » Thu Aug 18, 2011 7:00 pm
by e0y2e3 » Thu Aug 18, 2011 7:03 pm

by JCoz » Thu Aug 18, 2011 7:09 pm
by gnati » Thu Aug 18, 2011 7:20 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:reminds me of the original drafted version of TARP gnati.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Thu Aug 18, 2011 7:22 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Like I said, I don't know the answer I just know for 100% fact that they are there to use the school as much as the school is there to use them.
Not to mention how many Pel Grant absuses I've seen and everything else.
Athletes get Pel Grant's over their Schollies if they are poor and can get academic schollies and get overrewarded (I did this for a year) if they decide to work hard.
by gnati » Thu Aug 18, 2011 7:25 pm
JCoz wrote:Really gnati? That's whats straight? Admin, Coaches, Schools, Conferences, the NCAA,ESPN and the like all continue on the gravy train while no changes come for the players?
What a deal for the establishment.
by JCoz » Thu Aug 18, 2011 7:28 pm
by e0y2e3 » Thu Aug 18, 2011 7:30 pm

by gnati » Thu Aug 18, 2011 7:30 pm
JCoz wrote:See my other responses.
BTW, for a team like OSU....what's thier athletic dept revenue? $100 million a year? Those BTN checks aren't getting smaller either.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Thu Aug 18, 2011 7:45 pm
by pup » Thu Aug 18, 2011 8:15 pm
by furls » Thu Aug 18, 2011 9:46 pm
by danwismar » Thu Aug 18, 2011 10:05 pm
by mattvan1 » Thu Aug 18, 2011 10:45 pm
pup wrote:Vince Wolfork got $50,000.
What kind of stipend is fixing that?
by mattvan1 » Thu Aug 18, 2011 10:54 pm
danwismar wrote:---
Back to the Yahoo-Miami story...the reason I jumped in here...
Here's an article by a Miami U-based blogger, it appears...questioning the Yahoo investigation tactics...the strength of their evidence and corroboration etc. The guy makes some decent points that the case isn't quite as iron-clad as it appears on the surface. Worth looking at for a different perspective...consider the source, of course...lots of detail...long....
http://allabouttheu.wordpress.com/2011/ ... is-claims/
by The Score » Fri Aug 19, 2011 12:46 am
danwismar wrote:---
Back to the Yahoo-Miami story...the reason I jumped in here...
Here's an article by a Miami U-based blogger, it appears...questioning the Yahoo investigation tactics...the strength of their evidence and corroboration etc. The guy makes some decent points that the case isn't quite as iron-clad as it appears on the surface. Worth looking at for a different perspective...consider the source, of course...lots of detail...long....
http://allabouttheu.wordpress.com/2011/ ... is-claims/
by JCoz » Fri Aug 19, 2011 9:22 am
furls wrote:The about it, right now we are all up in arms over college kids partying on a yacht with hookers. So what. What about that kid from Florida last year that was suspended by Meyer for a couple of games for threatening to "kill a bitch?" Where is the outrage over Florida's 30 arrests a couple of years ago? That is actual criminal behavior and the players get a one game suspension. Sell your shit, that is a 5 game suspension. These rules are fucking stupid.
by JCoz » Fri Aug 19, 2011 9:48 am
danwismar wrote:Paying stipends to players is a (pick one) Pandora's Box...slippery slope...
Set up a system where potentially millions of dollars in cash changes hands between athletic department officials and student athletes.
What could go wrong?
And how could you pay football players and not pay the members of the women's rowing team and every other sport, mens and womens...and in equal amounts too. Fairness...equality...Title IX...and all that.
---
Back to the Yahoo-Miami story...the reason I jumped in here...
Here's an article by a Miami U-based blogger, it appears...questioning the Yahoo investigation tactics...the strength of their evidence and corroboration etc. The guy makes some decent points that the case isn't quite as iron-clad as it appears on the surface. Worth looking at for a different perspective...consider the source, of course...lots of detail...long....
http://allabouttheu.wordpress.com/2011/ ... is-claims/
by leadpipe » Fri Aug 19, 2011 9:51 am
by JCoz » Fri Aug 19, 2011 10:05 am
leadpipe wrote:All this about "reasonable stipends".....If that was all it was about it would already be problem solved. Cause there ain't too many D 1 football/basketball players walking around without money - no matter their background. There's a good bet that any campus you walk onto the football player has more cash in pocket than the 40 year old who's been in a career for 20 years.
It's greed beyond that which causes the great majority of issues. And no "McDonalds money" is going to change that. There's waaaay too much money involved in the sports as a whole for agents and boosters not to be able to easily exceed what the University would give them.
I'm with Eo here. Hard to feel bad for guys getting a free ride - and all the other stuff that comes with it. (what's the monetary value on hand picked classes and instructors? as a minor example of a perk) A great deal of them are using college and the NCAA just as much as the NCAA is using them.
This isn't much different than Unions and the Welfare systems. The argument against these things would be much weaker if not for years of certain individuals rampant abuse.
by e0y2e3 » Fri Aug 19, 2011 10:39 am

by pup » Fri Aug 19, 2011 11:17 am
by e0y2e3 » Fri Aug 19, 2011 11:29 am

by JCoz » Fri Aug 19, 2011 1:00 pm
pup wrote:Our government wasting more time looking into professional sports! Yes, that is exactly what this country needs.
What is the total revenue of tOSU football program for one year?
by JCoz » Fri Aug 19, 2011 1:01 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:I think you really are missing something here JCoz:
These guys are taking payoffs in the thousands upon thousands of dollars, merchandise, etc.
No one can replicate that on a stipend level.
A small stipend is nothing more than a pity action, throwing a shitty ass dog biscuit to a dog and telling it it’s steak. Like telling them, we’ve got your monthly McD’s trip covered because we feel bad about how hard you work!!!
by JCoz » Fri Aug 19, 2011 1:03 pm
pup wrote:Our government wasting more time looking into professional sports! Yes, that is exactly what this country needs.
What is the total revenue of tOSU football program for one year?
by peeker643 » Fri Aug 19, 2011 1:10 pm
JCoz wrote:It isn't about pity as much as it is hypocricy
by JCoz » Fri Aug 19, 2011 1:11 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Things I agree w/ the gov't looking into re: college sports - taxing them
Things I don't agree w/ them looking into "WE NEED A PLAYOFF!!! RECRUITING VIOLATIONS ARE BAAADDD!!!"
Which is more likely to get looked into: DIE BCS DIE!!!!
Also, has anyone bothered to read the NYTimes article I linked? I mean the NCAA knows about all of these allegations and pretty much said the death penalty and TV death won't happen.
by pup » Fri Aug 19, 2011 3:00 pm
JCoz wrote:pup wrote:Our government wasting more time looking into professional sports! Yes, that is exactly what this country needs.
What is the total revenue of tOSU football program for one year?
Close to 100 million.
EDIT- I should do some homework before shooting from the hip on this - I THINK its probably less than 100 million, because that is what the athletic budget is IIRC, and no other sports make money, but some contribute to the revenue, but I do think its a relativly small % of the total revenue.
by pup » Fri Aug 19, 2011 3:06 pm
JCoz wrote:pup wrote:Our government wasting more time looking into professional sports! Yes, that is exactly what this country needs.
What is the total revenue of tOSU football program for one year?
Actually its exactly what the fuck our country needs, pup.
This wouldn't be the gov putting Clemons and Bonds on the stand about Steriods in baseball, its billions of untaxed dollars flying under the facade of amatuer sports.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Fri Aug 19, 2011 4:34 pm
pup wrote:JCoz wrote:pup wrote:Our government wasting more time looking into professional sports! Yes, that is exactly what this country needs.
What is the total revenue of tOSU football program for one year?
Actually its exactly what the fuck our country needs, pup.
This wouldn't be the gov putting Clemons and Bonds on the stand about Steriods in baseball, its billions of untaxed dollars flying under the facade of amatuer sports.
Yes, tax them. So they raise the cost of tickets/memoribilia and the individual workers in this country pay more, but they make the exact same amount. Except at places like Average State University, where people will stop going to games because they are too expensive and it will kill not only a program but an entire athletic department.
Oh wait. These athletic programs will just take the hit? Awful nice of them. Too bad the rest of the athletic programs that get fed from football budgets will go by the way side. And thousands of deserving kids who play a sport other than football will no longer be able to get a scholarship, not go to college, and we will have the brightest group of ditch diggers in the world.
And with all those extra tax dollars, what will we do with them? Yep. Waste em, just like they do now.
by furls » Sat Aug 20, 2011 2:31 am
peeker643 wrote:JCoz wrote:It isn't about pity as much as it is hypocricy
Pay them.
Let those that can work work, those that can make endorsement deals make them. God bless the American way.
But no more scholarships. If they can buy in or get loans for the $50k per at USC good for them.
No more free food or medical coverage either. And no more admissions preference, no more preferential scheduling, none of it.
They'll be like any other student, just like they want. With as much right to make money as any other kid on campus.
Let's do it. Let's see just how many make it in that system. Nothing could possibly be more fair than that.
by e0y2e3 » Sat Aug 20, 2011 2:36 am

by Cerebral_DownTime » Sat Aug 20, 2011 2:51 am
by peeker643 » Sat Aug 20, 2011 10:53 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:You guys have on serious disconnect, I came from a midd-class comfortable family and got mad aid and grant money after I transferred.
90% of these kids qualified for the Pel, they would qualify for near to or complete aid.
Endowments and tax money would end up paying them and they would be free to make scrilla from wherever and however they wanted.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sat Aug 20, 2011 10:58 pm
by e0y2e3 » Sat Aug 20, 2011 10:58 pm

by peeker643 » Sat Aug 20, 2011 11:06 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Hey, cuntface, why did you lock the other thread?
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sat Aug 20, 2011 11:13 pm
peeker643 wrote:Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Hey, cuntface, why did you lock the other thread?
May have been the 25 complaints.
But more because you were enforcing your will and dominating it. Will not stand for that.
by peeker643 » Sat Aug 20, 2011 11:17 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:peeker643 wrote:Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Hey, cuntface, why did you lock the other thread?
May have been the 25 complaints.
But more because you were enforcing your will and dominating it. Will not stand for that.
Fuck the complaints and the 25 shithead complainers.
Could you imagine if I was the President? That would be AWESOME......
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sat Aug 20, 2011 11:25 pm
by peeker643 » Sat Aug 20, 2011 11:41 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Ohh sorry, I do not want to interrupt prison show time.
They only play the same fucking 3 episodes every weekend. MSNBC loser assholes.
Did you ever read the story about the French inmate who ate his cellmate's lung while the dude was still alive? He only got 30 more years.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sat Aug 20, 2011 11:44 pm
by peeker643 » Sat Aug 20, 2011 11:56 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Did you ever watch OZ on HBO?
(sorry to threadjack, just BSing with Peekerino)
Return to College Sports Arena
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests