Moderators: peeker643, swerb, pup, paulcousineau
by peeker643 » Thu Aug 11, 2011 1:28 pm
by Symbolic47 » Thu Aug 11, 2011 1:45 pm
by pup » Thu Aug 11, 2011 1:51 pm
by GodHatesClevelandSport » Thu Aug 11, 2011 1:53 pm
by Rat_Tail » Thu Aug 11, 2011 1:56 pm
by peeker643 » Thu Aug 11, 2011 1:58 pm
GodHatesClevelandSport wrote:Considering that Marson gets about two hits a week, I think the less of him in the lineup, the better.
by Symbolic47 » Thu Aug 11, 2011 2:07 pm
Rat_Tail wrote:Yeah I hate to keep knocking on LaPorta but he really is a poor mans Russell Branyan. And that's a pretty generous comparison. Which is sad.
He is either swinging at a terrible pitch, checking his swing, whiffing like a girl, or hitting the occasional home run.
by paulcousineau » Thu Aug 11, 2011 2:09 pm
pup wrote:Two weeks ago..who thought we would be talking about the plus offense making it able to hide Marson's bat?
by GodHatesClevelandSport » Thu Aug 11, 2011 2:09 pm
peeker643 wrote:GodHatesClevelandSport wrote:Considering that Marson gets about two hits a week, I think the less of him in the lineup, the better.
If that's the response you didn't read the article. Because it acknowledges the nominal difference between Marson and LaPorta and provides the rationale for making the move anyway.
Which you didn't speak to.
by DrPoove » Thu Aug 11, 2011 2:14 pm
by Symbolic47 » Thu Aug 11, 2011 2:16 pm
GodHatesClevelandSport wrote:peeker643 wrote:GodHatesClevelandSport wrote:Considering that Marson gets about two hits a week, I think the less of him in the lineup, the better.
If that's the response you didn't read the article. Because it acknowledges the nominal difference between Marson and LaPorta and provides the rationale for making the move anyway.
Which you didn't speak to.
That is true, I didn't see there was an article linked.
I will read it, and then dispute all of its salient points! Starting with pining for Marson in the lineup is like wishing for more playing time for Jack Hannahan. Dude can't hit. His glove won't make up for it.
by paulcousineau » Thu Aug 11, 2011 2:25 pm
Symbolic47 wrote:GodHatesClevelandSport wrote:peeker643 wrote:GodHatesClevelandSport wrote:Considering that Marson gets about two hits a week, I think the less of him in the lineup, the better.
If that's the response you didn't read the article. Because it acknowledges the nominal difference between Marson and LaPorta and provides the rationale for making the move anyway.
Which you didn't speak to.
That is true, I didn't see there was an article linked.
I will read it, and then dispute all of its salient points! Starting with pining for Marson in the lineup is like wishing for more playing time for Jack Hannahan. Dude can't hit. His glove won't make up for it.
Nobody is saying Marson can hit. We are just saying that having him catching regularly improves the team. Of course now that I need it, I cant find the link I was looking at the other night. But the team ERA is significantly lower with Marson calling the shots than Santana. Take into account the all around ineptitude of LaPorta and its a move I would go for till next season.
by Symbolic47 » Thu Aug 11, 2011 2:28 pm
by GodHatesClevelandSport » Thu Aug 11, 2011 2:35 pm
by peeker643 » Thu Aug 11, 2011 2:47 pm
GodHatesClevelandSport wrote:I think Lou is about as good as he's going to be as a hitter.
I think LaPorta is better than he's been showing lately, but not good overall. So that gives a team struggling offensively more chances to score.
Now, I did take a look at Lou's game log for the year. The Indians are 17-10 when he has 4 or more plate appearances. Interstingly, they are 2-10 when he has exactly 3 plate appearances. I am assuming he started in every one of those games. What that tells me is that he's not exactly hurting the team when he plays a full game. But he is not helping when no one else is doing anything. In other words, he's not a difference maker. If the guys who are supposed to be doing their jobs at the plate don't do their jobs at the plate, Marson's not going to make up for that. Hence, since he bats ninth, he only gets to the plate three times in games where no one is hitting, and he rarely does enough with the bat to make up for everyone else. When everyone is clicking, Lou gets his 4 ABs and he doesn't do anything terrible to ruin the team's chances. Sometimes he's even helping!
I suppose it is akin to the Angels' situation where they shipped out slugging catcher Mike Napoli and use no-hit Jeff Mathis regularly. They have a worse offense than the Indians but a better record (and fewer runs allowed).
by WiscTribeFan » Thu Aug 11, 2011 3:51 pm
by skatingtripods » Thu Aug 11, 2011 4:02 pm
by peeker643 » Thu Aug 11, 2011 4:33 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Thu Aug 11, 2011 4:51 pm
by DrPoove » Thu Aug 11, 2011 5:00 pm
by Commodore Perry » Thu Aug 11, 2011 5:02 pm
DrPoove wrote:What is this team being built around for the next 2-3 years? Pitching.
by scrambler » Thu Aug 11, 2011 5:03 pm
by leadpipe » Thu Aug 11, 2011 5:45 pm
by DrPoove » Thu Aug 11, 2011 5:49 pm
by Dnthateonthepronk » Thu Aug 11, 2011 7:23 pm
by StewieG » Thu Aug 11, 2011 7:53 pm
by peeker643 » Fri Aug 12, 2011 12:52 am
StewieG wrote:Is LaPorta's hip still bothering him? He just seems like he's swinging with his arms and not using his legs much at all. That, and he tries to pull EVERYTHING. I cringe when I see him trying to pull a pitch a foot outside.
by Spanky » Sun Aug 14, 2011 11:08 am
by dazindiansfanuk » Sun Aug 14, 2011 11:54 am
Spanky wrote:Santana is a DH at best. He is a showboat behind the plate even though he sucks and he's too short to play first and he makes no effort there either. The fact that he got in a fight with Chris Perez in spring training and again with Asdrubal the other night should tell you everything you need to know about him. He thinks he's the second coming and won't hear otherwise. Lou has the potential to be a better hitter. Before he got sent down for Santana last year he was really starting to hit his stride. And by the way, Santana being brought up last year was nothing more than a PR stunt since we were facing the Nationals with Strasberg. Santana is a man without a position and I would rather not have him on this team. He's cancer.
by Spanky » Sun Aug 14, 2011 1:09 pm
by dazindiansfanuk » Sun Aug 14, 2011 1:19 pm
Spanky wrote:care to disagree with any of the aforementioned points?
by motherscratcher » Sun Aug 14, 2011 1:20 pm
Spanky wrote:care to disagree with any of the aforementioned points?
by Spanky » Sun Aug 14, 2011 1:32 pm
by motherscratcher » Sun Aug 14, 2011 1:35 pm
Spanky wrote:You clearly havent met him before
by YouCanPutItOnTheBoardYES! » Sun Aug 14, 2011 2:22 pm

by Dnthateonthepronk » Sun Aug 14, 2011 2:34 pm
YouCanPutItOnTheBoardYES! wrote:You just said Lou Marson has the potential to be a better hitter than Santana. You sir, are an idiot.
by Spanky » Sun Aug 14, 2011 2:41 pm
YouCanPutItOnTheBoardYES! wrote:You just said Lou Marson has the potential to be a better hitter than Santana. You sir, are an idiot.
by YouCanPutItOnTheBoardYES! » Sun Aug 14, 2011 2:42 pm
Dnthateonthepronk wrote:YouCanPutItOnTheBoardYES! wrote:You just said Lou Marson has the potential to be a better hitter than Santana. You sir, are an idiot.
I think he meant lou has the potential to be better than Lou is right now, not lou has the potential to be better than Santanna.

by YouCanPutItOnTheBoardYES! » Sun Aug 14, 2011 2:46 pm

by leadpipe » Sun Aug 14, 2011 5:11 pm
YouCanPutItOnTheBoardYES! wrote:I'm also confused as to how bringing up the top prospect still in the minors at the time, was a PR stunt?
Return to Cleveland Indians & MLB
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests
