Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by ajunior148 » Wed Aug 10, 2011 9:48 am
by scott » Wed Aug 10, 2011 11:08 am
ajunior148 wrote:Good read on Colt, Mangini, and Shurmur.
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news;_ylt=AkXOz_YBAW4ce8UqwI5HHsxDubYF?slug=lc-carpenter_colt_mccoy_fresh_start_browns_080811
by yogi » Wed Aug 10, 2011 11:45 am
by SoulDawg74 » Wed Aug 10, 2011 12:16 pm
ajunior148 wrote:Good read on Colt, Mangini, and Shurmur.
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news;_ylt=AkXOz_YBAW4ce8UqwI5HHsxDubYF?slug=lc-carpenter_colt_mccoy_fresh_start_browns_080811
by pup » Wed Aug 10, 2011 3:53 pm
by ajunior148 » Wed Aug 10, 2011 4:20 pm
pup wrote:Hey SD. Maybe Mangini just agrees with you. Why waste time working with Colt since he will never be good enough to win a ring?
When the season began, the other quarterbacks got the weekly game plan on Monday. McCoy didn’t see his until Wednesday. No explanation provided; it was as if he didn’t exist at all.
And it’s far different for McCoy than last summer when communication was sometimes non-existent with his coaches. For instance, he says he didn’t learn he was going to start the team’s final exhibition game in 2010 until about five minutes before the contest started. A coach looked at him and said: “You’re starting,” then McCoy raced into a huddle with players he barely knew.
“There had been no reps [in practice], nothing,” McCoy said.
by yogi » Wed Aug 10, 2011 4:36 pm
by pup » Wed Aug 10, 2011 4:37 pm
by ajunior148 » Wed Aug 10, 2011 4:45 pm
pup wrote:Not at all.
You want to have time to prepare, go be a lawyer. You are going to be the back up QB for a football team. You have to be ready to go in on the next play. Actually sounds like a decent idea. If he wasn't ready to play...why was he there?
Sounds to me like the coach was trying to see what Colt was made of.

by SoulDawg74 » Wed Aug 10, 2011 5:35 pm
pup wrote:Hey SD. Maybe Mangini just agrees with you. Why waste time working with Colt since he will never be good enough to win a ring?
by SoulDawg74 » Wed Aug 10, 2011 5:43 pm
SoulDawg74 wrote:pup wrote:Hey SD. Maybe Mangini just agrees with you. Why waste time working with Colt since he will never be good enough to win a ring?
SD:
Hey pup , if Colt was a total waste of paper then don't give him the game plan at all , but to exclude a player any player from timely info especially a QB , because your acting like a petulant Bitch ass chlld because somebody went over your head and added him to your roster , is an unpardonable waste of resources , and about as ignorant and low class a move as you could pull on anybody , especially a QB.
SoulDawg
by pup » Wed Aug 10, 2011 11:13 pm
ajunior148 wrote:pup wrote:Not at all.
You want to have time to prepare, go be a lawyer. You are going to be the back up QB for a football team. You have to be ready to go in on the next play. Actually sounds like a decent idea. If he wasn't ready to play...why was he there?
Sounds to me like the coach was trying to see what Colt was made of.
Christ Pup, take a step back and read this again and comprehend what you are saying here.
Could you imagine Shurmur doing this last year to "see what Bradford is made of".
by SoulDawg74 » Thu Aug 11, 2011 1:40 am
pup wrote:ajunior148 wrote:pup wrote:Not at all.
You want to have time to prepare, go be a lawyer. You are going to be the back up QB for a football team. You have to be ready to go in on the next play. Actually sounds like a decent idea. If he wasn't ready to play...why was he there?
Sounds to me like the coach was trying to see what Colt was made of.
Christ Pup, take a step back and read this again and comprehend what you are saying here.
Could you imagine Shurmur doing this last year to "see what Bradford is made of".
Could you imagine Sam Bradford being the #3 QB behind Jake Delhome and Seneca Wallace? Little different.
Would it shock you to find out Parcells did it to Romo? Or Belicheck to Brady?
by pup » Thu Aug 11, 2011 9:02 am
by SoulDawg74 » Thu Aug 11, 2011 9:38 am
pup wrote:I will say this. Manigni's carcass was rotting throughout 2010. And no coddling/babysitting of the boss's pet project was going to change that. He was a dead man walking. And he knew it.
Anything short of winning big was going to get him fired. And winning might not have even mattered since it sure appears Holmgren already had his successor picked. His Shurmur crush is almost as big as his Little Engine That Could crush. And Colt was not coming in and taking this team to 10 wins.
by hiko » Thu Aug 11, 2011 11:30 am
And it’s far different for McCoy than last summer when communication was sometimes non-existent with his coaches. For instance, he says he didn’t learn he was going to start the team’s final exhibition game in 2010 until about five minutes before the contest started. A coach looked at him and said: “You’re starting,” then McCoy raced into a huddle with players he barely knew.
“There had been no reps [in practice], nothing,” McCoy said.
by pup » Thu Aug 11, 2011 12:00 pm
SoulDawg74 wrote:But .............................
No coach in his right mind who ever wants to persue a HC position again or be considered as front office material wants it to get out he can't handle QB's , the teams most valuable most high profile position.
What you do on your last gig is your resume for your next ,its one thing for people to cast aspersions on your rep , because you got fired for a reason and those things are murky excuse you can claim as a yeam simply wanting to go in another direction , quite another however when you furnish the documentation to such short sighted glaring incompetence .
No team could reasonably ever consider your stoopid ass with a reputation swirling around shortcomings in
handling identifying and developing QB talent .
What that Jackass did was an unpardonable disgrace to himself and all the coaches around him , let alone a disservice to the team and those who paid his salary and the men he coached .
What he did was so blatantly stoopid he makes the Monks who emulated themselves with gasoline look smart.
SoulDawg
by hiko » Thu Aug 11, 2011 12:14 pm
pup wrote:Unless of course he is correct, and McCoy = Quinn = Couch.
Then he evaluated the talent properly and saved time by not giving him the playbook.
by motherscratcher » Thu Aug 11, 2011 12:19 pm
pup wrote:
Unless of course he is correct, and McCoy = Quinn = Couch.
Then he evaluated the talent properly and saved time by not giving him the playbook.
by JCoz » Thu Aug 11, 2011 12:40 pm
pup wrote:Unless of course he is correct, and McCoy = Quinn = Couch.
Then he evaluated the talent properly and saved time by not giving him the playbook.
by e0y2e3 » Thu Aug 11, 2011 12:50 pm

by pup » Thu Aug 11, 2011 1:58 pm
JCoz wrote:pup wrote:Unless of course he is correct, and McCoy = Quinn = Couch.
Then he evaluated the talent properly and saved time by not giving him the playbook.
Because its Mangini who stands over the copy machine printing it out?
Please. I was a Mangini supporter for some time, that being said, not giving the kid a playbook? Uh, wft?
Doesn't make a bit of difference if Colt = Quinn = Couch. The team invested resources in him by using a 3rd round draft pick.
I seriously have no clue why you are choosing to back that, particularly by saying the reason was that he evaluated that Holmgren knew dick about QBs and he could tell Colt was worthless so he saved everyone the time and effort that may have been wasted by shunning him from the start.
That, pup, is an utterly laughable explanation.
by hiko » Thu Aug 11, 2011 2:08 pm
pup wrote:The rest of that take was the hindsight angle of Mangini being able to get another job. Not a reason for him doing it. Is someone going to hold it against him that he didn't give some 3rd string, 3rd round QB a playbook early enough in the week, especially if that QB proves to be nothing special? No way.
by JCoz » Thu Aug 11, 2011 2:22 pm
pup wrote:JCoz wrote:pup wrote:Unless of course he is correct, and McCoy = Quinn = Couch.
Then he evaluated the talent properly and saved time by not giving him the playbook.
Because its Mangini who stands over the copy machine printing it out?
Please. I was a Mangini supporter for some time, that being said, not giving the kid a playbook? Uh, wft?
Doesn't make a bit of difference if Colt = Quinn = Couch. The team invested resources in him by using a 3rd round draft pick.
I seriously have no clue why you are choosing to back that, particularly by saying the reason was that he evaluated that Holmgren knew dick about QBs and he could tell Colt was worthless so he saved everyone the time and effort that may have been wasted by shunning him from the start.
That, pup, is an utterly laughable explanation.
Shit happens behind the scenes none of us now about. Why would Mangini do this? Was it his way of saying FU to Holmgren? Why wouldn't McCoy say something to someone about if it was that big of a deal? You think he spent all season not getting the playbook until after it was too late? And never said a word to the front office? If he did and they didn't do anything?
This is nothing more than a Cowboy's coach not letting rookies put the star on their helmet until they earn it. To us, it is either juvenile or stupid or petty or whatever term you want to use. To an NFL Head Coach, it is a part of a process.
The rest of that take was the hindsight angle of Mangini being able to get another job. Not a reason for him doing it. Is someone going to hold it against him that he didn't give some 3rd string, 3rd round QB a playbook early enough in the week, especially if that QB proves to be nothing special? No way.
by HoodooMan » Thu Aug 11, 2011 2:25 pm
hiko wrote:It truly was a wasted year not firing him off the bat.
by pup » Thu Aug 11, 2011 3:44 pm
JCoz wrote:pup wrote:JCoz wrote:pup wrote:Unless of course he is correct, and McCoy = Quinn = Couch.
Then he evaluated the talent properly and saved time by not giving him the playbook.
Because its Mangini who stands over the copy machine printing it out?
Please. I was a Mangini supporter for some time, that being said, not giving the kid a playbook? Uh, wft?
Doesn't make a bit of difference if Colt = Quinn = Couch. The team invested resources in him by using a 3rd round draft pick.
I seriously have no clue why you are choosing to back that, particularly by saying the reason was that he evaluated that Holmgren knew dick about QBs and he could tell Colt was worthless so he saved everyone the time and effort that may have been wasted by shunning him from the start.
That, pup, is an utterly laughable explanation.
Shit happens behind the scenes none of us now about. Why would Mangini do this? Was it his way of saying FU to Holmgren? Why wouldn't McCoy say something to someone about if it was that big of a deal? You think he spent all season not getting the playbook until after it was too late? And never said a word to the front office? If he did and they didn't do anything?
This is nothing more than a Cowboy's coach not letting rookies put the star on their helmet until they earn it. To us, it is either juvenile or stupid or petty or whatever term you want to use. To an NFL Head Coach, it is a part of a process.
The rest of that take was the hindsight angle of Mangini being able to get another job. Not a reason for him doing it. Is someone going to hold it against him that he didn't give some 3rd string, 3rd round QB a playbook early enough in the week, especially if that QB proves to be nothing special? No way.
IMO, absolutely none of what you just said there matches or has anything to do with the quote I responded to.
Not that it matters at all. Mangini is not the coach of the Browns.
by JCoz » Thu Aug 11, 2011 3:58 pm
by hiko » Thu Aug 11, 2011 4:13 pm
HoodooMan wrote:hiko wrote:It truly was a wasted year not firing him off the bat.
How many of the players we took in the 2010 draft are going to be hurt by the transition to the 4-3 defense & WCO?
(I think it was truly wise of them to buy themselves an extra building year.)
by HoodooMan » Thu Aug 11, 2011 5:07 pm
hiko wrote:If we're looking purely at 2010 draftees, then the answer is Colt McCoy. I'm not sure how it wouldn't be better for him to be going into the 2nd year of the system rather than having 2 weeks to learn the system.
by hiko » Thu Aug 11, 2011 5:39 pm
HoodooMan wrote:hiko wrote:If we're looking purely at 2010 draftees, then the answer is Colt McCoy. I'm not sure how it wouldn't be better for him to be going into the 2nd year of the system rather than having 2 weeks to learn the system.
I get where you're going, but that's not what I meant.
Everyone we drafted in 2010 fits what we're doing right now, which I believe is less than a coincidence. In Colt's case, he fits what we're doing right now better than he fit what we were doing in 2010.
Holmgren & Heckert were able to get in a solid foundation-building draft before the clock even started on their regime. That wasn't a waste. It bought them some much needed time.
by SoulDawg74 » Thu Aug 11, 2011 6:59 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:My only thing re: this article is it seems far more like a painted slam piece that the Cleveland press perfected during the entire Mangini era than an actual piece of researched reporting.
Correct me if I'm wrong but aren't offenses not installed until later in the week? Do we have any clue if McCoy was being given the Scout team playbook first as the 3QB and then still given the actual playbook before the weeks offense was installed? I'm almost positive I have read that Thursday is the big installation day in a typical NFL week.
This reads more like a whole lot of stomping on the corpse of Mangini than actual research.
by e0y2e3 » Thu Aug 11, 2011 7:03 pm

by SoulDawg74 » Thu Aug 11, 2011 11:51 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:So Colt had a playbook for installation and we have no idea if he was asked to focus on Scout team shit before that? Right?
by e0y2e3 » Fri Aug 12, 2011 1:17 am

by e0y2e3 » Fri Aug 12, 2011 1:18 am

by ajunior148 » Fri Aug 12, 2011 2:47 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:He fucked up there, but to pretend that what he did and the sudden preseason start where guys were questionable health wise is a big deal is a joke, just like this article.
by e0y2e3 » Fri Aug 12, 2011 2:58 pm

by ajunior148 » Fri Aug 12, 2011 3:24 pm
by ajunior148 » Fri Aug 12, 2011 3:28 pm
by SoulDawg74 » Fri Aug 12, 2011 4:14 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:PS: I've played on real Scout teams, have you?
by hiko » Fri Aug 12, 2011 4:54 pm
ajunior148 wrote:Another Coly didn't like the coaches last season article:
http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-farmer-colt-mccoy-20110812,0,436920.column
McCoy said many of his teammates barely knew who he was at that point "other than the guy who stood on the sideline and got yelled at for just standing there."
Even now, the residue from that experience lingers. He said he quietly cringes like a scalded dog when he makes a mistake in practice, waiting for the hellfire of criticism to come.
"One of the things out here is when I make a mistake, I get so fearful to do anything because I'm afraid of what's going to happen," he said. "If I throw a ball and try to squeeze one in, I'm like [wincing], 'Uh.' I'm hesitant to just turn around. That's not how it should be. If you start playing scared, you can't play."
by yogi » Fri Aug 12, 2011 5:47 pm
by hiko » Fri Aug 12, 2011 9:18 pm
yogi wrote:I can tell you how Lombardi handled Starr.
At the beginning of Lombardi's HC gig, the first few paractices when Starr would make a mistake, Vince would scream and yell at him, just like any other football player that just screwed up.
One day after practice, Starr walked in Lombardi's office for a closed door meeting. He said, "Coach, you want me to lead this team, you cant undermine me in front of them. If I screw up, I'll take whatever heat you want to lay on me in private".
Starr said from that day on, Lombardi never raised his voice at Bart in front of the team. He became and was the leader of yhose great Packer teams.
by e0y2e3 » Fri Aug 12, 2011 10:27 pm

by SoulDawg74 » Sat Aug 13, 2011 12:05 am
e0y2e3 wrote:1) SD, you are stoopid and have no idea how a Scout team works (and I don't even know if that was his task, none of us do, so fuck it)
2) Colt's dripping vag is getting pretty out of hand. Two articles crying about how he was treated last year? Where their excerpts in his shit stain book about this? I mean, this is football and different coaches have different philosophies. Seen it all in my years and if Colt were my QB and crying like a bitch like that I'd have had a hard time respecting him (especially after said book).
.......................still
by mattvan1 » Sat Aug 13, 2011 12:13 am
by e0y2e3 » Sat Aug 13, 2011 12:25 am

by mattvan1 » Sat Aug 13, 2011 12:36 am
e0y2e3 wrote:It's simple matt, depends on what Front Office wagon you are on.
Everyone was in love w/ Savage for a couple years there.
Now everyone is burning the corpse of Mangini's ashes while pissing on them and then lighting them on fire again to get hope for Heckert.

by hiko » Sat Aug 13, 2011 12:52 am
e0y2e3 wrote:2) Colt's dripping vag is getting pretty out of hand. Two articles crying about how he was treated last year? Where their excerpts in his shit stain book about this? I mean, this is football and different coaches have different philosophies. Seen it all in my years and if Colt were my QB and crying like a bitch like that I'd have had a hard time respecting him (especially after said book).
by yogi » Sat Aug 13, 2011 11:56 am
hiko wrote:yogi wrote:I can tell you how Lombardi handled Starr.
At the beginning of Lombardi's HC gig, the first few paractices when Starr would make a mistake, Vince would scream and yell at him, just like any other football player that just screwed up.
One day after practice, Starr walked in Lombardi's office for a closed door meeting. He said, "Coach, you want me to lead this team, you cant undermine me in front of them. If I screw up, I'll take whatever heat you want to lay on me in private".
Starr said from that day on, Lombardi never raised his voice at Bart in front of the team. He became and was the leader of yhose great Packer teams.
But I doubt that's the way Parcells handled Simms.
Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
