Moderators: peeker643, swerb, pup, paulcousineau
by statmasta » Wed Aug 10, 2011 10:36 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Wed Aug 10, 2011 10:39 pm
Let's just enjoy tonight's victory.
by TribeinLA » Wed Aug 10, 2011 10:39 pm
by scrambler » Wed Aug 10, 2011 10:39 pm
by statmasta » Wed Aug 10, 2011 10:44 pm
by scrambler » Wed Aug 10, 2011 10:47 pm
by RedDawg53 » Wed Aug 10, 2011 10:47 pm

by Symbolic47 » Wed Aug 10, 2011 10:49 pm
by peeker643 » Wed Aug 10, 2011 10:53 pm
scrambler wrote:Where you guys getting all this Santana is a jerk stuff?? Is it well documented that he is hated in the locker room? I am being serious about this, I honestly don't know and haven't heard anything at all about it. I do love a guy who walks 110 times a year though, I will say that!! Compliments to Jimenez, outstanding tonight...I had my doubts!
by FUDU » Wed Aug 10, 2011 10:54 pm
by andrew6586 » Wed Aug 10, 2011 10:56 pm
by peeker643 » Wed Aug 10, 2011 10:56 pm
statmasta wrote:Huge win. Big-time performance from Ubaldo. Extremely encouraging.
by statmasta » Wed Aug 10, 2011 10:56 pm
peeker643 wrote:scrambler wrote:Where you guys getting all this Santana is a jerk stuff?? Is it well documented that he is hated in the locker room? I am being serious about this, I honestly don't know and haven't heard anything at all about it. I do love a guy who walks 110 times a year though, I will say that!! Compliments to Jimenez, outstanding tonight...I had my doubts!
Don't need o blow it up. He can be hard to reach and motivate at times. And with all the catching experience on the staff he hasn't improved behind the plate.
He's one dimensional and you'd like to see a young, talented guy work on all aspects of his game, not just offensively.
But yeah, he's a special offensive player. Gifted.
by peeker643 » Wed Aug 10, 2011 10:59 pm
statmasta wrote:peeker643 wrote:scrambler wrote:Where you guys getting all this Santana is a jerk stuff?? Is it well documented that he is hated in the locker room? I am being serious about this, I honestly don't know and haven't heard anything at all about it. I do love a guy who walks 110 times a year though, I will say that!! Compliments to Jimenez, outstanding tonight...I had my doubts!
Don't need o blow it up. He can be hard to reach and motivate at times. And with all the catching experience on the staff he hasn't improved behind the plate.
He's one dimensional and you'd like to see a young, talented guy work on all aspects of his game, not just offensively.
But yeah, he's a special offensive player. Gifted.
He has special defensive tools as well. Cannon of an arm, quick release, quick feet, great athlete behind the plate. He just doesn't know how to play the position at a major league caliber level yet. Victor wasn't great when he first came up, either. He used to be lazy and just stab at balls instead of getting down to smother them, just like Carlos now.
I trust it'll come. It's annoying now, sure, but we have to try to stay patient with him (easy to say after a fun blowout win, though).
by Pressrunnr » Wed Aug 10, 2011 11:01 pm
Jeremy Hellickson
Mark Trumbo
Between Pineda, Hellickson, and Trumbo, Kipnis has no shot.
by scrambler » Wed Aug 10, 2011 11:03 pm
peeker643 wrote:statmasta wrote:peeker643 wrote:scrambler wrote:Where you guys getting all this Santana is a jerk stuff?? Is it well documented that he is hated in the locker room? I am being serious about this, I honestly don't know and haven't heard anything at all about it. I do love a guy who walks 110 times a year though, I will say that!! Compliments to Jimenez, outstanding tonight...I had my doubts!
Don't need o blow it up. He can be hard to reach and motivate at times. And with all the catching experience on the staff he hasn't improved behind the plate.
He's one dimensional and you'd like to see a young, talented guy work on all aspects of his game, not just offensively.
But yeah, he's a special offensive player. Gifted.
He has special defensive tools as well. Cannon of an arm, quick release, quick feet, great athlete behind the plate. He just doesn't know how to play the position at a major league caliber level yet. Victor wasn't great when he first came up, either. He used to be lazy and just stab at balls instead of getting down to smother them, just like Carlos now.
I trust it'll come. It's annoying now, sure, but we have to try to stay patient with him (easy to say after a fun blowout win, though).
He's more gifted than Victor was (and Victor was never a really good defensive catcher even at his best- he got to 'average' for a while) but Victor was a leader and a guy that worked.
Hopefully Santana decides to make the effort. Just get the sense from the times I'm there that the org wishes the same thing while appreciating his offensive skills.
by peeker643 » Wed Aug 10, 2011 11:03 pm
by scrambler » Wed Aug 10, 2011 11:07 pm
by Dellucci TailGator » Wed Aug 10, 2011 11:08 pm
by Am I Here Again? » Wed Aug 10, 2011 11:08 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Let's just enjoy tonight's victory.
That's impossible with the morose humps around this joint. Like black clouds hanging around.
I'm partying! You guys can join in! 
by Dellucci TailGator » Wed Aug 10, 2011 11:09 pm
scrambler wrote:I was all excited about Hannahan early in the year when he was getting some big hits and his defense needs no explanation...but I am now wondering with Donald called up now what the purpose of hannahan is?? I'm just not convinced a 9th inning defensive replacement at 3rd base serves much purpose. This team can be offensively challenged at times and when we call up Huff, I would prefer to keep Duncan on the roster rather than Hannahan. I'd can the guy Saturday.
by TribeinLA » Wed Aug 10, 2011 11:10 pm
by Am I Here Again? » Wed Aug 10, 2011 11:12 pm
by Dellucci TailGator » Wed Aug 10, 2011 11:13 pm
by peeker643 » Wed Aug 10, 2011 11:26 pm
TribeinLA wrote:Your wish may come true, Scramble. It's evident that Mannahan's purpose is now lost. I thought maybe they'd try him at 1b and possibly move LaPorta (even to AAA), but that's not happening. Hannahan may be cut before Kearns. There's just no need.
by YouCanPutItOnTheBoardYES! » Thu Aug 11, 2011 3:45 am

by YouCanPutItOnTheBoardYES! » Thu Aug 11, 2011 3:52 am

by Symbolic47 » Thu Aug 11, 2011 4:28 am
YouCanPutItOnTheBoardYES! wrote:Also, for the whole Santana/LaPorta thing at first base. Some of you will hate me for posting this but just to throw it out there Santana has LaPorta beat, and by a decent margin, in terms of defensive metrics at first base.
These same metrics also say that Marson is the 2nd best defensive catcher in baseball only behind Matt Weiters. Keep in mind Weiters has played 800+ innings and Marson is just shy of 400 and this metric is cumulative.
by British_Pharaoh » Thu Aug 11, 2011 7:28 am
British_Pharaoh wrote:dazindiansfanuk wrote:British_Pharaoh wrote:Best thing about this is getting into that already over worked bullpen.
From the Tigers perspective, that probably doesn't bother them that much since they know they're not going to need a bullpen tomorrow!
I don't know it's usualy feast or famine for us when we face Verlander (11-11 with an ERA near 5 in his career vs Cleveland.) We have mixed success against him. We either get 2 hit or we smack him around like a piñata
Even if you just look at the last 3 seasons Verlander has a 4.19ERA against Cleveland which is the second highest ERA against AL opposition for him and he is just 7-6 in that time frame. He also has trouble at The Jake (4.89ERA) where he is 3-4 since 2008.
However he is having a superhuman season.

by leadpipe » Thu Aug 11, 2011 9:39 am
YouCanPutItOnTheBoardYES! wrote:Also, for the whole Santana/LaPorta thing at first base. Some of you will hate me for posting this but just to throw it out there Santana has LaPorta beat, and by a decent margin, in terms of defensive metrics at first base.
These same metrics also say that Marson is the 2nd best defensive catcher in baseball only behind Matt Weiters. Keep in mind Weiters has played 800+ innings and Marson is just shy of 400 and this metric is cumulative.
by scrambler » Thu Aug 11, 2011 10:28 am
by Symbolic47 » Thu Aug 11, 2011 10:35 am
by peeker643 » Thu Aug 11, 2011 11:08 am
scrambler wrote:Really, Hannahan defensively at first?? This has happened not many more than zero times this year...as Hannahan is the defensive 3rd base sub...not first base.
by peeker643 » Thu Aug 11, 2011 11:17 am
by gotribe31 » Thu Aug 11, 2011 11:43 am
peeker643 wrote:What happens when Choo comes back depends entirely on what the deal is with Brantley at that time.
That was already stated. Try and keep up now![]()
If Brantley is healthy Carrera will go back. If Brantley is dicey physically then it will be likely be Sloth at that point.
I guess Hannahan could be in danger if the Tribe, looking at how pathetic they already are defensively, just says, "Fuck it, how much worse can it be than this?" and decide to keep Donald as the only backup infielder.
Like I said, don't see it. Hannahan is the only IF on that team Acta (And AsCab) believes to above average defensively.

by peeker643 » Thu Aug 11, 2011 11:49 am
gotribe31 wrote:peeker643 wrote:What happens when Choo comes back depends entirely on what the deal is with Brantley at that time.
That was already stated. Try and keep up now![]()
If Brantley is healthy Carrera will go back. If Brantley is dicey physically then it will be likely be Sloth at that point.
I guess Hannahan could be in danger if the Tribe, looking at how pathetic they already are defensively, just says, "Fuck it, how much worse can it be than this?" and decide to keep Donald as the only backup infielder.
Like I said, don't see it. Hannahan is the only IF on that team Acta (And AsCab) believes to above average defensively.
Your utility INF bias is more apparent by the day. If it were up to you, we'd have Hannahan, Donald, Phelps as our INF, then sign Bill Hall and trade Santana and Kipnis for Jamey Carroll and Masterson for Eduardo Nunez.
by e0y2e3 » Thu Aug 11, 2011 12:04 pm

by peeker643 » Thu Aug 11, 2011 12:24 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:It's not Peeks fault he could never escape the traps of being a UIF in little league Al, so be nice. Can't imagine how tramatizing it would be to be a 12 year old defensive replacement UIF w/out any hair.
by Symbolic47 » Thu Aug 11, 2011 12:38 pm
by Dellucci TailGator » Thu Aug 11, 2011 1:29 pm
by Symbolic47 » Thu Aug 11, 2011 2:11 pm
Dellucci TailGator wrote:That play at first has been changed to an error today, Bastian Tweets. Ubaldo threw 8 shutout innings in terms of ERA.
Not worth anything really, just found it amusing.
by scrambler » Thu Aug 11, 2011 2:13 pm
peeker643 wrote:scrambler wrote:Really, Hannahan defensively at first?? This has happened not many more than zero times this year...as Hannahan is the defensive 3rd base sub...not first base.
Is 7 > 0?
What about 27 > 0?
That's the number of games and innings Hannahan has played/subbed defensively at 1b.
And please don't tell me he's not the best defensive 1B on the club. I watch that displayed every day I'm down there for BP.
It's not even close.
Everyone is a GD keyboard expert. Whether they're in Oregon, Idaho, Oklahoma or Mentor. That's comforting that there's so much depth and knowledge from folks who don't actually see the workouts and BP sessions.
by Symbolic47 » Thu Aug 11, 2011 2:23 pm
by scrambler » Thu Aug 11, 2011 2:33 pm
by peeker643 » Thu Aug 11, 2011 2:38 pm
scrambler wrote:peeker643 wrote:scrambler wrote:Really, Hannahan defensively at first?? This has happened not many more than zero times this year...as Hannahan is the defensive 3rd base sub...not first base.
Is 7 > 0?
What about 27 > 0?
That's the number of games and innings Hannahan has played/subbed defensively at 1b.
And please don't tell me he's not the best defensive 1B on the club. I watch that displayed every day I'm down there for BP.
It's not even close.
Everyone is a GD keyboard expert. Whether they're in Oregon, Idaho, Oklahoma or Mentor. That's comforting that there's so much depth and knowledge from folks who don't actually see the workouts and BP sessions.
I never have one single time said he wasn't our best defensive 1st baseman. I simply said that is not what he is used for. And I said I don't think he needs to be on the team any longer either. If you think his presence is required to make a playoff run, that is fine and I just don't agree with you. 4 of his 7 games at 1st base came when LaPorta was on the disabled list. Surely you remember that?? No?? A 5th came when LaPorta started at DH against KC recently and a series of pinch hitting assignments and the lack of being able to put LaPorta there meant Hannahan went there. He is not on the team because of his defensive ability at first base. If you think that is not a fact you are not even a GD keyboard expert. THe pure simple facts are he was pretty much used at first when our starting first baseman was injured and when that starting first baseman started a game at DH. Facts are really tough to deal with sometimes. I understand your frustration. OK, we need Jack Hannahan's defense at first base desperately on this team.
Re: 6/1/11 Indians vs. Blue Jays. Take the Series!
People make it sound as if Jack Hannahan didn't play this series? I can't even watch the games and even ESPN was showing his highlight reel stuff. Only the bad we see, only the bad we see, only the bad we see, nothing good, nothing good.
by scrambler » Thu Aug 11, 2011 4:50 pm
Return to Cleveland Indians & MLB
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests