Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by SoulDawg74 » Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:40 pm
by jta1975 » Fri Aug 05, 2011 12:17 am
by Cerebral_DownTime » Fri Aug 05, 2011 1:32 am
by mattvan1 » Fri Aug 05, 2011 12:05 pm
SoulDawg74 wrote:Colt will be given full support .Of other notes .Holmgren claimed the team got 334 years younger this offseason , kudos mistero , you called it first.http://sportsradiointerviews.com/2011/0 ... colt-mcco/SoulDawg
by Triple-S » Fri Aug 05, 2011 12:09 pm
mattvan1 wrote: 5 home wins and a .500% record against the AFC North and 8-8 would be a huge success in my book.
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.
by mattvan1 » Fri Aug 05, 2011 12:17 pm
jta1975 wrote:Tampa.....the rule or the exception....you pick
by FUDU » Fri Aug 05, 2011 12:21 pm
by Govbarney » Fri Aug 05, 2011 1:26 pm
by SoulDawg74 » Fri Aug 05, 2011 5:28 pm
Govbarney wrote:I can't recall a Front Office type or coach in the history of Pro Sports who has ever said: "You know I think we are going to play like shit this year, if your smart you wont bother buying tickets"
by Prosecutor » Sun Aug 07, 2011 9:45 am
The fact that then I had to make the change I suppose if I made it right away you could say we’d be a year ahead but I had reasons for not doing it and that’s the way it is. Now we have to kinda get going again
I think we have a chance to be a much better football team. That’s my hope anyway.
by SoulDawg74 » Sun Aug 07, 2011 4:50 pm
by Prosecutor » Sun Aug 07, 2011 7:20 pm
He didn't really say he expects to compete, either.SD: Never said that he said that he said that .........so there , neener neener neener.
We were 5-11 last year , our opponents strengthened themselves with offseason free agent signings including pissburgh who notoriously destains such signings , or even paying their own guys big contracts like they just gave Woodley .
by SoulDawg74 » Sun Aug 07, 2011 7:31 pm
Prosecutor wrote:He didn't really say he expects to compete, either.SD: Never said that he said that he said that .........so there , neener neener neener.Sorry, I must have misinterpreted the title of the thread - "Holmgren expects to compete." My bad.We were 5-11 last year , our opponents strengthened themselves with offseason free agent signings including pissburgh who notoriously destains such signings , or even paying their own guys big contracts like they just gave Woodley .Pissburgh is our opponent for only 2 out of 16 games. The Ravens will still be better than us even though they had to cut some aging vets. The Bengals without Palmer should be worse. The other 10 games look easier than last year's gauntlet which included New England, New Orleans, Atlanta, and Tampa Bay.I expect the Browns to do better than 5-11 as they've added some talent but haven't lost anybody significant unless you're a big fan of Delhomme, St. Clair, Bell, Barton, Bowens, Roth, Wright, Rogers, Trusnik, Elam, etc. OK, they lost Vickers but he doesn't fit in this offense and they lost Hodges, but otherwise the personnel should be better, especially the DL. With decent health, especially on defense, I can see 8-8 being realistic.
Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: ybot and 1 guest