Moderators: peeker643, swerb, Ziner
by swerb » Tue Jul 05, 2011 5:30 pm
by Bayou Tribe » Tue Jul 05, 2011 6:01 pm
by motherscratcher » Tue Jul 05, 2011 6:53 pm
leadpipe wrote:90%.
by GodHatesClevelandSport » Tue Jul 05, 2011 7:09 pm
by Erie Warrior » Tue Jul 05, 2011 7:58 pm


by leadpipe » Tue Jul 05, 2011 8:03 pm
GodHatesClevelandSport wrote:Prosecution could not establish cause of death. Can't establish someone was murdered without that.
by Orenthal » Tue Jul 05, 2011 9:26 pm
by googleeph2 » Tue Jul 05, 2011 9:49 pm
by furls » Tue Jul 05, 2011 10:06 pm
by swerb » Tue Jul 05, 2011 10:31 pm
furls wrote:Only people to blame here is the prosecution. You can hate Casey Anthony, I encourage it, but the burden of proof lies on the prosecutor and they came up short. It is our system and one of the cornerstones of the American Republic.
by Bayou Tribe » Tue Jul 05, 2011 10:52 pm
furls wrote:Only people to blame here is the prosecution. You can hate Casey Anthony, I encourage it, but the burden of proof lies on the prosecutor and they came up short. It is our system and one of the cornerstones of the American Republic.
by googleeph2 » Tue Jul 05, 2011 11:00 pm
by leadpipe » Tue Jul 05, 2011 11:06 pm
swerb wrote:furls wrote:Only people to blame here is the prosecution. You can hate Casey Anthony, I encourage it, but the burden of proof lies on the prosecutor and they came up short. It is our system and one of the cornerstones of the American Republic.
No DNA evidence, cause of death, how she died, how she got in the woods ... all things the prosecution was unable to account for. Any major evidence they presented was effectively disputed by the defense.
In that vein, yes, hard to blame the jury.
That said, I saw most of both sides closing arguments. I thought for sure they made the case circumstantially. Different being there, seeing the whole case, but man ... I am shocked that all 12 jurors agreed on an acquittal.
by leadpipe » Tue Jul 05, 2011 11:10 pm
googleeph2 wrote:I understand, the jury has its instructions and limitations. No hate for them.
I honestly haven't been following details closely enough- help me out:
she is guilty of 4 counts of lying to police? What is she guilty of lying about?
by FUDU » Wed Jul 06, 2011 2:35 am
by leadpipe » Wed Jul 06, 2011 9:32 am
FUDU wrote:In my heart I think the chic was guilty, however I also think the system worked just the way we set it up to work. Plenty of reasonable doubt was left at the end and the jury ruled accordingly per how the system asks them to. The prosecution failed at what coulda shoulda been a fairly easy lob and dunk, blame them after you blame those who killed the child and hid the truth, but don't pretend it is easy to sit on this jury and ship someone's life away for good when there is a shred of doubt.
A guilty person may have walked today but an innocent one didn't get sentenced for a crime they did not commit.
by gotribe31 » Wed Jul 06, 2011 9:39 am

by FUDU » Wed Jul 06, 2011 11:47 am
by Rat_Tail » Wed Jul 06, 2011 6:35 pm
by dem425 » Wed Jul 06, 2011 11:27 pm
Users browsing this forum: jb and 2 guests
