Moderators: peeker643, swerb, danwismar, furls
by daddywags » Tue May 31, 2011 5:39 pm
by googleeph2 » Tue May 31, 2011 5:45 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Yep, shame on me for acting like he was different and that excused him for choking repeatedly on the national stage.
http://www.sbnation.com/ncaa-football/2 ... rospective
Tresselball wasn't exactly some pleasure to experience either, let's not front.
by danwismar » Tue May 31, 2011 5:53 pm
daddywags wrote:The players broke rules and they have to answer for it. Tressel lied and broke rules and he is answering for it. That is how it should be. But for the love of God can somebody explain to me why a college football player can't get an arranged part time job or sell something they own for a tat or pizza money? Aren't those things that every 19 year-old kid in America does or tries to do?
by googleeph2 » Tue May 31, 2011 5:53 pm
daddywags wrote: explain to me why a college football player can't get an arranged part time job or sell something they own for a tat or pizza money? Aren't those things that every 19 year-old kid in America does or tries to do?
by peeker643 » Tue May 31, 2011 5:56 pm
by daddywags » Tue May 31, 2011 6:04 pm
googleeph2 wrote:daddywags wrote: explain to me why a college football player can't get an arranged part time job or sell something they own for a tat or pizza money? Aren't those things that every 19 year-old kid in America does or tries to do?
Well most would agree- except any transaction those kids take part in is seen as an opening to them getting way more value in return. Which is thought to possibly lead to a scenario in which they could be tempted to bargaining away their competitive integrity. I guess.
by furls » Tue May 31, 2011 6:05 pm
fundamentals wrote:If this link was posted previously, I apologize. I am having difficulty with accessing pages, here is the CNNSI big story and if you like/love the Vest this is not going to be a fun read:
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/m ... tml?hpt=C1
by motherscratcher » Tue May 31, 2011 6:31 pm
furls wrote:fundamentals wrote:If this link was posted previously, I apologize. I am having difficulty with accessing pages, here is the CNNSI big story and if you like/love the Vest this is not going to be a fun read:
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/m ... tml?hpt=C1
Dude, it basically rehashes the same things that we have had rererererereported for the last 3 months, exception that it added a couple of new names as possible violators.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Tue May 31, 2011 8:04 pm
motherscratcher wrote:furls wrote:fundamentals wrote:If this link was posted previously, I apologize. I am having difficulty with accessing pages, here is the CNNSI big story and if you like/love the Vest this is not going to be a fun read:
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/m ... tml?hpt=C1
Dude, it basically rehashes the same things that we have had rererererereported for the last 3 months, exception that it added a couple of new names as possible violators.
Don't forget about the raffle.
by peeker643 » Tue May 31, 2011 8:22 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:motherscratcher wrote:furls wrote:fundamentals wrote:If this link was posted previously, I apologize. I am having difficulty with accessing pages, here is the CNNSI big story and if you like/love the Vest this is not going to be a fun read:
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/m ... tml?hpt=C1
Dude, it basically rehashes the same things that we have had rererererereported for the last 3 months, exception that it added a couple of new names as possible violators.
Don't forget about the raffle.
That was the pinnacle of lazy journalism.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Tue May 31, 2011 9:04 pm
peeker643 wrote:Cerebral_DownTime wrote:motherscratcher wrote:furls wrote:fundamentals wrote:If this link was posted previously, I apologize. I am having difficulty with accessing pages, here is the CNNSI big story and if you like/love the Vest this is not going to be a fun read:
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/m ... tml?hpt=C1
Dude, it basically rehashes the same things that we have had rererererereported for the last 3 months, exception that it added a couple of new names as possible violators.
Don't forget about the raffle.
That was the pinnacle of lazy journalism.
Yep. Yet look at the stir and the buzz.
God forbid one with a clue finds a useful nugget.
by peeker643 » Tue May 31, 2011 9:11 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Which "nuggets" did you find useful? My favorite is where the accuse a player of trading merch for a pound of dope, i'd like to know who that was, I think that's important when claiming something that serious. Plus a pound of dope could cost thousands of dollars, which suggests it wouldn't be Joe Palooka.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Tue May 31, 2011 9:19 pm
by motherscratcher » Tue May 31, 2011 9:21 pm
peeker643 wrote:Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Which "nuggets" did you find useful? My favorite is where the accuse a player of trading merch for a pound of dope, i'd like to know who that was, I think that's important when claiming something that serious. Plus a pound of dope could cost thousands of dollars, which suggests it wouldn't be Joe Palooka.
I found next to nothing useful in that article.
My fear is something actually exists that someone not asleep or lazy will find. An actual, meaningful offense.
by peeker643 » Tue May 31, 2011 9:33 pm
motherscratcher wrote:peeker643 wrote:Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Which "nuggets" did you find useful? My favorite is where the accuse a player of trading merch for a pound of dope, i'd like to know who that was, I think that's important when claiming something that serious. Plus a pound of dope could cost thousands of dollars, which suggests it wouldn't be Joe Palooka.
I found next to nothing useful in that article.
My fear is something actually exists that someone not asleep or lazy will find. An actual, meaningful offense.
Nobody with half a brain found anything useful, but I've read a hell of a lot about how it exposed the "crisis" at OSU. It's unbelievable really. People, including 90% of sports journalists, don't actually CARE what it actually said.
by Bayou Tribe » Tue May 31, 2011 9:40 pm
by furls » Tue May 31, 2011 10:39 pm
by peeker643 » Tue May 31, 2011 10:50 pm
furls wrote:I tend to agree with Bayou. I think that OSU will try to get Meyer to take the job next Dec. If he does... well yay, they got their guy. If he doesn't want it then I think it goes to Fickell unless he is unable to keep it together this year.
Personally, I think Fickell is a rising star in the NCAA. He reminds me of Pat Fitzgerald at NW. He is super young, 37, a players coach (and disciplinarian), and is ridiculously fiery. He has already convinced Kyle Kalis to continue to honor his 2012 commitment and I think he will keep the team together this year. The job is Meyer's if he wants it, Fickell's if he doesn't.
by furls » Wed Jun 01, 2011 5:03 pm
by googleeph2 » Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:33 pm
furls wrote: the only real candidates right now are Fickell, Meyer, Hazell, Pelini, Dantonio and maybe a couple of other guys

by noles1 » Thu Jun 02, 2011 2:33 pm

by JCoz » Thu Jun 02, 2011 4:31 pm
by pup » Fri Jun 10, 2011 10:16 pm
In a March 21, 2007 email to Tressel, which was provided to the Plain Dealer, a source gave the following warning about the alleged online activities of Talbott, a Columbus-based freelance photographer who also is involved in memorabilia sales:
"He has sold over 50 items with underclassmen signatures before their eligibility expires and would seem to be someone that both you and the university is aware of. I have a full report of his eBay activities if you would like to explore further or require documentation."
The email was sent to the account tressel.3@osu.edu. That is the same address that Columbus attorney Chris Cicero used to email Tressel in April of 2010 about OSU players selling memorabilia, an email that Tressel did not disclose to his bosses, an NCAA violation that eventually led to his May 30 resignation.
Despite the warning in 2007, Talbott received free tickets from an OSU player to eight Buckeye games during the 2008 season, according to school records. OSU redacted which player or players left tickets for Talbott.
by furls » Fri Jun 10, 2011 11:41 pm
by e0y2e3 » Sat Jun 11, 2011 3:27 am

by danwismar » Sat Jun 11, 2011 1:57 pm
by Fire Marshall Bill » Sun Jun 12, 2011 8:32 am
My point is not to smear other schools, my point is that there is a lot of stuff going on out there, yet we still have the entire might of the sports journalism world looking into whether TP paid for an 80 round of golf, although hell, Scioto is private so even going as a guest is a minor infraction. The point remains... why is this still the only show in town?
by furls » Sun Jun 12, 2011 5:18 pm
by motherscratcher » Sun Jun 12, 2011 7:55 pm
by FUDU » Sun Jun 12, 2011 8:25 pm
by danwismar » Wed Jun 15, 2011 4:54 pm
by Fire Marshall Bill » Wed Jun 15, 2011 6:02 pm
motherscratcher wrote:FMB is funny because he thinks he's objective.
Return to College Sports Arena
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests