Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by SoulDawg74 » Fri Apr 29, 2011 9:22 pm
by peeker643 » Sat Apr 30, 2011 9:31 am
by noles1 » Sat Apr 30, 2011 10:56 am

by MikeCheckGW » Sat Apr 30, 2011 11:08 am
by peeker643 » Sat Apr 30, 2011 12:11 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sat Apr 30, 2011 6:17 pm
by SoulDawg74 » Sat Apr 30, 2011 10:09 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Decent pick, hope he doesn't end up being a diva.
More than a possesion WR though, which is good.
by Ziner » Sat Apr 30, 2011 10:35 pm
by pup » Mon May 02, 2011 9:02 am
by SoulDawg74 » Mon May 02, 2011 11:17 am
pup wrote:Josh Cribbs II
by pup » Mon May 02, 2011 11:51 am
SoulDawg74 wrote:pup wrote:Josh Cribbs II
SD:
Cribbs wouldn't have been a possible top 15 pick coming into the draft had he played last year Amigo .
More over he's bigger stronger and quicker , having converted from RB , he's also elusive .
His mentality is Micheal Irvin Cocky a confidence that borders on arrogance because he's that good .
Body type wise think Shannon Sharp with a mentality of the U , they didn't just want to beat you they wanted to bury you
SoulDawg
by SoulDawg74 » Mon May 02, 2011 12:03 pm
pup wrote:SoulDawg74 wrote:pup wrote:Josh Cribbs II
SD:
Cribbs wouldn't have been a possible top 15 pick coming into the draft had he played last year Amigo .
More over he's bigger stronger and quicker , having converted from RB , he's also elusive .
His mentality is Micheal Irvin Cocky a confidence that borders on arrogance because he's that good .
Body type wise think Shannon Sharp with a mentality of the U , they didn't just want to beat you they wanted to bury you
SoulDawg
Get back to me when he runs routes. Or spends more time on the field than suspended from it.
Physical tools? Sure.
Mental ones? Not so far.
Top 15? Never.
by pup » Mon May 02, 2011 12:22 pm
by SoulDawg74 » Mon May 02, 2011 1:32 pm
pup wrote:If I didn't ask ya to tell me so, you would anyway.
The kid COULD be all you are saying.
Just wish they would have gone another way with that pick. I thought there was a better player for their need in that spot, and a player that was not a project.
So we get a cat that needs a ton of work, and no time for him to get that work.
by mattvan1 » Mon May 02, 2011 2:05 pm
pup wrote:If I didn't ask ya to tell me so, you would anyway.
The kid COULD be all you are saying.
Just wish they would have gone another way with that pick. I thought there was a better player for their need in that spot, and a player that was not a project.
So we get a cat that needs a ton of work, and no time for him to get that work.
by e0y2e3 » Mon May 02, 2011 2:08 pm

by mattvan1 » Mon May 02, 2011 2:19 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:The Cleveland Browns - where you get a new 3 year plan every second year~~!
by pup » Mon May 02, 2011 3:44 pm
mattvan1 wrote:pup wrote:If I didn't ask ya to tell me so, you would anyway.
The kid COULD be all you are saying.
Just wish they would have gone another way with that pick. I thought there was a better player for their need in that spot, and a player that was not a project.
So we get a cat that needs a ton of work, and no time for him to get that work.
Not getting in the middle of this discussion, but as far as the time element - he's got 2-3 years to get that work. What's the rush? It's not as if they're going to compete for the wildcard next year. This is the H&H 3 year plan.
by peeker643 » Mon May 02, 2011 3:50 pm
by pup » Mon May 02, 2011 3:54 pm
peeker643 wrote:He has to be better than Jordan Norwood, Chansi Stuckey or Jonathan Haggerty in year one. The bar ain't that high.
So is Lil Dane who you can get next week.
And I'm already on record saying I like the pick. So there's that.
Still.... An effin TE and FB in round 4? Still don't get it.
by mattvan1 » Mon May 02, 2011 4:13 pm
pup wrote:mattvan1 wrote:pup wrote:If I didn't ask ya to tell me so, you would anyway.
The kid COULD be all you are saying.
Just wish they would have gone another way with that pick. I thought there was a better player for their need in that spot, and a player that was not a project.
So we get a cat that needs a ton of work, and no time for him to get that work.
Not getting in the middle of this discussion, but as far as the time element - he's got 2-3 years to get that work. What's the rush? It's not as if they're going to compete for the wildcard next year. This is the H&H 3 year plan.
Seeing as we are in year 2, the rush is just that.
Or do they get a reset on 2-3 every time they fire a HC?
by JacksonDysonJackson » Mon May 02, 2011 4:44 pm
by danwismar » Mon May 02, 2011 4:59 pm
by DrPoove » Mon May 02, 2011 5:36 pm

by JacksonDysonJackson » Mon May 02, 2011 5:42 pm
by SoulDawg74 » Mon May 02, 2011 6:20 pm
DrPoove wrote:I like the pick, too, however I think that SD has doomed him for failure just like Richard Bartell, Graham Harell and the everyone else he praises.
by SoulDawg74 » Mon May 02, 2011 6:22 pm
JacksonDysonJackson wrote:Does the SD curse go beyond QBs? If so, he's screwed.
by JJN » Fri May 06, 2011 3:57 am
by Soul_Thief_420 » Fri May 06, 2011 9:49 am
by jb » Fri May 06, 2011 10:00 am
by noles1 » Fri May 06, 2011 10:19 am
JJN wrote:Nice little video of AJ Green and Greg Little spending some time with Michael Irvin. More than anything else, what I noticed was that Little makes AJ Green look small. Kid is beefy.
http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-videos/09 ... -the-field

by JacksonDysonJackson » Fri May 06, 2011 10:51 am
I wish Little had about a month to hang out with Irvin....kid could really learn something
by jb » Fri May 06, 2011 11:23 am
JacksonDysonJackson wrote:I wish Little had about a month to hang out with Irvin....kid could really learn something
Careful what you wish for...
by hiko » Fri May 06, 2011 11:45 am
pup wrote:mattvan1 wrote:pup wrote:If I didn't ask ya to tell me so, you would anyway.
The kid COULD be all you are saying.
Just wish they would have gone another way with that pick. I thought there was a better player for their need in that spot, and a player that was not a project.
So we get a cat that needs a ton of work, and no time for him to get that work.
Not getting in the middle of this discussion, but as far as the time element - he's got 2-3 years to get that work. What's the rush? It's not as if they're going to compete for the wildcard next year. This is the H&H 3 year plan.
Seeing as we are in year 2, the rush is just that.
Or do they get a reset on 2-3 every time they fire a HC?
by jb » Fri May 06, 2011 12:39 pm
by yogi » Fri May 06, 2011 2:33 pm
by hiko » Fri May 06, 2011 2:52 pm
jb wrote:I don't give s carp whatsome "plan" was allegedly. Or whether the clock started.
If this org reboots ANYTHING but DC and position coaches in the next 5 years or so it only continues the absurdity.
by jb » Fri May 06, 2011 5:19 pm
hiko wrote:jb wrote:I don't give s carp whatsome "plan" was allegedly. Or whether the clock started.
If this org reboots ANYTHING but DC and position coaches in the next 5 years or so it only continues the absurdity.
That is obviously valid.
It's just that I think it would be naive to consider that this org should be better this year than last because this is theoretically Year 2 and we should expect improvement between Year 1 and Year 2 of a reboot.
With all the changes and the lockout, this team will very likely be worse than last year's version. Which also doesn't necessarily mean it's headed in the wrong direction.
Because Holmgren kept Mangini last season means that was a Wasted Year. (easily my biggest knock on Walrus). Nothing was accomplished except getting some rookies some PT.
Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 4 guests
