FUDU wrote:I get what your saying lead but man when you're in a search for truth is there really a time limit? The whole thing is a shame in so many respects, from the angle that it totally looks like this guy is innocent and his life has been made a living hell to the angle of what a waste of resources in doing all this.
Is is better for him to be innocent of the alleged crimes and yet had to endure all this, or better that he was guilty all this time and endured this, if we screwed this up which way was the better way to error?
Not that simple because of the way this has unfolded.
The least 30 years his life has been that of a guilty man. If he's on the fence till they figure it out, well, than take your time. If he's being toted in and out of court, in and out of the clink, and from country to country, thus disrupting a normal life, then 30 plus years in unacceptable.
In regard to which way its better to error - that speaks to the point. If it takes you 30 years and you still can't prove your point, than tough luck if you error. And the longer time goes by, the more it looks like you're trying to create something anyway.