Moderators: peeker643, swerb, danwismar, furls
by e0y2e3 » Mon Mar 07, 2011 10:16 pm

by skatingtripods » Mon Mar 07, 2011 10:26 pm
by motherscratcher » Mon Mar 07, 2011 11:15 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Mon Mar 07, 2011 11:30 pm
motherscratcher wrote:Fuck. This shit never ends. I suppose it does depend on the source, but this kind of thing rarely turns out good.
Tell us what it all means, Dan.
by e0y2e3 » Mon Mar 07, 2011 11:38 pm

by Triple-S » Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:04 am
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by JCoz » Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:05 am
by peeker643 » Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:06 am
by bucknutz94 » Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:37 am
by sk82day » Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:44 am

by motherscratcher » Tue Mar 08, 2011 1:37 am
by peeker643 » Tue Mar 08, 2011 2:07 am
motherscratcher wrote:Christ. I just saw on 19 Sports. They are talking possibly vacating the entire 2010 season and Tressel getting fired for cause.
Why the hell wouldn't he just report it in April and take whatever lumps at the beginning of '10? It's going to be 100X worse now.
Also makes me wonder how much shit SV has swept under the rug and gotten away with.
by jta1975 » Tue Mar 08, 2011 5:23 am
by jta1975 » Tue Mar 08, 2011 5:34 am
by fundamentals » Tue Mar 08, 2011 9:12 am
by JCoz » Tue Mar 08, 2011 10:36 am
by leadpipe » Tue Mar 08, 2011 10:40 am
by peeker643 » Tue Mar 08, 2011 10:41 am
by JCoz » Tue Mar 08, 2011 10:44 am
leadpipe wrote:If we don't wanna call it "cheating" like we do when referring to SEC teams, let's call it "head turning."
And all the things in between.
It's happening EVERYWHERE.
Say it till I'm blue in the face, the key is avoiding a major investigation, not being "clean," cause none of them are.
Ask the "paragon" of coaching cleanliness how Corey Maggette aquired all that he ran around with on the Duke campus. Did Coach K cheat, or did he turn his head? What's the difference?
And yes, there are certainly different levels, not everything is as egregious as Auburn, for example, but something like this - if this is the least bit suprising to you you've had your head in the sand far too long. I'd be willing to bet, in Tressel's tenure, there's been dozens of violations worse than this that have gone undetected. Violations that Tressel was aware were going on, cause that's the way the game works.
by peeker643 » Tue Mar 08, 2011 11:00 am
JCoz wrote:leadpipe wrote:If we don't wanna call it "cheating" like we do when referring to SEC teams, let's call it "head turning."
And all the things in between.
It's happening EVERYWHERE.
Say it till I'm blue in the face, the key is avoiding a major investigation, not being "clean," cause none of them are.
Ask the "paragon" of coaching cleanliness how Corey Maggette aquired all that he ran around with on the Duke campus. Did Coach K cheat, or did he turn his head? What's the difference?
And yes, there are certainly different levels, not everything is as egregious as Auburn, for example, but something like this - if this is the least bit suprising to you you've had your head in the sand far too long. I'd be willing to bet, in Tressel's tenure, there's been dozens of violations worse than this that have gone undetected. Violations that Tressel was aware were going on, cause that's the way the game works.
There is little to nothing in the world of sports that is shock worthy anymore.
I've heard grumblings of much worse.
by waborat » Tue Mar 08, 2011 11:00 am
by fundamentals » Tue Mar 08, 2011 11:12 am
by Cease » Tue Mar 08, 2011 11:39 am

by jb » Tue Mar 08, 2011 11:44 am
skatingtripods wrote:All depends on who this "source" is. Could be some big booster or could be some hoax. Who knows.
by jb » Tue Mar 08, 2011 11:46 am
peeker643 wrote:Shocking if OSU has to vacate their season before (if) Auburn does theirs.
by jb » Tue Mar 08, 2011 11:50 am
leadpipe wrote:If we don't wanna call it "cheating" like we do when referring to SEC teams, let's call it "head turning."
And all the things in between.
It's happening EVERYWHERE.
Say it till I'm blue in the face, the key is avoiding a major investigation, not being "clean," cause none of them are.
Ask the "paragon" of coaching cleanliness how Corey Maggette aquired all that he ran around with on the Duke campus. Did Coach K cheat, or did he turn his head? What's the difference?
And yes, there are certainly different levels, not everything is as egregious as Auburn, for example, but something like this - if this is the least bit suprising to you you've had your head in the sand far too long. I'd be willing to bet, in Tressel's tenure, there's been dozens of violations worse than this that have gone undetected. Violations that Tressel was aware were going on, cause that's the way the game works.
by peeker643 » Tue Mar 08, 2011 11:51 am
jb wrote:peeker643 wrote:Shocking if OSU has to vacate their season before (if) Auburn does theirs.
Good idea Peeker.
JT should claim he didn't know but his father did.
What's that?
Lee passed away years ago?
Shit.
nevermind.
by danwismar » Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:12 pm
by JCoz » Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:12 pm
jb wrote:skatingtripods wrote:All depends on who this "source" is. Could be some big booster or could be some hoax. Who knows.
Agree. I'm waiting until an objective souce like mark may weighs in.
This seems to explain his light "discipline" on the matter. Probably will result in a loss of a few schollies and maybe a bowl. A hiccup. If anyone thinks this sullies the rep of tSV, they were probably eagerly awaiting the arrival of the easter bunny as well.
by jb » Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:24 pm
danwismar wrote:Purely speculating...maybe he heard reports or rumors, but players denied it and there was no clear proof of violations.
During the investigation back in December (when the US Attorney discovered the OSU merchandise in the course of their dealings with the tattoo parlor operator and brought them to the attention of the university), it came out that several months prior, OSU staff had approached the team to "clarify" or "emphasize" the NCAA regs regarding such things...and to ask all players to come forward if they had been involved with anything of this sort...and all the players reportedly denied any involvement.
by JCoz » Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:31 pm
danwismar wrote:I'll wait till I hear from the school before getting out on the ledge.
It certainly doesn't sound like a "fireable" offense even if 100% true though.
Purely speculating...maybe he heard reports or rumors, but players denied it and there was no clear proof of violations.
During the investigation back in December (when the US Attorney discovered the OSU merchandise in the course of their dealings with the tattoo parlor operator and brought them to the attention of the university), it came out that several months prior, OSU staff had approached the team to "clarify" or "emphasize" the NCAA regs regarding such things...and to ask all players to come forward if they had been involved with anything of this sort...and all the players reportedly denied any involvement.
As I understand it, that's why the suspensions were for five games instead of four. There was precedent for a 4-game suspension for similar violations (Green from Georgia got a 4-gamer for selling a jersey) but a fifth game was added to the suspension because it was shown the players had lied about their involvement when first confronted.
Not sure how the timetable for all this jibes with "April" as reported by Yahoo, but we'll see.
by JCoz » Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:34 pm
by peeker643 » Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:37 pm
by danwismar » Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:39 pm
JCoz wrote:All depends on whats true Dan.
Thanks for some additional info. If it was as you wrote, there shouldn't be a big issue.
But if it was that easy to see, shouldn't Wetzel know what you just wrote, and if all he had was the word of one person saying there was more to it, do you believe it makes sense for him to put his name on that article?
by JCoz » Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:43 pm
danwismar wrote:JCoz wrote:All depends on whats true Dan.
Thanks for some additional info. If it was as you wrote, there shouldn't be a big issue.
But if it was that easy to see, shouldn't Wetzel know what you just wrote, and if all he had was the word of one person saying there was more to it, do you believe it makes sense for him to put his name on that article?
Not ready to put Mr. Wetzel on any kind of journalistic pedestal. I've seen some "reporting" by him that was fairly fact-free. He's looking for page clicks, and this gets him there.
I do suspect that the action the staff took months ago to confront and re-educate the team on these particular rules could be enough to mitigate the damage to JT. Hope so.
by peeker643 » Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:52 pm
by skatingtripods » Tue Mar 08, 2011 2:02 pm
by danwismar » Tue Mar 08, 2011 2:17 pm
skatingtripods wrote:I still find it hilarious that people want to chastise OSU for holding off on the suspensions until next year. They completely ignore how much power the BCS had in lobbying for the players to participate in the Fiesta Bowl.
Either way, again, still no word on who this source is. If there's one thing that universities are good at, it's damage control.
by waborat » Tue Mar 08, 2011 2:22 pm
danwismar wrote:
Not ready to put Mr. Wetzel on any kind of journalistic pedestal. I've seen some "reporting" by him that was fairly fact-free. He's looking for page clicks, and this gets him there.
by JCoz » Tue Mar 08, 2011 2:29 pm
waborat wrote:danwismar wrote:
Not ready to put Mr. Wetzel on any kind of journalistic pedestal. I've seen some "reporting" by him that was fairly fact-free. He's looking for page clicks, and this gets him there.
Here's^^^ the problem I have...
I'm supposed to believe that half-a-dozen goobs sittin round Yahoo's offices were able to uncover more dirt than the entire NCAA sleuth division?
They take calls, text & write for a living...
Not much different than JB, 'cept they're accomplished at translating & spelling
by peeker643 » Tue Mar 08, 2011 2:35 pm
by danwismar » Tue Mar 08, 2011 2:36 pm
by JCoz » Tue Mar 08, 2011 2:51 pm
danwismar wrote:When the penalties were announced in December, here's part of what A.D. Gene Smith said at the time (bold emphasis mine) This is from Tim May's article in the Dispatch, linked here: http://bit.ly/et8JUJ
---
Gene Smith, associate vice president and director of athletics at Ohio State, said the university will “further enhance” its rules education in the future based on this situation.
“We were not as explicit with our student-athlete education as we should have been in the 2007-08 and 2008-09 academic years regarding the sale of apparel, awards and gifts issued by the athletics department,” Smith said. “We began to significantly improve our education in November of 2009 to address these issues. After going through this experience, we will further enhance our education for all our student-athletes as we move forward.”
The standard withholding condition in cases like these involving the five student-athletes is four games, or 30 percent of a season. A fifth game was added to the penalty because these student-athletes did not immediately disclose the violations when presented with the appropriate rules education, Lennon said.
---
This tells me that as early as Nov. 2009, they probably had information that something had happened....hence the realization that they had not been "as explicit...as they should have been regarding the sale of apparel, awards..." and they set about to correct that with additional sessions with the team about that stuff. The part about the penalty going from four to five games is also in there....though I love the way it is phrased..."athletes did not immediately disclose the violations when presented with the appropriate rules education" (read: they lied and denied)
What else seems clear is that Tressel did not withhold information from the AD at the time...Smith was involved from the get-go, it would appear.
by danwismar » Tue Mar 08, 2011 3:03 pm
by JCoz » Tue Mar 08, 2011 3:06 pm
danwismar wrote:This just in my Inbox from OSU Athletic Communications 2 minutes ago:
COLUMBUS, Ohio—Officials with the Ohio State University and Department of Athletics will be available at 7 p.m. Tuesday (3/8/11).
E. Gordon Gee, Ohio State University president, Gene Smith, vice president and director of athletics, and Jim Tressel, head football coach, will address the media at the Jack Nicklaus Museum (2355 Olentangy River Road, Columbus, Ohio 43210).
The availability will be streamed live on http://www.ohiostatebuckeyes.com.
by danwismar » Tue Mar 08, 2011 3:28 pm
by motherscratcher » Tue Mar 08, 2011 3:40 pm
danwismar wrote:This just in my Inbox from OSU Athletic Communications 2 minutes ago:
COLUMBUS, Ohio—Officials with the Ohio State University and Department of Athletics will be available at 7 p.m. Tuesday (3/8/11).
E. Gordon Gee, Ohio State University president, Gene Smith, vice president and director of athletics, and Jim Tressel, head football coach, will address the media at the Jack Nicklaus Museum (2355 Olentangy River Road, Columbus, Ohio 43210).
The availability will be streamed live on http://www.ohiostatebuckeyes.com.
by tired » Tue Mar 08, 2011 3:46 pm
by danwismar » Tue Mar 08, 2011 3:50 pm
motherscratcher wrote:I'd also like to thank Dan who has begun to slowely back me away from the ledge upon which I am so precariously perched.
by skatingtripods » Tue Mar 08, 2011 3:56 pm
Return to College Sports Arena
Users browsing this forum: furls, gbot and 4 guests
