Moderators: peeker643, swerb, danwismar, furls
by e0y2e3 » Sat Feb 12, 2011 6:05 pm

by swerb » Sat Feb 12, 2011 6:18 pm
by e0y2e3 » Sat Feb 12, 2011 6:20 pm

by e0y2e3 » Sat Feb 12, 2011 6:23 pm

by swerb » Sat Feb 12, 2011 6:24 pm
by daddywags » Sat Feb 12, 2011 6:37 pm
by e0y2e3 » Sat Feb 12, 2011 6:39 pm

by statmasta » Sat Feb 12, 2011 6:57 pm
by JoJo White » Sat Feb 12, 2011 7:00 pm
swerb wrote:Still believe this is the best team in the country

by swerb » Sat Feb 12, 2011 7:50 pm
JoJo White wrote:swerb wrote:Still believe this is the best team in the country
Texas and Kansas would run a train on Ohio State.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sat Feb 12, 2011 8:04 pm
by skatingtripods » Mon Feb 14, 2011 8:04 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Ehhh it was as close to a choke as you can get. This was a game I had circled on the schedule as an L, nobody wins there. I hope we can return the favor here in CLB.
by peeker643 » Mon Feb 14, 2011 8:43 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:This was a game I had circled on the schedule as an L...

by Cerebral_DownTime » Mon Feb 14, 2011 9:21 pm
peeker643 wrote:Cerebral_DownTime wrote:This was a game I had circled on the schedule as an L...
People are missing the pertinent fact that CDT spends his days circling games on the calendar like some half-assed Notradumbass.
Guy knows nothing about pizza or monkeys but circling games on his Shawn Cassidy calendar he's got down pat.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
by Squints » Mon Feb 14, 2011 10:51 pm
by peeker643 » Mon Feb 14, 2011 11:19 pm
by noles1 » Tue Feb 15, 2011 12:43 am
JoJo White wrote:swerb wrote:Still believe this is the best team in the country
Texas and Kansas would run a train on Ohio State.

by Triple-S » Tue Feb 15, 2011 12:46 am
peeker643 wrote:That says it all. Drink a fucking porter like a real working class Irishman you dumb German giant.
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by JoJo White » Tue Feb 15, 2011 1:44 am
skatingtripods wrote:
I'm not sure Ohio State could beat Kansas 3 out of 10 times, but all it's going to take is one time if the bracket shakes out that way.
skatingtripods wrote:As for Texas, just 21.7% of their total points come from 3. If Ohio State were to play zone against them, or even mix up defenses, Texas would have a hard time scoring. I like Ohio State's ability to make shots in a close game.
Piggybacking on Ken Pomeroy’s post on the historically insane defense being played by Texas right now, I resolved to add an exclamation point to his headline the moment I saw the following number:
1.02
That’s the average number of points the Longhorns’ conference opponents are scoring on possessions where they do not commit a turnover (what I call an effective possession). In other words, if every team that played Texas was given a magic pill that would make it impossible for them to give the ball away, ever, those teams would still be scoring just 1.02 points per trip. That would make UT the second-best D in their league, behind Kansas. An imaginary Texas D with zero turnovers forced over 653 possessions would actually be better than 10 out of 11 real-world Big 12 defenses.
Mindful of this, I want to pose a question. Is this the best defense we’ve seen in recent years?
Not yet. It’s only Valentine’s Day, and there’s still hoops to be played. But if the Longhorns finish the regular season with anything like the numbers they’re carrying right now, then the answer to that question will be yes.
In particular the field-goal defense being played by Rick Barnes‘ team is little short of astonishing. No major-conference defense over the past five seasons has been able to do what Texas is doing this year. I’ll keep these lists short by including just the top three teams, but keep in mind Texas 2011 ranks No. 1, No. 2, and No. 1 on rankings that have 365 teams each (73 major-conference teams, five seasons including 2011 so far).

by noles1 » Tue Feb 15, 2011 12:24 pm

by jb » Tue Feb 15, 2011 3:14 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:27 pm
peeker643 wrote:Fer crissakes.
I refuse to sit here and explain who Shaun Fucking Cassidy was ( I mean 'is') to some pizza no nothing who hates monkeys and who circles goddamn games on calendars.
You probably live closer to the Free Stamp than I do and I wear sunglasses inside because of a rare and potentially deadly neurological disorder you insensitive prick.
Yeah....Don't feel so good about that comment now do ya? Knowing I could drop over dead at any second leaving you with 1perry and Timmah as the only online pals you have.
You know nothing about neurological disorders that involve light sensitivity.
I don't think the internet is big enough to list the stuff you know nothing about. Jesus, I'm arguing with a Pils drinker. That says it all. Drink a fucking porter like a real working class Irishman you dumb German giant.
by JoJo White » Tue Feb 15, 2011 8:57 pm
noles1 wrote:So Texas and KU have very good defensive teams against an utterly shitty Big 12 conference. Consider me minimally impressed.

by JoJo White » Tue Feb 15, 2011 9:00 pm
jb wrote:
But holy crap, ur Jayhawks' pimpin' has to be one of the most ill timed posts this side of Whack-phist's Michigan football infatuation in the day.

by jb » Tue Feb 15, 2011 9:03 pm
JoJo White wrote:jb wrote:
But holy crap, ur Jayhawks' pimpin' has to be one of the most ill timed posts this side of Whack-phist's Michigan football infatuation in the day.
KU has never won the national championship without losing to K-State during the season, so they just wanted their bases covered.
Besides, K-State's relatively pedestrian record is more a function of a tough schedule (top 10 in the country). THey'll be in the tournament, don't you worry.
by danwismar » Tue Feb 15, 2011 9:42 pm
JoJo White wrote:noles1 wrote:So Texas and KU have very good defensive teams against an utterly shitty Big 12 conference. Consider me minimally impressed.
Well golly gee, I guess UT and KU will have to live with being a 1 seed in the tourney even without your seal of approval. I think they'll be OK.
Go look up Ohio State's SOS and compare it to KU and UT.
Then look up the number of Big 12 and Big 10 teams in the RPI top 50 and then splain to me how the Big 10 is vastly superior.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Wed Feb 16, 2011 12:39 am
by hermanfontenot » Wed Feb 16, 2011 1:00 am
noles1 wrote:This KU team is going to struggle with good guard play and teams that are athletic.

by jb » Wed Feb 16, 2011 5:39 pm
danwismar wrote:JoJo White wrote:noles1 wrote:So Texas and KU have very good defensive teams against an utterly shitty Big 12 conference. Consider me minimally impressed.
Well golly gee, I guess UT and KU will have to live with being a 1 seed in the tourney even without your seal of approval. I think they'll be OK.
Go look up Ohio State's SOS and compare it to KU and UT.
Then look up the number of Big 12 and Big 10 teams in the RPI top 50 and then splain to me how the Big 10 is vastly superior.
Totally agree that the Big 10 ain't what it was cracked up to be. After the top three teams, it's a sea of mediocrity. MSU sucking really hurt the overall look of the conference.
by skatingtripods » Wed Feb 16, 2011 7:44 pm
JoJo White wrote:noles1 wrote:So Texas and KU have very good defensive teams against an utterly shitty Big 12 conference. Consider me minimally impressed.
Well golly gee, I guess UT and KU will have to live with being a 1 seed in the tourney even without your seal of approval. I think they'll be OK.
Go look up Ohio State's SOS and compare it to KU and UT.
Then look up the number of Big 12 and Big 10 teams in the RPI top 50 and then splain to me how the Big 10 is vastly superior.
by JoJo White » Thu Feb 17, 2011 12:14 am
skatingtripods wrote:JoJo White wrote:noles1 wrote:So Texas and KU have very good defensive teams against an utterly shitty Big 12 conference. Consider me minimally impressed.
Well golly gee, I guess UT and KU will have to live with being a 1 seed in the tourney even without your seal of approval. I think they'll be OK.
Go look up Ohio State's SOS and compare it to KU and UT.
Then look up the number of Big 12 and Big 10 teams in the RPI top 50 and then splain to me how the Big 10 is vastly superior.
Oh, you mean according to Ken Pomeroy, where Ohio State's SOS is .6890 for 30th and Texas's is .6810 for 39th? How about Kansas at .6867 for 33rd?
Highest strength of schedules of teams relevant to this discussion:
Michigan State .8285 (1st)
Illinois .7857 (6th)
Minnesota .7696 (8th)
Michigan .7458 (12th)
Purdue .7373 (13th)
Iowa .7254 (19th)
Kansas St .7239 (20th)
Yes, the B10 is inferior and plays weaker competition. Excellent analysis.

by JoJo White » Thu Feb 17, 2011 12:16 am
jb wrote:^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Boom.
Roasted.

by peeker643 » Thu Feb 17, 2011 12:19 am
JoJo White wrote:jb wrote:^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Boom.
Roasted.
Stop pretending like you know anything about CBB. You haven't watched a game since the days that Antoine Jobert was eating donuts during timeouts.
by skatingtripods » Thu Feb 17, 2011 2:34 am
JoJo White wrote:Heh - good find. I was referring at Sportsline RPI, but there are so many different rankings out there; hell, Sagarin has KU with the toughest schedule of the 3.
by jb » Thu Feb 17, 2011 12:30 pm
JoJo White wrote:jb wrote:^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Boom.
Roasted.
Stop pretending like you know anything about CBB. You haven't watched a game since the days that Antoine Jobert was eating donuts during timeouts.
Return to College Sports Arena
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests
