Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by swerb » Fri Feb 11, 2011 10:48 am
by SoulDawg74 » Fri Feb 11, 2011 2:40 pm
swerb wrote:http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2011/02/cleveland_browns_coach_pat_shu_2.html
by mattvan1 » Fri Feb 11, 2011 5:22 pm
SoulDawg74 wrote:swerb wrote:http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2011/02/cleveland_browns_coach_pat_shu_2.html
SD:
Green bay handles it the same way .
Its the way all the old god ones did it , including Walsh on calling his own plays IIRC before he stepped back
and delegated more.
SoulDawg
but I really don't see this a big deal.
by peeker643 » Fri Feb 11, 2011 5:29 pm
mattvan1 wrote:SoulDawg74 wrote:swerb wrote:http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2011/02/cleveland_browns_coach_pat_shu_2.html
SD:
Green bay handles it the same way .
Its the way all the old god ones did it , including Walsh on calling his own plays IIRC before he stepped back
and delegated more.
SoulDawg
Not exactly. GB had an OC - McCarthy called the plays. I don't really care about game day - anyone has got to be better than Daboll.
I am more concerened about Mon-Sat and does Shurmur have enough time to watch all the film and put in the complete game plan and sort out all of the personnel packages and all of the other things an OC would normally do?
You want him to keep his finger on the teams' pulse? The only pulse he'll have time for is the O. Again, not really a big deal as Jauron has HC experience and will handle the D 100%. Hopefully ST doesn't fall through the cracks, but EOD we're gonna suck hard anyway, so might as well suck while giving Shurmur a trial by fire.
Peeks is surprised I am not blowing a gasket,but I really don't see this a big deal.

by jb » Mon Feb 14, 2011 1:57 pm
SoulDawg74 wrote:Its the way all the old god ones did it ,
by hiko » Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:05 pm
jb wrote:SoulDawg74 wrote:Its the way all the old god ones did it ,
Actually, QB's called the plays. maybe we should try that, too?
This decision makes zero sense. None. Nada. It is as laughable as it sounds; a 1st time HC trying to be his own OC on a horrible team. And everyone will be screaming for an OC by game 3 next season and wondering why an organization "led" by Mike Holmgren can't attract a qualified OC .
Not me. I'm scoffing now, and not caring now and later. This really doesn't matter, except if you beleiev in the whole "gotta establish a winning culture" thing.
This probably means 2 wins and not 3. So we're in Luck ole Patches doesn't understand the job yet.

by jb » Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:07 pm
mattvan1 wrote:SoulDawg74 wrote:swerb wrote:http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2011/02/cleveland_browns_coach_pat_shu_2.html
SD:
Green bay handles it the same way .
Its the way all the old god ones did it , including Walsh on calling his own plays IIRC before he stepped back
and delegated more.
SoulDawg
Not exactly. GB had an OC - McCarthy called the plays.
by jb » Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:09 pm
hiko wrote:jb wrote:SoulDawg74 wrote:Its the way all the old god ones did it ,
Actually, QB's called the plays. maybe we should try that, too?
This decision makes zero sense. None. Nada. It is as laughable as it sounds; a 1st time HC trying to be his own OC on a horrible team. And everyone will be screaming for an OC by game 3 next season and wondering why an organization "led" by Mike Holmgren can't attract a qualified OC .
Not me. I'm scoffing now, and not caring now and later. This really doesn't matter, except if you beleiev in the whole "gotta establish a winning culture" thing.
This probably means 2 wins and not 3. So we're in Luck ole Patches doesn't understand the job yet.
It means nothing since Shurmur was going to call plays anyway.
People may indeed be screaming though - that seems to be the nature of today's Cleveland fan.
by hiko » Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:13 pm
jb wrote:hiko wrote:jb wrote:SoulDawg74 wrote:Its the way all the old god ones did it ,
Actually, QB's called the plays. maybe we should try that, too?
This decision makes zero sense. None. Nada. It is as laughable as it sounds; a 1st time HC trying to be his own OC on a horrible team. And everyone will be screaming for an OC by game 3 next season and wondering why an organization "led" by Mike Holmgren can't attract a qualified OC .
Not me. I'm scoffing now, and not caring now and later. This really doesn't matter, except if you beleiev in the whole "gotta establish a winning culture" thing.
This probably means 2 wins and not 3. So we're in Luck ole Patches doesn't understand the job yet.
It means nothing since Shurmur was going to call plays anyway.
People may indeed be screaming though - that seems to be the nature of today's Cleveland fan.
It'd be the same in Philly or Dallas or New York or KC.
by jb » Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:16 pm
by hiko » Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:57 pm
jb wrote:Maybe I should be asking this question: why WOULDN'T you want to hire an OC ?
What is patches gaining?
by jb » Mon Feb 14, 2011 3:33 pm
hiko wrote:jb wrote:Maybe I should be asking this question: why WOULDN'T you want to hire an OC ?
What is patches gaining?
Eternal consciousness?
Don't think he's gaining anything. Not sure he's losing anything either. Paddy IS the OC. Color me nonplussed.
by hiko » Mon Feb 14, 2011 3:41 pm
jb wrote:hiko wrote:jb wrote:Maybe I should be asking this question: why WOULDN'T you want to hire an OC ?
What is patches gaining?
Eternal consciousness?
Don't think he's gaining anything. Not sure he's losing anything either. Paddy IS the OC. Color me nonplussed.
So he's got THAT going for him, which is nice.
It's too much to take on, Hiko. That's why it's two jobs. Being a 1st time HC is a big enough step. Taking on two of the most complex jobs in the org is not a good thing. At least that's what I was told when the borderline HOF HC in the org passed on the job cause it was too much work to be figurehead as well.
![]()
I see a whole lotta downside to being potentially overwehlmed. I see no upside.
by jb » Mon Feb 14, 2011 3:49 pm
by SoulDawg74 » Mon Feb 14, 2011 7:27 pm
jb wrote:Good to see you embracing the dark side and seeing the dots connect. ;-)
Yeah, nada to talk about, so it is prolly a bigger deal than if FA were coming up. I just don't see how this team could possibly need any more challenges, that's all. If it were a non-issue, 31 other teams wouldn't have OC's either. Even Todd Haley named an OC . I openly wonder if being a HC for the first time in year one of a losing culture is a bigger task than Pcthes thinks. Unless he's just going to throw wrenches at the WR's.
Concur this means jaraun is a one man gang on the other side of the ball.
by smalls1129 » Mon Feb 14, 2011 8:55 pm
SoulDawg74 wrote:jb wrote:Good to see you embracing the dark side and seeing the dots connect. ;-)
Yeah, nada to talk about, so it is prolly a bigger deal than if FA were coming up. I just don't see how this team could possibly need any more challenges, that's all. If it were a non-issue, 31 other teams wouldn't have OC's either. Even Todd Haley named an OC . I openly wonder if being a HC for the first time in year one of a losing culture is a bigger task than Pcthes thinks. Unless he's just going to throw wrenches at the WR's.
Concur this means jaraun is a one man gang on the other side of the ball.
SD:
Unofficially the other coaches are going to be doing the scouting work an OC uses to prepare his game plan .
Shurmur is on new ground as a HC , to your point , it may overwhelm him , to my point , Calling his own plays gives him a confort level while he gets his sea legs .
it gives him a frame of reference , in a box with no dimensions .
Instead of everything being new , he has one thing he can build his base on.
Doesn't mean you ain't right , but that was the point I was trying to articulate.
SoulDawg
by Fire Marshall Bill » Mon Feb 14, 2011 9:31 pm
by pup » Mon Feb 14, 2011 10:41 pm
by mistero » Mon Feb 14, 2011 11:51 pm
by mistero » Mon Feb 14, 2011 11:54 pm
by SoulDawg74 » Tue Feb 15, 2011 12:05 am
mistero wrote:"Former Eagles and Packers head coach Ray Rhodes will continue his 30-year coaching career in Cleveland.
The Browns announced a slew of coaching hires, including Rhodes as a senior assistant/defense. He served in similar capacity in Houston over the last three years.
Cleveland also announced they retained the following coaches from Eric Mangini’s staff: Gary Brown (running backs), Steve Hagen (tight ends), Jerome Henderson (defensive backs), Kent Johnston (strength and conditioning), Rick Lyle (assistant strength and conditioning), Luke Steckel (assistant to the head coach) and George Warhop (offensive line).
In addition to Rhodes, the team also added Chris Beake (offensive assistant), Chuck Bullough (defensive assistant), and Shawn Mennenga (special teams assistant). Keith Gilbertson will also be a senior offensive assistant after serving as the Browns’ Director of Pro Personnel.
by mistero » Tue Feb 15, 2011 12:07 am
by motherscratcher » Tue Feb 15, 2011 12:30 am
mistero wrote:Of course there's something left in the tank. Now all we need to do is talk Jayme Mitchell back into the fold.
by mattvan1 » Tue Feb 15, 2011 9:17 am
by jb » Tue Feb 15, 2011 10:16 am
by jb » Tue Feb 15, 2011 10:23 am
mistero wrote:"Former Eagles and Packers head coach Ray Rhodes will continue his 30-year coaching career in Cleveland.
The Browns announced a slew of coaching hires, including Rhodes as a senior assistant/defense. He served in similar capacity in Houston over the last three years.
Cleveland also announced they retained the following coaches from Eric Mangini’s staff: Gary Brown (running backs), Steve Hagen (tight ends), Jerome Henderson (defensive backs), Kent Johnston (strength and conditioning), Rick Lyle (assistant strength and conditioning), Luke Steckel (assistant to the head coach) and George Warhop (offensive line).
In addition to Rhodes, the team also added Chris Beake (offensive assistant), Chuck Bullough (defensive assistant), and Shawn Mennenga (special teams assistant). Keith Gilbertson will also be a senior offensive assistant after serving as the Browns’ Director of Pro Personnel.

by mattvan1 » Tue Feb 15, 2011 10:26 am
jb wrote:Some good hires rounding out the D side of the ball:
http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.s ... _thei.html
A staff with Jaraun & Ray Rhodes? Plus a Bullaugh?
I thought Patches was really joking when he quipped "there's a defense?" but that might not be the case. The good news is that if he's going it on his own on the other side of the ball the D should have MORE than enough know-how and been-there, done-that so the store should be minded.
Huge contasts between the O staff and the D staff, IMO. Loads of vets and experience on D , wet behind the ears on O.
Interesting.

by jb » Tue Feb 15, 2011 10:27 am
mattvan1 wrote:Really trying hard to stay objective. Positive. Upbeat. Trying not to be "one of those guys"
But Ray Rhodes? Really? From the 2008-2010 Houston Texans defense which struck fear into the hearts of all that faced them? While ranking last in the league in almost every category? The guy who RETIRED last month due to health problems?
I guess there's two ways to look at this
1. H&H know Ray Rhodes, respect him, think he's a good guy and an asset to the staff
2. This entire team has completely lost it's fucking mind, and what we're seeing is nothing more than The Walrus Old Timers Club with H&H spending Lerner's money on cronies
I'll stay positive and go all in on number 1. Only because 2 is so absurd I can't really fathom it
by peeker643 » Tue Feb 15, 2011 10:53 am
mattvan1 wrote:jb wrote:Some good hires rounding out the D side of the ball:
http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.s ... _thei.html
A staff with Jaraun & Ray Rhodes? Plus a Bullaugh?
I thought Patches was really joking when he quipped "there's a defense?" but that might not be the case. The good news is that if he's going it on his own on the other side of the ball the D should have MORE than enough know-how and been-there, done-that so the store should be minded.
Huge contasts between the O staff and the D staff, IMO. Loads of vets and experience on D , wet behind the ears on O.
Interesting.
Maybe Gill Haskell plays more of a role on the O side? Clear that Holmgren and Shurmur will abdicate most if not all of the D to the senior guys.
Just don't see what Rhodes brings other than a trusted face. The guy is a walking time bomb health-wise. Bullough was drafted by the Eagles in '92 - so that explains that.
by jb » Tue Feb 15, 2011 11:13 am
Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
