Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by RickNashEquilibrium » Thu Feb 10, 2011 1:04 am
by motherscratcher » Thu Feb 10, 2011 1:41 am
Triple-S wrote:I don't get it..
SD, you just Andrew Luck is the finest prospect in the draft, had he declared.
Why not just wait a year until he comes out, instead of burning a pick on Vince Young II?
I could understand that, hell, I would be in full support of drafting Luck this year, had he not declared.
by RedDawg » Thu Feb 10, 2011 1:58 am
by RedDawg » Thu Feb 10, 2011 2:17 am
by SoulDawg74 » Thu Feb 10, 2011 1:11 pm
Triple-S wrote:I don't get it..
SD, you just Andrew Luck is the finest prospect in the draft, had he declared.
Why not just wait a year until he comes out, instead of burning a pick on Vince Young II?
I could understand that, hell, I would be in full support of drafting Luck this year, had he not declared.
by jta1975 » Thu Feb 10, 2011 8:41 pm
by pup » Thu Feb 10, 2011 9:18 pm
by SoulDawg74 » Thu Feb 10, 2011 9:21 pm
jta1975 wrote:Cam giving a preview of the goods
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/draft2011/news/story?id=6109802
by SoulDawg74 » Thu Feb 10, 2011 9:51 pm
RedDawg wrote:"What Color is Ben Rottenbeerger. YELLOW, he's a fucking coward.
What Color is Mark Sanchez BROWN, and possibly soon to be in an orange prison jumpsuit.
What color is Josh Freeman who I never said one word about last year . What about the year before? :D
What color is Andrew Luck who I said was the finest QB prospect in this draft class
\had he declared. If dumb was a color, he'd be it for not being the last #1 picked QB to hit the lottery.
What Color was Tim Couch when i pimped him over McNabb Akillme Smith and the Browns doing the Ditka deal.
Rose-colored, like he was through all of our glasses.
and Yeah your full of Shit and still a cocksucker and and I'm glad to meet your stoopid ass trouble making ignorant dumb ass Brother ..Just Curious."
Nah, tube steak has never been on my menu. Like the brother joke though. Witty.
Acknowledging that Ben and Luck are great QBs - even though they are white - isn't a very strong move to deny your pattern. Even Jesse Jackson and the Black Panthers would pick Luck over Cam Newton if they were both there for CAR this year.
I floated the "maybe stashing Cam Newton and trying to make him an uber-QB of the future" take weeks ago, so that idea doesn't make me cringe - but it ain't gonna happen so you are wasting your time pimping him.
Move on, and try to quit talking about QBs for a while because you really don't know jack shit about how to evaluate an NFL prospect. I don't either, but at least I'm not pretending like I do.
by Fire Marshall Bill » Fri Feb 11, 2011 10:50 am
if he was white we wouldn't be having this conversation
by RedDawg » Fri Feb 11, 2011 12:16 pm
by SoulDawg74 » Fri Feb 11, 2011 12:56 pm
RedDawg wrote:"i pimped a 6' 2' 235 lb Big ten senior starter with the attributes of Mcnabb a local kid from my hometown Daryll Clark as a late second day prospect as worthy of our consideration during the time when Vick fucked up a $100, million dollar plus contract and there was a resultant moratorium on black QB's by the owners , so if you don't like that sue me , because i still say the kid got a raw deal as he labors away in Canada now .
butt on Newton .
I see the best athletic most gifted athlete to ever lace up a set of cleats , and we might have a chance to draft him
and make him a Cleveland Brown .
and
if he was white we wouldn't be having this conversation .
You'd be lined up in front of me pimpin his virtues like your dumb ass actually knew something ..
Stay our of my way you stinkin no class no nothing race baitin cockroach ."
I thought JaMarcus Russell was the best athlete to lace up QB cleats? Or was it Mike Vick? Actually, it might have been Duante Culpepper. Wait, Did we forget about Randall Cunningham?
It doesn't matter how good an athlete they are. It's just a nice side benefit that hinges on whether they can play the position or not. An athlete that can't play QB is well....Josh Cribbs and Randle El.
Oh yeah, Daryl Clark. He was mediocre at best at PSU, and along with his mother you are the only person in the world that thinks he's an NFL QB.
Your QB evaluation skills SUCK. If pimping a drafting of Big Ben over Couch is your big claim to fame - then you are a complete joke as a poster.
Big Ben would have SUCKED if he'd played in Cleveland. So would Mark Sanchez. Peyton Manning MIGHT have turned this franchise around if we would have started up a year earlier, but only because of his leadership abilities and NOT just his sheer talent. Tom Brady would have broken in half after 3 years and toiled in obscurity on another team for another two until he left the NFL.
It's true that you can't win championships and usually can't even make the playoffs without a good QB, but it's even truer that you can't even be mediocre if there is no stability in the program and no talent around the QB.
You just don't get it, and waste all of our time with your obsession about the QB position.
The fact that about 50% of the QBs you talk about are black is WAY above the average. All your insults and profanities aren't going to change that fact, so if you don't want to hear the truth then cut that shit out.
You are a microcosm of ignorant NFL fans that always want to bench the starting QB and put the backup in when you have no concept of why he threw three interceptions. Also, you don't have to be able to throw a 70 yard rope to lead your team to a Super Bowl.
Do you really have to infect TWO different websites with your ignorance? Jesus H. Christ, that's one of the reasons I came here was to try to find a forum where people just BS'ed about football instead of trying to flame everyone that disagreed with them.
Put the remote down and stop trying to act like a QB guru, and pick up your orange and brown pom-poms and do what you do best. You are much better as Uncle Soul than this angry old man who loses his cool everytime someone calls him out on something.
by motherscratcher » Fri Feb 11, 2011 12:58 pm
by e0y2e3 » Fri Feb 11, 2011 1:02 pm

by motherscratcher » Fri Feb 11, 2011 1:11 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Called it.
by SoulDawg74 » Fri Feb 11, 2011 1:49 pm
motherscratcher wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:Called it.
Yes you did.
by motherscratcher » Fri Feb 11, 2011 2:06 pm
by SoulDawg74 » Fri Feb 11, 2011 2:34 pm
pup wrote:Dude will be gone before we get to pass on him.
Which is a good thing, because I am going to lose my mind in 2 years when he is leading someone to the playoffs who picked him after we did not.
by trsteve1 » Fri Feb 11, 2011 2:45 pm
by peeker643 » Fri Feb 11, 2011 4:05 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Fri Feb 11, 2011 4:37 pm
peeker643 wrote:We done with the race stuff?
Look, I started out by saying the dude looked way too much in need of mechanical help and had no clue how to read an NFL defense. I still stand by both though it appears the first part he's working hard on.
I hate the combines because dudes emerge that are physically gifted but can't actually play football and scouts fall all over themselves creating reasons why a mediocre college player will suddenly be more than that in the NFL.
But if Cam aces the psych and the skull sessions then I'll be the first guy to line up with SD and root for the kid to be in, as SD, the one color that matters. I don't give a fuck what color Cam Newton or Peyton Hillis or Ben Watson or Evan Moore are.
Players. And if this management team decides Newton's worth #6 then, like I said, I'm all for it if he's there.
Never been an argument about getting a potential game changing QB. It's always only been a question of whether Cam was that guy.
Now, let's move on and keep it to just that.
Thanks.
by RedDawg » Fri Feb 11, 2011 4:55 pm
by RedDawg » Fri Feb 11, 2011 4:58 pm
by trsteve1 » Fri Feb 11, 2011 6:32 pm
RedDawg wrote:To get back on topic, I wish we were in a position that we could afford to take a talented stud like Cam Newton - stash him for a year or two - and see if he can continue to revolutionize the NFL with his sick upside.
But we aren't, and I'd take one Dareus, Bowers or Fairley for two Cam Newton's if I had the option.
Colt McCoy is going to be the starting QB in 2011 and probably 2012, so get back to reality and deal with it.
by pup » Fri Feb 11, 2011 9:05 pm
trsteve1 wrote:RedDawg wrote:To get back on topic, I wish we were in a position that we could afford to take a talented stud like Cam Newton - stash him for a year or two - and see if he can continue to revolutionize the NFL with his sick upside.
But we aren't, and I'd take one Dareus, Bowers or Fairley for two Cam Newton's if I had the option.
Colt McCoy is going to be the starting QB in 2011 and probably 2012, so get back to reality and deal with it.
If we were in a position to stash a guy like Newton, we wouldn't be picking 6th and thus, probably not in a position to pick Newton (unless we had an injury plagued season where all of our talent got injured, but have little of that [talent])
by RedDawg » Sat Feb 12, 2011 12:42 am
trsteve1 wrote:RedDawg wrote:To get back on topic, I wish we were in a position that we could afford to take a talented stud like Cam Newton - stash him for a year or two - and see if he can continue to revolutionize the NFL with his sick upside.
But we aren't, and I'd take one Dareus, Bowers or Fairley for two Cam Newton's if I had the option.
Colt McCoy is going to be the starting QB in 2011 and probably 2012, so get back to reality and deal with it.
If we were in a position to stash a guy like Newton, we wouldn't be picking 6th and thus, probably not in a position to pick Newton (unless we had an injury plagued season where all of our talent got injured, but have little of that [talent])
by SpaceShuttleDoorGunner » Sat Feb 12, 2011 1:44 am
by Fire Marshall Bill » Sat Feb 12, 2011 10:59 am
pup wrote:trsteve1 wrote:RedDawg wrote:To get back on topic, I wish we were in a position that we could afford to take a talented stud like Cam Newton - stash him for a year or two - and see if he can continue to revolutionize the NFL with his sick upside.
But we aren't, and I'd take one Dareus, Bowers or Fairley for two Cam Newton's if I had the option.
Colt McCoy is going to be the starting QB in 2011 and probably 2012, so get back to reality and deal with it.
If we were in a position to stash a guy like Newton, we wouldn't be picking 6th and thus, probably not in a position to pick Newton (unless we had an injury plagued season where all of our talent got injured, but have little of that [talent])
Why are we stashing anything? If he is the pick at 6, play his ass? If he isn't better than Colt today, then don't pick him. He is by the way, I am not going to convince anyone of that, so I am no longer going to try.
by pup » Sat Feb 12, 2011 12:05 pm
Fire Marshall Bill wrote:pup wrote:trsteve1 wrote:RedDawg wrote:To get back on topic, I wish we were in a position that we could afford to take a talented stud like Cam Newton - stash him for a year or two - and see if he can continue to revolutionize the NFL with his sick upside.
But we aren't, and I'd take one Dareus, Bowers or Fairley for two Cam Newton's if I had the option.
Colt McCoy is going to be the starting QB in 2011 and probably 2012, so get back to reality and deal with it.
If we were in a position to stash a guy like Newton, we wouldn't be picking 6th and thus, probably not in a position to pick Newton (unless we had an injury plagued season where all of our talent got injured, but have little of that [talent])
Why are we stashing anything? If he is the pick at 6, play his ass? If he isn't better than Colt today, then don't pick him. He is by the way, I am not going to convince anyone of that, so I am no longer going to try.
PRAISE THE LORD!!!!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
..cus all you do is argue for arguments sake as if you're some kind of expert talent evaluator and your repsonse to that post is totally out of whack with what he suggested
by SoulDawg74 » Sat Feb 12, 2011 1:44 pm
RedDawg wrote:"and I'll destroy your stupid ass and make you just as chicken to run your fat yap here as in Pure football , where your too ashamed to show up after Reents eviserrated your fake sorry ass and i made you my lil bitch whinning to the mods about every little thang."
Hilarious. I left the other site and Pure Football because posters like you turned it into a junior high schoolyard where no meaningful discussion could ever happen. You single-handedly turned what was a great concept into crap.
I'm proud to have threaded with a lot of good posters like Reents, and have no problem admitting he usually got the best of me. He's a smart guy who uses logic to prove his point instead of childish threats and schoolyard bully tactics. You really ought to try it sometime.
So...game on. I'll enjoy shredding your crap takes in a mature way while you foam at the mouth and flex your internet muscles or grow the fuck up and quit acting like a teenage girl.
Your choice.
by peeker643 » Sat Feb 12, 2011 1:51 pm
by leadpipe » Sat Feb 12, 2011 2:20 pm
pup wrote:Fire Marshall Bill wrote:pup wrote:trsteve1 wrote:RedDawg wrote:To get back on topic, I wish we were in a position that we could afford to take a talented stud like Cam Newton - stash him for a year or two - and see if he can continue to revolutionize the NFL with his sick upside.
But we aren't, and I'd take one Dareus, Bowers or Fairley for two Cam Newton's if I had the option.
Colt McCoy is going to be the starting QB in 2011 and probably 2012, so get back to reality and deal with it.
If we were in a position to stash a guy like Newton, we wouldn't be picking 6th and thus, probably not in a position to pick Newton (unless we had an injury plagued season where all of our talent got injured, but have little of that [talent])
Why are we stashing anything? If he is the pick at 6, play his ass? If he isn't better than Colt today, then don't pick him. He is by the way, I am not going to convince anyone of that, so I am no longer going to try.
PRAISE THE LORD!!!!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
..cus all you do is argue for arguments sake as if you're some kind of expert talent evaluator and your repsonse to that post is totally out of whack with what he suggested
I am not even close to acting like an expert on anything. I am simply providing an opinion, just like everyone else on these boards.
It is my opinion that Cam Newton is a better QB than Colt McCoy. Hardly am I alone in that thought.
Does he need work? Yes. Fortunately for him, the things that he needs to improve on are actually things that can be worked on.
Colt is never going to have the arm strength to throw the deep ball. And not sure he will ever have the "edge" that allows him to try to throw the football into tight spots when there is an easier, safer throw that can be made (sound like anyone else you know?)
by pup » Sat Feb 12, 2011 2:39 pm
by leadpipe » Sat Feb 12, 2011 3:59 pm
pup wrote:Yes Lead.
Obviously without having coaching tape it is hard to be positive about it at this point, but do not remember seeing a whole lot of "trying to squeeze it in there" from young Mr. McCoy.
I remember seeing mostly safe, under throws even in spots that taking chances was the right call. Maybe there was absolutely no window. Like I said, I cannot be positive.
It is a different skill than being in the huddle and in charge. I like him from that standpoint. But when a majority of your background (@ UT) is zones being cleared and hitting the next guy through, then in your first year as a starter in the NFL you are not looking to stretch the field, it is a concern I have.
by SoulDawg74 » Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:32 pm
leadpipe wrote:pup wrote:Yes Lead.
Obviously without having coaching tape it is hard to be positive about it at this point, but do not remember seeing a whole lot of "trying to squeeze it in there" from young Mr. McCoy.
I remember seeing mostly safe, under throws even in spots that taking chances was the right call. Maybe there was absolutely no window. Like I said, I cannot be positive.
It is a different skill than being in the huddle and in charge. I like him from that standpoint. But when a majority of your background (@ UT) is zones being cleared and hitting the next guy through, then in your first year as a starter in the NFL you are not looking to stretch the field, it is a concern I have.
I suppose I thought I saw a little more of him throwing it in pretty tough spots than you. Perhaps watching Brady the previous year knocked my ratios off.
In any event, I'm not sure his arm is rag, and I saw enough, especially with the humps he had runnin' routes and catchin balls, that I'm interested in seeing what he can do.
By the way, I think I'll see enough either way, cause Cam is a couple year project anyway - even if he's as good as advertised.
by pup » Sun Feb 13, 2011 10:57 am
leadpipe wrote:pup wrote:Yes Lead.
Obviously without having coaching tape it is hard to be positive about it at this point, but do not remember seeing a whole lot of "trying to squeeze it in there" from young Mr. McCoy.
I remember seeing mostly safe, under throws even in spots that taking chances was the right call. Maybe there was absolutely no window. Like I said, I cannot be positive.
It is a different skill than being in the huddle and in charge. I like him from that standpoint. But when a majority of your background (@ UT) is zones being cleared and hitting the next guy through, then in your first year as a starter in the NFL you are not looking to stretch the field, it is a concern I have.
I suppose I thought I saw a little more of him throwing it in pretty tough spots than you. Perhaps watching Brady the previous year knocked my ratios off.
In any event, I'm not sure his arm is rag, and I saw enough, especially with the humps he had runnin' routes and catchin balls, that I'm interested in seeing what he can do.
By the way, I think I'll see enough either way, cause Cam is a couple year project anyway - even if he's as good as advertised.

by SoulDawg74 » Sun Feb 13, 2011 12:55 pm
motherscratcher wrote:Triple-S wrote:I don't get it..
SD, you just Andrew Luck is the finest prospect in the draft, had he declared.
Why not just wait a year until he comes out, instead of burning a pick on Vince Young II?
I could understand that, hell, I would be in full support of drafting Luck this year, had he not declared.
The truth is we have no idea what position the Browns will be in next year. Maybe they are drafting #11 and have 5 teams ahead of them that need a QB and no good option will remain.
If you are convinced you still need a QB, and you are equally convinced that Cam might be that QB, then you have to take your shot, even if you like Luck better.
I'm not saying that's what I want or what I do. I'm just saying that's the thinking and it isn't unreasonable.
Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 3 guests