Moderators: peeker643, swerb, mitch
by swerb » Wed Jan 26, 2011 4:41 pm
by peeker643 » Wed Jan 26, 2011 5:13 pm
swerb wrote:127 Hours
by e0y2e3 » Wed Jan 26, 2011 5:16 pm

by peeker643 » Wed Jan 26, 2011 5:21 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:It's pretty freaking good Peeks.
Ain't read the book, but damn good movie. Franco is fantastic.
by e0y2e3 » Wed Jan 26, 2011 5:54 pm

by Cerebral_DownTime » Wed Jan 26, 2011 6:50 pm
by peeker643 » Wed Jan 26, 2011 7:09 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Ugghhhh....... It was ok, not great. Now everyone has a hard on for Danny Boyle.
Always with the Trainspotting and Slumdog....... no one ever mentions The Beach or Shallow Grave. I wonder why.
by e0y2e3 » Wed Jan 26, 2011 7:10 pm

by e0y2e3 » Wed Jan 26, 2011 7:12 pm

by Cerebral_DownTime » Wed Jan 26, 2011 7:18 pm
by e0y2e3 » Wed Jan 26, 2011 7:20 pm

by peeker643 » Wed Jan 26, 2011 7:31 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:And wait a second, you still have a blockbuster?
by e0y2e3 » Wed Jan 26, 2011 7:32 pm

by Cerebral_DownTime » Wed Jan 26, 2011 7:47 pm
by peeker643 » Wed Jan 26, 2011 7:58 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:If you're going to the video store, pick up a copy of This Is England or White Lightnin'.
by mitch » Wed Jan 26, 2011 8:11 pm
by Rat_Tail » Wed Jan 26, 2011 8:28 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:I hated Pinnapple Express.
That said my Inner Freaks and Geeks love was fulfilled seeing Franco put on that great of an acting display. Guy has mad talent but instead of using it has traditionally just picked weird ass roles that amuse him.
by peeker643 » Wed Jan 26, 2011 11:12 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Ugghhhh....... It was ok, not great. Now everyone has a hard on for Danny Boyle.
Always with the Trainspotting and Slumdog....... no one ever mentions The Beach or Shallow Grave. I wonder why.
by mitch » Wed Jan 26, 2011 11:18 pm
peeker643 wrote: Looking forward to watching both Trainspotting and 28 Days Later tonight.
by peeker643 » Wed Jan 26, 2011 11:24 pm
mitch wrote:peeker643 wrote: Looking forward to watching both Trainspotting and 28 Days Later tonight.
Hopefully your head won't end up hurting even worse trying to decypher the VERY thick Scottish accents in Transpotting.
by e0y2e3 » Wed Jan 26, 2011 11:53 pm

by peeker643 » Thu Jan 27, 2011 12:02 am
e0y2e3 wrote:The both of those are too much for one night, split em up, do yourself a favor. That said I love both dearly and the accents are worth it (and easier than Snatch and Lock Stock, FWIW)
by e0y2e3 » Thu Jan 27, 2011 12:44 am

by JCoz » Thu Jan 27, 2011 12:52 am
e0y2e3 wrote:If you liked Snatch you also gotta watch Lock Stock and Two Smoking Barrels. It's the better brother movie, FWIW. Although thickest of thick accents. Snatch and Lock Stock are the only two movies I've ever wished for subtitles on.
by motherscratcher » Thu Jan 27, 2011 1:22 am
JCoz wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:If you liked Snatch you also gotta watch Lock Stock and Two Smoking Barrels. It's the better brother movie, FWIW. Although thickest of thick accents. Snatch and Lock Stock are the only two movies I've ever wished for subtitles on.
Lock Stock is definitely good, but the better of the two?
Not close IMO.
Better talent, better storyline, better soundtrack in Snatch.
But yah, you are right that anyone that liked snatch should see lock stock.
by motherscratcher » Thu Jan 27, 2011 1:25 am
e0y2e3 wrote:If you liked Snatch you also gotta watch Lock Stock and Two Smoking Barrels. It's the better brother movie, FWIW. Although thickest of thick accents. Snatch and Lock Stock are the only two movies I've ever wished for subtitles on.
by JCoz » Thu Jan 27, 2011 1:28 am
motherscratcher wrote:Maybe it's because I saw Lock Stock about 20 times before snatch came out. I dig it a lot.
But that's a matter of opinion.
What I really want to know is how the hell Peeker went the last 15 years without seeing Trainspotting.
by e0y2e3 » Thu Jan 27, 2011 1:39 am

by Cerebral_DownTime » Thu Jan 27, 2011 1:42 am
by RedDawg53 » Thu Jan 27, 2011 1:44 am
by e0y2e3 » Thu Jan 27, 2011 1:53 am

by JCoz » Thu Jan 27, 2011 1:57 am
e0y2e3 wrote:Yeah it is, it includes Inception (which should win best screenplay) as the worst acted and worst ending for a nominee ever.
by e0y2e3 » Thu Jan 27, 2011 2:01 am

by JCoz » Thu Jan 27, 2011 2:04 am
e0y2e3 wrote:You gonna tell me you didn't know the ending ten minutes before you saw it? Most predictable shit ever, which is fine if the general acting of the film doesn't suck ass.
Was the easiest and most predictable way out of the most brilliant idea I have seen in a long time. Ending was set to do nothing more than leave the door open for a box office sequel.
by e0y2e3 » Thu Jan 27, 2011 2:06 am

by JCoz » Thu Jan 27, 2011 2:08 am
e0y2e3 wrote:Where in the fuck did you get that the top fell?
Seriously?
Were you high?
We don't know what happened to the top. That's that point.
by JCoz » Thu Jan 27, 2011 2:10 am
by e0y2e3 » Thu Jan 27, 2011 2:13 am

by JCoz » Thu Jan 27, 2011 2:16 am
by JCoz » Thu Jan 27, 2011 2:18 am
Nolan explains that to blatantly state whether or not Cobb was dreaming would not only be a disservice to the film (and its audience), but that people obsessed with finding the answer are missing the point entirely:
“There can’t be anything in the film that tells you one way or another because then the ambiguity at the end of the film would just be a mistake … It would represent a failure of the film to communicate something. But it’s not a mistake. I put that cut there at the end, imposing an ambiguity from outside the film. That always felt the right ending to me — it always felt like the appropriate ‘kick’ to me….The real point of the scene — and this is what I tell people — is that Cobb isn’t looking at the top. He’s looking at his kids. He’s left it behind. That’s the emotional significance of the thing.”
by e0y2e3 » Thu Jan 27, 2011 2:20 am

by JCoz » Thu Jan 27, 2011 2:27 am
e0y2e3 wrote:Seriously, you don't see it not falling and it only wobbling as a cheap attempt to take a predictable ending to something we argue about on a message board?
^ my point. sad, predictable end. WITH THE SEQUAL CHANCE OUT THERE~
*and that quote you just quoted is a punt that dodges the answer entirely
EOD: bad acting = bad movie
by JCoz » Thu Jan 27, 2011 2:28 am
e0y2e3 wrote:EOD: bad acting = bad movie
by peeker643 » Thu Jan 27, 2011 2:32 am
by JCoz » Thu Jan 27, 2011 2:56 am
peeker643 wrote:'28 Days ' was well worth the scurrying around for it.
Well worth it. Liked it a lot better than Zombieland fwiw.
by peeker643 » Thu Jan 27, 2011 3:39 am
JCoz wrote:peeker643 wrote:'28 Days ' was well worth the scurrying around for it.
Well worth it. Liked it a lot better than Zombieland fwiw.
Did you actually like Zombieland?
Was it in the same vein or another?
by JCoz » Thu Jan 27, 2011 3:58 am
peeker643 wrote:JCoz wrote:peeker643 wrote:'28 Days ' was well worth the scurrying around for it.
Well worth it. Liked it a lot better than Zombieland fwiw.
Did you actually like Zombieland?
Was it in the same vein or another?
Same vein in that it dealt with the undead. But it was more of a lark with Woody Harrelson.
Just saw someone else mention Zombieland above someplace. Zombieland was a popcorn movie.
28 Days much darker and more serious and layered with much more than zombies. More of an indictment of the living and human nature IMO.
by peeker643 » Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:56 am
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:If you're going to the video store, pick up a copy of This Is England or White Lightnin'.
by motherscratcher » Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:25 am
peeker643 wrote:Cerebral_DownTime wrote:If you're going to the video store, pick up a copy of This Is England or White Lightnin'.
Another excellent suggestion. 'This is England' was tremendous. I always thought, because of a geocentric worldview, that Stephen Graham was an American actor. Dude's in gangster movies and plays Capone in Boardwalk Empire fer crissakes and he LOOKS like many of my wife's relatives.
The dude's as British as the Queen.
Awesome flick.
And those who can stream Netflix can watch it as soon as you want. Worth a view for sure.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Fri Jan 28, 2011 4:59 am
motherscratcher wrote:peeker643 wrote:Cerebral_DownTime wrote:If you're going to the video store, pick up a copy of This Is England or White Lightnin'.
Another excellent suggestion. 'This is England' was tremendous. I always thought, because of a geocentric worldview, that Stephen Graham was an American actor. Dude's in gangster movies and plays Capone in Boardwalk Empire fer crissakes and he LOOKS like many of my wife's relatives.
The dude's as British as the Queen.
Awesome flick.
And those who can stream Netflix can watch it as soon as you want. Worth a view for sure.
Wait, Capone from Boardwalk Empire is a fuckin' Limey?
Huh
Return to Movies, Music, TV, Books, Pop Culture
Users browsing this forum: motherscratcher and 4 guests
