Text Size

Cleveland Browns & The NFL

One & Only Official Cam Newton Discussion Thread

Talk Browns football and discuss the NFL here.

Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby JCoz » Fri Jan 14, 2011 7:19 pm

jb wrote:^^^^

and ben's from his scrambling.

Goose, Gander.

Then again, what does it matter. He's still bigger than many NFL LBers.


So was Culpepper.

And no, to compare the adjustments defenses had to make for Bens scrambling (Read: Minimum) to the entire defensive gameplans suited to make Cam throw instead of run is not a good one.

I'm not nearly as certain he will bust as I am with Locker, I just think you aren't tempering your projections with the difference his running will make on his passing options in the NFL vs CFB.
"I won’t tell you exactly what it’s about, but this is typical of what might happen,'' he said. "I said, ‘Tom, do you want to do this?’ He said, ‘I don’t think I do. I think it’s too much or too strong or whatever.’ I said, ‘well, we might have to.’ And he goes, ‘well, if we have to, then you’ve got to tell me, because I won’t do it.’ And I said, ‘OK, then I might have to tell you. Fine.'''

Our fearless leader in the Draft War Room getting his hands dirty.

Yay for us.
User avatar
JCoz
Donnie, you're out of your element
 
Posts: 4109
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 12:57 pm
Favorite Player: Competency
Least Favorite Player: Gene Smith

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby peeker643 » Fri Jan 14, 2011 7:23 pm

jb wrote:Peeker, Sperg Wynn was not pre-injry Minnesota Daunte Culpepper


Not sure what you're saying to me JB. He's not fullback big like $cam? That's all I can think of.

Other than smh/at 6'5" 225 now not being big enough for ya.

Good. Maybe he'd be more prone to learning how to navigate in the pocket and actually become a passer than tuck and run as a second resort.
"Great minds think alike. The opposite is also true."

"None of us is as dumb as all of us."


Follow me on Twitter at http://twitter.com/peeker643
User avatar
peeker643
Duly Noted
 
Posts: 21292
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 2:33 pm
Favorite Player: Smokey Rowe
Least Favorite Player: Dingle Stetson

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby Madre Hill, Superstar » Fri Jan 14, 2011 7:38 pm

Did Rich make a bet with JB that he can out SoulDawg SoulDawg?
"The fucking Who...... If I want to watch old people run around ill go set fire to a nursing home." - CDT
User avatar
Madre Hill, Superstar
Eternal Optimist
 
Posts: 4596
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 8:06 am
Location: Parma, OH
Favorite Player: The Playa
Least Favorite Player: The Game

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby skatingtripods » Fri Jan 14, 2011 7:38 pm

I cannot believe this thread has over 100 replies in 10 hours.
A God Damn dead man would understand that if a minor league bus in any city took a real sharp right turn, a Zack McCalister would likely fall out. - Lead Pipe
User avatar
skatingtripods
Sloth Duncan
 
Posts: 13339
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 1:27 pm
Location: Cleveland
Favorite Player: Mike Aviles
Least Favorite Player: Every Detroit Tiger

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby Ziner » Fri Jan 14, 2011 7:39 pm

Madre Hill, Superstar wrote:Did Rich make a bet with JB that he can out SoulDawg SoulDawg?


+1

I almost posted this earlier.
In the end, we're all "only for a limited time," you guys.
User avatar
Ziner
Tot-Lovin' Hippy
 
Posts: 7044
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 5:04 pm
Location: Boulder, Colorado
Favorite Player: Tater Tots
Least Favorite Player: Yam Fries

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby peeker643 » Fri Jan 14, 2011 7:45 pm

Ziner wrote:
Madre Hill, Superstar wrote:Did Rich make a bet with JB that he can out SoulDawg SoulDawg?


+1

I almost posted this earlier.


You're all idiots along with me.

There is one wise man in this thread and it is He Who Created It. No one else has the brass balls to say it or the foresight to see Cam's value as the 6th pick in this draft.

Clearly.

Still, I love the short bus ridin' dumbass. He's lovable. Can't help it. Plus he'll just write it off to being provocative down the road.

:group:
"Great minds think alike. The opposite is also true."

"None of us is as dumb as all of us."


Follow me on Twitter at http://twitter.com/peeker643
User avatar
peeker643
Duly Noted
 
Posts: 21292
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 2:33 pm
Favorite Player: Smokey Rowe
Least Favorite Player: Dingle Stetson

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby FUDU » Fri Jan 14, 2011 8:14 pm

jb wrote:You play Colt next season and the season after that. Then you know for sure whether he is lightening in a bottle or Eric Zeier. Meanwhile, Cam abides. Learns. get's ready.

If Colt is the shizznit you play Cam in mop up roles where he can look like god sham god. With his skills, grooming, and teams' desperations, I guarantee cam nets you two first round draft choices, just at the time we are gonna have our team fecal matter together to make a run if Patches and Heckert are what Walrus hopes they are.

If Colt is meh, feh, or blows, you have your franchise QB ready to go. You aren't back to the drawing board, hoping.

Cam's stats are really solid. Despite rust and yips in the BCS bowl, Cam has a pretty nice throwing motion. It isn't some BS crank up or hard side arm. His comletion percentage was damn good, and except for the BCS game he's shown he's pretty accurate, esp given his other gifts. Cam Newton isn't ready to play right away by any stretch, but he is a once in a lifetime talent and he is a winner, big time. He's Big Jen who runs about 1.0 faster in the 40.

Lastly, I can do this yet again, but the Browns are heded for a reboot and rebuild yet again. The D must be rebuilt and coached up. The O needs to learn a new system and retool to fit the WCO. I hope those of you pissing and moaning about close losses and 5 - 11 this year STFU when we look like an expansion team going 2 - 14 next season, if there is a next season, casue it is coming as sure as I'm typing this.


Now is the perfect time to do this and build the foundation. cam or no Cam, it's gonna take 3 seasons to be any good at all, minimum. May as well buy the stock with the highest upside.
A fairly reasonable break down JB, but I take issue with the bold font, obviously, b/c I made it bold so it would stand out, you follow.

Please explain to me how you go from "Colt possible being the shizznits and using Cam in mop up" to "if Colt is feh you have your franchise QB ready to go"? Why the inherent assumption that Cam is a franchise QB that is ready to go throughout the entire process you mentioned, all the while not even remotely hinting Colt presumably is, based on his college background and stats (which are quite a bit more than solid) when all you have to go on with Cam is a college background and stats.

You're nitpicking what you see in them and don't see in them, IMHO.
Criminals in this town used to believe in things...honor, respect.
"I heard your dog is sick, so bought you this shovel"

2011 TCF Stratomatic Champ
User avatar
FUDU
 
Posts: 12309
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 3:02 am
Favorite Player: Me
Least Favorite Player: You

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby Erie Warrior » Fri Jan 14, 2011 8:35 pm

Right now, I take Tyrod before Cam or Locker, and Gabbert before any of them.

And of those mentioned above, are any of them appreciably better then Colt? And I'm not just talking about arm strength or mobility, but actually playing the position. The talent in this draft is not at the QB position.
This natural coozy comes free with every Miller Time
Image
User avatar
Erie Warrior
Goose Slayer
 
Posts: 6037
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 6:50 pm
Location: Hampton, VA
Favorite Player: 1995 Indians
Least Favorite Player: Global Warming

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby Cerebral_DownTime » Fri Jan 14, 2011 8:44 pm

peeker643 wrote:
Ziner wrote:
Madre Hill, Superstar wrote:Did Rich make a bet with JB that he can out SoulDawg SoulDawg?


+1

I almost posted this earlier.


You're all idiots along with me.

There is one wise man in this thread and it is He Who Created It. No one else has the brass balls to say it or the foresight to see Cam's value as the 6th pick in this draft.

Clearly.

Still, I love the short bus ridin' dumbass. He's lovable. Can't help it. Plus he'll just write it off to being provocative down the road.

:group:



Shut up, cunt.

CAM NEWTUN IS DA BIZZZOMB, DAWG!

HE WILL SHUNT COLT MCCOY OFF TEH FIELD AND TAKE OVER WIT HIS AM8ZING SKILLZ TO PAY DA BILLZ!

TEH OMG SO CRAZY.
Listen to me Randy, it doesn't matter if you're white, or black, or a Sasquatch even. As long as you follow your dreams, no matter how crazy or against the law it is. Except for Sasquatch, if you're a Sasquatch the rules are different.- Meatwad

http://www.wolf-pac.com/
User avatar
Cerebral_DownTime
Go f#%k yourself
 
Posts: 13667
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2007 4:31 am
Location: Galloway Ohio
Favorite Player: Fenrir
Least Favorite Player: King George III

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby peeker643 » Fri Jan 14, 2011 9:10 pm

Cerebral_DownTime wrote:
peeker643 wrote:
Ziner wrote:
Madre Hill, Superstar wrote:Did Rich make a bet with JB that he can out SoulDawg SoulDawg?


+1

I almost posted this earlier.


You're all idiots along with me.

There is one wise man in this thread and it is He Who Created It. No one else has the brass balls to say it or the foresight to see Cam's value as the 6th pick in this draft.

Clearly.

Still, I love the short bus ridin' dumbass. He's lovable. Can't help it. Plus he'll just write it off to being provocative down the road.

:group:



Shut up, cunt.

CAM NEWTUN IS DA BIZZZOMB, DAWG!

HE WILL SHUNT COLT MCCOY OFF TEH FIELD AND TAKE OVER WIT HIS AM8ZING SKILLZ TO PAY DA BILLZ!

TEH OMG SO CRAZY.



This thread keeps getting better.
"Great minds think alike. The opposite is also true."

"None of us is as dumb as all of us."


Follow me on Twitter at http://twitter.com/peeker643
User avatar
peeker643
Duly Noted
 
Posts: 21292
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 2:33 pm
Favorite Player: Smokey Rowe
Least Favorite Player: Dingle Stetson

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby hiko » Fri Jan 14, 2011 9:11 pm

This argument is fruitless, as it is clear that Holmgren hired Shurmur so that the team could tank bad enough to get the #1 overall pick and Andrew Luck.

Jeenyus.

Thus we get our football LeBron and a system that'll keep his ass locked up with us whether he likes it or not.

Dubble jeenyus.
User avatar
hiko
 
Posts: 1052
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 2:13 am
Favorite Player: Gray
Least Favorite Player: Black and White

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby Fire Marshall Bill » Fri Jan 14, 2011 9:12 pm

jb...guarantee us that Cam will not be Ryan Leaf and Colt goes somewhere and becomes Drew Brees...........

Erie Warrior wrote:The talent in this draft is not at the QB position.


A million times this ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Sheeesh!
Hope is a moment now long past
The Shadow of Death is the one I cast
Koo koo ka joob....I am the Walrus
User avatar
Fire Marshall Bill
 
Posts: 2691
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 11:00 pm
Favorite Player: Killer Bean
Least Favorite Player: Charcoal&Piss

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby leadpipe » Fri Jan 14, 2011 10:34 pm

JB,
The two issues with Cam, which you have touched upon, seem to be 1. While his accuracy improved, it still gets a questionable grade. and 2. He's never been in anything close to a pro offense.

Keeping my opinions on those two topics aside, let's say you, or someone else convinces me that he will overcome those. Well, I still have another big problem, that is, I'm not sure this type of quarterback can get to week 18.....or maybe 20 by next season, in close to top form.

What happened to Vick is par for the course. He was NOT the same player we saw week 5. And I realize Vick is small, and Newton a horse, but his style of play.....hell, you need multiple running backs nowadays. Much like Vince Young ceasing to run away from guys like they were in middle school, Cam ain't bolin' over guys at the next level and prancing back to the huddle.

So, for me personally to draft this type of QB, I'm not sure that I can be foggy about points 1 and 2, because even if he's better than that, I think he's real lucky to answer the bell when you need him to.

At the end of the day, game changing and all, the guys that hold the Lombardi 10 years from now are still going to look much more like Brady, Brees and Peyton than Cam, Timmy and Vince.

Aaron Rodgers is the prototype as the modern NFL's next big thing. Mobile enough to make plays, but not so mobile its at the forefront of his game.

Passing the football, and passing it accurately is still killing everything else out there.

This being said, I'm not going to freak if they take him, cause there's cats there that know more than me.....but someone's gotta convince me that athleticism can trump someone that can PASS the friggin' ball
User avatar
leadpipe
The Reverend
 
Posts: 6148
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 2:58 am

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby SoulDawg74 » Sat Jan 15, 2011 12:34 am

peeker643 wrote:
jb wrote:This is a place holder to be completed at aproximately 9:30 am EST on 1/14/11 cause like I have to work now.

_______________________

Ran L 8, I am now ready.

Since when did it become a rule that a college QB had to be absolutely, positively, NFL ready in order to draft him n the top third of the draft ? I am guessing when the slary cap made it an imperative for this kid to play right away, and fans went from patient to the SD view of the world. That is to say, I WANT AN OOMPA LOOPA AND I WANT IT NOW!

Well kids, the CBA as you knew it that excluded a rookie salary scale is now dead. DEAD I TELL YOU (see my bseball bat I'm waiving?) The rules have changed. This draft will probbaly occur, but no signings until a new CBA is in place. A rookie salary cap is one of two hills the owners will die on (18 game RS is the other) .

So you draft Cam Newton at 6 overall as the Browns. here's why.

hve you seen the kid play over a body of his regual season?

Duh.

For most, this would be good enough. But Peeker's bllod supply to his brain has been earratic as of late, so I continue.

The rookie cap and the overall suckitude of the Browns not having a high cap number mens you can carry and start McCoy and his 3rd round money for the next season, maybe even the season after in my opinion. This allows Cam to learn the NFL in the same manner that ne Steve Mcnair did when he went 4th overall and was similarly steak tartar as far as being Sunday ready. All he did was have a borderline HOF career.

You play Colt next season and the season after that. Then you know for sure whether he is lightening in a bottle or Eric Zeier. Meanwhile, Cam abides. Learns. get's ready.

If Colt is the shizznit you play Cam in mop up roles where he can look like god sham god. With his skills, grooming, and teams' desperations, I guarantee cam nets you two first round draft choices, just at the time we are gonna have our team fecal matter together to make a run if Patches and Heckert are what Walrus hopes they are.

If Colt is meh, feh, or blows, you have your franchise QB ready to go. You aren't back to the drawing board, hoping.

Cam's stats are really solid. Despite rust and yips in the BCS bowl, Cam has a pretty nice throwing motion. It isn't some BS crank up or hard side arm. His comletion percentage was damn good, and except for the BCS game he's shown he's pretty accurate, esp given his other gifts. Cam Newton isn't ready to play right away by any stretch, but he is a once in a lifetime talent and he is a winner, big time. He's Big Jen who runs about 1.0 faster in the 40.

Lastly, I can do this yet again, but the Browns are heded for a reboot and rebuild yet again. The D must be rebuilt and coached up. The O needs to learn a new system and retool to fit the WCO. I hope those of you pissing and moaning about close losses and 5 - 11 this year STFU when we look like an expansion team going 2 - 14 next season, if there is a next season, casue it is coming as sure as I'm typing this.


Now is the perfect time to do this and build the foundation. cam or no Cam, it's gonna take 3 seasons to be any good at all, minimum. May as well buy the stock with the highest upside.


Excellent. Two hours late and that's it? He's big, strong and doesn't have terrible mechanics. Awesome. Thanks for all of that.

Allow me to tell you why I don't want him at #6.

1. You can get immediate help for your rebuild w/o taking that leap.
2. You don't know if McCoy is the shit as you said. If he is then there is no slate of games for Cam to get time and reps.

And here, some actual objective stuff from others who know more than you and this idiot:

Final word: Cam Newton will be the most polarizing player in the 2011 NFL Draft. It's easy to see why some will fall madly in love him and why others will go mad if their team drafts him.

Newton is a rare talent. With his size, athleticism and arm strength, Newton has more potential than any player in this year's draft. That alone will get him picked in the first round. He also displays great leadership skills that are impossible to teach. In only one year at Auburn, the Tigers rallied around Newton and he led them to a national title.

But his negatives may scare some teams off completely. Newton will have to greatly refine all of his mechanical flaws if he wants to succeed in the pros. His field vision and pocket poise are average, at best.


Great! Only ALL of his mechanics need refined. That sounds hopeful. Lacks poise? Against a college rush where his line dominated 90% of the time? Tremendous. That should NOT be an issue in the NFL at all.

This one's worse (http://tommeltonscouting.wordpress.com/ ... ng-report/) :

The comparison I would make
is Vince Young with a cleaner throwing motion and better arm strength, but probably a little less impressive accuracy. However, Vince Young would very likely not be picked as high now as he was when he initially entered the draft. The reason Newton will be drafted as a QB is because he has demonstrated incredible potential this year doing the things he has done this year in the SEC. Obviously the offense he plays in does not translate to the NFL at all, and it coaches him to make one read and then look to scramble to extend the play, but the key component of evaluating Newton will be evaluating his intelligence and his intangibles. If he is a smart guy and he can impress scouts and coaches with X’s and O’s at the combine or any other time they interview him, his stock will shoot up. And if they talk to him and come to the conclusion that he has learned from his past mistakes and has a good work ethic then his stock will shoot up even more.

It’s tricky to evaluate him because you can look at him and see him for what he is and say: He’s a great athlete that can throw the ball really far and make great plays with his legs. That doesn’t sound like a good NFL QB. But then some people will look at him and say: If I can work with him for a year or two to improve his footwork and clean up his mechanics and get him comfortable going through progressions and reads, as well as working from under center regularly so he can learn to do 3, 5 and 7 step drops, then boy… I could have a revolutionary talent on my hands.

I personally think he will end up something like Vince Young. He will be able to win some games despite his sometimes erratic accuracy, but ultimately I think he will be a disappointment compared to what he was able to do in college. Too many things have to go right for him to overcome his issues as a prospect including: dramatically improving his footwork, teaching him how to do 3, 5 and 7 step drops, teaching him a pro-style offense and helping him learn how to go through more than one progression consistently, developing actual pocket poise to the point where he can buy time in the pocket without scrambling outside of the tackle box… There’s just a laundry list of things he has to work on, and even if he has great ability and good work ethic it will be a serious chore to overcome all of this. Best case scenario I think he becomes a 56-58% passer who can put up some big games.


http://nfldraftmonsters.com/scouting/sc ... am-newton/

As I said it was tough to find a lot of window throws on Newton, and what I did find when charting them, wasn’t very impressive (that amazing sideline fourth down conversion against Alabama not withstanding). He has a tendency to throw the ball high, and not spin it cleanly when throwing into tight coverage, especially on shorter routes. Auburn tried a WR mid screen early against Alabama, and the receiver actually had to jump to catch the football. The lost time in the receiver resetting his feet, allowed the Crimson Tide linebacker to shed his block and make the tackle for no gain.

Mechanical:This is quite possibly the weakest area of Newton’s game. His mechanics are quite often down right awful. He has a propensity to throw off balance and off his back foot, even when not facing any measurable pressure. Both throws I mentioned above featured Newton doing some sort of ridiculous “hop pass” despite have absolutely no reason to. A good NFL QB coach will do nothing but footwork drills for the first few weeks he’s in camp.


Pre/Post snap reads: Another glaring weakness in Newton’s game is the lack of pre-snap reads. This isn’t his fault, it’s a product of Auburn’s offensive style, but taking the audible ability out of the hands of your quarterback, does a disservice in preparing him for life in the NFL. Since all of the calls come from the sideline, Newton will be behind the curve in diagnosing defensive looks at the NFL level.

Post snap, Newton has been given mostly simplified half field reads, thanks to the offensive system he’s in. Most pass plays are designed 1-2 reads and then for Newton to take off. We’ve seen quarterbacks struggle mightily to transition from this type of offense before (Vince Young). I’m not saying Newton can’t, I’m just saying he certainly has his work cut out for him.


Overall Newton is an intriguing prospect. He will be a project for whatever teams eventually drafts him. Personally given the amount of work that’s going to have to go into him, as well as the potential character risk, I wouldn’t touch him before the second round. You just don’t make a guy with as many things swirling above him as Cam Newton, the face of your franchise. That said, given the raw physicality, size, and athleticism, I can definitely see a team that thinks they can coach him up, snapping him up in the late first round, where salaries aren’t prohibitively high to sit a guy for awhile.


http://blogs.ajc.com/atlanta-falcons-bl ... lcons_blog

Heisman Trophy winner Cam Newton, of Auburn and Westlake High, needs to stay in college and work on his God awful mechanics, according to Russ Lande, a former NFL Scout, who heads the War Room for the Sporting News.

Lande, who had his early Mock Draft up in Sporting News Today on Wednesday, doesn’t have Newton going in the first round. He does have three other quarterbacks being selected in the first round.

Lande considers Newton to be two to three years away from being ready to play in the NFL as a traditional quarterback.


I'll provide more if you like. Those were just going down the scouting report lists. Nothing cherry-picked and you can do the same. Tried to hit on the upside as well because clearly an athlete with that size and arm has upside.

It's just not #6 worthy when you need so much more.

But what do I know?


SD:

Ben went at 11 IIRC , Josh Freeeman went at 15 we passes on both , and if they were redrafted tommorrow both would go #1 respectively in their drafts .

When will we learn.


SoulDawg
SoulDawg74
 
Posts: 3036
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 2:36 pm

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby peeker643 » Sat Jan 15, 2011 12:50 am

SoulDawg74 wrote:SD:

Ben went at 11 IIRC , Josh Freeeman went at 15 we passes on both , and if they were redrafted tommorrow both would go #1 respectively in their drafts .

When will we learn.


SoulDawg


Take a side. First ya wanted him at 6, then Tuesday ya didn't and Friday night ya did again? Can't wait for next Tuesday.

You're like a 13 yr old girl in puppy love every time we turn around.

Whatcha want. One answer, no waffling, no changing before the last sentence is out of your mouth.

Just once.

Please. ;-) ;) :wink:
"Great minds think alike. The opposite is also true."

"None of us is as dumb as all of us."


Follow me on Twitter at http://twitter.com/peeker643
User avatar
peeker643
Duly Noted
 
Posts: 21292
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 2:33 pm
Favorite Player: Smokey Rowe
Least Favorite Player: Dingle Stetson

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby motherscratcher » Sat Jan 15, 2011 2:05 am

SoulDawg74 wrote:SD:

Ben went at 11 IIRC , Josh Freeeman went at 15 we passes on both , and if they were redrafted tommorrow both would go #1 respectively in their drafts .

When will we learn.


SoulDawg


Exactly at what point this season did Josh Freeman slap Mark Sanchez's cock out of your mouth?
I got this one rule. I never go out with girls who say "bitchin'".
User avatar
motherscratcher
Little Larry Sellers
 
Posts: 6784
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 10:14 pm
Location: CDT's Garage
Favorite Player: Ernie Camacho
Least Favorite Player: Jose Mesa

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby Cerebral_DownTime » Sat Jan 15, 2011 2:15 am

Josh Freeman is a pretty good QB.
Listen to me Randy, it doesn't matter if you're white, or black, or a Sasquatch even. As long as you follow your dreams, no matter how crazy or against the law it is. Except for Sasquatch, if you're a Sasquatch the rules are different.- Meatwad

http://www.wolf-pac.com/
User avatar
Cerebral_DownTime
Go f#%k yourself
 
Posts: 13667
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2007 4:31 am
Location: Galloway Ohio
Favorite Player: Fenrir
Least Favorite Player: King George III

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby Mavre » Sat Jan 15, 2011 12:45 pm

Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Josh Freeman is a pretty average QB.
Up yours JoBu
User avatar
Mavre
 
Posts: 43
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 1:54 pm
Location: Toledo, OH
Favorite Player: Colt Mccoy
Least Favorite Player: Offensive Line

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby SoulDawg74 » Sat Jan 15, 2011 1:53 pm

motherscratcher wrote:
SoulDawg74 wrote:SD:

Ben went at 11 IIRC , Josh Freeeman went at 15 we passes on both , and if they were redrafted tommorrow both would go #1 respectively in their drafts .

When will we learn.


SoulDawg


Exactly at what point this season did Josh Freeman slap Mark Sanchez's cock out of your mouth?


SD:

Why you slovenly slut.

I called for the choice of Sanchez over Quinn and Brady on realtime,
your the 2 bit whore who had brady's cock down your throat and Anderson dick up your funky ass .

Josh Freeman was supposedly even less NFL ready than Newton with similar athleticism , butt as usual Cleveland had their eyes closed , and as it turned out a kid just as talented as McNabb when we bypassed him wasn't even invited to camp.

Freeman is the product of good coaching to have come this far this fast , and a big reason Holmgren selected shurmur so someone on staff has the wherewithal to do the same with oue QB's albeit Colt , Brown or Newton or Gabbert , or whomever in the future .

Mangy new as much about handling QB's as Mumbles new about People when he shit canned Kosar and was surprised at the backlash.

SoulDawg
SoulDawg74
 
Posts: 3036
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 2:36 pm

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby SoulDawg74 » Sat Jan 15, 2011 1:55 pm

Mavre wrote:
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Josh Freeman is a pretty average QB.


SD:

No shit , you think he's as good as Brady Quinn
SoulDawg74
 
Posts: 3036
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 2:36 pm

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby motherscratcher » Sat Jan 15, 2011 4:23 pm

SoulDawg74 wrote:
motherscratcher wrote:
SoulDawg74 wrote:SD:

Ben went at 11 IIRC , Josh Freeeman went at 15 we passes on both , and if they were redrafted tommorrow both would go #1 respectively in their drafts .

When will we learn.


SoulDawg


Exactly at what point this season did Josh Freeman slap Mark Sanchez's cock out of your mouth?


SD:

Why you slovenly slut.

I called for the choice of Sanchez over Quinn and Brady on realtime,
your the 2 bit whore who had brady's cock down your throat and Anderson dick up your funky ass .

Josh Freeman was supposedly even less NFL ready than Newton with similar athleticism , butt as usual Cleveland had their eyes closed , and as it turned out a kid just as talented as McNabb when we bypassed him wasn't even invited to camp.

Freeman is the product of good coaching to have come this far this fast , and a big reason Holmgren selected shurmur so someone on staff has the wherewithal to do the same with oue QB's albeit Colt , Brown or Newton or Gabbert , or whomever in the future .

Mangy new as much about handling QB's as Mumbles new about People when he shit canned Kosar and was surprised at the backlash.

SoulDawg


Well, that's what I'm saying SD. You were all over Dirty Sanchez and made about 492 posts bemoaning the fact that we passed over him because we had Brady (who I acknoweldge you NEVER liked). Now that Sanchez is a turnover machine and Josh Freeman is coming into his own, you are all over Freeman.

And FTR, I NEVER had Andersons dick up my funky ass. Well, maybe a little bit in 2007, but even then it was just the tip. Not last year at all.

As far as Brady goes, have you not seen him with his shirt off?

Ultimately I am with you, though. I really like what I'm seeing out of Freeman and I would love to have him on the Browns. But, I'm not going to rewrite history now and start shouting about it as if I was on the Josh train since draft day 2009 pissed off about passing him over.

I am still pissed about passing up Clay Jr, though.
I got this one rule. I never go out with girls who say "bitchin'".
User avatar
motherscratcher
Little Larry Sellers
 
Posts: 6784
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 10:14 pm
Location: CDT's Garage
Favorite Player: Ernie Camacho
Least Favorite Player: Jose Mesa

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby gameface » Sat Jan 15, 2011 5:05 pm

No offense Scratch, cause your sense of humor is always good to me, but I do not get the Sanchez hating. At all.

Kid is a second year QB, and has made and does make young QB mistakes. But he personally won the Jets a bunch of games this year by being cash money late in the game, and he's playing hurt right now. He does a decent job managing the game. He can make all the throws needed. He's a competitor, and when he gets in trouble, its from trying to do too much. The Jets, by design and philosophy, are not a come from behind team. But in games that they play team ball, Sanchez has been very solid. He has also been vic'd a few times by both Edwards and Holmes dropping big passes.

Sanchez may not be Peyton Manning Jr. But you could do a hella lot worse picking a young QB to build your team around. And we have. He's going more than one game into the playoffs two years in a row.

I know why Mangini didn't draft him, although in hindsight it was a missed opportunity imo. But when Browns' fans case him, it just seems like sour grapes to me.
gameface
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 6:28 pm

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby FUDU » Sat Jan 15, 2011 5:43 pm

[Bob Uecker]

In case you haven't noticed, and judging by the replies you haven't, SD doesn't watch much football. Hence the crazy flip floppin on the QB's in the league.

[/Bob Uecker]
Criminals in this town used to believe in things...honor, respect.
"I heard your dog is sick, so bought you this shovel"

2011 TCF Stratomatic Champ
User avatar
FUDU
 
Posts: 12309
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 3:02 am
Favorite Player: Me
Least Favorite Player: You

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby motherscratcher » Sat Jan 15, 2011 6:22 pm

gameface wrote:No offense Scratch, cause your sense of humor is always good to me, but I do not get the Sanchez hating. At all.

Kid is a second year QB, and has made and does make young QB mistakes. But he personally won the Jets a bunch of games this year by being cash money late in the game, and he's playing hurt right now. He does a decent job managing the game. He can make all the throws needed. He's a competitor, and when he gets in trouble, its from trying to do too much. The Jets, by design and philosophy, are not a come from behind team. But in games that they play team ball, Sanchez has been very solid. He has also been vic'd a few times by both Edwards and Holmes dropping big passes.

Sanchez may not be Peyton Manning Jr. But you could do a hella lot worse picking a young QB to build your team around. And we have. He's going more than one game into the playoffs two years in a row.

I know why Mangini didn't draft him, although in hindsight it was a missed opportunity imo. But when Browns' fans case him, it just seems like sour grapes to me.


It ain't so much about Sanchez as it is about SD hitching his wagon to whoever is looking good right about now. He had his wagon hitched to Sanchez for about a year as a huge missed opportunity until he started throwing picks. Now his wagon is apparently hitched to Freeman.
I got this one rule. I never go out with girls who say "bitchin'".
User avatar
motherscratcher
Little Larry Sellers
 
Posts: 6784
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 10:14 pm
Location: CDT's Garage
Favorite Player: Ernie Camacho
Least Favorite Player: Jose Mesa

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby Cerebral_DownTime » Sat Jan 15, 2011 6:25 pm

Mavre wrote:
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Josh Freeman is a pretty average QB.


Did you see him play this year or bother to look at his numbers before editing my post? He was very good, 25 TD and a 95.9 QB rating.... all as a second year starter.
Listen to me Randy, it doesn't matter if you're white, or black, or a Sasquatch even. As long as you follow your dreams, no matter how crazy or against the law it is. Except for Sasquatch, if you're a Sasquatch the rules are different.- Meatwad

http://www.wolf-pac.com/
User avatar
Cerebral_DownTime
Go f#%k yourself
 
Posts: 13667
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2007 4:31 am
Location: Galloway Ohio
Favorite Player: Fenrir
Least Favorite Player: King George III

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby leadpipe » Sat Jan 15, 2011 6:28 pm

gameface wrote:No offense Scratch, cause your sense of humor is always good to me, but I do not get the Sanchez hating. At all.

Kid is a second year QB, and has made and does make young QB mistakes. But he personally won the Jets a bunch of games this year by being cash money late in the game, and he's playing hurt right now. He does a decent job managing the game. He can make all the throws needed. He's a competitor, and when he gets in trouble, its from trying to do too much. The Jets, by design and philosophy, are not a come from behind team. But in games that they play team ball, Sanchez has been very solid. He has also been vic'd a few times by both Edwards and Holmes dropping big passes.

Sanchez may not be Peyton Manning Jr. But you could do a hella lot worse picking a young QB to build your team around. And we have. He's going more than one game into the playoffs two years in a row.

I know why Mangini didn't draft him, although in hindsight it was a missed opportunity imo. But when Browns' fans case him, it just seems like sour grapes to me.


Sour grapes....or calling it what it is.

There's a wide gap between "Brady Quinn" and "good"

He did NOTHING to win that game last week. Hell, anyone that could hit the broad side of a barn hangs 4 TD's on Indy last week.

Look, in a GREAT place to play QB, they protect him, seems like a good guy......but save a few games in last years playoffs, the guy hasn't been good.

He's young. Can improve......but his biggest problem ILO is that he's not nearly accurate enough. I'm not sure how much more accurate you get by now.

And, my rating has nothing to do with the Browns passing on him or whatever. Just watchin' him play.
User avatar
leadpipe
The Reverend
 
Posts: 6148
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 2:58 am

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby rebelwithoutaclue » Sat Jan 15, 2011 9:57 pm

No offense Scratch, cause your sense of humor is always good to me, but I do not get the Sanchez hating. At all.


It stems from the fact that as per usual with New York QB's the media has been sucking his dick since day one when anyone with half a brain can see that he's been barely better than Derek Anderson. He's an inaccurate, turnover machine with a career completion percentage of 54.4% but because he plays for New York, he's seen as a franchise QB. Put him on Arizona and they'd be writing bust articles already.
Fuck the Browns...
User avatar
rebelwithoutaclue
 
Posts: 3478
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 12:43 pm
Location: Under them Skies of Blue
Favorite Player: Kyrie Irving
Least Favorite Player: Mike Lombardi

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby gameface » Sat Jan 15, 2011 11:46 pm

Uh huh, rookie QB goes to the AFC championship game and it's because he's a creation of the NY media. And anybody could beat the Colts with a 4th quarter drive.

24 years old. Two year starter, two years in the playoffs.

Yeah, that guy really sucks.

Might not be an elite QB, but you could do a lot worse picking a QB in the first round.

And I've seen a lot of Jets games the last two years myself.
gameface
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 6:28 pm

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby rebelwithoutaclue » Sat Jan 15, 2011 11:54 pm

gameface wrote:Uh huh, rookie QB goes to the AFC championship game and it's because he's a creation of the NY media. And anybody could beat the Colts with a 4th quarter drive.



He can thank Jim Caldwell and that god-awful timeout for that Colts win. Sanchez was terrible in that game; 58% completion percentage 0:1 TD:INT ratio. The Jets win despite Sanchez, not because of him. It's a lot like another New York football team and their overrated QB.
Fuck the Browns...
User avatar
rebelwithoutaclue
 
Posts: 3478
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 12:43 pm
Location: Under them Skies of Blue
Favorite Player: Kyrie Irving
Least Favorite Player: Mike Lombardi

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby gameface » Sun Jan 16, 2011 12:06 am

Sanchez on the game winning drive: 3 for 3 for 38 yards. As if your truncated stats tell the whole story.
gameface
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 6:28 pm

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby leadpipe » Sun Jan 16, 2011 1:42 am

gameface wrote:Sanchez on the game winning drive: 3 for 3 for 38 yards. As if your truncated stats tell the whole story.


Dude, say no more. If you claim you've watched a lot of Jets games the last two years, and found Sanchez has played well in many of them......ummm...what can anyone say?

For the record, a dead man would know he had a horrible last two thirds of this season.

Again, don't take it personally. I'm not saying he blows, I'm not saying he can't get better, but Christ, it is what it is, he's not been good. And quarterback is CLEARLY the weakest part of that offense.
User avatar
leadpipe
The Reverend
 
Posts: 6148
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 2:58 am

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby peeker643 » Sun Jan 16, 2011 2:28 am

This isn't about me being an idiot or Cam Newton anymore and I find that to be sad. And if we're going to get derailed every single time SD gets a hard on for some QB or another then I suggest we give up now and burn this site to the ground.

Quarterbacks are his viagara.

Take it with a grain of salt and move along is my recommendation.
"Great minds think alike. The opposite is also true."

"None of us is as dumb as all of us."


Follow me on Twitter at http://twitter.com/peeker643
User avatar
peeker643
Duly Noted
 
Posts: 21292
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 2:33 pm
Favorite Player: Smokey Rowe
Least Favorite Player: Dingle Stetson

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby gameface » Sun Jan 16, 2011 12:05 pm

leadpipe wrote:
Dude, say no more. If you claim you've watched a lot of Jets games the last two years, and found Sanchez has played well in many of them......ummm...what can anyone say?

For the record, a dead man would know he had a horrible last two thirds of this season.

Again, don't take it personally. I'm not saying he blows, I'm not saying he can't get better, but Christ, it is what it is, he's not been good. And quarterback is CLEARLY the weakest part of that offense.


Lead,

I can assure you I'm not dead, and I think your dislike of Sanchez is irrational.

Sanchez had 4 games with a 100+ rating and 4 games with an 80+ rating this season. How that equals a "horrible" 2/3 of a year is some math you need to explain to me. He's "not been good", yet went deep in the playoffs last year and have a win this year. Again, unless someone else is passing the ball, or the Jets run on every down, please tell me how a 2nd year QB is not good yet his team manages to succeed despite him. Because, realistically, it's not possible to have a bad QB and go as far as the Jets have the last two years. Yeah, no shit, he's not carrying them, but he's not retarding them nearly as much as you portray.

Also, it is not easy to be a QB in NY from a press/pressure standpoint.

You obviously think he's a pretender, but I'll give him his due. I respect what he's done, which is play QB competently enough and to contribute enough to help his team make the playoffs two years in a row. In a high profile market, in a tough division.

I guess Matt Ryan blows him away.........or maybe not.



If he was a Brown, fans would be creaming themselves over his potential. That's irrelevant to our argument, but it's also true.
gameface
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 6:28 pm

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby Mavre » Sun Jan 16, 2011 12:45 pm

Cerebral_DownTime wrote:
Mavre wrote:
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Josh Freeman is a pretty average QB.


Did you see him play this year or bother to look at his numbers before editing my post? He was very good, 25 TD and a 95.9 QB rating.... all as a second year starter.


numbers dont lie CDT, Im just in denial
Up yours JoBu
User avatar
Mavre
 
Posts: 43
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 1:54 pm
Location: Toledo, OH
Favorite Player: Colt Mccoy
Least Favorite Player: Offensive Line

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby FUDU » Sun Jan 16, 2011 3:52 pm

gameface wrote:Sanchez on the game winning drive: 3 for 3 for 38 yards. As if your truncated stats tell the whole story.
Really, can you nit pick a smaller sample size to make your point, sheesh.

The guy sucked up the joint for over 58 minutes (to the tune of 0TDs 1INT and a rating of 53) and you're gonna ride 35 seconds and 3-3 as justification for him winning the game? The Jets D and the Colts D not being able to stop the run is why NY is playing today.
Criminals in this town used to believe in things...honor, respect.
"I heard your dog is sick, so bought you this shovel"

2011 TCF Stratomatic Champ
User avatar
FUDU
 
Posts: 12309
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 3:02 am
Favorite Player: Me
Least Favorite Player: You

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby gameface » Sun Jan 16, 2011 4:45 pm

Yep, I will.

Because it's been stated in this thread that Sanchez did nothing to help win the game. Those stats demonstrate the lack of truth in such a statement.

Because with the game on the line, he didn't miss. When they needed to get closer for the FG he threw a perfect pass.

On that drive, to win the game, the Jets ran the ball once, for two yards. Yes sir, that running game really did the trick.

Try these stats: 75 rating for the season, 24 years old, playoffs every year, playoff record 3-1. And he beat Pittsburgh with the Jets' season on the line.

Ooooooo, he really sucks.

You can point out what he did poorly, and as a 2nd year QB it's not surprising that you can find some games or parts of games that he didn't do well. But you're in denial regarding what he did accomplish.
gameface
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 6:28 pm

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby leadpipe » Sun Jan 16, 2011 4:56 pm

gameface wrote:
leadpipe wrote:
Dude, say no more. If you claim you've watched a lot of Jets games the last two years, and found Sanchez has played well in many of them......ummm...what can anyone say?

For the record, a dead man would know he had a horrible last two thirds of this season.

Again, don't take it personally. I'm not saying he blows, I'm not saying he can't get better, but Christ, it is what it is, he's not been good. And quarterback is CLEARLY the weakest part of that offense.


Lead,

I can assure you I'm not dead, and I think your dislike of Sanchez is irrational.

Sanchez had 4 games with a 100+ rating and 4 games with an 80+ rating this season. How that equals a "horrible" 2/3 of a year is some math you need to explain to me. He's "not been good", yet went deep in the playoffs last year and have a win this year. Again, unless someone else is passing the ball, or the Jets run on every down, please tell me how a 2nd year QB is not good yet his team manages to succeed despite him. Because, realistically, it's not possible to have a bad QB and go as far as the Jets have the last two years. Yeah, no shit, he's not carrying them, but he's not retarding them nearly as much as you portray.

Also, it is not easy to be a QB in NY from a press/pressure standpoint.

You obviously think he's a pretender, but I'll give him his due. I respect what he's done, which is play QB competently enough and to contribute enough to help his team make the playoffs two years in a row. In a high profile market, in a tough division.

I guess Matt Ryan blows him away.........or maybe not.



If he was a Brown, fans would be creaming themselves over his potential. That's irrelevant to our argument, but it's also true.


You've got many things wrong here, first and foremost, you don't understand that I don't "dislike" Sanchez, again, seems like a good guy. I'm just not seeing that great a player.

And, Browns fans wouldn't be creaming themselves, because they haven't the team that's going to be able to carry ANY young QB thru trying times.

Next, did you see the Jets give Sanchez the "Trent Dilfer" treatment (speaking of living proof you can be an awful QB and have your team carry you) that is, in the second half last week when he was disallowed to lift his right arm. Then they blow a lead and he floats a jump ball to Braylon and all of the sudden he had a good game?

Lastly, and most importantly, there is an area between "Good" and "blows" and you're quite obtuse to the fact that I'm placing him in that area. All this "winning despite him" you're attributing to me? More like his greatest strengths have been NOT losing the game for the Jets, which is, while admirable, not nearly all that's going to be required somewhere down the road.

Again, quarterback is the worst facet of the Jets offense. Last season it was the worst facet of that team. Doesn't mean he's DA out there. But it means something.

For the record, I hope he does well today. I wanna see some good football. But, if he plays like he has been the second half of the season, or especially last week, they are going to get murdered again. How many weeks did they go this season without an offensive touchdown?

Lastly, Matt Ryan and Sanchez are in the same category, that is, they are both in an extremely fortunate place to play quarterback in. Put those guys in Detroit and they aren't on the cover of any magazine. And, don't overeact - again. Not that they might not earn it one day, but there aren't too many places where you can go behind a great line, have excellent skill guys, an excellent running game and a very good defense.
User avatar
leadpipe
The Reverend
 
Posts: 6148
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 2:58 am

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby FUDU » Sun Jan 16, 2011 4:56 pm

I don't think he sucks in general, I think he is just OK and has a long way to go, however he did suck v the Colts. That really is not even arguable, he just happened to hit on the most crucial throw of the game, after missing over a dozen other easy throws previously. You're being subjective in saying his one play erases all the others poor plays, and it was a 9 yard pass to the sidelines that you are holding up as such an example of greatness.

Career post season rating of 83, pretty eh, very average, with a comp% of 59, again eh. Since his first playoff game v Cinci he has regressed in his post season play. Will he be good or better in 3 years, probably, but right now he is very very bleh.

Keep ignoring the reasons why the Jets win games though if it helps you feel better.

...he hasn't accomplished anything yet.
Criminals in this town used to believe in things...honor, respect.
"I heard your dog is sick, so bought you this shovel"

2011 TCF Stratomatic Champ
User avatar
FUDU
 
Posts: 12309
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 3:02 am
Favorite Player: Me
Least Favorite Player: You

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby gameface » Sun Jan 16, 2011 5:25 pm

I quoted you as saying he was "horrible" over 2/3 of the year, so I don't think I'm overreacting. True, that there is a huge area between "good" and "blows", calling a guy's play horrible and not good doesn't leave that much wiggle room, but if I've mischaracterized your POV, I apologize. Remember my original post was simply about not understanding the hating on a young QB that I feel has performed pretty well given his circumstances. Never touted him as top ten, just not as bad as portrayed. IE: a turnover machine, a player being carried, etc. Sanchez played very well early in the season, faltered in the middle, and got it together again late. He did injure his shoulder late, which may explain a bit why they're Dilfering him. But he's also contributed, quite directly, to a number of Jets victories this year. You can downplay that last pass to Edwards, but it was a big play and a nice throw with the game on the line.
gameface
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 6:28 pm

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby gameface » Sun Jan 16, 2011 5:36 pm

FUDU wrote:I don't think he sucks in general, I think he is just OK and has a long way to go, however he did suck v the Colts. That really is not even arguable, he just happened to hit on the most crucial throw of the game, after missing over a dozen other easy throws previously. You're being subjective in saying his one play erases all the others poor plays, and it was a 9 yard pass to the sidelines that you are holding up as such an example of greatness.

Career post season rating of 83, pretty eh, very average, with a comp% of 59, again eh. Since his first playoff game v Cinci he has regressed in his post season play. Will he be good or better in 3 years, probably, but right now he is very very bleh.

Keep ignoring the reasons why the Jets win games though if it helps you feel better.

...he hasn't accomplished anything yet.


If he's just OK, name the other 2nd year QBs who are good. Matt Ryan, check, nice playoff debut for him.

Post season rate of 83, pretty average? For a 2nd year QB? And it wasn't a 9 yard out, it was 18 yards down the sideline to make a difficult FG attempt into something much more doable. Again, with the game on the line. Plenty of good QBs have shitty games and pull them out at the end. Many of those QBs are considered great. I don't think Sanchez is great, but he's hardly the schlub you and others have painted him to be.

The Jets, like most good teams, win with a team effort. Peyton, Rogers, and Brady can carry teams. I am not saying Sanchez is that, or even predicting that he will be that someday. Only that he's much more valuable to the Jets than you're giving him credit for.

And your wrong. He's accomplished quite a bit, even if it's just not fucking up the Jets post-season. Something few rookie and 2nd year QBs could claim.

One more thing, the Jets defense fell apart a few times too...so we can pin a few loses on them as well as on Sanchez.

I think he may get schooled today. Won't change my POV.
gameface
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 6:28 pm

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby Cerebral_DownTime » Sun Jan 16, 2011 6:00 pm

gameface wrote:If he's just OK, name the other 2nd year QBs who are good. Matt Ryan, check, nice playoff debut for him.


Well Matt Ryan is a 3rd year QB.

As for other 2nd year QBs, Josh Freeman has been good, and that's it because Stafford has been injured and there just wasn't many QBs taken in that draft. 12 total I think.
Listen to me Randy, it doesn't matter if you're white, or black, or a Sasquatch even. As long as you follow your dreams, no matter how crazy or against the law it is. Except for Sasquatch, if you're a Sasquatch the rules are different.- Meatwad

http://www.wolf-pac.com/
User avatar
Cerebral_DownTime
Go f#%k yourself
 
Posts: 13667
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2007 4:31 am
Location: Galloway Ohio
Favorite Player: Fenrir
Least Favorite Player: King George III

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby FUDU » Sun Jan 16, 2011 6:03 pm

What does another QB (even 2nd year) have to do with Sanchez being just OK IMO. I don't judge a player by merely one game or one pass, despite Sanchez sucking v the Colts I think he is still OK. Hence I don't judge his game v the Colts on that one pass, or those last 3, I judge him on the whole body of work for that game. He made the throw, which he should be able to do, it was part of what the game for the Jets but not as significant of a part as what the jets D did to give the O the chance it had at the end.

Plus you make it sound like Sanchez has accomplished something unprecedented, rookie QBs have made the playoffs before, Shawn King even did it, hell Bernie did.

Bottom line is you are not recognizing that the Jets are built in such a fashion that you can put a large number of QB at the helm there and the team would have success, most likely even similar success b/c for the most part Sanchez has only been a game manager for most of his time so far, hell the reduce him to that in the post season. That says a lot right there if his own staff reduces his responsibilities when it comes to one and done football.

Going into this weekend's games you could easily say Sanchez was the worst QB left in the post season, actually you could say he was the worst QB in the entire playoffs from day 1.

He's OK, and he should be able to accomplish the monumental task of going 3-3 for 38 yards on the last drive of a game when you only need a FG and the D is giving you some room.

If he as good as you claim he is he should not get schooled today.
Criminals in this town used to believe in things...honor, respect.
"I heard your dog is sick, so bought you this shovel"

2011 TCF Stratomatic Champ
User avatar
FUDU
 
Posts: 12309
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 3:02 am
Favorite Player: Me
Least Favorite Player: You

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby gameface » Sun Jan 16, 2011 6:29 pm

Well, if you judge a QB by his whole body of work, then you ought to like Sanchez even better. Like I said, four games with a 100 plus rating, and if you watched the Jets all season, you'd know that he's been more than a game manager.

Saying he's the worst QB in the post season still makes him better than most of the league. Not a good analogy, but not in the ballpark of just OK. And pretty sweet for a rookie to get to the division championship game, or for a second year player to winning and moving on.

The whole argument that the Jets don't need a QB is weak. No team advances in the playoffs without decent QB play, except maybe the 2000 Ravens. And they couldn't do it two years in a row, even when the "upgraded" from Dilfer.

Shawn King? Really? And Bernie was better than just ok, I think.

It's amusing to say that 3 for 3 for 38 on a game winning drive should be taken for granted. Yep, if you're better than ok, so thanks for making my point.

Belichick and the Pats have schooled some great QBs, and I don't put Sanchez in that class yet. He's better than OK, though, imo. With some upside. I'm kind of surprised that people would argue that in the face of what the Jets have done with him at the wheel. But to each his own.
gameface
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 6:28 pm

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby FUDU » Sun Jan 16, 2011 6:36 pm

You just don't understand the entire make up of the Jets, it is fairly obvious. Very similar to the Pats in Brady's first year, he managed games, made a few plays, and was OK.

...and don't look now but a team did just advance without decent QB play, the Jets did, I am starting to wonder if you watched the game at all last week, or watched more than the last minute. Sanchez sucked, and he could't put the ball in a 5 yard window, that is a fact.

Don't even know why I am bothering with this seeing as he's about to get smoked and he'll be home in time to watch the pro bowl.
Criminals in this town used to believe in things...honor, respect.
"I heard your dog is sick, so bought you this shovel"

2011 TCF Stratomatic Champ
User avatar
FUDU
 
Posts: 12309
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 3:02 am
Favorite Player: Me
Least Favorite Player: You

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby Ziner » Sun Jan 16, 2011 6:40 pm

oh god, not only did SD take over JB's account, but he also started an account named gameface.
In the end, we're all "only for a limited time," you guys.
User avatar
Ziner
Tot-Lovin' Hippy
 
Posts: 7044
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 5:04 pm
Location: Boulder, Colorado
Favorite Player: Tater Tots
Least Favorite Player: Yam Fries

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby Erie Warrior » Sun Jan 16, 2011 8:08 pm

Sanchez and Freeman are sodomites. Disprove that.
This natural coozy comes free with every Miller Time
Image
User avatar
Erie Warrior
Goose Slayer
 
Posts: 6037
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 6:50 pm
Location: Hampton, VA
Favorite Player: 1995 Indians
Least Favorite Player: Global Warming

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby Cerebral_DownTime » Sun Jan 16, 2011 8:58 pm

What if Cam Newton is an idiot about Peeker?
Listen to me Randy, it doesn't matter if you're white, or black, or a Sasquatch even. As long as you follow your dreams, no matter how crazy or against the law it is. Except for Sasquatch, if you're a Sasquatch the rules are different.- Meatwad

http://www.wolf-pac.com/
User avatar
Cerebral_DownTime
Go f#%k yourself
 
Posts: 13667
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2007 4:31 am
Location: Galloway Ohio
Favorite Player: Fenrir
Least Favorite Player: King George III

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby motherscratcher » Sun Jan 16, 2011 9:24 pm

Cerebral_DownTime wrote:What if Cam Newton is an idiot about Peeker?


Well, that's impossible to know for sure but the odds are in your favor.
I got this one rule. I never go out with girls who say "bitchin'".
User avatar
motherscratcher
Little Larry Sellers
 
Posts: 6784
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 10:14 pm
Location: CDT's Garage
Favorite Player: Ernie Camacho
Least Favorite Player: Jose Mesa

Re: Why Peeker is an idiot about Cam Newton

Unread postby gameface » Sun Jan 16, 2011 10:01 pm

FUDU wrote:
Don't even know why I am bothering with this seeing as he's about to get smoked and he'll be home in time to watch the pro bowl.


Snicker. I rest my case.

I concede to Lead he's not the most accurate, and I concede to you that the Jets aren't built so that he needs to carry them. So facking what? My point was, and is, that they win with him, and not despite him. He makes enough plays to help out.

4 and 1 in the playoffs. Every one on the road. 2nd year player. Recognize.

And back to the very beginning, and SD's contention: where would the Jets be without him? It was a smart draft pick for them.

One other thing. Shut the fuck up Donny. ; )

PS: I spell better than both SD and JB, so you know I'm nobody's duplicate.
gameface
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 6:28 pm

Who the Browns should pick at 6 or trade up for

Unread postby SoulDawg74 » Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:00 pm

Dude is getting schooled from the same guru who got Rapistburglar together .

How app pro bowl .

Latest from the GBN. the meat market begins>


Update on QB Newton work out … The workout that former former Auburn QB Cam Newton has reportedly scheduled in San Diego on February 10th will be open to the media. NFL teams that want a look can probably find a way, however, according to NFL rules teams can attend a private workout for a player only at he player’s school or in his hometown. As well, teams are not allowed to work out a player who has been invited to the Combine before the Combine. At his workout, which will be a couple of weeks before the combine, Newton will purportedly show off the progress he‘s made in recent weeks while working with noted QB-coach George Whitfield, who has also worked with Pittsburgh QB Ben Roethlisberger as well as other big-name clients. Whitfield has been working with Newton since Auburn’s victory in the national championship bowl earlier this month to improve the Heisman Trophy winner’s mechanics dropping back from center after he played almost exclusively in a shotgun spread offense at Auburn. Of note, the workout is reportedly being organized by Newton’s father Cecil who gained national notoriety this fall after it was disclosed that the elder Newton had tried to shakedown Mississippi State for almost $200 grand to get his son to commit to that program. And there is a bit of a buzz around the league that some teams with early picks this year could be wary about the possible impact of having the elder Newton around their dressing room if they were to draft Cam. What do they say about families? Can’t live with ‘em; can’t live without ‘em!

*************************************************

SoulDawg

WAR : OUR TIME HAS COME
SoulDawg74
 
Posts: 3036
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 2:36 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

Who is online

In total there are 3 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 3 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 181 on Sat Feb 16, 2013 5:50 pm

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests