Moderators: peeker643, swerb, danwismar, furls
by pup » Mon Dec 20, 2010 1:13 am
by Loo » Tue Dec 21, 2010 2:52 pm
by neoleo » Tue Dec 21, 2010 11:36 pm
Loo wrote:I like a lot of his intangibles, integrity and recruiting pitch (although selling Ohio State and Kent State are completely different things), but there's a lot that remains to be seen. He has a good base, but can he manage and motivate a team, and how will his in-game decisions and game-plans come out? Also, Nielsen said he was known as one of the best recruiters in the country and knows Ohio--but Hazell admitted he recruited only a small area around Columbus to go along with the east coast.
This hire looks eerily similar to the Akron hire.

by mikeperry » Wed Dec 22, 2010 2:20 am
by Loo » Wed Dec 22, 2010 5:04 pm
by mikeperry » Wed Dec 22, 2010 9:23 pm
by Loo » Mon Jan 03, 2011 6:26 pm
by jb » Mon Jan 03, 2011 7:55 pm
mikeperry wrote: I mentioned how the school would have to loosen the purse strings a little bit to get someone like Hazell. Doug Martin, after six years, was making $190,000 a year, plus bonuses and incentives. Hazell is starting at $300,000, with his bonuses and incentives still being worked out.
by Loo » Mon Jan 03, 2011 9:26 pm
jb wrote:mikeperry wrote: I mentioned how the school would have to loosen the purse strings a little bit to get someone like Hazell. Doug Martin, after six years, was making $190,000 a year, plus bonuses and incentives. Hazell is starting at $300,000, with his bonuses and incentives still being worked out.
Hi Mike. I've enjoyed reading your MAC coverage and seeing you on STO.
As an alumnus, I'm sure that you are aware of the financial situation at Kent and most of the other MAC schools dfependant on state funding as well as how their FBS programs simply hemmohrage red ink. Throwing $ 300 large at a new HC is an incredible investment for Kent. I wish him well.
Long term, however, I hope part of all this year's BCS AQ fall out is a MAC-wide movement from the neitherworlds of door mat FBS to a more budget friendly FCS championship calibur program. FBS budgets and illusions pretty much demonstrates poor fuduciary responsibility to the taxpayers of Ohio.
BTW - I agree with you about the facilities. Just becasue most of the MAC schools aren't as nice as Massillon Washington doesn't mean they suck for what they are. I think the biggest problem is that Dix is just too far from campus. Sounds lame, but getting there took effort on a bloody eyed Sartuday morning after too much Loft, Shroom and Rays (showing my era). Dix should have been built where the new rec center is located.
by jb » Mon Jan 03, 2011 11:17 pm
by Triple-S » Tue Jan 04, 2011 2:52 am
jb wrote:Specifically what facilities? Dix? Indoor facility? Dorms? Weight & locker rooms?
Lack of or maintenance of?
Curious...
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by Loo » Tue Jan 04, 2011 5:40 am
jb wrote:Specifically what facilities? Dix? Indoor facility? Dorms? Weight & locker rooms?
Lack of or maintenance of?
Curious...
by jb » Tue Jan 04, 2011 10:38 am
Loo wrote:jb wrote:Specifically what facilities? Dix? Indoor facility? Dorms? Weight & locker rooms?
Lack of or maintenance of?
Curious...
I've heard mention of the all of the above except the dorms.
by Loo » Tue Jan 04, 2011 9:17 pm
jb wrote:Loo wrote:jb wrote:Specifically what facilities? Dix? Indoor facility? Dorms? Weight & locker rooms?
Lack of or maintenance of?
Curious...
I've heard mention of the all of the above except the dorms.
Other than being empty, what's wrong with Dix? I've been to just about 1/2 of the MAC stadiums and the renovated Dix is better than any of them. Its clearly better than Yeager, to name one. It's also one of the biggest in the MAC; bigger than the new one Akron built.
by jb » Wed Jan 05, 2011 2:33 pm

by jb » Wed Jan 05, 2011 2:34 pm
Loo wrote:jb wrote:Loo wrote:jb wrote:Specifically what facilities? Dix? Indoor facility? Dorms? Weight & locker rooms?
Lack of or maintenance of?
Curious...
I've heard mention of the all of the above except the dorms.
Other than being empty, what's wrong with Dix? I've been to just about 1/2 of the MAC stadiums and the renovated Dix is better than any of them. Its clearly better than Yeager, to name one. It's also one of the biggest in the MAC; bigger than the new one Akron built.
Size isn't the issue with Dix. Ask 100 recruits where they would like to play based on stadium alone and set 95 as the over/under, and I'll take the over.
It's also worthless to have a stadium that big when you can only fill it once every two years. Funny thing is Akron is having the exact same problem Kent has had in the past even with their shiny new toy.
by Erie Warrior » Wed Jan 05, 2011 3:25 pm


Return to College Sports Arena
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
