Moderators: peeker643, swerb, Ziner
by jb » Fri Dec 10, 2010 7:59 pm
by gotribe31 » Fri Dec 10, 2010 8:18 pm
jb wrote:But I will.
Is barry still a socialist now?
Told y'all he was alot closer to center than the political hype and apoplexy.
And where is the deficit outrage now, Tea Party?

by Cerebral_DownTime » Fri Dec 10, 2010 8:33 pm
by jb » Fri Dec 10, 2010 8:59 pm
gotribe31 wrote:jb wrote:But I will.
Is barry still a socialist now?
Told y'all he was alot closer to center than the political hype and apoplexy.
And where is the deficit outrage now, Tea Party?
His voting record as a senator was as liberal as you can get. Don't confuse scrambling to save his own hide come 2012 as a move to the center. He sees the miderms for what they were; a referendum on his borderline-historic big government policies. He's making a deal not because he's some sort of Clintonian centrist, but because he knows how much trouble he and his party are in. Too bad for the Dems that Pelosi, Sherrod Brown and the rest aren't smart enough to see the train coming down the tracks.
Come on JB...he's making this deal while calling Republicans "hostage takers." See it for what it is...a politician out to get re-elected. No more, no less.
This is a pretty good look at the deal, in my opinion:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 ... #printMode
You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves
by Cerebral_DownTime » Fri Dec 10, 2010 9:07 pm
by jb » Fri Dec 10, 2010 9:16 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote: I've never seen a party have that much control and do so little.
by Fire Marshall Bill » Fri Dec 10, 2010 9:26 pm
by jb » Fri Dec 10, 2010 9:28 pm
Fire Marshall Bill wrote::lmfao:
Dude, you should be a politician
Today he bails out on a presser for a pinch hitter in Clinton because he can't make his own case with his own party? Pullleeeeze....where's the "Presidential" Biden?
Botox clinic?
Hope is a moment now long past
The Shadow of Death is what I cast

by Cerebral_DownTime » Fri Dec 10, 2010 9:41 pm
by FUDU » Fri Dec 10, 2010 9:45 pm
by jb » Fri Dec 10, 2010 9:52 pm
FUDU wrote:Yeah that was some real tough talk there CDT.![]()
As far as Obama, right now were in the stage of his presidency akin to having to hold in your piss till you get home, the further up the drive way you make it the harder it is to hold. Just have to hope he doesn't fuck anything else up until 2012 b/c he is a 1 and done for sure.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Fri Dec 10, 2010 9:55 pm
Yeah that was some real tough talk there CDT
FUDU wrote: Just have to hope he doesn't fuck anything else up until 2012 b/c he is a 1 and done for sure.
by FUDU » Fri Dec 10, 2010 10:02 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Fri Dec 10, 2010 10:15 pm
FUDU wrote:WTF do you mean I have no candidate, I don't vote for fucks like Obama & what was his name.
by swerb » Fri Dec 10, 2010 10:43 pm
by jb » Fri Dec 10, 2010 11:19 pm
by FUDU » Fri Dec 10, 2010 11:34 pm
by swerb » Fri Dec 10, 2010 11:38 pm
by FUDU » Fri Dec 10, 2010 11:40 pm
by jb » Fri Dec 10, 2010 11:45 pm
by jb » Fri Dec 10, 2010 11:46 pm
On Romney, aside from playing flag football with Macphisto, everything the guy has touched has turned to gold.
by FUDU » Sat Dec 11, 2010 12:01 am
Gasoline is a scam way beyond Obama and any POTUS, no mistake about that. Most people still believe it is simply controlled by the "free" market, most people have more votes than a minority like you & I.jb wrote:You have to elaborate homie. The insurance industry will naturally profit grab between now and regulation. Plus covering the prexisting will rasise costs, but that is nothing new at all. HC costs have been rising way ahead of inflation for years. What reigns in costs is covering the uninsured so we dont have to pay for them. The only real mistake is the long roll out period.
Again, the heart of this, besides the welfare increase, a seperate issue for us to discuss, is mandating participation. There is no major difference. And don't blame Barry for the partisanship up until now. Be credible. Lastly, Rich, states don't pay for military or SS. Anyone can balance the budget. watch what Kasich will do. people will pay more user fees, but he'll do it.
Peeps is sheep. I've seen it. Economy ups, potus is great. Tanks and he's a moron.
Bloomberg is flirting with it. I don't care what he says. Nick Saban and all that.
and gas prices turned witin 2 weeks after the gop sweep. Don't be naive.
by swerb » Sat Dec 11, 2010 12:10 am
jb wrote:On Romney, aside from playing flag football with Macphisto, everything the guy has touched has turned to gold.
Can not concur.
He's an arbitrager, Rich. He destroyed all he touched for profit.
Plus he's a Morman, and yeah, I'll go there. Ever read the book of or at least watch south park?
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sat Dec 11, 2010 12:26 am
I didn't care Bush was hardcore religious right.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sat Dec 11, 2010 12:42 am
CDT I'm no (R).
by peeker643 » Sat Dec 11, 2010 12:43 am
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I didn't care Bush was hardcore religious right.
Because he wasn't. He's about as Christian as I am. He used the Evangelical crowd like a condom, but it was the country that got fucked.
Politics today isn't so much about who will do right (if it ever was), it's about which crowd gets their lip service. Pander Pander Pander.
And once again I do not think Romney wants any part of Jindal or even Rubio in the southern primaries. I think there's a disconnect between southern Repub voters and the possible Yankee cannidates.
There are too many Indians and no Chiefs for the Repubs right now.
They gained seats and they need to strike while the iron is hot.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sat Dec 11, 2010 12:45 am
by peeker643 » Sat Dec 11, 2010 12:53 am
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:You could never kill my deer.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sat Dec 11, 2010 1:00 am
by FUDU » Sat Dec 11, 2010 4:45 am
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:CDT I'm no (R).
lol. Yeah..... and i'm the king of Prussia.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sat Dec 11, 2010 5:05 am
FUDU wrote:Cerebral_DownTime wrote:CDT I'm no (R).
lol. Yeah..... and i'm the king of Prussia.
Well that goes a long way in explaining why you have half a brain, the wrong half.
But regardless you need to lay off the Funyons and pay more attention.
by peeker643 » Sat Dec 11, 2010 2:44 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Deer don't eat meat, moron.
Plus you could never kill me. Unless you're a Highlander..... but I would expect that and cut your head off first.
by peeker643 » Sat Dec 11, 2010 2:45 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:FUDU wrote:Cerebral_DownTime wrote:CDT I'm no (R).
lol. Yeah..... and i'm the king of Prussia.
Well that goes a long way in explaining why you have half a brain, the wrong half.
But regardless you need to lay off the Funyons and pay more attention.
Sure...... That's why you're on the Republican side of 95% of the debates we have in this joint.
I do pay attention, that's how I came to my conclusion that you're a Republican.
Maybe you fancy yourself some sort of independent (which if that's the case then AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!)...... or "Libertarian"..... The latter being a made up thing, much like the Yeti.
Dude, you're a Republican, face it.
I know it's awful......but you're handling it well.
by FUDU » Sat Dec 11, 2010 3:04 pm

by Cerebral_DownTime » Sat Dec 11, 2010 5:55 pm
FUDU wrote:Yeah b/c I am always backing up specific people with (R) in front of their name.
Sorry CDT but you're talking out of your ass. Which in actuality seems to be a good move considering the other options.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sat Dec 11, 2010 6:03 pm
peeker643 wrote:Cerebral_DownTime wrote:FUDU wrote:Cerebral_DownTime wrote:CDT I'm no (R).
lol. Yeah..... and i'm the king of Prussia.
Well that goes a long way in explaining why you have half a brain, the wrong half.
But regardless you need to lay off the Funyons and pay more attention.
Sure...... That's why you're on the Republican side of 95% of the debates we have in this joint.
I do pay attention, that's how I came to my conclusion that you're a Republican.
Maybe you fancy yourself some sort of independent (which if that's the case then AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!)...... or "Libertarian"..... The latter being a made up thing, much like the Yeti.
Dude, you're a Republican, face it.
I know it's awful......but you're handling it well.
He's a clearly a centrist like every single other person on this board when it suits them.
by Orenthal » Sat Dec 11, 2010 8:13 pm
by Orenthal » Sat Dec 11, 2010 8:14 pm
by gotribe31 » Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:45 pm
Orenthal wrote:Can't have a serious debate here becuase the loudest and proudest pretend to be something grander...
JB states that Obama isn't a socialist. When called on it he states you have to isolate the man to one decision? How can you label a guy anything if you only judge him on single actions? As if any politician is a 100% ideologue... Even Sharrod Brown stated he would vote against cap and trade. That must make him, not Sharrod Brown...

by gotribe31 » Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:48 pm
jb wrote:gotribe31 wrote:jb wrote:But I will.
Is barry still a socialist now?
Told y'all he was alot closer to center than the political hype and apoplexy.
And where is the deficit outrage now, Tea Party?
His voting record as a senator was as liberal as you can get. Don't confuse scrambling to save his own hide come 2012 as a move to the center. He sees the miderms for what they were; a referendum on his borderline-historic big government policies. He's making a deal not because he's some sort of Clintonian centrist, but because he knows how much trouble he and his party are in. Too bad for the Dems that Pelosi, Sherrod Brown and the rest aren't smart enough to see the train coming down the tracks.
Come on JB...he's making this deal while calling Republicans "hostage takers." See it for what it is...a politician out to get re-elected. No more, no less.
This is a pretty good look at the deal, in my opinion:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 ... #printMode
BTW Al God bless you for writing about the Tribe. Good luck and godspeed.
Don't misocnstrue this as supporting Barry or an opinion on the tax deal.
But I don't care about motivation or authenticity based on his Senate record. Alll I am looking at are policy decisions in the here and now. I don't get distracted by the noise. Barry has gone dead nuts center on this one and the Prog Wing is losing its mind worse than the right wing when GHWB 41 raised taxes. Barry ain't no socialist when he supports the W tax rates. That was at the core of the 2008 Prog Platform, and he just summarily gave it away.
Like Joe Scarborough said to pat Buchannon: if the Dems believe tax cuts to millionaires stimulate the economy, the debate s over and the GOP won.
BTW:You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves
That's one hgell of a foreign policy statement AFAIC.

by FUDU » Sat Dec 11, 2010 10:19 pm
by Orenthal » Sat Dec 11, 2010 11:57 pm
gotribe31 wrote:Orenthal wrote:Can't have a serious debate here becuase the loudest and proudest pretend to be something grander...
JB states that Obama isn't a socialist. When called on it he states you have to isolate the man to one decision? How can you label a guy anything if you only judge him on single actions? As if any politician is a 100% ideologue... Even Sharrod Brown stated he would vote against cap and trade. That must make him, not Sharrod Brown...
Sharrod Brown is helping the only Senator (from Vermont) who actually self-identifies as a socalist fillibuster the tax deal. He's not voting against cap and trade because he doesn't want it, he's voting against cap and trade because he's a Senator from Ohio and there are already too few people working there for him to survive backing legislation that would further cripple manufacturing businesses. He's voting to get re-elected, which means he's actually voting the way the people he represents wants, which is actually a welcome departure from most politicians I suppose.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sun Dec 12, 2010 2:15 am
FUDU wrote:Tell me what I stand for CDT.
by FUDU » Sun Dec 12, 2010 4:38 am
by aclayman » Sun Dec 12, 2010 5:24 am
by gotribe31 » Sun Dec 12, 2010 5:50 pm
Orenthal wrote:gotribe31 wrote:Orenthal wrote:Can't have a serious debate here becuase the loudest and proudest pretend to be something grander...
JB states that Obama isn't a socialist. When called on it he states you have to isolate the man to one decision? How can you label a guy anything if you only judge him on single actions? As if any politician is a 100% ideologue... Even Sharrod Brown stated he would vote against cap and trade. That must make him, not Sharrod Brown...
Sharrod Brown is helping the only Senator (from Vermont) who actually self-identifies as a socalist fillibuster the tax deal. He's not voting against cap and trade because he doesn't want it, he's voting against cap and trade because he's a Senator from Ohio and there are already too few people working there for him to survive backing legislation that would further cripple manufacturing businesses. He's voting to get re-elected, which means he's actually voting the way the people he represents wants, which is actually a welcome departure from most politicians I suppose.
Which is my point. Even Sharrod Brown sometimes votes against HIS grain. To isolate that one vote and claim he is something other then ULTRA LEFT is absurd. I have no freaking clue wtf JB is trying to prove about Obama by one calculated vote, as if it nullifies the previous 49 years of his life...

by FUDU » Sun Dec 12, 2010 5:54 pm
by JJN » Mon Dec 13, 2010 3:26 am
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Deer don't eat meat, moron.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Mon Dec 13, 2010 4:05 am
by Fire Marshall Bill » Mon Dec 13, 2010 1:16 pm
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests