Text Size

No Holds Barred

No more San Fransisco treats

Need to get something off your chest? Have a topic that doesn't fit one of the other forums? Rant away in here. Mature audiences only, not for the easily offended.

Moderators: peeker643, swerb, Ziner

Re: No more San Fransisco treats

Unread postby peeker643 » Fri Nov 26, 2010 8:01 am

FUDU wrote:Never stated that people visiting McD's don't get a salad, or everyone at Chipotle's gets 300 calorie stuff, never once.

But talk about straw men, the end of our freedoms is upon us b/c some municipal lawmakers told restaurants they cannot add child oriented incentives to their meals until those meals are nutritionally improved. My God you'd think McDonald's itself was incorporated into the Constitution.



Like I said, take the toy out. Everything will be fine if you do that.
"Great minds think alike. The opposite is also true."

"None of us is as dumb as all of us."


I'm on Twitter at http://twitter.com/peeker643
User avatar
peeker643
Duly Noted
 
Posts: 22497
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 1:33 pm
Favorite Player: Smokey Rowe
Least Favorite Player: Dingle Stetson

Re: No more San Fransisco treats

Unread postby pup » Fri Nov 26, 2010 8:37 am

You could replace the toy with lead painted arsenic and it would not stop about 30% from blindly buying their kid a happy meal. At least the first time. Would probably be a while for them to buy a second time. Those newborns take a little while to work up to McDonalds.
Home Run Leaders as RHB 5/7/13

Mark Reynolds (10)
User avatar
pup
Closet Shapiro Fan
 
Posts: 12004
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 9:15 pm
Location: Eastlake, Ohio
Favorite Player: Vince Shubrownicek
Least Favorite Player: Any other coach

Re: No more San Fransisco treats

Unread postby jb » Tue Nov 30, 2010 12:48 pm

I don't see rights being tramples on here


Me neither. Get on the GD BART to Oakhood and you and get your crack, stolen Glock, and Happy Meal toy all you want.

Local governance is a good thing. If that's what they want in SF, whoopie fizz. That's a reason y I don't liv ethere.
jb
 
Posts: 17730
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 7:08 pm
Location: Defend Youngstown
Favorite Player: Daddy Rich / Carwa$h
Least Favorite Player: Hines Ward

Re: No more San Fransisco treats

Unread postby jb » Tue Nov 30, 2010 12:58 pm

Ol' No.11 wrote:Nobody here is seeing the big picture.

When the government takes over total control of health care in this country in 2014, the bureaucracy will have the legal power to dictate what you can’t eat, what you can’t drink, and what you can’t smoke -- all in the name of saving the government’s health care dollars so that all the previously uninsured can head to the emergency room for every friggin’ hangnail.




Complete and utter retarded bullcrap. The government is taking "control" of almost nothing. The HC Act was about insurance regulation and covering the uninsured through either carrot, stick or more welfare. There's no fuckin' single payer system and looming government national/socialist beauracracy coming. If you got a beef about putting more than just gramma and gramps butsing the deficit on the dole, fine. I get that. If you got a beef about how the Romney Plan was adopted nationwide (like states that have required auto insurance for years) to mandate health insurance in a capitalist, regulated, market, fine. I get that, too. It may or may not work requiring some entity to pay into health care costs so those who can (individuals, companies, an dthe gub mint) get some of the burdon spread out. It may or may not work. Who the hell knows?

Just don't make stupid shit up.

Gotta hit the ignorance button on this tired shitty take.

Didja also hear that there's gonna be Happy Meal Panels? Michelle Obama is gonna tell you what you can and can't have in them.

And lastly, any of these insurance companies can pry the chicken wings from my cold, dead hands. Just up my statin to 20 mgs and STFU.
Last edited by jb on Tue Nov 30, 2010 1:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
jb
 
Posts: 17730
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 7:08 pm
Location: Defend Youngstown
Favorite Player: Daddy Rich / Carwa$h
Least Favorite Player: Hines Ward

Re: No more San Fransisco treats

Unread postby jb » Tue Nov 30, 2010 1:00 pm

peeker643 wrote:
FUDU wrote:Never stated that people visiting McD's don't get a salad, or everyone at Chipotle's gets 300 calorie stuff, never once.

But talk about straw men, the end of our freedoms is upon us b/c some municipal lawmakers told restaurants they cannot add child oriented incentives to their meals until those meals are nutritionally improved. My God you'd think McDonald's itself was incorporated into the Constitution.



Like I said, take the toy out. Everything will be fine if you do that.



F That. I still have the Simpson's halloween series from BK circa 1997. best decorations ever. Why can't they make good shit like that? In fact, I wish they'd do adult happy meals with like shot glasses and those mini silicone vibrators you can now buy at Walgreens as toys.
jb
 
Posts: 17730
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 7:08 pm
Location: Defend Youngstown
Favorite Player: Daddy Rich / Carwa$h
Least Favorite Player: Hines Ward

Previous

Return to No Holds Barred

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

Who is online

In total there are 2 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 2 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 181 on Sat Feb 16, 2013 4:50 pm

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests