For some reason this article gives me so much confidence they will resign Choo

Moderators: peeker643, swerb, pup, paulcousineau
by Watt » Fri Nov 19, 2010 3:02 pm

by Erie Warrior » Fri Nov 19, 2010 3:32 pm
"The fans want to see a winner. Some are impatient and express that impatience. Some understand. Others are excited about the structure we have.


by 1Perry » Fri Nov 19, 2010 4:04 pm
by scott » Fri Nov 19, 2010 4:56 pm
by gotribe31 » Fri Nov 19, 2010 4:57 pm

by peeker643 » Fri Nov 19, 2010 5:05 pm
gotribe31 wrote:Who do you all suggest they go out and break the bank on this offseason? What one or two players on the FA market will have this team in the playoffs, exactly?
by motherscratcher » Fri Nov 19, 2010 5:14 pm
1Perry wrote:Well it certainly clears up the questions as to how someone like a Shapiro can get a promotion as opposed to being fired.
by gotribe31 » Fri Nov 19, 2010 5:38 pm
peeker643 wrote:gotribe31 wrote:Who do you all suggest they go out and break the bank on this offseason? What one or two players on the FA market will have this team in the playoffs, exactly?
If they can grab up Cliffie and Carl Crawford that'll help.![]()
They spent $10million on the 2010 draft and went over slot a number of times to get deals done.
Perhaps some would prefer John Buck at 3yrs and $18m. I'm fine with the way they're going about things.
The biggest problem is they're late to that particular party.
It is the Tribe boards though. You have to give a wide berth.


by peeker643 » Fri Nov 19, 2010 5:47 pm
gotribe31 wrote:peeker643 wrote:gotribe31 wrote:Who do you all suggest they go out and break the bank on this offseason? What one or two players on the FA market will have this team in the playoffs, exactly?
If they can grab up Cliffie and Carl Crawford that'll help.![]()
They spent $10million on the 2010 draft and went over slot a number of times to get deals done.
Perhaps some would prefer John Buck at 3yrs and $18m. I'm fine with the way they're going about things.
The biggest problem is they're late to that particular party.
It is the Tribe boards though. You have to give a wide berth.
Hmmm...I like where your head is at. If we sign Crawford, that will give us our leadoff guy, and Lee should come at a hometown discount. He probably would have signed already if Shapiro hadn't lowballed him initally.
I hear Justin Upton is available too. We should deal Cord Phelps and Beau Mills for him. Then flip Raffie Perez and Jeremy Sowers for Zach Grienke (he's available!) and we should be all set
by skatingtripods » Fri Nov 19, 2010 5:59 pm
by peeker643 » Fri Nov 19, 2010 6:27 pm
skatingtripods wrote:Don't forget that we're going to sign Beltre.
by gotribe31 » Fri Nov 19, 2010 6:35 pm
skatingtripods wrote:Don't forget that we're going to sign Beltre.

by Rat_Tail » Fri Nov 19, 2010 6:39 pm
peeker643 wrote:Marson is still a trading chip.

by motherscratcher » Fri Nov 19, 2010 6:49 pm
gotribe31 wrote:skatingtripods wrote:Don't forget that we're going to sign Beltre.
Wish we had him 2 years ago.
by skatingtripods » Fri Nov 19, 2010 7:20 pm
peeker643 wrote:skatingtripods wrote:Don't forget that we're going to sign Beltre.
Starting to come together now.
Beltre, Crawford, Lee and Upton? People are still gonna want more. Marson is still a trading chip.
by RedDawg53 » Sat Nov 20, 2010 1:33 am

by Cease » Sat Nov 20, 2010 12:32 pm

by feuders » Sat Nov 20, 2010 1:04 pm
by 1Perry » Sat Nov 20, 2010 3:07 pm
by Eckersley » Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:18 pm

by gotribe31 » Sat Nov 20, 2010 7:02 pm
motherscratcher wrote:gotribe31 wrote:skatingtripods wrote:Don't forget that we're going to sign Beltre.
Wish we had him 2 years ago.
We did.

by Dellucci TailGator » Sat Nov 20, 2010 9:38 pm
by 1Perry » Sat Nov 20, 2010 10:32 pm
by jack_tors » Sun Nov 21, 2010 1:16 am
motherscratcher wrote:gotribe31 wrote:skatingtripods wrote:Don't forget that we're going to sign Beltre.
Wish we had him 2 years ago.
We did.
by pup » Sun Nov 21, 2010 8:51 am
jack_tors wrote:motherscratcher wrote:gotribe31 wrote:skatingtripods wrote:Don't forget that we're going to sign Beltre.
Wish we had him 2 years ago.
We did.
Wait, isnt this guy dead?
by motherscratcher » Sun Nov 21, 2010 12:56 pm
1Perry wrote:Seems to me that your arguement may be turned to where spending does work but like with drafting the Indians front office can't even pick the right veterans to spend money on.
The Rangers went and got Lee and Hamilton. That worked pretty well for them. It all goes back to the fact that the Indians front office is absolutely clueless as to building a team.
by pup » Sun Nov 21, 2010 2:45 pm
by Cease » Sun Nov 21, 2010 7:56 pm
pup wrote:When will someone finally follow up with: "When will be the right time to spend?"

by Eckersley » Mon Nov 22, 2010 12:01 pm
Cease wrote:pup wrote:When will someone finally follow up with: "When will be the right time to spend?"
Their probably best off waiting until the Cavs to fold/move. I'm half serious on that...

by skatingtripods » Mon Nov 22, 2010 1:00 pm
gotribe31 wrote:Who do you all suggest they go out and break the bank on this offseason? What one or two players on the FA market will have this team in the playoffs, exactly?
by pup » Mon Nov 22, 2010 1:05 pm
skatingtripods wrote:gotribe31 wrote:Who do you all suggest they go out and break the bank on this offseason? What one or two players on the FA market will have this team in the playoffs, exactly?
Still waiting for an answer to gotribe's question...
Kaffee: *Colonel Jessep, did you order the Code Red?*
Judge Randolph: You *don't* have to answer that question!
Col. Jessep: I'll answer the question!
[to Kaffee]
Col. Jessep: You want answers?
Kaffee: I think I'm entitled.
Col. Jessep: *You want answers?*
Kaffee: *I want the truth!*
Col. Jessep: *You can't handle the truth!*
by Erie Warrior » Mon Nov 22, 2010 3:22 pm
skatingtripods wrote:gotribe31 wrote:Who do you all suggest they go out and break the bank on this offseason? What one or two players on the FA market will have this team in the playoffs, exactly?
Still waiting for an answer to gotribe's question...


by Cease » Mon Nov 22, 2010 4:14 pm
Eckersley wrote:Cease wrote:pup wrote:When will someone finally follow up with: "When will be the right time to spend?"
Their probably best off waiting until the Cavs to fold/move. I'm half serious on that...
I think the chances are much greater that the Tribe eventually moves out of Cleveland.

by Cease » Mon Nov 22, 2010 5:14 pm
Eckersley wrote:Cease wrote:pup wrote:When will someone finally follow up with: "When will be the right time to spend?"
Their probably best off waiting until the Cavs to fold/move. I'm half serious on that...
I think the chances are much greater that the Tribe eventually moves out of Cleveland.

by skatingtripods » Mon Nov 22, 2010 7:37 pm
Erie Warrior wrote:It's not the right time now because they let all their good players walk. I know they can't sign them all, but not a single one? Ever? WTF is that?
by Rat_Tail » Mon Nov 22, 2010 9:20 pm
skatingtripods wrote:They're not keeping a 1B/DH like Victor for the money he'll be looking at. They're not keeping Lee for 35-40% of their payroll, and they have zero chance at keeping CC. What don't people understand about this?
by Erie Warrior » Mon Nov 22, 2010 9:40 pm
skatingtripods wrote:They're not keeping a 1B/DH like Victor for the money he'll be looking at. They're not keeping Lee for 35-40% of their payroll, and they have zero chance at keeping CC. What don't people understand about this?


by skatingtripods » Mon Nov 22, 2010 9:54 pm
Erie Warrior wrote:That's the point. All of those players are good. 95% of the current Indians are not. If you want to win, keep good players. Yes you have to pay for them. Cleveland can support a team with an 80-90 million dollar payroll. They have done it before. It wasn't all that long ago that this team averaged 3 million a year in attendance. If Dolan wants to make more money, win some ball games.
How much lower does the payroll go? 40 million? 30 million? Attendance under 1 million? Will that be the right time to spend?
by Erie Warrior » Tue Nov 23, 2010 12:20 am
skatingtripods wrote: But, why would the Dolans spend that much money when there is a plan in place. You're looking at a group of minor leaguers who have won TWO consecutive minor league championships. Akron in '09, Columbus in '10. That's not coincidence. Again, open market, why would Lee or CC stay here? No matter how much money we throw at them. There's no point in matching an offer from a big market team. Why play on a losing team?


by skatingtripods » Tue Nov 23, 2010 1:22 am
Erie Warrior wrote:A plan? Really? The plan is to save as much money a possible. They will lose 95 games next season and they will begin to move Choo/ Grady/ Fausto and drop the payroll to $40 million. And guess what, it won't be time to spend next off season either. Why, because they have a core nucleus of young talent that has won at every level of minor league ball. And that's all they'll ever win. Because the Indians best players are career AAAers. While every other team takes Cleveland's ML talent and gives them high upside guys that might make it to average. Did you see the lineup this season? The reason no one want's to play in Cleveland is because the humps they put out there day in and day out. There is almost zero ML talent in the entire Indians organization. And it's the owner's fault. Stop with the "Plan" bullshit. Stop with the "mid-market team" nonsense. If Dolan wanted a winner, he'd build one. The only thing he wants is to not lose money. And he's doing poorly at it.
by bookelly » Tue Nov 23, 2010 2:26 am
by leadpipe » Tue Nov 23, 2010 2:33 am
skatingtripods wrote:Erie Warrior wrote:A plan? Really? The plan is to save as much money a possible. They will lose 95 games next season and they will begin to move Choo/ Grady/ Fausto and drop the payroll to $40 million. And guess what, it won't be time to spend next off season either. Why, because they have a core nucleus of young talent that has won at every level of minor league ball. And that's all they'll ever win. Because the Indians best players are career AAAers. While every other team takes Cleveland's ML talent and gives them high upside guys that might make it to average. Did you see the lineup this season? The reason no one want's to play in Cleveland is because the humps they put out there day in and day out. There is almost zero ML talent in the entire Indians organization. And it's the owner's fault. Stop with the "Plan" bullshit. Stop with the "mid-market team" nonsense. If Dolan wanted a winner, he'd build one. The only thing he wants is to not lose money. And he's doing poorly at it.
Bro, I like you, and I like your posts, but this is far and away the most close-minded post I've ever seen of yours.
Zero talent in the organization? What do you actually know about this organization? Again, you don't win back to back minor league championships if none of those guys have talent. Baseball America's been raving about our system lately. We've shot up the organizational rankings. Those people know far more about those players than you do.
You want to be pessimistic, fine. I've seen these kids in person in both Akron and Columbus. They've got some kids who can play. I see what scouts have to say. I see what BA has to say. The track record of those kids, to this point, speaks for itself. Whether it translates to the big leagues or not remains to be seen. But the future looks brighter than it did two years ago.
I watch every game. I go to nearly 30 a year. I'm fully aware of the lineup and the economic situation of the team. I view it differently than you do, but at least I'm willing to try and understand the other viewpoint.
Don't support the team EW. They don't give a fuck and neither do the people around here. But you're way off-base with your post. Way off-base.
I'll stop with my logical points, though. God forbid logic be used in this forum.
by pup » Tue Nov 23, 2010 11:35 am
by exiledbuckeye » Tue Nov 23, 2010 12:13 pm
When New York and Boston spend, they're spending from their profits.
by gotribe31 » Tue Nov 23, 2010 12:51 pm

by Eckersley » Tue Nov 23, 2010 12:56 pm
exiledbuckeye wrote:Whatever good points are raised above, Dolan isn't going to earn himself any goodwill among the fan base when he says shit like this:When New York and Boston spend, they're spending from their profits.

by skatingtripods » Tue Nov 23, 2010 3:17 pm
Eckersley wrote:It's time for them (the small market owners) to take a stand & level the playing field somewhat. If they refuse to do so, then they deserve to see more than half empty stadiums.
by Eckersley » Tue Nov 23, 2010 3:28 pm
skatingtripods wrote:Eckersley wrote:It's time for them (the small market owners) to take a stand & level the playing field somewhat. If they refuse to do so, then they deserve to see more than half empty stadiums.
Why would they have any pull?
They'll only have pull if they stick together. Let's say 28 owners are on board with raising revenue sharing from 31% to 40%. The Bosox & Bankees have no choice but to go along. If there's no agreement, those 2 have the most to lose by far.
I realize it's not a small market, but SF won the WS with a team built from within. TB went to a WS with a team built from within.

by skatingtripods » Tue Nov 23, 2010 3:32 pm
by Eckersley » Tue Nov 23, 2010 3:51 pm
skatingtripods wrote:IMO, the system is irreparably broken. It's a matter of coming to terms with that and accepting it. Which is what I've done and why I can still enjoy baseball.

Return to Cleveland Indians & MLB
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests
