Moderators: peeker643, swerb, Ziner
by dem425 » Wed Oct 06, 2010 6:17 pm
by GodHatesClevelandSport » Wed Oct 06, 2010 6:38 pm
by motherscratcher » Wed Oct 06, 2010 6:50 pm
GodHatesClevelandSport wrote:Is the world screwed up because the one team won't play, or because the other team places too much emphasis on football, probably recruits players, and probably has players who use steroids?
As laid out in both The Boston Globe and Boston Herald, the numbers behind St. George's decision are pretty stark. Three Lawrence Academy offensive lineman weigh in at 300, 335 and 350 pounds, where St. George's players come nowhere near those marks.
by GodHatesClevelandSport » Wed Oct 06, 2010 7:12 pm
by motherscratcher » Wed Oct 06, 2010 7:31 pm
by jfiling » Wed Oct 06, 2010 7:33 pm
dem425 wrote:http://rivals.yahoo.com/highschool/blog/prep_rally/post/Massachusetts-school-pulls-out-of-game-citing-si?urn=highschool-274799
Great message to send to our kids. If your opponent is TOO big, quit. Didn't these friggin genuises have a clue when the schedule was created who they would be playing. And, if there exists such an inequity in the league, FIX IT!.........
Nonetheless, St. George's decision shines a spotlight on a significant problem that has been building within the ISL for years, according to the Boston Herald's Danny Ventura.Other coaches in the game have privately voiced their displeasure with Lawrence Academy. Judging by the volume of hits this story (which the Herald first broke yesterday morning) has received, it's certainly a newsworthy issue. What remains to be seen is whether any other team in the league follows suit and refuses to play LA.
League administrators were scheduled to meet this morning and we're sure one of the hot topics will be how to handle this situation. Is it a forfeit against SG or a no contest. You also have to believe that they will be feeling out the rest of Lawrence Academy opponents to see if they have plans on playing the game.
As one coach who asked his name not be used said: "The situation stinks. It's a black eye for our league."
by motherscratcher » Wed Oct 06, 2010 7:40 pm
jfiling wrote:I'm not sure how declining to play a game against a much larger team is any evidence that this world is "screwed up". I tell you what, dem425, why don't you jump into a boxing ring with someone 100 lbs heavier and 6 inches taller than you. If you refuse, then that is another reason this world is screwed up.
by jfiling » Wed Oct 06, 2010 7:45 pm
Motherscratcher wrote:jfiling wrote:I'm not sure how declining to play a game against a much larger team is any evidence that this world is "screwed up". I tell you what, dem425, why don't you jump into a boxing ring with someone 100 lbs heavier and 6 inches taller than you. If you refuse, then that is another reason this world is screwed up.
Where are you getting 110lbs heavier and 6 inches taller? And what does boxing have to do with anything?
by Erie Warrior » Wed Oct 06, 2010 7:45 pm


by jfiling » Wed Oct 06, 2010 8:36 pm
Erie Warrior wrote:There are lessons to be learned from getting your ass kicked as well. Because they're big, doesn't increase the chance of getting hurt. A 200lb kid moving half again as fast as a 300lber creates the same amount of force.
Play the game.
by Ziner » Wed Oct 06, 2010 8:40 pm
by Ziner » Wed Oct 06, 2010 8:41 pm
jfiling wrote:Erie Warrior wrote:There are lessons to be learned from getting your ass kicked as well. Because they're big, doesn't increase the chance of getting hurt. A 200lb kid moving half again as fast as a 300lber creates the same amount of force.
Play the game.
If we're talking pure physics, then yes. I'd imagine that sometimes players land on other players' joints, at which point a 300 lber falling on a 200 lber isn't likely to end well for the guy on the bottom.
What I'd really like to know is how many parents of the forfeiting team objected to the game being cancelled. It's easy to be an internet tough guy when it comes to other people's children being put into harm's way. Since this is a private school that forfeited, I'd think if the parents are against this move the coach will be fired, or at least seriously sanctioned.
by dem425 » Wed Oct 06, 2010 9:49 pm
by peeker643 » Wed Oct 06, 2010 9:55 pm
by motherscratcher » Wed Oct 06, 2010 10:18 pm
by hermanfontenot » Wed Oct 06, 2010 10:57 pm
jfiling wrote:What I'd really like to know is how many parents of the forfeiting team objected to the game being cancelled. It's easy to be an internet tough guy when it comes to other people's children being put into harm's way.

by peeker643 » Wed Oct 06, 2010 11:32 pm
by Erie Warrior » Thu Oct 07, 2010 9:07 am
peeker643 wrote:
I quit dipping Skoal 2 weeks, 2 days a 20 hours ago. Everyone's quitting something these days.


by Larvell Blanks » Thu Oct 07, 2010 10:15 am
by peeker643 » Thu Oct 07, 2010 10:22 am
Erie Warrior wrote:peeker643 wrote:
I quit dipping Skoal 2 weeks, 2 days a 20 hours ago. Everyone's quitting something these days.
Weak. Oh, and cuntslice.
by danwismar » Thu Oct 07, 2010 11:56 am
peeker643 wrote:In the real world do you see big countries picking on little ones? No. Can't little countries just quit when a larger country's military force comes a knocking and the little country still maintains their dignity and way of life? Yes.
by peeker643 » Thu Oct 07, 2010 12:10 pm
wiz1001 wrote:peeker643 wrote:In the real world do you see big countries picking on little ones? No. Can't little countries just quit when a larger country's military force comes a knocking and the little country still maintains their dignity and way of life? Yes.
What planet are we talking about here?
China-----> Tibet
Russia-----> Georgia
Iran/Syria------> Lebanon
Turkey------> Cyprus
The entire Arab world and Iran-------> Israel
...to name a few.
Why hasn't Israel, for example, thought of this before? Just quit, and they'll be permitted to carry on with their dignity and their way of life intact.
Tell me you're not serious, Peeker.
by danwismar » Thu Oct 07, 2010 1:46 pm
peeker643 wrote:Wiz- when am I serious?
by jfiling » Thu Oct 07, 2010 2:41 pm
dem425 wrote:Thanks, Fling, Ole Buddy..............I knew if there was someone out there who can present an inane, asinine reply, you were the dude.
dem425 wrote:My point in posting was to show the ridiculous ends that high-school sports will go. I believe in some respects that high-school sports is a microcosm of our society.
Plan days, weeks, months in advance to create a schedule. Practice hours and hours encouraging team concepts, esprit d'corps, learning about sport and competition............then tell your team three games into the season, we're not gonna play those big boys. Why didn't they know about this in advance?.....If the health of the players was at stake, they should not be playing tackle football OR that team should not have been on their schedule.
dem425 wrote:You can spin the good lesson here to read that "discretion is a the better part of valor".......Be intersting to take a straw vote of the kids.......
Adults, once again, fuck up the kid's world.
dem425 wrote:As far as stepping into the ring.............at 55, fat and a heart condition, probably an ignorant move on my part.........However, assuming you are 6 inches and a 100# heavier than me, I might make an exception.....
by jb » Thu Oct 07, 2010 2:47 pm
Motherscratcher wrote:Knob Gobbler lol
well done. Just goes to show that you can accomplish anything if you set your mind to it.
by Erie Warrior » Thu Oct 07, 2010 9:38 pm
jb wrote:
Don't see "knob gobbler" used often enough anymore...


by JCoz » Fri Oct 08, 2010 9:42 am
Among other options, Lawrence Academy reportedly offered to play the game at "half speed" to ensure no players got hurt. That hardly seems like a positive message to send to a program that claims it is trying to build gradual success among a young core of players.
by exiledbuckeye » Fri Oct 08, 2010 11:34 am
by Erie Warrior » Fri Oct 08, 2010 4:13 pm
"That left us with nine kids, two of which were 14-year-old freshmen that I was not about to put in against these 17-18-year-old juniors/seniors."


by Love child of shawn kemp » Fri Oct 08, 2010 5:13 pm
by jfiling » Tue Oct 12, 2010 4:35 pm
Offensive Linemen Gone Blimp: Tuesday Morning Quarterback has long contended that linemen, especially in high school, are forcing themselves to gain unhealthy levels of weight. Katie Weil of Brookline, Mass., was among many readers to point out this story of a high school that forfeited last weekend rather than face a private prep team with several linemen exceeding 300 pounds.
Twenty years ago, there were few NFL players weighing more than 300 pounds. Now this weight is not uncommon in college. With modern training, it's possible for many college males to be what scouts call a "natural" 300 pounds -- meaning appropriate to their frame and based on supervised weightlifting and a healthful diet -- since muscle weighs more than other kinds of tissue. But college players are years ahead of high-school boys in physical maturity and time spent lifting. Rare is the high-school boy who carries a natural 300 pounds, as opposed to weight gained by deliberate overeating. For instance Good Counsel, one of the country's powerhouse private prep programs and one with an excellent reputation for taking good care of players, has no one above 290 pounds.
The prep school in question with the very heavy boys, Lawrence Academy, won its 2009 games by an average of 43-9 and its first two games of 2010 by a combined 73-14. Surely Lawrence plays well, but margins that wide suggest poor sportsmanship – when a football team wins 56-0 or 47-0, as Lawrence did in 2009, the victor, not the vanquished, should feel embarrassed. Lawrence head coach Mike Taylor -- beating up on teams that have no chance is bully behavior that reflects poorly on you and your program. Taylor declined comment. Dave Casanave, director of communications for Lawrence Academy, told TMQ, "There were valid questions about sportsmanship and game management last year. We've had some discussions with the football coaches and are optimistic that bad sportsmanship will not happen again."
More important, Lawrence claims its mission is "excellence." Can it be excellence for the football staff to be encouraging or at least averting eyes from unhealthy levels of weight gain, in order to create gigantic linemen? Don't try to tell me it's just some weird coincidence that football boys who enroll at Lawrence balloon up. Short term, excessive weight increases risk of heat stroke -- heavy players are more prone than lean ones. Long term, excessive weight gain for football can lead to lifelong health problems, including diabetes, hypertension and heart trouble.
In 2006, former San Francisco coach Bill Walsh told me he thought excessive weight in football won't end until NFL teams, colleges or high schools lose health liability litigation. The high-school level may be the place to start, since there, football players are minors whom coaches and teachers should safeguard. Maybe a high-school parent whose boy has gained unsafe weight for football should sue, claiming the abetting of dangerous behavior by a minor. That might lead to positive reform.
by jb » Tue Oct 12, 2010 4:42 pm
by hermanfontenot » Tue Oct 12, 2010 4:51 pm
jb wrote:The slution is to legalize and encourage safe usage of PEDS. In the golden era of the 80's, you'd have guys at 285 who were as strong as the fat ph*&%s at 350 and a hell of alot more mobile. It was only when roids strated to get a bad rap that you saw the rise of the fat pig Crackwagon OL. Even the Hogs were athletic. I've had occasion to meet Russ Grimm. He's piut on a nice boiler, but he's no Andre the Giant. And lachey and jacoby were athletic.
Culpepper, the retired lineman, sees a correlation between the inception of the NFL's steroid testing about 15 years ago and the increase in players' weights. With the crackdown on illegal substances, focus shifted from strength to sheer mass.
"No longer could a guy be 270 and maul people because he's on steroids and has so many muscles," Culpepper said. "Now you have to be 300 to move people. It remains to be seen what's going to happen to these guys as they get in their 30s and retire."

by Fire Marshall Bill » Tue Oct 12, 2010 5:24 pm
jb wrote:Motherscratcher wrote:Knob Gobbler lol
well done. Just goes to show that you can accomplish anything if you set your mind to it.
+ 2
Don't see "knob gobbler" used often enough anymore...
by jb » Tue Oct 12, 2010 5:32 pm
hermanfontenot wrote:jb wrote:The slution is to legalize and encourage safe usage of PEDS. In the golden era of the 80's, you'd have guys at 285 who were as strong as the fat ph*&%s at 350 and a hell of alot more mobile. It was only when roids strated to get a bad rap that you saw the rise of the fat pig Crackwagon OL. Even the Hogs were athletic. I've had occasion to meet Russ Grimm. He's piut on a nice boiler, but he's no Andre the Giant. And lachey and jacoby were athletic.
Former NFL defensive lineman Brad Culpepper agrees with you, JB:Culpepper, the retired lineman, sees a correlation between the inception of the NFL's steroid testing about 15 years ago and the increase in players' weights. With the crackdown on illegal substances, focus shifted from strength to sheer mass.
"No longer could a guy be 270 and maul people because he's on steroids and has so many muscles," Culpepper said. "Now you have to be 300 to move people. It remains to be seen what's going to happen to these guys as they get in their 30s and retire."
http://www.sptimes.com/2006/01/29/Sports/A_huge_problem.shtml
What's interesting to me is the effort a lot of these guys make to lose that extra weight once they quit playing. Culpepper, who was 270 pounds when he played on Tampa Bay's DL in the late '90s, is down to about 200. Mark May, Mark Schlereth and Ed Cunningham are all former 300-pound offensive linemen who have lost a ton of weight. Whe you see Cunningham on college football telecasts you'd enver guess he was a 300-pound center in the NFL.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Tue Oct 12, 2010 7:44 pm
Fire Marshall Bill wrote:
Same with 'twatwaffle'
by danwismar » Wed Oct 13, 2010 3:21 am
jb wrote:And lachey and jacoby were athletic.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests