Moderators: peeker643, swerb, pup, papacass
by swerb » Mon Sep 20, 2010 10:26 pm
by GodHatesClevelandSport » Mon Sep 20, 2010 10:52 pm
by Triple-S » Tue Sep 21, 2010 11:38 am
GodHatesClevelandSport wrote:Good to hear. The best remaining player on the team wanted to quit basketball because LeBron left.
I don't think we need to know anything else about this year's Cavs.
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by Orenthal » Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:11 pm
by aoxo1 » Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:27 pm
Triple-S wrote:GodHatesClevelandSport wrote:Good to hear. The best remaining player on the team wanted to quit basketball because LeBron left.
I don't think we need to know anything else about this year's Cavs.
Gotta trade him at this point, hate saying it, but if you're really looking out for the best for Mo and for the Cavs, you give him to a team like the Lakers or hell even give him back to the Bucks.
Gotta get as bad as possible too, anything not young or at the very least promising you give up.
by CharacterIV » Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:31 pm
aoxo1 wrote:Triple-S wrote:GodHatesClevelandSport wrote:Good to hear. The best remaining player on the team wanted to quit basketball because LeBron left.
I don't think we need to know anything else about this year's Cavs.
Gotta trade him at this point, hate saying it, but if you're really looking out for the best for Mo and for the Cavs, you give him to a team like the Lakers or hell even give him back to the Bucks.
Gotta get as bad as possible too, anything not young or at the very least promising you give up.
Now you've got something. Let's just give the Lakers whatever they want off our roster, so that they can beat the Heat like the little bitches they are.
Dead serious.
by jb » Tue Sep 21, 2010 2:52 pm
GodHatesClevelandSport wrote:I don't think we need to know anything else about last year's Cavs.
by boilerdaveb » Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:05 pm
by peeker643 » Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:13 pm
to Andy being a manly enforcer-type while Bosh is seen as soft.
by CharacterIV » Wed Sep 22, 2010 1:21 pm
peeker643 wrote:Andto Andy being a manly enforcer-type while Bosh is seen as soft.
Charmin and Cottonelle
above refers to my wish that Andy ends up on a contender to deal with Bosh. Manly enforcer, no... Annoying as hell on D, yes. Chances are good Bosh's frustration level will be red-lining for the better part the season as an unquestioned third banana, so I'm figuring Andy's relentless pestering could be a hell of an effective weapon against him during a 7 game playoff series. Goad him into some dumb plays, a couple of unnecessary T's, maybe an ejection?
by Triple-S » Wed Sep 22, 2010 1:26 pm
aoxo1 wrote:Triple-S wrote:GodHatesClevelandSport wrote:Good to hear. The best remaining player on the team wanted to quit basketball because LeBron left.
I don't think we need to know anything else about this year's Cavs.
Gotta trade him at this point, hate saying it, but if you're really looking out for the best for Mo and for the Cavs, you give him to a team like the Lakers or hell even give him back to the Bucks.
Gotta get as bad as possible too, anything not young or at the very least promising you give up.
Now you've got something. Let's just give the Lakers whatever they want off our roster, so that they can beat the Heat like the little bitches they are.
Dead serious.
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by peeker643 » Wed Sep 22, 2010 1:41 pm
CharacterIV wrote:peeker643 wrote:Andto Andy being a manly enforcer-type while Bosh is seen as soft.
Charmin and Cottonelle
Clarification required, presuming theabove refers to my wish that Andy ends up on a contender to deal with Bosh. Manly enforcer, no... Annoying as hell on D, yes. Chances are good Bosh's frustration level will be red-lining for the better part the season as an unquestioned third banana, so I'm figuring Andy's relentless pestering could be a hell of an effective weapon against him during a 7 game playoff series. Goad him into some dumb plays, a couple of unnecessary T's, maybe an ejection?
I wish y'all could see me right now. I'm on the FLOOR literally crying from laughing. I can't get up! Help me!! Help meeeee! Hahahaahahaaaa!
about 20 hours ago via Echofon
Reply Retweet . Hahahahaahahahahahaahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahaaahahaahahahahahahahaahahhahahahaahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahaahahahaahahahahahahahaaaaa
about 20 hours ago via Echofon
Reply Retweet . Yo, Mo Williams is like 27 & considered RETIRING!! Not due to injuries, due to hurt feelings! Ahahahahahahahahaahahhahahaahahahahaahahahahaa
about 20 hours ago via Echofon
Reply Retweet . @NSMORTGAGESHOP hahahahaaa. Lame. Try again. Hahahaaa
about 20 hours ago via Echofon in reply to NSMORTGAGESHOP
Reply Retweet . Hahahahaahahahahahaahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaahahhahahahaahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahaaaahahahaahahahahahahahaaaaa
about 20 hours ago via Echofon
Reply Retweet . Hahahahaahahahahahaahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaahahhahahahaahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahaahahahaahahahahahahahahaaa
about 20 hours ago via Echofon
Reply Retweet . Hahahahaahahahahahaahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaahahhahahahaahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahaahahahaahahahahahahahaaaaa
about 20 hours ago via Echofon
Reply Retweet . Hahahahaahahahahahaahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaahahhahahahaahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahaahahahaahahahahahahahahaa
about 20 hours ago via Echofon
Reply Retweet . Wowww so Moe Williams said he considered RETIRING b/c LeBron left! Hahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahhahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaahahaa!
about 20 hours ago via Echofon
by tired » Wed Sep 22, 2010 1:44 pm
by daddywags » Wed Sep 22, 2010 3:28 pm

by bac5665 » Wed Sep 22, 2010 4:14 pm
Triple-S wrote:Lose, lose like you've never lost before and build through the draft. You got a coach already, keep giving him pieces and lets go from there.
JUST LOSE BABY.
by aoxo1 » Wed Sep 22, 2010 4:30 pm
by Madre Hill, Superstar » Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:14 pm
Triple-S wrote:Lose, lose like you've never lost before and build through the draft. You got a coach already, keep giving him pieces and lets go from there.
JUST LOSE BABY.

by leadpipe » Thu Sep 23, 2010 7:35 pm
Madre Hill, Superstar wrote:Triple-S wrote:Lose, lose like you've never lost before and build through the draft. You got a coach already, keep giving him pieces and lets go from there.
JUST LOSE BABY.
Because nothing works better than accumulating a bunch of lottery busts and hopefully maybe that one guy with potential who'll be doing his best Vince Carter imitation while notching the days until he hits free agency. Granted that they haven't moved to Las Vegas already after drawing less than the Lake Erie Monsters.
by GodHatesClevelandSport » Thu Sep 23, 2010 7:48 pm
bac5665 wrote:Triple-S wrote:Lose, lose like you've never lost before and build through the draft. You got a coach already, keep giving him pieces and lets go from there.
JUST LOSE BABY.
Which is exactly why the NBA is dead to me. No sports system, ever should ever, ever, ever, ever, ever make it ok to tank a season. It makes me sick to my stomach to see teams resting their starters at the start of a game, or to see what the Nicks and Nets did for the last several years, or what people say (correctly as far as I can tell) that the Cavs need to do. It's just not how any competitive person should comport themselves. And yet, the NBA is designed so that unless you strip your team of talent and then tank intentionally, you're going to have a hell of a time.
Sports should be about competing at the game first and foremost. Anything that makes the games less competitive has to go. Just has to go.
by Madre Hill, Superstar » Thu Sep 23, 2010 10:27 pm
leadpipe wrote:In the NBA, in Cleveland, in the Winter, how in the wide world of sports do you think you can do it any other way.


by papacass » Fri Sep 24, 2010 1:44 pm
by jb » Fri Sep 24, 2010 2:00 pm
papacass wrote:I quite frankly wonder about the long-term viability of the NBA in cities like Cleveland, Milwaukee, Minneapolis, Indianapolis, Memphis etc. The middle-America, mid-sized, white-flight bedroom cities where pro basketball just isn't that popular unless the team is good.
The above-mentioned cities are about as anti-NBA as you can get. They're not havens for hip-hop culture like Detroit is. They're not big-city glamour destinations like Chicago or New York. They're not warm-weather cities. They're not places to see and be seen.
Any young star player who can indulge in all the trappings of the NBA star lifestyle will find nothing attractive about spending his winters playing in a smallish Midwestern burg where they roll the sidewalks up at 7 p.m. They don't have to settle for that, and they won't.
LBJ isn't a problem, he's a symptom. And I don't see how it's possible to build a long-term NBA winner in a city like Cleveland. You just can't keep the talent here. The days of being able to construct your contender around 20-something family-man guys -- like Mark Price and Brad Daugherty were back in the late '80s -- are long gone.
Most of the modern NBA players who value what Cleveland has to offer are over 30 and approaching their 100K checkup, so you don't want to build around them anyway.
I don't see the Cavs, Bucks, Pacers etc. being able to survive competitively in the modern NBA, at least for long stretches. We're just not NBA enough anymore.
by GodHatesClevelandSport » Fri Sep 24, 2010 6:01 pm
by Madre Hill, Superstar » Fri Sep 24, 2010 7:28 pm
jb wrote:IOW, these idiots need to constrict the Association by about half or more and stay in the top 10 markets only + glamour weather cities. Make it about a 14 team league.

by papacass » Fri Sep 24, 2010 10:54 pm
Madre Hill, Superstar wrote:jb wrote:IOW, these idiots need to constrict the Association by about half or more and stay in the top 10 markets only + glamour weather cities. Make it about a 14 team league.
That's half the league's ownership and players throwing away their meal tickes. Not gonna happen.
What I more expect is the owners revolting and demanding NFL-esque concessions: Franchise tags, hard caps, and no more guaranteed contracts. Considering how badly the players' association folded the last time around, they might get it too.
by peeker643 » Fri Sep 24, 2010 11:16 pm
by FUDU » Fri Sep 24, 2010 11:23 pm
by jb » Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:11 am
Madre Hill, Superstar wrote:jb wrote:IOW, these idiots need to constrict the Association by about half or more and stay in the top 10 markets only + glamour weather cities. Make it about a 14 team league.
That's half the league's ownership and players throwing away their meal tickes. Not gonna happen.
What I more expect is the owners revolting and demanding NFL-esque concessions: Franchise tags, hard caps, and no more guaranteed contracts. Considering how badly the players' association folded the last time around, they might get it too.
by Orenthal » Mon Sep 27, 2010 12:06 pm
by aoxo1 » Mon Sep 27, 2010 12:12 pm
by StewieG » Mon Sep 27, 2010 1:05 pm
by bac5665 » Mon Sep 27, 2010 3:10 pm
by motherscratcher » Mon Sep 27, 2010 3:51 pm
by Madre Hill, Superstar » Mon Sep 27, 2010 8:06 pm
bac5665 wrote:The problem is that the NBA is broken as far as 1/3 to 2/3 of the teams being able to compete regularly and yet they will make even more money than ever before from it because of all the hype.
Colin Cowheard (Gods I hate him some times) is right when he says the NBA has never been better than this coming season; it will be massively more popular. BUT it will attrophy and die in Cleveland, Minnesota, Indiana, Toronto, etc., where this summer proved categorically that those teams CANNOT win, even if everything goes right.
In the short term we're screwed. But in five years, when attendance is at record lows in these cities, half the owners will rebel, and things will have a chance of getting better. Right now, this lock out will not help us. Its the next one that will have a chance of fixing that game so that we can play.

by Madre Hill, Superstar » Mon Sep 27, 2010 8:14 pm
jb wrote:The irony is that the owners doid that last go-round and basiclly broke the players' will in no time flat. And this is the CBA thay got?

by jb » Tue Sep 28, 2010 12:45 pm
aoxo1 wrote:I don't really see anything wrong with what Mo said. I'm not going to kill a guy for being honest, when I know 90% of the guys in the association would feel the same way if they just went from being a featured performer on one of the marquee teams and contending for a championship to, at best, fighting for the 8 seed and at worst having to play out a string of games before an inevitable trade back to BFE.
by jb » Tue Sep 28, 2010 12:46 pm
bac5665 wrote:In the short term we're screwed. But in five years, when attendance is at record lows in these cities, half the owners will rebel, and things will have a chance of getting better.
by papacass » Tue Sep 28, 2010 1:58 pm
jb wrote:bac5665 wrote:In the short term we're screwed. But in five years, when attendance is at record lows in these cities, half the owners will rebel, and things will have a chance of getting better.
Just like in MLB since about 2002.
What's that?
Shit.
nevermind.
by bac5665 » Tue Sep 28, 2010 2:23 pm
jb wrote:bac5665 wrote:In the short term we're screwed. But in five years, when attendance is at record lows in these cities, half the owners will rebel, and things will have a chance of getting better.
Just like in MLB since about 2002.
What's that?
Shit.
nevermind.
Return to Cleveland Cavaliers & The NBA
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
