Moderators: peeker643, swerb, Ziner
by Fire Marshall Bill » Tue Jun 22, 2010 8:24 am
by Cerebral_DownTime » Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:08 pm
by mattvan1 » Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:11 pm

by Orenthal » Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:42 pm

by Fire Marshall Bill » Tue Jun 22, 2010 8:50 pm
But yeah, they hired more IRS workers because they knew there was going to be a massive oil spill in the Gulf Of BP.

by Cerebral_DownTime » Tue Jun 22, 2010 10:23 pm
Fire Marshall Bill wrote:But yeah, they hired more IRS workers because they knew there was going to be a massive oil spill in the Gulf Of BP.
Not what I meant at all but nice twist
by Fire Marshall Bill » Wed Jun 23, 2010 12:13 pm
by FUDU » Wed Jun 23, 2010 12:53 pm
Fire Marshall Bill wrote:To even mention taxing the victims at this time is just fucking ludicrous, insensitive and downright fucking ignirt
...
by Cerebral_DownTime » Wed Jun 23, 2010 5:39 pm
FUDU wrote:Fire Marshall Bill wrote:To even mention taxing the victims at this time is just fucking ludicrous, insensitive and downright fucking ignirt
...
Yep.
End of thread!
by Orenthal » Wed Jun 23, 2010 9:50 pm
by FUDU » Wed Jun 23, 2010 10:28 pm
much like finding a driver on the tee box and keeping it is considered income by the IRS.
by Erie Warrior » Wed Jun 30, 2010 7:55 pm


by Bayou Tribe » Wed Jun 30, 2010 9:04 pm
Erie Warrior wrote:http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/eticket/story?page=100630/tarponfishing
Really makes me die a little inside.
by Orenthal » Fri Jul 02, 2010 11:38 pm
by Spin » Sat Jul 03, 2010 1:20 pm
Anatoly Sagalevich of Russia's Shirshov Institute of Oceanology warns that the Gulf of Mexico sea floor has been fractured “beyond all repair” and people should begin preparing for an ecological disaster “beyond comprehension” unless “extraordinary measures” are taken to stop the huge flow of oil.
According to Sagalevich’s report, the oil leaking into the Gulf of Mexico is not just coming from the 22 inch well bore site being shown on television, but from at least 18 other sites on the “fractured seafloor” with the largest being nearly 7 miles from where the Deepwater Horizon exploded and sank and is spewing oil in the Gulf of Mexico at an estimated 2 million gallons of oil a day.
However, the most interesting fact about Sagalevicvh’s findings is that the American government made Sagalevich and his co-workers sign a document stating that they would not realize their findings to the American public or media. However, Sagalevicvh and his coworkers have been giving hourly updates to BP and the American government.
Matthew Simmons, who was former United States President Bush’s energy advisor has said, ““Let the well run dry (taking 30 years, and probably ruining the Atlantic ocean) or nuking the well.” Obama will not even consider nuking the well and various people, including Russian and American experts are trying to press Obama on the urgency of this matter. However, there are even more news reports from different areas about the toxic rain affecting crops.
This disaster needs to be stopped somehow because it is only going to get worse as more oil spills into the Gulf of Mexico and brings more disaster to both wildlife and humans.
by Erie Warrior » Sat Jul 03, 2010 3:01 pm
Spin wrote:Anatoly Sagalevich of Russia's Shirshov Institute of Oceanology warns that the Gulf of Mexico sea floor has been fractured “beyond all repair” and people should begin preparing for an ecological disaster “beyond comprehension” unless “extraordinary measures” are taken to stop the huge flow of oil.


by mattvan1 » Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:24 pm
Erie Warrior wrote:Spin wrote:Anatoly Sagalevich of Russia's Shirshov Institute of Oceanology warns that the Gulf of Mexico sea floor has been fractured “beyond all repair” and people should begin preparing for an ecological disaster “beyond comprehension” unless “extraordinary measures” are taken to stop the huge flow of oil.
I really, really hope this is not true.
by jb » Wed Jul 07, 2010 11:04 am
mattvan1 wrote:Erie Warrior wrote:Spin wrote:Anatoly Sagalevich of Russia's Shirshov Institute of Oceanology warns that the Gulf of Mexico sea floor has been fractured “beyond all repair” and people should begin preparing for an ecological disaster “beyond comprehension” unless “extraordinary measures” are taken to stop the huge flow of oil.
I really, really hope this is not true.
99.999% certainty this is a hoax. The original author, Sorcha Faal, has also written the following
US Arrest Of Blue Star ‘Psychic Spies’ Rocks Russia
To Featured on Tuesday, June 29, 2010 2:55 109
Obama Warns World Leaders ‘Millions Could Die’ From Gulf Oil Disaster
To Featured on Sunday, June 27, 2010 12:12 1657
Green Comet Of Doom Gives Grave Warning As Gulf Apocalypse Grows
To Featured on Sunday, June 20, 2010 9:45 574
Obama To Earn Nearly $85 Million From Gulf Oil Disaster
To Featured on Wednesday, June 16, 2010 9:45 870
Scientists Warn Gulf Of Mexico Sea Floor Fractured Beyond Repair
To Featured on Thursday, June 10, 2010 7:38 84320
Russia Orders Troops To Prepare For War With US
To Alternative on Monday, June 07, 2010 11:18 946
New Obama Law Warned Will Jail 500,000 Americans
To Alternative on Friday, May 28, 2010 9:58 378
Obama Threatens 14 US Governors With Immediate Arrest
To Obama on Wednesday, May 26, 2010 8:59 11409
Toxic Oil Spill Rains Warned Could Destroy North America
To Gulf Oil Spill on Sunday, May 23, 2010 10:22 8038
Top US Spy Chief Quits After Obama Orders 2 Americans Assassinated
To Alternative on Sunday, May 23, 2010 10:05
http://beforeitsnews.com/stories/by/0000000000000168
by FUDU » Thu Jul 15, 2010 9:41 pm
by smalls1129 » Thu Jul 15, 2010 11:17 pm
FUDU wrote:Gee wonder why we never see pictures like this on the 6 o'clock news.
http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2010/07/11/bp-gulf-oil-spill-photos-show-bp-real-reason-constitution-suspended/
by General » Fri Jul 16, 2010 12:57 am

by Orenthal » Fri Jul 16, 2010 9:45 pm
by FUDU » Fri Jul 16, 2010 10:47 pm
General wrote:There are 643 Quadrillion gallons of water in the Gulf, around 220 million gallons of oil gushed into the gulf which makes it .00000003% of the total volume of the gulf. While concentrations vary from site to site and time to time, Overall...well take a wade, it can't be any worse than what you breathe in at a tailgate with generators going and car exhaust concentrated in a few hundred square feet. I am NOT a BP shill, I live in Pensacola, and work all day along the gulf coast in the resort industry so the effects have been devastating but I am a slave to numbers and 3 one hundred millionths of a percent doesn't seem to bad. Obviously I wouldn't go wading in a giant tar mat, but I did swim in Lake Erie in the 70's and haven't mutated yet.
by Fire Marshall Bill » Sat Jul 17, 2010 4:27 pm
by General » Sun Jul 18, 2010 8:16 am
Fire Marshall Bill wrote:General is the guy who pisses in the pool


by Erie Warrior » Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:10 am
General wrote: which makes it .00000003% of the total volume of the gulf.


by Orenthal » Sun Jul 18, 2010 11:43 am
by Erie Warrior » Sun Jul 18, 2010 12:27 pm


by Fire Marshall Bill » Sun Jul 18, 2010 3:04 pm
by FUDU » Sun Jul 18, 2010 3:18 pm
by Bayou Tribe » Sun Jul 18, 2010 5:55 pm
FUDU wrote:I understand the whole notion that living there is a person's (stupid) choice to a degree
by smalls1129 » Sun Jul 18, 2010 7:16 pm
Bayou Tribe wrote:If you choose to make your primary residence off of a fault line in California or in the middle of Tornado Alley in Oklahoma, is that also a stupid choice?
by Bayou Tribe » Sun Jul 18, 2010 8:01 pm
smalls1129 wrote:Bayou Tribe wrote:If you choose to make your primary residence off of a fault line in California or in the middle of Tornado Alley in Oklahoma, is that also a stupid choice?
Absolutely it is stupid. Like those idiots that get interviewed every year when the mudslides begin. There were interviews last year where people were talking about rebuilding for the third or fourth time. You really expect me to feel sorry for your dumb ass when you keep building your home in a place where you know you're putting you home and family in danger, just ignorant at that point.
by General » Sun Jul 18, 2010 9:12 pm
Erie Warrior wrote:General wrote: which makes it .00000003% of the total volume of the gulf.
Specious reasoning, the spill isn't spread evenly throughout the Gulf, and most of the animals this will kill are migratory and use the wetlands as a place to breed.
Tide, currents and wind bring the oil on shore, fouling the beaches and marshes. Momma fish/ birds/ crabs swim in to lay eggs and get covered with oil/ chemicals. Some die, some make it to spawn. The eggs die soon after they are laid, or soon after birth. The mommas who didn't die on the way in, die on the way out. Cutting the population off at both ends.
And this will continue for years. The shrimp and crab industry probably won't recover from this. Both are primarily detritivores, and the oil will stay in the sediment for decades.
And if your going to take your family on vacation somewhere, why risk someone getting sick? I guess if you live there, a swim at the beach is fine, but nobody is going to fly down and stay for a week with their kids.

by General » Sun Jul 18, 2010 9:16 pm

by FUDU » Sun Jul 18, 2010 9:17 pm
IMO yes. I'm not trying to be a dick, or judgmental or argumentative. I'm just pointing out that living in an area in which mother nature can be extremely volatile (on a rather consistent basis) is a very high risk. I'm know the area can be nice, the people are good people and I know there is risk anywhere, but man knowing that any given day a storm/mother nature can come in and force you to start your life over is a tough tough way to go.Bayou Tribe wrote:FUDU wrote:I understand the whole notion that living there is a person's (stupid) choice to a degree
The area they show often and report from (Grande Isle) is vacation homes and fishing camps for the most part, same with many areas along the coast (Dularge, Dulac, Montegut, Venice, etc). Not a great deal of primary homes down there. Even at that, I know a handful of people who have had places down there for 25-30 years and have never had any issues with home damage throughout any of the major storms.
If you choose to make your primary residence off of a fault line in California or in the middle of Tornado Alley in Oklahoma, is that also a stupid choice?
by FUDU » Sun Jul 18, 2010 9:19 pm
LOL.General wrote:Someone point me in the direction of the most perfectly safe place to live. So I can patiently wait fot the asteroid to hit.
by General » Sun Jul 18, 2010 9:23 pm
FUDU wrote:IMO yes. I'm not trying to be a dick, or judgmental or argumentative. I'm just pointing out that living in an area in which mother nature can be extremely volatile (on a rather consistent basis) is a very high risk. I'm know the area can be nice, the people are good people and I know there is risk anywhere, but man knowing that any given day a storm/mother nature can come in and force you to start your life over is a tough tough way to go.Bayou Tribe wrote:FUDU wrote:I understand the whole notion that living there is a person's (stupid) choice to a degree
The area they show often and report from (Grande Isle) is vacation homes and fishing camps for the most part, same with many areas along the coast (Dularge, Dulac, Montegut, Venice, etc). Not a great deal of primary homes down there. Even at that, I know a handful of people who have had places down there for 25-30 years and have never had any issues with home damage throughout any of the major storms.
If you choose to make your primary residence off of a fault line in California or in the middle of Tornado Alley in Oklahoma, is that also a stupid choice?

by Bayou Tribe » Sun Jul 18, 2010 9:49 pm
FUDU wrote:IMO yes. I'm not trying to be a dick, or judgmental or argumentative. I'm just pointing out that living in an area in which mother nature can be extremely volatile (on a rather consistent basis) is a very high risk. I'm know the area can be nice, the people are good people and I know there is risk anywhere, but man knowing that any given day a storm/mother nature can come in and force you to start your life over is a tough tough way to go.Bayou Tribe wrote:FUDU wrote:I understand the whole notion that living there is a person's (stupid) choice to a degree
The area they show often and report from (Grande Isle) is vacation homes and fishing camps for the most part, same with many areas along the coast (Dularge, Dulac, Montegut, Venice, etc). Not a great deal of primary homes down there. Even at that, I know a handful of people who have had places down there for 25-30 years and have never had any issues with home damage throughout any of the major storms.
If you choose to make your primary residence off of a fault line in California or in the middle of Tornado Alley in Oklahoma, is that also a stupid choice?
by Ziner » Mon Jul 19, 2010 1:22 am
General wrote:Someone point me in the direction of the most perfectly safe place to live. So I can patiently wait for the asteroid to hit.

by Erie Warrior » Mon Jul 19, 2010 11:07 am
General wrote:If you would have bothered to read my qualifier concerning concentration areas instead of picking out a single line of my post, I am well aware of the differences in concentration of the oil. Also, I am well aware of the long term impact of this disaster as it pertains to the wildlife, so do me a favor and try not to instruct us on the obvious. Perceptions on this disaster will hinder tourism and travel to this region for years thanks to doomsayers, similar to you. Next time you are grading "papers" look at the entire body of work as opposed to one single line, you are better than that.


by General » Mon Jul 19, 2010 12:36 pm

by Erie Warrior » Mon Jul 19, 2010 1:08 pm
General wrote: At any rate the beaches in the five counties above have been relatively unscathed and to my unscientific and numerically enslaved mind, safe.


by General » Mon Jul 19, 2010 1:43 pm

by Erie Warrior » Thu Aug 05, 2010 9:51 am
But almost three-quarters of the nearly 207 million gallons of oil that leaked overall has been collected at the well by a temporary containment cap, been cleaned up or chemically dispersed, or naturally deteriorated, evaporated or dissolved, the report said.


by Orenthal » Thu Aug 05, 2010 6:24 pm
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests