Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Jfiling doesn't like cops.... And the sky is blue.
You think it's wrong to demand information and for events to play out for a cop killer (who soon after plead guilty) but immediately condemn a cop as a murderer for a horrific shooting that left a 7-year old dead?
I think both events should be allowed to play out facts wise.
It only goes one way?
Are you surprised for him it only goes one way? That's his MO, you know this.
Dude vehemently defended a guy who put four bullets in the brain of a cop who never unholstered his weapon, told everyone the absence of a dash-cam was his justification for his admittedly paranoid theory and then went on other boards defending the alleged killer's right to a fair trial.
I don't agree with his method, but asking why the Dashcam was not recording is a fair question. I don't know what went down on other boards. And he does have the right to a fair trial, just like the officer in this case if it comes to that.
Which is fine. Right up until you call a cop who shot a kid a murderer without any of the benefits that he cried for in an earlier thread. And then he whines about keeping it real in this thread. Sorry, your body of work here speaks. You build a history and reputation here honestly. Your words are your words. No one forced them out of you
This thread was started to get J to say what you already know he thinks. It was bait and he bit.
That's some hypocritical bullshit no matter whether you favor yourself a contrarian or distrustful of police or anything else.
Probably.
It's horse shit plain and simple.
Not sure why that's all that difficult to understand.
I'm not sayin it ain't horse shit. I just think it's hil-fuckin-larious for someone who thinks 90% of the people out there are morons to call someone else an asshole. If someone really believes in the 90% rule it would have to extend to everyone, including LEO. I don't agree with J's tone and approach but I don't think he's an asshole either. He's just a guy that doesn't like authority. Which everyone on these boards has known for a long time.
The 90% rule is horse shit. Steaming horse shit.
Crossed the line when he went back at Dem concerning the accident.
So yeah, he's an asshole.
And if you think that's hil-fucking-larious coming from me that's great.
This is the part of the post where I would explain how literally one should take the "90% rule," maybe I'd say it in third person....
Look, this has drifted far away from black and white. It's gotten a little deeper than jfiling not diggin' authority. That's why the bludgeoning. Plain and simple.
So, if your opinion of me ain't all that high because of "the 90% rule" or any other previous ramblings, well, nothing I can do about it. As the saying goes, "if everyone likes you, you're lyin' to somebody." I just give my opinion on these here boards. Not asking anyone to accept it, or change there own. And trust me, I know where I stand in the world. Elvis is dead and the world's still spinnin'
And, you are correct, this thread was a dangling carrot, and we'd probably all be better off without it, and, we all could predict what line it was going to take. That being said, while I respect your takes based on your history on these boards, I'm a bit puzzled as to why you seem to be a bit taken aback at how hard the hammer is being swung here. Again, not asking you to agree with a heavy handed stance, but certainly you can understand why it became so.
Lastly, the good thing that has come out of this is that I'm done with this topic on these boards. Not going to repeat the same shit. Next time an officer does something wrong and newsworthy, I'm not even ducking in. I'll just take solace in the fact jfiles is having a banner day and leave it at that.
