Moderators: peeker643, swerb, pup, papacass
by SoulDawg74 » Fri May 14, 2010 1:46 pm
by JCoz » Fri May 14, 2010 1:52 pm
by e0y2e3 » Fri May 14, 2010 1:54 pm

by Ziner » Fri May 14, 2010 1:55 pm
by TouchEmAllTime » Fri May 14, 2010 2:00 pm
by aoxo1 » Fri May 14, 2010 2:02 pm
by Shadow Scars » Fri May 14, 2010 2:04 pm
by Tree » Fri May 14, 2010 2:04 pm

by aoxo1 » Fri May 14, 2010 2:05 pm
by aoxo1 » Fri May 14, 2010 2:07 pm
by Ziner » Fri May 14, 2010 2:07 pm
Shadow Scars wrote:Is it just me or does SD start a new thread everytime he has a thought?
by Orenthal » Fri May 14, 2010 2:09 pm
by fundamentals » Fri May 14, 2010 2:10 pm
by Tree » Fri May 14, 2010 2:11 pm
aoxo1 wrote:Yes Tree you effing moron. LBJ heard from his agent that the Cavs would not give him a max deal unless he acted like a bore for 7 years.
Do you have a single neuron firing, or is your ass in complete control of your mouth at this point?

by SoulDawg74 » Fri May 14, 2010 2:11 pm
JCoz wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong (not you SD, other credible NBA people who will look at this thread), but if LeBron never considers signing for more than 3 years, there is actually little or no money left on the table apples to apples.
So Rich can wipe his ass with that little theory, IMO.
by Orenthal » Fri May 14, 2010 2:12 pm
fundamentals wrote:Why is Calipari seen as "The Answer?"
by e0y2e3 » Fri May 14, 2010 2:13 pm

by Larvell Blanks » Fri May 14, 2010 2:16 pm
SoulDawg74 wrote:
SD:
Why would he re-sign or sign with anybody for less than the Max , the situation would really really really have to be totally untenable and even then business would still have to be consummated on a path which makes sense.
If push came to shove he'd orchestrate a sign and trade minimum sighting irreconcilable differences .
Yeah I know the Cavs sid they aren't down , however
Gilbert would have to bite , if Nike made his outside deals so lucrative with a package to a Chicago lets say it more than made up for the cash difference.All these players coming available at the same time is no accident .
Wade Bosh Dirk Johnson Lebron and others have created a feeding frenzy to extort the max out of these franchises.
To even consider your idea that any of these guys let alone Lebron would level the playing field , for the owners is ludicrous , never mind the presumptive arrogance
of your tone and continence .
SoulDawg
Some Cavaliers fans may be wondering whether LeBron James' recently signed Nike contract extension will have any bearing on his decision as a free agent. However, according to multiple sources, the new deal does not have any bonuses for James to play in a larger market such as New York, Chicago or Los Angeles. There has been some speculation that such clauses in endorsement deals may have been something for James to consider when he becomes a free agent in July. Instead, James will continue to focus on winning, which is helping shoe sales. The current version of James' signature shoe, the Zoom LeBron VI, has been the best-selling version of the shoe.
by SoulDawg74 » Fri May 14, 2010 2:18 pm
Orenthal wrote:fundamentals wrote:Why is Calipari seen as "The Answer?"
fund that is what I fail to understand. The guy was a complete flop in his last NBA gig. However the guy is an excellent salesman, and the type of recruiter that would tell LeBron everything he wants to hear, and LeBron loves that as we can see...
by aoxo1 » Fri May 14, 2010 2:21 pm
Tree wrote:aoxo1 wrote:Yes Tree you effing moron. LBJ heard from his agent that the Cavs would not give him a max deal unless he acted like a bore for 7 years.
Do you have a single neuron firing, or is your ass in complete control of your mouth at this point?
So apparently you think LeBron not making a verbal committment means he is leaving? I simply think he wants to see what the market is going to be for his contract, so he didn't commit. Some team's gonna offer him a lot of jack, and the Cavs will simply top it, but LeBron isn't going to simply say, yah, I'm reupping.
So what part of my comments would you like me to delete, so as to make you feel more comfortable? Oh....the whole thing? Sure....whatever you say. I bow down to your superior intellect.
If you think my comments don't merit any discussion, ignore them. I'm not here to stir crap up. I am a Cavs fan, and am doing nothing more than discussing my thoughts. If maybe they aren't as well thought out as your one liners, then I do sincerely apologize.
Stay classy.
by Ziner » Fri May 14, 2010 2:27 pm
by Tree » Fri May 14, 2010 2:27 pm
aoxo1 wrote:Tree wrote:aoxo1 wrote:Yes Tree you effing moron. LBJ heard from his agent that the Cavs would not give him a max deal unless he acted like a bore for 7 years.
Do you have a single neuron firing, or is your ass in complete control of your mouth at this point?
So apparently you think LeBron not making a verbal committment means he is leaving? I simply think he wants to see what the market is going to be for his contract, so he didn't commit. Some team's gonna offer him a lot of jack, and the Cavs will simply top it, but LeBron isn't going to simply say, yah, I'm reupping.
So what part of my comments would you like me to delete, so as to make you feel more comfortable? Oh....the whole thing? Sure....whatever you say. I bow down to your superior intellect.
If you think my comments don't merit any discussion, ignore them. I'm not here to stir crap up. I am a Cavs fan, and am doing nothing more than discussing my thoughts. If maybe they aren't as well thought out as your one liners, then I do sincerely apologize.
Stay classy.
It doesn't matter what you think. The NBA has something called max contracts and LeBron could get one from any team far enough under the salary cap. There is no such thing as "exploring the market" for a player of his stature. He gets the maximum, that's that. And everyone has known it since the 4th quarter of his 1st game in the association.
If you can't be bothered to understand the most basic of facts about the NBA, don't vomit out 5 paragraphs of repeating shit over and over again.

by SoulDawg74 » Fri May 14, 2010 2:27 pm
Larvell Blanks wrote:SoulDawg74 wrote:
SD:
Why would he re-sign or sign with anybody for less than the Max , the situation would really really really have to be totally untenable and even then business would still have to be consummated on a path which makes sense.
If push came to shove he'd orchestrate a sign and trade minimum sighting irreconcilable differences .
Yeah I know the Cavs sid they aren't down , however
Gilbert would have to bite , if Nike made his outside deals so lucrative with a package to a Chicago lets say it more than made up for the cash difference.All these players coming available at the same time is no accident .
Wade Bosh Dirk Johnson Lebron and others have created a feeding frenzy to extort the max out of these franchises.
To even consider your idea that any of these guys let alone Lebron would level the playing field , for the owners is ludicrous , never mind the presumptive arrogance
of your tone and continence .
SoulDawg
His re-upped Nike contract does not have any type of elevator clause that gives him more money for going to a larger market. He'll make the same from them whether he plays in Clev or NY/Chi
by Ziner » Fri May 14, 2010 2:30 pm
Tree wrote:
I fully understand what the Cavs can offer LeBron as opposed to other teams. What is the Max that can be offered James? Is there an actual number? If there is, I've never seen it mentioned. I never claimed to be an NBA capologist. Maybe instead of being a dick, you could educate me a bit...I mean...that's how people have civil discussions...at least...that's what I was told at one time.
by e0y2e3 » Fri May 14, 2010 2:31 pm

by aoxo1 » Fri May 14, 2010 2:32 pm
Tree wrote:I fully understand what the Cavs can offer LeBron as opposed to other teams. What is the Max that can be offered James? Is there an actual number? If there is, I've never seen it mentioned. I never claimed to be an NBA capologist. Maybe instead of being a dick, you could educate me a bit...I mean...that's how people have civil discussions...at least...that's what I was told at one time.
by Tree » Fri May 14, 2010 2:35 pm
Ziner wrote:Tree wrote:
I fully understand what the Cavs can offer LeBron as opposed to other teams. What is the Max that can be offered James? Is there an actual number? If there is, I've never seen it mentioned. I never claimed to be an NBA capologist. Maybe instead of being a dick, you could educate me a bit...I mean...that's how people have civil discussions...at least...that's what I was told at one time.
The number is based on the cap.
Since I can't speak for aoxo, I would assume he was a dick because you rambled on about something acting as if you are some genius when you have basic simple things completely incorrect.
Kind of like SD saying that Pierce had to leave to get a ring.

by Tree » Fri May 14, 2010 2:44 pm
aoxo1 wrote:Tree wrote:I fully understand what the Cavs can offer LeBron as opposed to other teams. What is the Max that can be offered James? Is there an actual number? If there is, I've never seen it mentioned. I never claimed to be an NBA capologist. Maybe instead of being a dick, you could educate me a bit...I mean...that's how people have civil discussions...at least...that's what I was told at one time.
Read the thread before you post. I already posted it.

by HoodooMan » Fri May 14, 2010 5:25 pm
SoulDawg74 wrote:As one analyst succinctly pointed out the true target market is the $300 million ballers in China.
SoulDawg
by Cerebral_DownTime » Fri May 14, 2010 5:33 pm

by e0y2e3 » Fri May 14, 2010 5:58 pm

by Ziner » Fri May 14, 2010 5:59 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Damn straight CDT.
I'm out for awhile, have fun w/ Tree, SD, Spin and Pros.
Fucking hell.

by OldDawg » Fri May 14, 2010 11:18 pm
Shadow Scars wrote:Is it just me or does SD start a new thread everytime he has a thought?


by FUDU » Sat May 15, 2010 1:06 am
B/C he doesn't like to hold practices?fundamentals wrote:Why is Calipari seen as "The Answer?"
by waborat » Sat May 15, 2010 10:17 am
Tree wrote:
Wilkins' teams never showed any quit.
by British_Pharaoh » Sat May 15, 2010 10:25 am
OldDawg wrote:Shadow Scars wrote:Is it just me or does SD start a new thread everytime he has a thought?
OD
What do you mean?
OldDawg

by JCoz » Sat May 15, 2010 12:33 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Coz, w/ the new CBA up and the fact that the financial landscape of the league is going to VASTLY change there is no way in hell LBJ only reups for three years.
And there is still money left on the table since the % raises are larger for the Cavs. There is a thread like 3-5 pages back where WhackPhisto did all of the calculation on this. Feel free to go find it.
by JCoz » Sat May 15, 2010 12:49 pm
SoulDawg74 wrote:JCoz wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong (not you SD, other credible NBA people who will look at this thread), but if LeBron never considers signing for more than 3 years, there is actually little or no money left on the table apples to apples.
So Rich can wipe his ass with that little theory, IMO.
SD:
Why would he re-sign or sign with anybody for less than the Max , the situation would really really really have to be totally untenable and even then business would still have to be consummated on a path which makes sense.
If push came to shove he'd orchestrate a sign and trade minimum sighting irreconcilable differences .
Yeah I know the Cavs sid they aren't down , however
Gilbert would have to bite , if Nike made his outside deals so lucrative with a package to a Chicago lets say it more than made up for the cash difference.
All these players coming available at the same time is no accident .
Wade Bosh Dirk Johnson Lebron and others have created a feeding frenzy to extort the max out of these franchises.
To even consider your idea that any of these guys let alone Lebron would level the playing field , for the owners is ludicrous , never mind the presumptive arrogance
of your tone and continence .
SoulDawg
by aoxo1 » Sat May 15, 2010 12:49 pm
JCoz wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:Coz, w/ the new CBA up and the fact that the financial landscape of the league is going to VASTLY change there is no way in hell LBJ only reups for three years.
And there is still money left on the table since the % raises are larger for the Cavs. There is a thread like 3-5 pages back where WhackPhisto did all of the calculation on this. Feel free to go find it.
Right, and I will go find it, but can you expand on why he would sig long term in this landscape?
I mean, with the economy where it is and the cap going where it is, why would it make more financial sense to sign long term? Unless it was with the cavs, off his current deal, without opting out?
Wouldn't it make more sense to sign for three and see where the financial landscape is in three years?
by JCoz » Sat May 15, 2010 1:00 pm
by JCoz » Sat May 15, 2010 1:02 pm
by SoulDawg74 » Sun May 16, 2010 1:07 pm
JCoz wrote:SoulDawg74 wrote:JCoz wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong (not you SD, other credible NBA people who will look at this thread), but if LeBron never considers signing for more than 3 years, there is actually little or no money left on the table apples to apples.
So Rich can wipe his ass with that little theory, IMO.
SD:
Why would he re-sign or sign with anybody for less than the Max , the situation would really really really have to be totally untenable and even then business would still have to be consummated on a path which makes sense.
If push came to shove he'd orchestrate a sign and trade minimum sighting irreconcilable differences .
Yeah I know the Cavs sid they aren't down , however
Gilbert would have to bite , if Nike made his outside deals so lucrative with a package to a Chicago lets say it more than made up for the cash difference.
All these players coming available at the same time is no accident .
Wade Bosh Dirk Johnson Lebron and others have created a feeding frenzy to extort the max out of these franchises.
To even consider your idea that any of these guys let alone Lebron would level the playing field , for the owners is ludicrous , never mind the presumptive arrogance
of your tone and continence .
SoulDawg
SD, I'm not trying to be overly dickish about this, but your ideas about the Cavs and getting rid of saleries and signing or aquiring Bosh demonstrated an extreme lack of understanding on how these things work.
Hence my dig that someone else should correct my logic on this.
That's as nice as I can be regarding that.
Anyways, I'd like to understand the difference this time in signing max years as opposed to last time he was approaching FA.
Any pointing to signing a max deal for money reasons has to consider the difference between extending off his current deal as opposed to opting out. Meaning, if maxing dollars was the goal, there is no way you should opt out at all. And what would be the benifit of signing max year without a sign and trade as opposed to signing for 4 with an opt out clause as he did this time?
I probably should go find that Phisto thread.
by jb » Mon May 17, 2010 11:42 am
Orenthal wrote:fundamentals wrote:Why is Calipari seen as "The Answer?"
fund that is what I fail to understand. The guy was a complete flop in his last NBA gig. However the guy is an excellent salesman, and the type of recruiter that would tell LeBron everything he wants to hear, and LeBron loves that as we can see...
Return to Cleveland Cavaliers & The NBA
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests
