Why?

Moderators: peeker643, swerb, Ziner
by jb » Thu May 06, 2010 10:07 am

by jb » Thu May 06, 2010 10:19 am

by Bayou Tribe » Thu May 06, 2010 10:41 am
jb wrote:Um, it isn't happening.
Why?
by skatingtripods » Fri May 07, 2010 5:02 pm
by jfiling » Fri May 07, 2010 5:04 pm
by motherscratcher » Fri May 07, 2010 5:08 pm
skatingtripods wrote:It's George Bush's fault.
by waborat » Fri May 07, 2010 5:32 pm
by idoctribefan » Fri May 07, 2010 5:41 pm

by FUDU » Fri May 07, 2010 7:48 pm
by Bayou Tribe » Fri May 07, 2010 11:05 pm
waborat wrote:Funny how I haven't seen any campaigns on "Give Until It Fuckin' Hurts"...
Unlike Big EZ...
Oh, maybe because these people actually take responsibility to help themselves & their neighbors?
Naw, can't be, that wouldn't be American like
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sat May 08, 2010 2:27 pm
by RC » Sun May 09, 2010 1:15 am
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:lol. "State Controlled Media". Adorable.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sun May 09, 2010 2:09 am
RC wrote:Cerebral_DownTime wrote:lol. "State Controlled Media". Adorable.
Would be if it wasn't pretty much true.
by Orenthal » Mon May 10, 2010 1:26 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:RC wrote:Cerebral_DownTime wrote:lol. "State Controlled Media". Adorable.
Would be if it wasn't pretty much true.
How exactly is it true? There still is a Fox News Channel right? There are still many Conservative talk radio shows no? There are still Conservative newspapers and magazines, or did Obama come in and shut all these things down while I was sleeping?
Please...... Republicans still have the same voice in the media as they did under Boy Blunder. You can cry about "state controlled media" and play the role of the ostrich, but it doesn't make the claim true. It's bullshit, total unabashed bullshit.
by idoctribefan » Mon May 10, 2010 2:14 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:RC wrote:Cerebral_DownTime wrote:lol. "State Controlled Media". Adorable.
Would be if it wasn't pretty much true.
Please...... Republicans still have the same voice in the media as they did under Boy Blunder. You can cry about "state controlled media" and play the role of the ostrich, but it doesn't make the claim true. It's bullshit, total unabashed bullshit.

by Cerebral_DownTime » Mon May 10, 2010 2:55 pm
by jb » Mon May 10, 2010 4:26 pm
RC wrote:Cerebral_DownTime wrote:lol. "State Controlled Media". Adorable.
Would be if it wasn't pretty much true.
by jb » Mon May 10, 2010 4:27 pm
jfiling wrote:It didn't happen to that great of an extent in New Orleans, either, if that's the bait you're using to fish.
by GodHatesClevelandSport » Mon May 10, 2010 4:29 pm
by jb » Mon May 10, 2010 4:41 pm
GodHatesClevelandSport wrote:The original poster is assuming that looting should be happening. Why do you assume that looting should be happening in Nashville?
by Bayou Tribe » Mon May 10, 2010 5:51 pm
jb wrote:GodHatesClevelandSport wrote:The original poster is assuming that looting should be happening. Why do you assume that looting should be happening in Nashville?
The original poster does not assume that.
The original poster is merely using sarcasm as a device to compare and contrast
The original poster is impressed that there are not such reports.
The original poster knows that in smaller midwestern cities, neighbors helping each other instead of preying on one another is commonplace in these floods, but is impressed that even in a big city in the mid South there are no reports compared to the disgusting exhibition shown in NOLA.
The original poster thinks those labelled un-PC who spoke up against the rebuilding of NOLA shouldn't have given up. Logic was on their side, the original poster thinks.
The original poster even thinks "Treme" kind of sucks, and would like to punch out the NPR deejay and duct tape John Goodman's character before the original poster shit canned watching the series midway through eposie two.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Mon May 10, 2010 5:57 pm
jb wrote:GodHatesClevelandSport wrote:The original poster is assuming that looting should be happening. Why do you assume that looting should be happening in Nashville?
The original poster does not assume that.
The original poster is merely using sarcasm as a device to compare and contrast
The original poster is impressed that there are not such reports.
The original poster knows that in smaller midwestern cities, neighbors helping each other instead of preying on one another is commonplace in these floods, but is impressed that even in a big city in the mid South there are no reports compared to the disgusting exhibition shown in NOLA.
The original poster thinks those labelled un-PC who spoke up against the rebuilding of NOLA shouldn't have given up. Logic was on their side, the original poster thinks.
The original poster even thinks "Treme" kind of sucks, and would like to punch out the NPR deejay and duct tape John Goodman's character before the original poster shit canned watching the series midway through eposie two.
by peeker643 » Mon May 10, 2010 5:59 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:jb wrote:GodHatesClevelandSport wrote:The original poster is assuming that looting should be happening. Why do you assume that looting should be happening in Nashville?
The original poster does not assume that.
The original poster is merely using sarcasm as a device to compare and contrast
The original poster is impressed that there are not such reports.
The original poster knows that in smaller midwestern cities, neighbors helping each other instead of preying on one another is commonplace in these floods, but is impressed that even in a big city in the mid South there are no reports compared to the disgusting exhibition shown in NOLA.
The original poster thinks those labelled un-PC who spoke up against the rebuilding of NOLA shouldn't have given up. Logic was on their side, the original poster thinks.
The original poster even thinks "Treme" kind of sucks, and would like to punch out the NPR deejay and duct tape John Goodman's character before the original poster shit canned watching the series midway through eposie two.
Original poster is angry.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Mon May 10, 2010 6:02 pm
by Bayou Tribe » Mon May 10, 2010 8:39 pm
jb wrote:The original poster even thinks "Treme" kind of sucks, and would like to punch out the NPR deejay and duct tape John Goodman's character before the original poster shit canned watching the series midway through eposie two.
by jb » Tue May 11, 2010 9:47 am
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:jb wrote:GodHatesClevelandSport wrote:The original poster is assuming that looting should be happening. Why do you assume that looting should be happening in Nashville?
The original poster does not assume that.
The original poster is merely using sarcasm as a device to compare and contrast
The original poster is impressed that there are not such reports.
The original poster knows that in smaller midwestern cities, neighbors helping each other instead of preying on one another is commonplace in these floods, but is impressed that even in a big city in the mid South there are no reports compared to the disgusting exhibition shown in NOLA.
The original poster thinks those labelled un-PC who spoke up against the rebuilding of NOLA shouldn't have given up. Logic was on their side, the original poster thinks.
The original poster even thinks "Treme" kind of sucks, and would like to punch out the NPR deejay and duct tape John Goodman's character before the original poster shit canned watching the series midway through eposie two.
Original poster is angry.
by jb » Tue May 11, 2010 9:54 am
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Maybe.
by Bayou Tribe » Tue May 11, 2010 10:21 am
jb wrote:The original poster thinks that anyone has a right to live where they wish, but that when they do live under sea level and then stomp and piss and moan that I need to pay for them to do so to the tune of unreasonable sums or I am a ______________ (fill in the blank with whatever outrageous term chosen at the moment ) that we part company quickly.
by jb » Tue May 11, 2010 11:01 am
Bayou Tribe wrote:jb wrote:The original poster thinks that anyone has a right to live where they wish, but that when they do live under sea level and then stomp and piss and moan that I need to pay for them to do so to the tune of unreasonable sums or I am a ______________ (fill in the blank with whatever outrageous term chosen at the moment ) that we part company quickly.
I'm guessing the same would apply to fault lines, tornado alley, etc? What about unappreciative welfare recipients, federal housing recipients, etc?
by Bayou Tribe » Tue May 11, 2010 11:17 am
jb wrote:Bayou Tribe wrote:jb wrote:The original poster thinks that anyone has a right to live where they wish, but that when they do live under sea level and then stomp and piss and moan that I need to pay for them to do so to the tune of unreasonable sums or I am a ______________ (fill in the blank with whatever outrageous term chosen at the moment ) that we part company quickly.
I'm guessing the same would apply to fault lines, tornado alley, etc? What about unappreciative welfare recipients, federal housing recipients, etc?
Yeah man, it's a choice. Have fun living there, and immediate human relief needs to come if tragedy strikes, but just buy your insurance for the long term instead of not doing that and having a hand out. If you can't find a carrier, what does that tell you?
And yeah, fuck the unappreciative. Like booing Celtic fan.
by jb » Tue May 11, 2010 1:32 pm
Bayou Tribe wrote:jb wrote:Bayou Tribe wrote:jb wrote:The original poster thinks that anyone has a right to live where they wish, but that when they do live under sea level and then stomp and piss and moan that I need to pay for them to do so to the tune of unreasonable sums or I am a ______________ (fill in the blank with whatever outrageous term chosen at the moment ) that we part company quickly.
I'm guessing the same would apply to fault lines, tornado alley, etc? What about unappreciative welfare recipients, federal housing recipients, etc?
Yeah man, it's a choice. Have fun living there, and immediate human relief needs to come if tragedy strikes, but just buy your insurance for the long term instead of not doing that and having a hand out. If you can't find a carrier, what does that tell you?
And yeah, fuck the unappreciative. Like booing Celtic fan.
No doubt. It's high and dry where I am at, but alot of folks south of I-10 still have trouble with new homeowners' policies. Alot of new homeowners can only be approved if they have an existing policy (auto, life, etc) with said company for X amount of years prior. I enjoy being on the coast as much as the next guy, but for that price and hassle I'm fine with a couple hundred mile drive for great offshore fishing.
As for the population sample that was drug out of the inner city and evac'ed out, that's a pet peeve of mine. I miss the old Baton Rouge. Never the same.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Tue May 11, 2010 4:14 pm
jb wrote:Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Maybe.
The original poster doesn't have a hate on for the NOLA wilders, just disdain. Sick MFers .
The OP has let those animals and the post-relief (certainly in a disaster immediate triage relief must occur on a military logistical scale and the Feds dropped the ball tryng to have FEMA run the show ) entitlement hue and cry define his perception of NOLA.
The original poster just thinks that other than a few city blocks for the tourism industry that NOLA was largely an ungovernable train wreck built below sea level and a diaspora wouldn't have been the worst idea in 90 degree sunny weather (nor is Dave Bing's Detroit vision BTW ) . In fact AFAIC opportunity lost.
The original poster thinks that anyone has a right to live where they wish, but that when they do live under sea level and then stomp and piss and moan that I need to pay for them to do so to the tune of unreasonable sums or I am a ______________ (fill in the blank with whatever outrageous term chosen at the moment ) that we part company quickly.
I wouldn't go so far as to say Pol Pot woulda been right in this case with his anti-urban policy but certainly it is a case of Sam Kinneson and his take on U hauls all over again.
by Bayou Tribe » Tue May 11, 2010 4:30 pm
by Larvell Blanks » Tue May 11, 2010 4:39 pm
by Orenthal » Tue May 11, 2010 6:17 pm
jb wrote:GodHatesClevelandSport wrote:The original poster is assuming that looting should be happening. Why do you assume that looting should be happening in Nashville?
The original poster does not assume that.
The original poster is merely using sarcasm as a device to compare and contrast
The original poster is impressed that there are not such reports.
The original poster knows that in smaller midwestern cities, neighbors helping each other instead of preying on one another is commonplace in these floods, but is impressed that even in a big city in the mid South there are no reports compared to the disgusting exhibition shown in NOLA.
The original poster thinks those labelled un-PC who spoke up against the rebuilding of NOLA shouldn't have given up. Logic was on their side, the original poster thinks.
The original poster even thinks "Treme" kind of sucks, and would like to punch out the NPR deejay and duct tape John Goodman's character before the original poster shit canned watching the series midway through eposie two.
by Bayou Tribe » Tue May 11, 2010 9:26 pm
Larvell Blanks wrote:Brother in law, who graduated from LSU Law 3 years ago, just moved back to Baton Rouge for a new job. He can't believe what has happened there and is really excited. Can't wait to get back down there and have sushi at Tsunami again.
by idoctribefan » Wed May 12, 2010 1:07 am
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Who the hell takes a 90 minute break?

Users browsing this forum: danwismar, jb, motherscratcher and 3 guests