Moderators: peeker643, swerb, pup, papacass
by RedDawg » Tue May 04, 2010 10:26 am
by Gradysmanldy » Tue May 04, 2010 10:37 am
Why were we so worried about getting Z back after the trade when he never gets to play? Can't he contribute anymore?
by swerb » Tue May 04, 2010 10:47 am
by fundamentals » Tue May 04, 2010 11:06 am
by swerb » Tue May 04, 2010 11:13 am
by jonne99 » Tue May 04, 2010 11:15 am
by Larvell Blanks » Tue May 04, 2010 11:18 am
sportsguy33 I'd like to thank Mike Brown once again for refusing to play the Hickson-Jamison-LBJ-West-Mo quintet. Seriously, thank you.
about 12 hours ago via web
Reply Retweet
by e0y2e3 » Tue May 04, 2010 12:01 pm

by British_Pharaoh » Tue May 04, 2010 12:19 pm

by ajunior148 » Tue May 04, 2010 12:26 pm
by ajunior148 » Tue May 04, 2010 12:28 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Stop pointing the finger's at Roker and asking for retarded ideas like going big against a team that we ran out of the gym going small more than once this season (note: this does not mean go small for the entire game).
by Prosecutor » Tue May 04, 2010 12:32 pm
by Gradysmanldy » Tue May 04, 2010 12:43 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:People really need to stop scapegoating Roker..
The C's came in w/ the exact same game plan as the game before, as did we. They executed and NO ONE on our team did. It's really that simple.
Rondo is going to get his against everyone, D-West, Parker, etc.... The only hope is to contain him w/ solid team D and get offensive production from our PG. We didn't.
Shaq has been up and down and we need him to even out, because we cannot win this series w/ out him. He has closed out our last two wins, has altered shots on D, has made rebounding a far less impossible task (he had two offensive boards in the first three series yesterday, each of which led to missed easy shots) and during the second quarter yesterday he kept us in the game.
We need Mo to produce at 60-75% of what Rondo is on O. We need to make shots. We need to make the 75 wide open looks we have missed at the start of games. We need to run some more Jamo P&R (it's dumfounding that as soon as JJ enters the game we go straight to the P&R, are we so afraid of having KG in the lane we are seriously just going to tell Jamo to camp outside all series????).
Roker has not been great by any stretch of the imagination, but the blame for this one starts at LBJ and works its entire way down through every single person on this team.
by e0y2e3 » Tue May 04, 2010 1:01 pm

by e0y2e3 » Tue May 04, 2010 1:18 pm
The Boston Celtics are gaining more and more momentum with every passing game, picking up speed with a set rotation of healthy players that are cognizant of their station, and the team's offensive execution has picked up.
But with all that in Boston's back pocket, I can't help but slam the Cavs. This team is just wandering, looking for inspiration. They're playing with a sense of entitlement that seems a bit odd when you consider the fact that the Cleveland Cavaliers have yet to win a title. Not only are the Cavs letting their opponents dictate the terms of competition, they're taking plays off.
And I've got news for Cleveland. There are eight teams left. None of them can take plays off, on either end, and survive. Even the team with the most regular season wins of the lot.
It really does come down to effort. Because while Boston was lauded for its defensive effort in the team's Game 2 win, Cleveland's defense deserves as much scrutiny as Boston's defense (or offense) deserves plaudits. The Cavaliers were constantly losing Celtics on screens, back-screens, screen and roll ... any kind of movement, really. Cleveland knows what it is doing, mind you, so Mike Brown's crew is not exactly new to this defensive thing, or averse to dominating on that end. They know better.
They just had to bring the effort. And in Game 2, the Cavs declined. And because we're done with the regular season, and done with a should-be lottery participant in the Chicago Bulls, the Cavaliers are going to have to learn how to earn wins again, instead of just backing into them.
Boston was fantastic. It overcame a series of terrible calls to work what isn't an option-rich offense on paper into becoming an option-rich offense on the court. Rajon Rondo(notes) was active without having to dominate the rock, Ray Allen(notes) developed all sorts of cross matches and confusion with his work off screens (the Cavs just didn't talk, at all; it was clear through the TV screen), Rasheed Wallace(notes) played terrific defense and even came out nailing perimeter looks after a solid post-up jumper started his night.
When Rasheed nailed his second three-pointer of the game, making his third straight shot to start the evening, I swear you could hear all the laptops on press row pop right open, as everyone began their column for the night. He then topped that with a nice post-up score on J.J. Hickson(notes).
And Paul Pierce(notes)? Well, Paul Pierce is struggling. 40 percent on the season against Cleveland, struggled against them last season, and 33 percent shooting in this series after a 4-10 night on Monday. He's forcing LeBron James(notes) to guard him, though, which is enough.
James had a poor defensive night. He was constantly out of place on that end, including some of Pierce's makes, and though he changed (or persuaded opponents not to shoot) shots and blocked a pair of looks, James was a problem on that end.
And he was a huge problem on the offensive end.
James wandered. He missed some looks on the interior that he usually follows through on, he wasn't committed to working within the flow of the Cleveland offense, and that comes down to effort. That comes down to wanting to make an impact, and could you really point to a time (save for a furious Cleveland rush toward the middle of the fourth quarter) where you really saw James looking to make this game his own?
Even down the stretch, with his ears perked, James just didn't ‘ave it. Missed shots, poor rotations, missed free throws.
If James is hurting, he needs to let his team know, and the Cavs have to find a way to work around it. He has to be honest about his limitations.
And if he can play though this pain? If he can dominate with it, as was the case late in Game 1? Then he needs to get to dominating. Because while this is the best supporting cast he's ever head, this is still a beatable supporting cast. I don't care if Mike Brown is botching the rotations, the lineups, and minutes allotments. He can do better.
His whole team can, as well. Miserable showing from Cleveland.
And, man, I'm telling you -- Boston thinks it can win it all. That's never gone away. And when you pair that up against a team that thinks it's about to be handed a championship? Dangerous stuff.

by e0y2e3 » Tue May 04, 2010 1:33 pm

by e0y2e3 » Tue May 04, 2010 1:40 pm

by hermanfontenot » Tue May 04, 2010 1:52 pm

by RedDawg » Tue May 04, 2010 2:04 pm
by fundamentals » Tue May 04, 2010 2:11 pm
hermanfontenot wrote:First of all, LeBron is injured. It's obvious. I'm starting to wonder if he should be playing at all. Because he didn't help his team playing the way he did last night. Really though, if he's hurt it's over.
Re: the sense of entitlement. I see it too and find it amazing as well. What amazes me is that this isn't the first Cleveland team we've seen to have this sense of entitlement. The late '90s Indians had it too. How can you play in this city and possibly expect to have anything handed to you?
by hermanfontenot » Tue May 04, 2010 2:18 pm
fundamentals wrote:I am curious as to why you think it's obvious he's hurt?

by ajunior148 » Tue May 04, 2010 2:29 pm
hermanfontenot wrote:What pisses me off is that he's obviously injured more than he's letting on, yet he won't admit the extent of the injury not because of anything having to do with this postseason, but because he doesn't want to hurt his upcoming free-agent goodwill tour. The guy is selfish almost beyond belief.
by hermanfontenot » Tue May 04, 2010 2:35 pm
ajunior148 wrote:What a terrible take, even for Herm. At least you are correct on that he is obviously hurt more than he is letting on.

by tired » Tue May 04, 2010 2:35 pm
by ajunior148 » Tue May 04, 2010 2:43 pm
hermanfontenot wrote:ajunior148 wrote:What a terrible take, even for Herm. At least you are correct on that he is obviously hurt more than he is letting on.
Right, even for me. There's no other reason for him to play possum on this injury than he doesn't want to hurt his chances to be courted to the max in FA. None. I mean, New York City ain't getting down on its collective knees for a guy with a bum elbow.
by ajunior148 » Tue May 04, 2010 3:00 pm
by e0y2e3 » Tue May 04, 2010 3:11 pm

by hermanfontenot » Tue May 04, 2010 3:24 pm
How about he's a professional athlete that lives in a PC world where a "no excuse" attitude is expected? Is that not a possibility?
You're telling me that you think teams might shy away from him because of a bone bruise this offseason? God, I wish that was the case.

by ajunior148 » Tue May 04, 2010 3:35 pm
hermanfontenot wrote:Maybe I just stayed in a Holiday Inn last night, but I don't think it's just a bone bruise. I think it's more serious and it involves nerve damage. Take it with a grain of salt.
As for NHB, it wasn't that I was being judgmental, it was that I was being judgmental in a way you didn't like. But never mind that.
by ajunior148 » Tue May 04, 2010 3:43 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:BTW: I find it kind of funny that no one has brought up the fact that the biggest rotation problem and Brown's biggest blunder last night was not getting Moon more than 7 minutes.
Instead of crying about JJ who got himself pulled try bitching about what is actually a problem.
by Gradysmanldy » Tue May 04, 2010 3:45 pm
by aoxo1 » Tue May 04, 2010 4:00 pm
by Orenthal » Tue May 04, 2010 8:38 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:People really need to stop scapegoating Roker.
The C's came in w/ the exact same game plan as the game before, as did we. They executed and NO ONE on our team did. It's really that simple.
Rondo is going to get his against everyone, D-West, Parker, etc.... The only hope is to contain him w/ solid team D and get offensive production from our PG. We didn't.
KG is scoring 18 points on 20+ shots against Jamo. Big effing deal. I'll let KG take 20 shots to produce < 20 points all day every day and twice on Sunday.
Shaq has been up and down and we need him to even out, because we cannot win this series w/ out him. He has closed out our last two wins, has altered shots on D, has made rebounding a far less impossible task (he had two offensive boards in the first three series yesterday, each of which led to missed easy shots) and during the second quarter yesterday he kept us in the game.
For everyone screaming for more JJ, you do realize that it was JJ that got torched by Sheed to the tune of 15 points in the 2nd quarter yesterday? JJ needs to get burn and he had a chance early yesterday. He blew that chance. If he wants to rotate on D and not run around like a retard he'll stay on the floor, simple as that.
Delonte's D has been about as effective as Mo's.
And this isn't even touching on the big fat no show from LBJ.
Stop pointing the finger's at Roker and asking for retarded ideas like going big against a team that we ran out of the gym going small more than once this season (note: this does not mean go small for the entire game).
We need Mo to produce at 60-75% of what Rondo is on O. We need to make shots. We need to make the 75 wide open looks we have missed at the start of games. We need to run some more Jamo P&R (it's dumfounding that as soon as JJ enters the game we go straight to the P&R, are we so afraid of having KG in the lane we are seriously just going to tell Jamo to camp outside all series????).
Roker has not been great by any stretch of the imagination, but the blame for this one starts at LBJ and works its entire way down through every single person on this team.
Good lord people, you want to bitch bitch about the fucking MVP and his shit talking sidekick Mo.
EOD we are missing open looks and LBJ isn't creating. Cannot fix the O until those two things are addressed.
Where the hell is the bow down in worship emoticon?
by DrPoove » Tue May 04, 2010 9:07 pm
by waborat » Tue May 04, 2010 9:39 pm
by Orenthal » Tue May 04, 2010 10:36 pm
by jb » Wed May 05, 2010 8:37 am
by jb » Wed May 05, 2010 8:39 am
Orenthal wrote:I love JJ's energy, but guy has no concept of spacing on D or O. He hurts us on the boards and gets lost on D. His shortcomings are the same as was described early season, and although he was improved vastly over the past 2 years, at this time there is no room for error. At his best against a veteran Boston team he is a +/- wash.
As far as minutes, Moon needs to be eating up some of Parker's and Redz some of Mo's. While I would love to see Boobie get some burn, I just cannot see Brown throwing another small guard into the equation even if his defense is a vast upgrade over Mo's.
by RedDawg » Wed May 05, 2010 9:38 am
by fundamentals » Wed May 05, 2010 10:39 am
by e0y2e3 » Wed May 05, 2010 1:01 pm

by Tree » Wed May 05, 2010 1:43 pm

by e0y2e3 » Wed May 05, 2010 1:45 pm

by Tree » Wed May 05, 2010 1:59 pm

by e0y2e3 » Wed May 05, 2010 2:01 pm
Tree wrote:Stick where the sun don't shine. That was uncalled for. Maybe you need to go back to OBR....oops...that's right, you wore your welcome out there.

by Tree » Wed May 05, 2010 2:04 pm

by Tree » Wed May 05, 2010 2:04 pm

by e0y2e3 » Wed May 05, 2010 2:07 pm
Tree wrote:Oh...never said you were banned there, just said, nobody there cares for your bullshit, and you repeatedly get run there for it. That's why you hide here now. And we both know it's true. Your comments here are a prime example of why you aren't well liked.

by Prosecutor » Wed May 05, 2010 2:08 pm
Roker isn't wholly responsible for his team to start playing COMPLETELY DIFFERENTLY than they did all season when the playoffs show up. He can draw plays, coach, and cajole....but if they don't want to play the same game they've been playing all year (and for the most part, played in the first round) then WTF is he supposed to do.
by Tree » Wed May 05, 2010 2:16 pm

Return to Cleveland Cavaliers & The NBA
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
