Moderators: peeker643, swerb, Ziner
by waborat » Tue Apr 27, 2010 7:30 am
jb wrote:OK, whose leading off?
by Cerebral_DownTime » Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:48 am
by Fire Marshall Bill » Tue Apr 27, 2010 10:12 am
by Ziner » Tue Apr 27, 2010 12:03 pm
The measure — set to take effect in late July or early August — would make it a crime under state law to be in the U.S. illegally.
by Ea$t $ide » Tue Apr 27, 2010 12:53 pm
Ziner wrote:Ugh, I dont know what you do. These states are being crippled by illegal immigrants at some point they have to do something don't they? Loved this comment from this AP article
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/art ... gD9FBAE0O0The measure — set to take effect in late July or early August — would make it a crime under state law to be in the U.S. illegally.
Really make something that is illegal a crime... go figure.
The tricky part comes in when they enforce it. Do I want the police able to stop any person of Mexican decent walking down the street, of course not. However these states need to do something in order to even survive. Arizona has one of the worst budget problems in the country. Escalating education and medicaid costs (read: out of control from immigrants) as well as the housing crisis (read: out of control Americans) has that state in bad shape.
What else are they supposed to do? I am with CDT on the 4th amendment, but 70% of Arizonians (Arizonites?) don't.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_ ... il_14_2010
by Cerebral_DownTime » Tue Apr 27, 2010 1:00 pm
There's also disagreement on the potential effect of the law's provisions that allow citizens to sue any agency or official who "limits or restricts the enforcement of federal immigration laws." Some fear that those provisions will bring a flood of court cases against cops and elected officials, but Livingston says the law has enough protections against frivolous lawsuits. Phil Gordon, the mayor of Phoenix who calls SB1070 a "hateful law," disagrees, saying that even seemingly unrelated city ordinances, like the one that prevents high-speed chases in residential neighborhoods, could lead to lawsuits if they even once impede the apprehension of a suspected illegal immigrant
Brewer has ordered state officials to develop a training course for officers to learn what constitutes reasonable suspicion that someone is in the U.S. illegally.

by Fire Marshall Bill » Tue Apr 27, 2010 2:10 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Tue Apr 27, 2010 2:32 pm
by Fire Marshall Bill » Tue Apr 27, 2010 2:43 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I never said anything on how they should handle their problem, so i'm not sure who you're speaking at, or if you're just talking in generalities. I just don't see how they can enforce it. That's all.
Apparently nobody wants to be a Border Patrol Agent.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Tue Apr 27, 2010 2:48 pm
by idoctribefan » Tue Apr 27, 2010 2:53 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:
Even with the un-named protections against frivolous lawsuits, there are going to tidal waves of lawsuits in AZ, from both angles.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:This is pretty funny too. I have no idea how the hell they can define "reasonable suspicion". What makes a illgeal look more suspicious than a legal? I don't think they really thought this through, and it's going to come back to bite them in the ass when they're being sued by legal residents for having their rights violated, and when the Feds refuse to take custody of anyone caught up in the dragnet.

by Cease » Tue Apr 27, 2010 3:35 pm
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Sadly, this isn't how most issues are handled these days. It's a choose a side and cry world...
by Cerebral_DownTime » Tue Apr 27, 2010 3:36 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Tue Apr 27, 2010 3:40 pm
Cease wrote:FTR 4th AmendmentThe right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Should illegals be protected by the 4th Amendment? Prolly not. But if, I'm a US citizen and they ask me for papers without cause, and I refuse and am detained, I think I've got a case.
While I don't agree with how far-reaching this legislation is, I will give kudos to the Arizona people to forcing this issue on the front pages. Sometimes you've to over-reach to get noticed (see Denver's 1st Rd. pick). It's a serious issue (immigration reform, not Tebow) that must be dealt with- just maybe not like this.
Hopefully the powers that be can work toward a solution that is centrist.Sadly, this isn't how most issues are handled these days. It's a choose a side and cry world...
by Ziner » Tue Apr 27, 2010 4:13 pm
Others, like Mexican day laborer Jesus Aguilar, 52, say the measure leaves them few options but to leave Arizona and try their luck elsewhere.
"Since the law says that people hiring undocumented day laborers will get fined, no-one wants to (hire) us," said Aguilar, who early on Monday was among some two dozen migrants touting for landscaping and building work at a day labor site in north Phoenix.
"We are thinking of going to Utah or New Mexico ... Here it is just too racist," he added.
"What is a father to do if, in 90 days, they can be stopped by any police officer and questioned ... when their family is at home and their kids in school?" said Elias Bermudez, the founder of Phoenix nonprofit Immigrants Without Borders.
"That's going to create havoc, so a lot of them are saying, 'Look, before they pick me up, I'd rather leave the state of Arizona either to another state or back home,'" he added.
For Mexican day laborer Rodolfo Espinoza, meanwhile, it was simply time to go back home to work as a fisherman on the Pacific coast of northwest Mexico, where he has a wife and four children.
"This new law gives us no other option than to leave ... I'm going back to Mexico, where I feel more comfortable," he added.
by jfiling » Tue Apr 27, 2010 5:49 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Tue Apr 27, 2010 5:51 pm
jfiling wrote:Yes, the answer to the budget problems that illegal immigrants cause is to put them into state prisons, with state-funding food and medical care. Arizona cannot deport them, and will be forced to put them up somewhere until DHS gets around to processing their deportations, if they even bother. Makes perfect sense to me. What happens to the children who are here illegally as well?
by exiledbuckeye » Tue Apr 27, 2010 6:03 pm
jfiling wrote:Yes, the answer to the budget problems that illegal immigrants cause is to put them into state prisons, with state-funding food and medical care. Arizona cannot deport them, and will be forced to put them up somewhere until DHS gets around to processing their deportations, if they even bother. Makes perfect sense to me. What happens to the children who are here illegally as well?
by FUDU » Tue Apr 27, 2010 6:14 pm

by Cerebral_DownTime » Tue Apr 27, 2010 6:20 pm
In the end the 4th amendment has nothing to do with this as far as illegal aliens go.
There is one important thing to remember about immigration, immigration is designed to serve the very needs of the nation, not the wants of the world.
America is for Americans first. Immigration is not a "right" that belongs to anybody and everybody who wants to come to America. Immigration is a privilege that we Americans alone decide to confer.
by FUDU » Tue Apr 27, 2010 6:29 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:In the end the 4th amendment has nothing to do with this as far as illegal aliens go.
It does when you don't define "reasonable suspicion". American's shouldn't have their rights infringed upon just because they look like illegals, which will happen.America is for Americans first. Immigration is not a "right" that belongs to anybody and everybody who wants to come to America. Immigration is a privilege that we Americans alone decide to confer.
Really? What tribe do you belong to?
by Cerebral_DownTime » Tue Apr 27, 2010 6:40 pm
by Ziner » Tue Apr 27, 2010 6:49 pm
by jfiling » Tue Apr 27, 2010 6:51 pm
FUDU wrote:America is for Americans first. Immigration is not a "right" that belongs to anybody and everybody who wants to come to America. Immigration is a privilege that we Americans alone decide to confer.
The New Colossus
Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,
With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name
Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.
"Keep ancient lands, your storied pomp!" cries she
With silent lips. "Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"
by FUDU » Tue Apr 27, 2010 6:55 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:We all came from immigrants, what makes us so superior to a fruit picker in Florida? Every negative thing people say about Mexicans, has probably been said your relatives and my relatives.
FTR. I like having this debate with you FUDU, I was looking forward to you joining in. You're good at defending your points, which believe it or not, I do get.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Tue Apr 27, 2010 6:57 pm
Ziner wrote:To be fair your ancestors were Nazi's
by Ziner » Tue Apr 27, 2010 7:04 pm
Generally, those immigrants who were approved spent from two to five hours at Ellis Island. Arrivals were asked 29 questions including name, occupation, and the amount of money carried. Those with visible health problems or diseases were sent home or held in the island's hospital facilities for long periods of time. More than three thousand would-be immigrants died on Ellis Island while being held in the hospital facilities. Some unskilled workers were rejected because they were considered "likely to become a public charge." About 2 percent were denied admission to the U.S. and sent back to their countries of origin for reasons such as having a chronic contagious disease, criminal background, or insanity. Ellis Island was sometimes known as "The Island of Tears" or "Heartbreak Island" because of those 2% who were not admitted after the long transatlantic voyage. The Kissing Post is a wooden column outside the Registry Room, where new arrivals were greeted by their relatives and friends, typically with tears, hugs and kisses.
by Ziner » Tue Apr 27, 2010 7:08 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Ziner wrote:To be fair your ancestors were Nazi's
My great grandparents (dad's side) left Germany in 1938 because some friends of my grandfather blew up a Nazi rail stop that killed 2 SS men and wounded several others. The Nazis caught his friends, hung them in a meat locker, then cut them with straight razors and rubbed salt into the wounds, that's when my grandfather decided it was probably best to leave.
My mom's side has been here since the late 1800's, they came here "illegaly" through Canada.
by jfiling » Tue Apr 27, 2010 7:19 pm
Ziner wrote:Well shit, lets just let everyone in who wants to be. Let's take all the poor in the world, let them come here, add nothing to society except getting free health care and education and be ok with it.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Tue Apr 27, 2010 7:23 pm
Ziner wrote:Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Ziner wrote:To be fair your ancestors were Nazi's
My great grandparents (dad's side) left Germany in 1938 because some friends of my grandfather blew up a Nazi rail stop that killed 2 SS men and wounded several others. The Nazis caught his friends, hung them in a meat locker, then cut them with straight razors and rubbed salt into the wounds, that's when my grandfather decided it was probably best to leave.
My mom's side has been here since the late 1800's, they came here "illegaly" through Canada.
It was a joke obviously, but that is a hell of a story. I can not imagine living in Germany or most of Europe during all that.
My great-great-grandparents sent my great-grandfather and all of his brothers and sisters to the US or Argentina as World War I was breaking out. I never knew him but I could not even imagine coming to the US knowing no one, not speaking the language, and making a go of it. Sure glad he did though.
by Ziner » Tue Apr 27, 2010 7:30 pm
jfiling wrote:Ziner wrote:Well shit, lets just let everyone in who wants to be. Let's take all the poor in the world, let them come here, add nothing to society except getting free health care and education and be ok with it.
Strange how that system worked for most of the history of this country. It's also strange how each new immigration scare happens to target some particular ethnic group (not necessarily in order, but: Chinese, Italians, Irish, Japanese, Indians, and Middle Easterners) who are responsible for some new social ill (drugs, laziness, taking our jobs, opening up too many convenience stores). Mexicans are just the latest wop, mick, dothead, slant, and towelhead, and at some point this shit has to stop.
by Ziner » Tue Apr 27, 2010 7:32 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:What country did they leave from?
by hermanfontenot » Tue Apr 27, 2010 7:32 pm
jfiling wrote:Strange how that system worked for most of the history of this country.

by jfiling » Tue Apr 27, 2010 7:38 pm
hermanfontenot wrote:jfiling wrote:Strange how that system worked for most of the history of this country.
Not really. The population wasn't paying out the nose of immigrants back in the day, you see. There was no welfare, no free emergency-room visits, no free education, no free lunches, no safety net whatsoever. Made them a lot cheaper to take in. Entire states were not being bankrupted by a parasitical immigrant class, as California is right now.
You want to let every third-world peasant into this country who wants to? Dismantle the welfare structure that allows these people to treat the country like termites treat a wooden house and we'll talk.
by FUDU » Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:17 pm
I believe Herm addressed this (I admittedly skimmed his post, no offense Herm) but again somebody is missing or ignoring the context of today's immigration. Completely different situations and circumstances in history.jfiling wrote:Ziner wrote:Well shit, lets just let everyone in who wants to be. Let's take all the poor in the world, let them come here, add nothing to society except getting free health care and education and be ok with it.
Strange how that system worked for most of the history of this country. It's also strange how each new immigration scare happens to target some particular ethnic group (not necessarily in order, but: Chinese, Italians, Irish, Japanese, Indians, and Middle Easterners) who are responsible for some new social ill (drugs, laziness, taking our jobs, opening up too many convenience stores). Mexicans are just the latest wop, mick, dothead, slant, and towelhead, and at some point this shit has to stop.
by jfiling » Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:19 pm
FUDU wrote:I believe Herm addressed this (I admittedly skimmed his post, no offense Herm) but again somebody is missing or ignoring the context of today's immigration. Completely different situations and circumstances in history.jfiling wrote:Ziner wrote:Well shit, lets just let everyone in who wants to be. Let's take all the poor in the world, let them come here, add nothing to society except getting free health care and education and be ok with it.
Strange how that system worked for most of the history of this country. It's also strange how each new immigration scare happens to target some particular ethnic group (not necessarily in order, but: Chinese, Italians, Irish, Japanese, Indians, and Middle Easterners) who are responsible for some new social ill (drugs, laziness, taking our jobs, opening up too many convenience stores). Mexicans are just the latest wop, mick, dothead, slant, and towelhead, and at some point this shit has to stop.
Thing is jfiling this is not "a scare" this is real, maybe you are not as aware b/c you don't live in the midst of this. Do you like having access to working hospitals in your community, well so do the people in SoCal, but guess what, they don't get that anymore like they did just 5-10 years ago, that is just one small example. But to your overall point, immigration has a history of taking place in waves in regards to the demographics of the immigrants. It is just the nature of the beast, especially with our country.
The big difference with today's immigration (especially illegal immigration) is that IT IS wave of people from a third world country, in which in many cases they are diseased and in most cases they are low skilled or unskilled. So, um, where is the benefit? You know why they are most often unskilled, b/c Mexico has a terrible education system, why should that be the fault of you or me? Why should you or I be responsible for making up for that short coming? No where else on the planet does a 1st world country border a 3rd world country like this. That is a big reason for all of this no doubt.
I've probably asked you this before, most likely with no response (b/c there is no response other than the obvious) would you let just anybody enter your home? Then why would you let just anybody enter your country.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:25 pm
hermanfontenot wrote:jfiling wrote:Strange how that system worked for most of the history of this country.
Not really. The population wasn't paying out the nose of immigrants back in the day, you see. There was no welfare, no free emergency-room visits, no free education, no free lunches, no safety net whatsoever. Made them a lot cheaper to take in. Entire states were not being bankrupted by a parasitical immigrant class, as California is right now.
You want to let every third-world peasant into this country who wants to? Dismantle the welfare structure that allows these people to treat the country like termites treat a wooden house and we'll talk.
by FUDU » Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:26 pm
jfiling wrote:FUDU wrote:I believe Herm addressed this (I admittedly skimmed his post, no offense Herm) but again somebody is missing or ignoring the context of today's immigration. Completely different situations and circumstances in history.jfiling wrote:Ziner wrote:Well shit, lets just let everyone in who wants to be. Let's take all the poor in the world, let them come here, add nothing to society except getting free health care and education and be ok with it.
Strange how that system worked for most of the history of this country. It's also strange how each new immigration scare happens to target some particular ethnic group (not necessarily in order, but: Chinese, Italians, Irish, Japanese, Indians, and Middle Easterners) who are responsible for some new social ill (drugs, laziness, taking our jobs, opening up too many convenience stores). Mexicans are just the latest wop, mick, dothead, slant, and towelhead, and at some point this shit has to stop.
Thing is jfiling this is not "a scare" this is real, maybe you are not as aware b/c you don't live in the midst of this. Do you like having access to working hospitals in your community, well so do the people in SoCal, but guess what, they don't get that anymore like they did just 5-10 years ago, that is just one small example. But to your overall point, immigration has a history of taking place in waves in regards to the demographics of the immigrants. It is just the nature of the beast, especially with our country.
The big difference with today's immigration (especially illegal immigration) is that IT IS wave of people from a third world country, in which in many cases they are diseased and in most cases they are low skilled or unskilled. So, um, where is the benefit? You know why they are most often unskilled, b/c Mexico has a terrible education system, why should that be the fault of you or me? Why should you or I be responsible for making up for that short coming? No where else on the planet does a 1st world country border a 3rd world country like this. That is a big reason for all of this no doubt.
I've probably asked you this before, most likely with no response (b/c there is no response other than the obvious) would you let just anybody enter your home? Then why would you let just anybody enter your country.
Please point out to me the time in history where there has been a mass immigration from a country that consisted primarily of highly skilled workers.
by FUDU » Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:35 pm
by jfiling » Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:41 pm
FUDU wrote:Um define high skilled in regards to the times of the previous waves of immigration j?
I mean seriously, comparing Europe where most of our founders came from to the current 3rd world status of Mexico today? But again it plays to the point I made above about we don't need the immigration we are getting today. Do we need some immigration, sure, some of the best and brightest to immigrate here, sure we do, what are those famous universities south of the border of us, I am drawing a blank.
Also note I added an edit to my previous post.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:43 pm
FUDU wrote:Um define high skilled in regards to the times of the previous waves of immigration j?
I mean seriously, comparing Europe where most of our founders came from to the current 3rd world status of Mexico today? But again it plays to the point I made above about we don't need the immigration we are getting today. Do we need some immigration, sure, some of the best and brightest to immigrate here, sure we do, what are those famous universities south of the border of us, I am drawing a blank.
Also note I added an edit to my previous post.
by FUDU » Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:49 pm
by FUDU » Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:56 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:FUDU wrote:Um define high skilled in regards to the times of the previous waves of immigration j?
I mean seriously, comparing Europe where most of our founders came from to the current 3rd world status of Mexico today? But again it plays to the point I made above about we don't need the immigration we are getting today. Do we need some immigration, sure, some of the best and brightest to immigrate here, sure we do, what are those famous universities south of the border of us, I am drawing a blank.
Also note I added an edit to my previous post.
I'd bet being poor in 15th-18th century Europe wasn't much different than Mexico.
You imply that Mexico is a 3rd world country, which isn't totaly true, shit there are parts of the US that look just as bad as poorer parts of Mexico. Their colleges produce doctors, architects, engineers, philosophers, mathematicians, and scientists, just like ours.
And you're wrong, we do need poor people who will pick our fruit and vegetables. Americans will not pick lettuce for $3 an hour while working 10-12 hour days.

by hermanfontenot » Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:18 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Stormfront?

by jb » Tue Apr 27, 2010 11:20 pm
hermanfontenot wrote:jfiling wrote:Strange how that system worked for most of the history of this country.
Not really. The population wasn't paying out the nose of immigrants back in the day, you see. There was no welfare, no free emergency-room visits, no free education, no free lunches, no safety net whatsoever.
by jb » Tue Apr 27, 2010 11:28 pm
by jb » Tue Apr 27, 2010 11:30 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Ziner wrote:To be fair your ancestors were Nazi's
My great grandparents (dad's side) left Germany in 1938 because some friends of my grandfather blew up a Nazi rail stop that killed 2 SS men and wounded several others. The Nazis caught his friends, hung them in a meat locker, then cut them with straight razors and rubbed salt into the wounds, that's when my grandfather decided it was probably best to leave.
My mom's side has been here since the late 1800's, they came here "illegaly" through Canada.
by Fire Marshall Bill » Wed Apr 28, 2010 8:20 am
Lastly - what we're talking mostly isn't just agriculture, for which we coiuld easily issue work permit visas. But a ton of construction jobs that had been taken from union living wages and housekeeping / child care jobs that lower SES class American women served in for years, and would if they were at a living wage.
by Rat_Tail » Wed Apr 28, 2010 9:38 am
FUDU wrote:Well where we differ is in how this country approaches low skilled or unskilled workers. We don't need unskilled immigration right now, we need more of the best & brightest, regardless of where from.
Users browsing this forum: mattvan1 and 2 guests