Moderators: peeker643, swerb, mitch
by CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! » Fri Jan 08, 2010 1:49 pm

by British_Pharaoh » Fri Jan 08, 2010 1:54 pm
CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! wrote:
TOP 3
1. The Usual Suspects
In no particular order, here's some more:
Forrest Gump

by British_Pharaoh » Fri Jan 08, 2010 1:56 pm

by CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! » Fri Jan 08, 2010 2:04 pm

by Guest » Fri Jan 08, 2010 2:06 pm
by waborat » Fri Jan 08, 2010 2:27 pm

by CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! » Fri Jan 08, 2010 2:30 pm

by hermanfontenot » Fri Jan 08, 2010 2:40 pm

by motherscratcher » Fri Jan 08, 2010 2:46 pm
by Triple-S » Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:14 pm
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by Guest » Fri Jan 08, 2010 4:10 pm
Motherscratcher wrote:Is there a difference between an "overrated" movie and a movie "I didn't really care for but it is probably more about me because a lot of reasonable people really like it"? Because I don't think the fact that you didn't care for The Usual Suspects means that you should necessarily label it "overrated."
I didn't really like Citizen Kane, but I'd have to be some kind of narcissist to call it overrated... basically implying that I'm right about it and everyone else is wrong.
With that said, Eraserhead is hands down the most worthless piece of shit in the history of cinema ever to be considered remotely good. There is a small contingent of people who think that it is a masterpiece. That would be OK if they didn't consider any dissenters "not smart enough to understand surrealism and David Lynch's true genius."
Screw those assholes. Eraserhead is nothing more than Lynch's completely boring mess of a student film that deserves nothing close to the cult status that it has somehow attained.
by hermanfontenot » Fri Jan 08, 2010 4:27 pm
Mitch wrote:For me...the Eraserhead level movie would be "Being John Malkovich". Horrible film, but all the critics raved.

by skatingtripods » Fri Jan 08, 2010 6:29 pm
Triple-S wrote:Keep saying it, Superbad
"Hey, I mean if we swear enough every two minutes it'll make the movie hilarious!!"
No it wasn't, I'm all for swearing in movies and I fully support it (I thought 40 year old virgin did this brilliantly), but when it's done in the way Superbad did it, it came off as forced and unfunny.
Not to mention, Michael Cera is like David Spade, but in a dweeby way with his sarcastic/smartass type roles, and Jonah Hill pretty much is an unfunny clone of Seth Rogen. Two of my least favorite actors right now in Hollywood are those two, and it's largely due to this movie.
And Cera just got another role in another movie called "Youth in revolt", the sad thing is, I don't even think that Zach Galifianakis, Fred Willard and Ray Liotta can save the movie from probably one of the most overrated comediac actors of our day.
by Triple-S » Fri Jan 08, 2010 7:28 pm
Skating Tripods wrote:Triple-S wrote:Keep saying it, Superbad
"Hey, I mean if we swear enough every two minutes it'll make the movie hilarious!!"
No it wasn't, I'm all for swearing in movies and I fully support it (I thought 40 year old virgin did this brilliantly), but when it's done in the way Superbad did it, it came off as forced and unfunny.
I think you fell out of the demographic for this movie. I know it's age-appropriate for you, but as far as I can tell, you found nothing to relate to. It's funny how you focus on the swearing. I've noticed that as someone who constantly writes shit as sh*t (or something to that effect), you have something against foul language. Which is fine, that's your prerogative. But still, the movie definitely was not intended to focus on the foul dialogue.
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by Cerebral_DownTime » Sat Jan 09, 2010 3:27 am
by British_Pharaoh » Sat Jan 09, 2010 11:16 am
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:2) Christian Bale
Other than American Psycho, he's a boring douche. In every movie.

by jack_tors » Sat Jan 09, 2010 11:49 am
Skating Tripods wrote:Triple-S wrote:Keep saying it, Superbad
"Hey, I mean if we swear enough every two minutes it'll make the movie hilarious!!"
No it wasn't, I'm all for swearing in movies and I fully support it (I thought 40 year old virgin did this brilliantly), but when it's done in the way Superbad did it, it came off as forced and unfunny.
I think you fell out of the demographic for this movie. I know it's age-appropriate for you, but as far as I can tell, you found nothing to relate to. It's funny how you focus on the swearing. I've noticed that as someone who constantly writes shit as sh*t (or something to that effect), you have something against foul language. Which is fine, that's your prerogative. But still, the movie definitely was not intended to focus on the foul dialogue.
You just weren't that kind of person in HS so you didn't find it funny. As for me, and a lot of my friends, it was somewhat representative of high school. There was a giant stigma attached to going to college a virgin or someone who hadn't partied and enjoyed alcohol. And I went to a private high school.
You have to take this movie for what it is. Trying to get laid in high school. If you want to call it overrated because of some cursing, so be it. But at no point did you mention anything about the content or the theme.
by justmebd » Sat Jan 09, 2010 2:29 pm
by jb » Sat Jan 09, 2010 3:12 pm
Motherscratcher wrote:Is there a difference between an "overrated" movie and a movie "I didn't really care for but it is probably more about me because a lot of reasonable people really like it"? Because I don't think the fact that you didn't care for The Usual Suspects means that you should necessarily label it "overrated."
I didn't really like Citizen Kane, but I'd have to be some kind of narcissist to call it overrated... basically implying that I'm right about it and everyone else is wrong.
With that said, Eraserhead is hands down the most worthless piece of shit in the history of cinema ever to be considered remotely good. There is a small contingent of people who think that it is a masterpiece. That would be OK if they didn't consider any dissenters "not smart enough to understand surrealism and David Lynch's true genius."
Screw those assholes. Eraserhead is nothing more than Lynch's completely boring mess of a student film that deserves nothing close to the cult status that it has somehow attained.
by skatingtripods » Sat Jan 09, 2010 8:48 pm
jack_tors wrote:I wasnt that guy in high school but certainly wasnt far from it. Plus, I was good friends with "that guy" in high school so I know what you are getting at ST. However, I just didnt think it was that funny. Its not a bad movie but I think the hype exceeds the overall funny in the movie. Plus, I think it has a little do with the fact Michael Cera continuous plays the same role and its kinda getting old. He was still at his best as George Michael in Arrested Development because the material was stronger and he had better actors/actresses to play against.
I say the same about Juno. Definitely not a bad movie but one I dont think will stand up against the test of time. Juno came off as too much of a smart ass, typical of this generation. I will say that Allison Janney and JK Simmons stole that movie. They by far were the best part.
by Bill the Butcher » Sat Jan 09, 2010 10:45 pm
4thQtrGlory wrote:If we got all that, i would hang a browns flag from my boner for 2 weeks straight...
by aoxo1 » Sat Jan 09, 2010 10:47 pm
by Bill the Butcher » Sat Jan 09, 2010 10:47 pm
aoxo1 wrote:Transformers.
4thQtrGlory wrote:If we got all that, i would hang a browns flag from my boner for 2 weeks straight...
by skatingtripods » Sun Jan 10, 2010 3:36 pm
Bill the Butcher wrote:300.
The storyline is cool, the battles are awesome, and tits... but it is overrated.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sun Jan 10, 2010 9:40 pm
Skating Tripods wrote:Bill the Butcher wrote:300.
The storyline is cool, the battles are awesome, and tits... but it is overrated.
The storyline is way off. Had to write a paper on it for an Ancient Civ class to finish off my gen ed classes comparing the movie to what was written about the real event (which may also be bullshit).
The battles are awesome and the effects are pretty bad ass, too.
+1 to Transformers. Not that they get a lot of love anymore, but the Pirates of the Caribbean series is horrible.
by British_Pharaoh » Mon Jan 11, 2010 1:48 pm

by skatingtripods » Thu Jan 14, 2010 4:06 pm
by Fermin » Thu Jan 14, 2010 4:28 pm
by Captain Pabst » Thu Jan 14, 2010 6:53 pm
by jb » Thu Jan 14, 2010 6:57 pm
by jb » Thu Jan 14, 2010 6:59 pm
CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! wrote:And I gotta throw in The Dark Knight, despite loving the movie. But people were calling it THE GREATEST MOVIE OF ALL TIME. Overrated.
by Lebowski » Thu Jan 14, 2010 8:23 pm
by Bill the Butcher » Thu Jan 14, 2010 10:23 pm
4thQtrGlory wrote:If we got all that, i would hang a browns flag from my boner for 2 weeks straight...
by rebelwithoutaclue » Fri Jan 15, 2010 11:45 am
JB wrote:There will be blood was very disappointing.
by rebelwithoutaclue » Fri Jan 15, 2010 11:48 am
Bill the Butcher wrote:Not saying I hated The Big Lebowski, but I think it is overrated.
Captain Pabst wrote:The Big Lebowski.
So popular, and yet I've tried three times and can't enjoy it at all.
by Fire Marshall Bill » Fri Jan 15, 2010 2:40 pm
by jb » Fri Jan 15, 2010 6:05 pm
rebelwithoutaclue wrote:JB wrote:There will be blood was very disappointing.
I thought it was better than No Country for Old Men but then again a lot of people would say that's overrated as well.
by jb » Fri Jan 15, 2010 6:06 pm
Lebowski wrote:The Big Lebowski.
So popular, and yet I've tried three times and can't enjoy it at all.
Ban.
by motherscratcher » Sat Jan 16, 2010 6:16 pm
Captain Pabst wrote:The Big Lebowski.
So popular, and yet I've tried three times and can't enjoy it at all.
by Captain Pabst » Tue Jan 19, 2010 8:44 pm
JB wrote:Lebowski wrote:The Big Lebowski.
So popular, and yet I've tried three times and can't enjoy it at all.
Ban.
Second.
Check his papers.
by Captain Pabst » Tue Jan 19, 2010 8:45 pm
Motherscratcher wrote:Captain Pabst wrote:The Big Lebowski.
So popular, and yet I've tried three times and can't enjoy it at all.
Fuckin' fascist
by hermanfontenot » Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:47 pm

by pup » Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:51 pm
HermanFontenot wrote:"Captain Pabst?" That's an interesting name.
by peeker643 » Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:54 pm
Pup wrote:HermanFontenot wrote:"Captain Pabst?" That's an interesting name.
Just wait until his dad, Sergeant Schlitz shows up

by pup » Tue Jan 19, 2010 11:07 pm
Peeker643 wrote:Pup wrote:HermanFontenot wrote:"Captain Pabst?" That's an interesting name.
Just wait until his dad, Sergeant Schlitz shows up
I thought you were here to offer the future Brazilian biopic on Anderson Varejao as the "Most Overrated Movie".
by jb » Tue Jan 19, 2010 11:10 pm
Pup wrote:HermanFontenot wrote:"Captain Pabst?" That's an interesting name.
Just wait until his dad, Sergeant Schlitz shows up
by hermanfontenot » Wed Jan 20, 2010 12:00 am
Pup wrote:HermanFontenot wrote:"Captain Pabst?" That's an interesting name.
Just wait until his dad, Sergeant Schlitz shows up

by Cerebral_DownTime » Wed Jan 20, 2010 12:05 am
HermanFontenot wrote:Pup wrote:HermanFontenot wrote:"Captain Pabst?" That's an interesting name.
Just wait until his dad, Sergeant Schlitz shows up
Captain Pabst was a real person. Look him up.
by Rat_Tail » Wed Jan 20, 2010 11:53 am
Triple-S wrote:Keep saying it, Superbad
"Hey, I mean if we swear enough every two minutes it'll make the movie hilarious!!"
No it wasn't, I'm all for swearing in movies and I fully support it (I thought 40 year old virgin did this brilliantly), but when it's done in the way Superbad did it, it came off as forced and unfunny.
Not to mention, Michael Cera is like David Spade, but in a dweeby way with his sarcastic/smartass type roles, and Jonah Hill pretty much is an unfunny clone of Seth Rogen. Two of my least favorite actors right now in Hollywood are those two, and it's largely due to this movie.
And Cera just got another role in another movie called "Youth in revolt", the sad thing is, I don't even think that Zach Galifianakis, Fred Willard and Ray Liotta can save the movie from probably one of the most overrated comediac actors of our day.
by Captain Pabst » Thu Jan 21, 2010 6:50 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:HermanFontenot wrote:Pup wrote:HermanFontenot wrote:"Captain Pabst?" That's an interesting name.
Just wait until his dad, Sergeant Schlitz shows up
Captain Pabst was a real person. Look him up.
Was his last name "Smear"?
Return to Movies, Music, TV, Books, Pop Culture
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
