Moderators: peeker643, swerb, mswerb
by jfiling » Sat Jan 09, 2010 8:05 pm
by mattvan1 » Sat Jan 09, 2010 11:50 pm
by FUDU » Sun Jan 10, 2010 1:42 pm
by aoxo1 » Sun Jan 10, 2010 1:48 pm
FUDU wrote:It all comes down to discipline, every single time.
Obviously eating reasonably decent foods is a key and moderation plays a part, but it all falls under the category of discipline.
I mean now people can eat Taco Bell everyday and lose weight in a reasonably healthy way.
by Erie Warrior » Sun Jan 10, 2010 3:06 pm
aoxo1 wrote:Anyone who is interested in improving their diet to make it more healthy just needs to take Michael Pollan's advice: "Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants." Doesn't need to be more complicated than that.


by peeker643 » Sun Jan 10, 2010 3:12 pm
Erie Warrior wrote:aoxo1 wrote:Anyone who is interested in improving their diet to make it more healthy just needs to take Michael Pollan's advice: "Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants." Doesn't need to be more complicated than that.
The biggest problem with diets is that people make the mistake of assuming they will work the same for everyone. Nothing is further from the truth. Of course it's a good idea to eat less junk. But why can I only eat red meat, pasta and beer once a week? Because this dude lost weight doing it? Not for me. Here's the rub. Exercise. That's the difference between people now, and people even 50 years ago. People have become sedentary. You know how I know that, because walking is now exercise. Really, walking? That's a mode of transportation. Unless you're old or are missing lower extremities, walking should not count as an exercise program.
by jb » Mon Jan 11, 2010 2:05 pm
Peeker643 wrote:Erie Warrior wrote:aoxo1 wrote:Anyone who is interested in improving their diet to make it more healthy just needs to take Michael Pollan's advice: "Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants." Doesn't need to be more complicated than that.
The biggest problem with diets is that people make the mistake of assuming they will work the same for everyone. Nothing is further from the truth. Of course it's a good idea to eat less junk. But why can I only eat red meat, pasta and beer once a week? Because this dude lost weight doing it? Not for me. Here's the rub. Exercise. That's the difference between people now, and people even 50 years ago. People have become sedentary. You know how I know that, because walking is now exercise. Really, walking? That's a mode of transportation. Unless you're old or are missing lower extremities, walking should not count as an exercise program.
Eat less, move more.
by mattvan1 » Mon Jan 11, 2010 7:07 pm
JB wrote: Lasly, I am too lazy to watch the whole thing, butt why is canned soup on the verbotten list if it is low fat and not something like Chunky steak & potato, other than high sodium? I thought like a Progresso could give you a nice veggie boost?
by peeker643 » Mon Jan 11, 2010 7:13 pm
JB wrote:Peeker643 wrote:Erie Warrior wrote:aoxo1 wrote:Anyone who is interested in improving their diet to make it more healthy just needs to take Michael Pollan's advice: "Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants." Doesn't need to be more complicated than that.
The biggest problem with diets is that people make the mistake of assuming they will work the same for everyone. Nothing is further from the truth. Of course it's a good idea to eat less junk. But why can I only eat red meat, pasta and beer once a week? Because this dude lost weight doing it? Not for me. Here's the rub. Exercise. That's the difference between people now, and people even 50 years ago. People have become sedentary. You know how I know that, because walking is now exercise. Really, walking? That's a mode of transportation. Unless you're old or are missing lower extremities, walking should not count as an exercise program.
Eat less, move more.
It really isn't that smple. Check out Time mags "The myth of exercize" written this year. It isn't just quantities, it is also about types of food and eating patterns.
by jb » Mon Jan 11, 2010 7:40 pm
mattvan1 wrote:JB wrote: Lasly, I am too lazy to watch the whole thing, butt why is canned soup on the verbotten list if it is low fat and not something like Chunky steak & potato, other than high sodium? I thought like a Progresso could give you a nice veggie boost?
Brown advocates fresh natural foods that are nutrient rich. Even foods that are low in calories but devoid of vitamins, minerals, and essential amino acids (canned soup, processed meals, "diet" anything) need not apply. The concept is more than low cal - it's overall wellness and concentration on "super foods".
He lost me at one alcoholic drink per week. I'm all for moderation, but that's a deal breaker.
by Erie Warrior » Mon Jan 11, 2010 9:34 pm


by FUDU » Mon Jan 11, 2010 10:23 pm
I don't know for sure but my guess is all those things on that menu have chicken instead of ground meat, the rest of the stuff is all veggies and some sort of tortilla or bread, right?aoxo1 wrote:FUDU wrote:It all comes down to discipline, every single time.
Obviously eating reasonably decent foods is a key and moderation plays a part, but it all falls under the category of discipline.
I mean now people can eat Taco Bell everyday and lose weight in a reasonably healthy way.
Is that actually healthy, though? There are plenty of unhealthy ways to lose weight.
Anyone who is interested in improving their diet to make it more healthy just needs to take Michael Pollan's advice: "Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants." Doesn't need to be more complicated than that. (food means real food, not all the pseudo-food that fills grocery stores)
by leadpipe » Mon Jan 11, 2010 11:59 pm
FUDU wrote:I don't know for sure but my guess is all those things on that menu have chicken instead of ground meat, the rest of the stuff is all veggies and some sort of tortilla or bread, right?aoxo1 wrote:FUDU wrote:It all comes down to discipline, every single time.
Obviously eating reasonably decent foods is a key and moderation plays a part, but it all falls under the category of discipline.
I mean now people can eat Taco Bell everyday and lose weight in a reasonably healthy way.
Is that actually healthy, though? There are plenty of unhealthy ways to lose weight.
Anyone who is interested in improving their diet to make it more healthy just needs to take Michael Pollan's advice: "Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants." Doesn't need to be more complicated than that. (food means real food, not all the pseudo-food that fills grocery stores)
My main point on this is basically, just like sound financial principles, sound nutritional principles really never change. All the diets we've come up with for the past 25-30 years all rely on one sound principle, discipline. As different as many of these approaches are they retain so much similarity it is ridiculous. Moderation and some level of exercise are always two important factors to any approach to losing weight, old or new. The moderation and physical activity are accomplished through the discipline.
My body requires 3700-3800 calories a day according to the ways we evaluate this stuff. That is a lot of calories meaning I need to eat a pretty significant amount of food each day. However it is all up to me and my discipline as to how I go about reaching that requirement.
by fundamentals » Tue Jan 12, 2010 10:10 am
by jb » Tue Jan 12, 2010 10:34 am
Lead Pipe wrote:FUDU wrote:I don't know for sure but my guess is all those things on that menu have chicken instead of ground meat, the rest of the stuff is all veggies and some sort of tortilla or bread, right?aoxo1 wrote:FUDU wrote:It all comes down to discipline, every single time.
Obviously eating reasonably decent foods is a key and moderation plays a part, but it all falls under the category of discipline.
I mean now people can eat Taco Bell everyday and lose weight in a reasonably healthy way.
Is that actually healthy, though? There are plenty of unhealthy ways to lose weight.
Anyone who is interested in improving their diet to make it more healthy just needs to take Michael Pollan's advice: "Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants." Doesn't need to be more complicated than that. (food means real food, not all the pseudo-food that fills grocery stores)
My main point on this is basically, just like sound financial principles, sound nutritional principles really never change. All the diets we've come up with for the past 25-30 years all rely on one sound principle, discipline. As different as many of these approaches are they retain so much similarity it is ridiculous. Moderation and some level of exercise are always two important factors to any approach to losing weight, old or new. The moderation and physical activity are accomplished through the discipline.
My body requires 3700-3800 calories a day according to the ways we evaluate this stuff. That is a lot of calories meaning I need to eat a pretty significant amount of food each day. However it is all up to me and my discipline as to how I go about reaching that requirement.
Actually, all the "diets" rely on nonsense.
If you wanna change your way of living, the correct information is out there.
The problem being, like everything else, everyone wants a short cut. Everyone wants it to be easy.
Whenever this topic comes up I advise people to not take advice from someone who is trying to sell you something, look at the methods used by those who have a stake. The methods are wonderfully, and interestingly consistent. An example, the Borowns bring in a young free agent lineman who has a weight issue. They need him to drop 40. They don't give a shit about the kid, they give a shit about what he can do for them, and therefore, gain value. Guaranteed this guys weight loss program consists of; several small meals throughout the day to ward off the sarvation reflex that releases insulin and causes fat storage, he'll be doing interval cardio in order for his heart rate to fluctuate, and he'll be lifting weights with interval workouts to further boost the metabolism. This is how it's done, period. We KNOW this.
Just a matter if you wanna do it or not.
Or, you could listen to fans of Dr. Atkins, (Who died too young and out of shape, incidentally) who will tell you with a straight face that eating 20 sausage links is healthier than an apple.
by leadpipe » Tue Jan 12, 2010 10:45 am
JB wrote:Lead Pipe wrote:FUDU wrote:I don't know for sure but my guess is all those things on that menu have chicken instead of ground meat, the rest of the stuff is all veggies and some sort of tortilla or bread, right?aoxo1 wrote:FUDU wrote:It all comes down to discipline, every single time.
Obviously eating reasonably decent foods is a key and moderation plays a part, but it all falls under the category of discipline.
I mean now people can eat Taco Bell everyday and lose weight in a reasonably healthy way.
Is that actually healthy, though? There are plenty of unhealthy ways to lose weight.
Anyone who is interested in improving their diet to make it more healthy just needs to take Michael Pollan's advice: "Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants." Doesn't need to be more complicated than that. (food means real food, not all the pseudo-food that fills grocery stores)
My main point on this is basically, just like sound financial principles, sound nutritional principles really never change. All the diets we've come up with for the past 25-30 years all rely on one sound principle, discipline. As different as many of these approaches are they retain so much similarity it is ridiculous. Moderation and some level of exercise are always two important factors to any approach to losing weight, old or new. The moderation and physical activity are accomplished through the discipline.
My body requires 3700-3800 calories a day according to the ways we evaluate this stuff. That is a lot of calories meaning I need to eat a pretty significant amount of food each day. However it is all up to me and my discipline as to how I go about reaching that requirement.
Actually, all the "diets" rely on nonsense.
If you wanna change your way of living, the correct information is out there.
The problem being, like everything else, everyone wants a short cut. Everyone wants it to be easy.
Whenever this topic comes up I advise people to not take advice from someone who is trying to sell you something, look at the methods used by those who have a stake. The methods are wonderfully, and interestingly consistent. An example, the Borowns bring in a young free agent lineman who has a weight issue. They need him to drop 40. They don't give a shit about the kid, they give a shit about what he can do for them, and therefore, gain value. Guaranteed this guys weight loss program consists of; several small meals throughout the day to ward off the sarvation reflex that releases insulin and causes fat storage, he'll be doing interval cardio in order for his heart rate to fluctuate, and he'll be lifting weights with interval workouts to further boost the metabolism. This is how it's done, period. We KNOW this.
Just a matter if you wanna do it or not.
Or, you could listen to fans of Dr. Atkins, (Who died too young and out of shape, incidentally) who will tell you with a straight face that eating 20 sausage links is healthier than an apple.
Straight up Bill Phillips.
by jb » Tue Jan 12, 2010 11:22 am
Lead Pipe wrote:No big suprise really, because Phillips is clear; not a diet, a lifestyle change.
The other aspect of Phillips program is the "free day." Totally unrealistic to believe someone is never going to eat a piece of chocolate cake, their favorite pizza or Mexican meal.
Bottom line, it's not what you do SOME of the time, it's what you do MOST of the time.
by peeker643 » Tue Jan 12, 2010 12:07 pm
fundamentals wrote:If you want to change your eating habits, it's a process. It takes two weeks to develop new ways of doing things with regard to your food intake. It takes approximately 40 days to make it a lifestyle change. You have to be smart. Starvation is stupid.

by fundamentals » Tue Jan 12, 2010 12:21 pm
Peeker643 wrote:fundamentals wrote:If you want to change your eating habits, it's a process. It takes two weeks to develop new ways of doing things with regard to your food intake. It takes approximately 40 days to make it a lifestyle change. You have to be smart. Starvation is stupid.
That the time it took you to change focus from pizza to wings?

by jb » Tue Jan 12, 2010 12:58 pm
Peeker643 wrote:fundamentals wrote:If you want to change your eating habits, it's a process. It takes two weeks to develop new ways of doing things with regard to your food intake. It takes approximately 40 days to make it a lifestyle change. You have to be smart. Starvation is stupid.
That the time it took you to change focus from pizza to wings?
by peeker643 » Tue Jan 12, 2010 1:00 pm
JB wrote:Peeker643 wrote:fundamentals wrote:If you want to change your eating habits, it's a process. It takes two weeks to develop new ways of doing things with regard to your food intake. It takes approximately 40 days to make it a lifestyle change. You have to be smart. Starvation is stupid.
That the time it took you to change focus from pizza to wings?
Dude, you gotta keep balance with wo of the 4 bsic foodgroups, and IIRC they are beer, wings, pizza and red meat.
Riiight?
by jb » Tue Jan 12, 2010 1:03 pm
Peeker643 wrote:JB wrote:Peeker643 wrote:fundamentals wrote:If you want to change your eating habits, it's a process. It takes two weeks to develop new ways of doing things with regard to your food intake. It takes approximately 40 days to make it a lifestyle change. You have to be smart. Starvation is stupid.
That the time it took you to change focus from pizza to wings?
Dude, you gotta keep balance with wo of the 4 bsic foodgroups, and IIRC they are beer, wings, pizza and red meat.
Riiight?
I thought Skoal and bourbon were there but your four are fine....
by aoxo1 » Tue Jan 12, 2010 1:04 pm
Lead Pipe wrote:Actually, all the "diets" rely on nonsense.
If you wanna change your way of living, the correct information is out there.
The problem being, like everything else, everyone wants a short cut. Everyone wants it to be easy.
Whenever this topic comes up I advise people to not take advice from someone who is trying to sell you something, look at the methods used by those who have a stake. The methods are wonderfully, and interestingly consistent. An example, the Borowns bring in a young free agent lineman who has a weight issue. They need him to drop 40. They don't give a shit about the kid, they give a shit about what he can do for them, and therefore, gain value. Guaranteed this guys weight loss program consists of; several small meals throughout the day to ward off the sarvation reflex that releases insulin and causes fat storage, he'll be doing interval cardio in order for his heart rate to fluctuate, and he'll be lifting weights with interval workouts to further boost the metabolism. This is how it's done, period. We KNOW this.
Just a matter if you wanna do it or not.
Or, you could listen to fans of Dr. Atkins, (Who died too young and out of shape, incidentally) who will tell you with a straight face that eating 20 sausage links is healthier than an apple.
by peeker643 » Tue Jan 12, 2010 1:09 pm
JB wrote:Peeker643 wrote:JB wrote:Peeker643 wrote:fundamentals wrote:If you want to change your eating habits, it's a process. It takes two weeks to develop new ways of doing things with regard to your food intake. It takes approximately 40 days to make it a lifestyle change. You have to be smart. Starvation is stupid.
That the time it took you to change focus from pizza to wings?
Dude, you gotta keep balance with wo of the 4 bsic foodgroups, and IIRC they are beer, wings, pizza and red meat.
Riiight?
I thought Skoal and bourbon were there but your four are fine....
You forgot your red neck deer meat?

by fundamentals » Tue Jan 12, 2010 1:12 pm
Peeker643 wrote:Not too mention humping all those hills to hunt it, all those hills to track it and dragging the fokking thing out of the woods ain't a bad way to stay in shape for 4 months out of the year.
So that's what I got so far: deer, skoal, bourbon and beer.
I'm good widit. Still 34-32 like I have been for 20+ years and still right at 190 like I have been for the last 20 years.
Plus this head makes me look even sleeker and more aerodynamically svelte.

by swerb » Tue Jan 12, 2010 1:43 pm
by peeker643 » Tue Jan 12, 2010 1:53 pm
Swerb wrote:~No more chips or late night snacking. Nothing is worse when it comes to adding weight. If I do jones, I have some Snyders Hard Pretzels, which have no fat. I love em anyway.
And exercise. I run three miles a night 4 times a week. Used to take me 40 minutes, now I can do it in 24. Sat, Sun, and two weeknights.
by fundamentals » Tue Jan 12, 2010 2:15 pm

by jfiling » Tue Jan 12, 2010 2:52 pm
fundamentals wrote:Stay away from MSG or the "organic" version of it, autolyzed yeast extract
by fundamentals » Tue Jan 12, 2010 3:02 pm
jfiling wrote:fundamentals wrote:Stay away from MSG or the "organic" version of it, autolyzed yeast extract
I don't know, my new favorite winter lunch is a cup of miso soup. That stuff is insanely delicious and warming, while being more filling than just a cup of green tea or hot chocolate. MSG makes it umami.


by peeker643 » Tue Jan 12, 2010 3:04 pm
fundamentals wrote:jfiling wrote:fundamentals wrote:Stay away from MSG or the "organic" version of it, autolyzed yeast extract
I don't know, my new favorite winter lunch is a cup of miso soup. That stuff is insanely delicious and warming, while being more filling than just a cup of green tea or hot chocolate. MSG makes it umami.
Moderation. For me, that means a bag of Cool Ranch Doritos instead of two.
by fundamentals » Tue Jan 12, 2010 3:09 pm
Peeker643 wrote:
Yep. If you're talking about one Family-Size bag of Cool Ranch Doritos.


by jb » Tue Jan 12, 2010 3:34 pm
fundamentals wrote:jfiling wrote:fundamentals wrote:Stay away from MSG or the "organic" version of it, autolyzed yeast extract
I don't know, my new favorite winter lunch is a cup of miso soup. That stuff is insanely delicious and warming, while being more filling than just a cup of green tea or hot chocolate. MSG makes it umami.
Moderation. For me, that means a bag of Cool Ranch Doritos instead of two.
MSG makes you crave more of the product.
by jfiling » Tue Jan 12, 2010 3:42 pm
fundamentals wrote:jfiling wrote:fundamentals wrote:Stay away from MSG or the "organic" version of it, autolyzed yeast extract
I don't know, my new favorite winter lunch is a cup of miso soup. That stuff is insanely delicious and warming, while being more filling than just a cup of green tea or hot chocolate. MSG makes it umami.
Moderation. For me, that means a bag of Cool Ranch Doritos instead of two.
MSG makes you crave more of the product.
by fundamentals » Tue Jan 12, 2010 3:51 pm
JB wrote:fundamentals wrote:jfiling wrote:fundamentals wrote:Stay away from MSG or the "organic" version of it, autolyzed yeast extract
I don't know, my new favorite winter lunch is a cup of miso soup. That stuff is insanely delicious and warming, while being more filling than just a cup of green tea or hot chocolate. MSG makes it umami.
Moderation. For me, that means a bag of Cool Ranch Doritos instead of two.
MSG makes you crave more of the product.
No wonder you're a devout Christian, fund.
You're on the express train to the after life.
Try to put in a good word for us.
( You had the buffalo / ranch combo? I cry every time I walk by them and forego their decadent junkness.)


by leadpipe » Tue Jan 12, 2010 5:00 pm
aoxo1 wrote:Lead Pipe wrote:Actually, all the "diets" rely on nonsense.
If you wanna change your way of living, the correct information is out there.
The problem being, like everything else, everyone wants a short cut. Everyone wants it to be easy.
Whenever this topic comes up I advise people to not take advice from someone who is trying to sell you something, look at the methods used by those who have a stake. The methods are wonderfully, and interestingly consistent. An example, the Borowns bring in a young free agent lineman who has a weight issue. They need him to drop 40. They don't give a shit about the kid, they give a shit about what he can do for them, and therefore, gain value. Guaranteed this guys weight loss program consists of; several small meals throughout the day to ward off the sarvation reflex that releases insulin and causes fat storage, he'll be doing interval cardio in order for his heart rate to fluctuate, and he'll be lifting weights with interval workouts to further boost the metabolism. This is how it's done, period. We KNOW this.
Just a matter if you wanna do it or not.
Or, you could listen to fans of Dr. Atkins, (Who died too young and out of shape, incidentally) who will tell you with a straight face that eating 20 sausage links is healthier than an apple.
I'm not an Atkins person, but just for everyone's information, Atkins died at 72 after slipping on an icy sidewalk caused bleeding around his brain, sending him into a coma and then death. It also says on wikipedia that he had a heart attack a year earlier (so age 71 I guess?) and was described as a "trim, nice looking 72 year-old" by journalist William Leith.
by pristie » Mon Jan 25, 2010 4:10 am
by Ziner » Mon Jan 25, 2010 12:23 pm
pristie wrote:What diet and exercise changes will i need if im going into a high altitude environment? im going to new zeland for a ten day snow-boarding holiday with my school, and i need to know what diet and exercise changes i will need to make before entering this high altitude environment.
by exiledbuckeye » Mon Jan 25, 2010 12:55 pm
Ziner wrote:pristie wrote:What diet and exercise changes will i need if im going into a high altitude environment? im going to new zeland for a ten day snow-boarding holiday with my school, and i need to know what diet and exercise changes i will need to make before entering this high altitude environment.
What elevation is NZ? There isnt a ton you can do as far as I know. Never looked it up, but I live at 5,700 feet. Drink water, drink water, and drink water and you should be ok. While it is always recommended, I never lay off the alcohol up in the mountains 9,000-12,000 feet here. It will produce a wicked hangover, and that is coming from someone who doesn't get hangovers. Just stay hydrated, always found that to be the most important. Not sure you can do much about being out of breathe. Took me 4-6 months to get used to my altitude to be able to run like I did at sea level.
by Ziner » Mon Jan 25, 2010 1:06 pm
exiledbuckeye wrote:Ziner wrote:pristie wrote:What diet and exercise changes will i need if im going into a high altitude environment? im going to new zeland for a ten day snow-boarding holiday with my school, and i need to know what diet and exercise changes i will need to make before entering this high altitude environment.
What elevation is NZ? There isnt a ton you can do as far as I know. Never looked it up, but I live at 5,700 feet. Drink water, drink water, and drink water and you should be ok. While it is always recommended, I never lay off the alcohol up in the mountains 9,000-12,000 feet here. It will produce a wicked hangover, and that is coming from someone who doesn't get hangovers. Just stay hydrated, always found that to be the most important. Not sure you can do much about being out of breathe. Took me 4-6 months to get used to my altitude to be able to run like I did at sea level.
Also, might want to plan on taking a day or two to acclimatize to the altitude, depending on how high the elevation is. I went from flat Ohio to 12,000 feet at the top of Rocky Mountain Nat'l Park in less than 24 hours a couple years ago, and the altitude sickness was brutal. I guess it depends on your predisposition to it, not everyone gets it. But it is best to be prepared.
by Lubber » Tue Feb 02, 2010 1:05 am
Lead Pipe wrote:aoxo1 wrote:Lead Pipe wrote:Actually, all the "diets" rely on nonsense.
If you wanna change your way of living, the correct information is out there.
The problem being, like everything else, everyone wants a short cut. Everyone wants it to be easy.
Whenever this topic comes up I advise people to not take advice from someone who is trying to sell you something, look at the methods used by those who have a stake. The methods are wonderfully, and interestingly consistent. An example, the Borowns bring in a young free agent lineman who has a weight issue. They need him to drop 40. They don't give a shit about the kid, they give a shit about what he can do for them, and therefore, gain value. Guaranteed this guys weight loss program consists of; several small meals throughout the day to ward off the sarvation reflex that releases insulin and causes fat storage, he'll be doing interval cardio in order for his heart rate to fluctuate, and he'll be lifting weights with interval workouts to further boost the metabolism. This is how it's done, period. We KNOW this.
Just a matter if you wanna do it or not.
Or, you could listen to fans of Dr. Atkins, (Who died too young and out of shape, incidentally) who will tell you with a straight face that eating 20 sausage links is healthier than an apple.
I'm not an Atkins person, but just for everyone's information, Atkins died at 72 after slipping on an icy sidewalk caused bleeding around his brain, sending him into a coma and then death. It also says on wikipedia that he had a heart attack a year earlier (so age 71 I guess?) and was described as a "trim, nice looking 72 year-old" by journalist William Leith.
The last line was tongue and cheek toward Lub, a multi-time Atkins guy, a big fan of the Hardees monster burger......sans bun. Busting balls about the rumours alledgedly started by Vegan groups in regards to DA's demise.
Return to Eat, Drink, & Be Merry
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests