Moderators: peeker643, swerb, mitch
by jb » Mon Aug 10, 2009 10:09 pm
by peeker643 » Mon Aug 10, 2009 10:25 pm
This is the remarkable story of Henry DeTamble, a dashing, adventuresome librarian who travels involuntarily through time, and Clare Abshire, an artist whose life takes a natural sequential course. Henry and Clare's passionate love affair endures across a sea of time and captures the two lovers in an impossibly romantic trap.
The story told is a test of love, and patience. It shows that love knows no boundaries and transcends time and death.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Mon Aug 10, 2009 10:35 pm
by OldDawg » Mon Aug 10, 2009 11:17 pm

by pup » Mon Aug 10, 2009 11:19 pm
by e0y2e3 » Mon Aug 10, 2009 11:21 pm
Pup wrote:Didn't vote, but curious...is she making you wear a Rothlisberger jersey when you go?


by Guest » Mon Aug 10, 2009 11:28 pm
Pup wrote:Didn't vote, but curious...is she making you wear a Rothlisberger jersey when you go?
by jb » Mon Aug 10, 2009 11:36 pm
Peeker643 wrote:Gay as hell? Come on. It sounds phenomenal:This is the remarkable story of Henry DeTamble, a dashing, adventuresome librarian who travels involuntarily through time, and Clare Abshire, an artist whose life takes a natural sequential course. Henry and Clare's passionate love affair endures across a sea of time and captures the two lovers in an impossibly romantic trap.
The story told is a test of love, and patience. It shows that love knows no boundaries and transcends time and death.
by Ziner » Tue Aug 11, 2009 1:19 am

by jordan kramer » Tue Aug 11, 2009 3:33 am
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Who cares about this crap?
WE GOT A MUTHA FUCKIN EARTHQUAKE MACHINE!
by Erie Warrior » Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:15 am


by Guest » Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:28 am
by Stu » Tue Aug 11, 2009 11:01 am
by peeker643 » Tue Aug 11, 2009 11:10 am
Stu wrote:whats so wrong about going with her to see something she wants to?
my bride and i will not be seeing it in the theater, but we'll watch it at home as soon as its available. who cares its 2 hours?
by e0y2e3 » Tue Aug 11, 2009 11:42 am
Peeker643 wrote:Stu wrote:whats so wrong about going with her to see something she wants to?
my bride and i will not be seeing it in the theater, but we'll watch it at home as soon as its available. who cares its 2 hours?
Relax Stu. We all get it and we all do things with the wives because it's a two-way street. We all get it.
It's called ball busting dude.
We're all nearly as evolved as you. None of us suck the joy out of a cock-around exercise like you though.

by peeker643 » Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:14 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Peeker643 wrote:Stu wrote:whats so wrong about going with her to see something she wants to?
my bride and i will not be seeing it in the theater, but we'll watch it at home as soon as its available. who cares its 2 hours?
Relax Stu. We all get it and we all do things with the wives because it's a two-way street. We all get it.
It's called ball busting dude.
We're all nearly as evolved as you. None of us suck the joy out of a cock-around exercise like you though.
Stu's just frontin.
He doesn't want anyone to know that mega sappy soul sucking chick flicks are his kyptonite....
by swerb » Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:15 pm
by hermanfontenot » Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:24 pm
The trailer for the film was released in early June 2009, and Jeremy Medina of Entertainment Weekly referred to it as The Notebook crossed with Benjamin Button.
Jarett Wieselman of the New York Post wrote that the trailer "all but guarantees I'll be crying come Aug. 14."


by swerb » Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:30 pm
HermanFontenot wrote:From Wiki:The trailer for the film was released in early June 2009, and Jeremy Medina of Entertainment Weekly referred to it as The Notebook crossed with Benjamin Button.
And the money shot...Jarett Wieselman of the New York Post wrote that the trailer "all but guarantees I'll be crying come Aug. 14."
The poster (awesome):
by e0y2e3 » Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:33 pm

by swerb » Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:36 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:I take it you haven't seen the trailers yet Rich...
You need to before realizing the depths of this monster.
by hermanfontenot » Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:41 pm

by swerb » Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:44 pm
HermanFontenot wrote:Aaaaaand the trailer:
by hermanfontenot » Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:47 pm

by peeker643 » Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:57 pm
HermanFontenot wrote:Eric Bana rocking the Cosby sweater. Hey you know, at least this movie has the balls to come right out and declare, "I'm a chick flick!" Not like Jerry Maguire, which tricked guys into the cinema with football and sports agents and then revealed its black chick-flick heart.
by jb » Tue Aug 11, 2009 1:13 pm
Peeker643 wrote:Stu wrote:whats so wrong about going with her to see something she wants to?
my bride and i will not be seeing it in the theater, but we'll watch it at home as soon as its available. who cares its 2 hours?
Relax Stu. We all get it and we all do things with the wives because it's a two-way street. We all get it.
It's called ball busting dude.
We're all nearly as evolved as you. None of us suck the joy out of a cock-around exercise like you though.
by jb » Tue Aug 11, 2009 1:16 pm
Peeker643 wrote:HermanFontenot wrote:Eric Bana rocking the Cosby sweater. Hey you know, at least this movie has the balls to come right out and declare, "I'm a chick flick!" Not like Jerry Maguire, which tricked guys into the cinema with football and sports agents and then revealed its black chick-flick heart.
Jerry Maguire was cigars and bourbon shooters at the Rathskeller followed by Friday night at the fights finished off with a visit to the strip club compared to this travesty that JB's getting dragged by the ear to see.
by Ziner » Tue Aug 11, 2009 1:18 pm
Swerb wrote:Another option. Agree to go and even act happy about it. Go Ferris Bueller on her the night of. Maybe even eat 3-4 laxatives. You can come off looking like the good guy and if you are adept enough at faking sick, may even get to lay on your ass and watch sports and be waited on for a couple days.
by peeker643 » Tue Aug 11, 2009 1:39 pm
JB wrote:Peeker643 wrote:HermanFontenot wrote:Eric Bana rocking the Cosby sweater. Hey you know, at least this movie has the balls to come right out and declare, "I'm a chick flick!" Not like Jerry Maguire, which tricked guys into the cinema with football and sports agents and then revealed its black chick-flick heart.
Jerry Maguire was cigars and bourbon shooters at the Rathskeller followed by Friday night at the fights finished off with a visit to the strip club compared to this travesty that JB's getting dragged by the ear to see.
ear?

by jack_tors » Tue Aug 11, 2009 2:21 pm
by peeker643 » Tue Aug 11, 2009 2:25 pm
jack_tors wrote:I say bite the bullet, worth it in the end. However, there is another aspect to this movie you are all missing. If done right, this could have been the best film ever. Let me explain based on what I have seen in trailer:
Guy meets girl, then leaves to another time & place
Guy dates girl, then leaves to a time in place
Guy marries girl, (probably bangs girl) then leaves to another time in place.
Girl has baby and is stuck with a whining, crying baby while the guy leaves to another time and place.
See a theme here? Its like the best possible scenario for the guy. Gets what he wants (from Rachel McAdams nonetheless), then leaves to a place where she can NEVER find and nag the life out of him. Sure, they probably kill the ending with some sappy love story but go to your happy place and imagine
the guy going back to live the awesome life of a bachelor playing the field..
This idea, in the hands of the right director, would be awesome..
by OldDawg » Tue Aug 11, 2009 2:30 pm
jack_tors wrote:I say bite the bullet, worth it in the end. However, there is another aspect to this movie you are all missing. If done right, this could have been the best film ever. Let me explain based on what I have seen in trailer:
Guy meets girl, then leaves to another time & place
Guy dates girl, then leaves to a time in place
Guy marries girl, (probably bangs girl) then leaves to another time in place.
Girl has baby and is stuck with a whining, crying baby while the guy leaves to another time and place.
See a theme here? Its like the best possible scenario for the guy. Gets what he wants (from Rachel McAdams nonetheless), then leaves to a place where she can NEVER find and nag the life out of him. Sure, they probably kill the ending with some sappy love story but go to your happy place and imagine
the guy going back to live the awesome life of a bachelor playing the field..
This idea, in the hands of the right director, would be awesome..


by jack_tors » Tue Aug 11, 2009 4:22 pm
Peeker643 wrote:jack_tors wrote:I say bite the bullet, worth it in the end. However, there is another aspect to this movie you are all missing. If done right, this could have been the best film ever. Let me explain based on what I have seen in trailer:
Guy meets girl, then leaves to another time & place
Guy dates girl, then leaves to a time in place
Guy marries girl, (probably bangs girl) then leaves to another time in place.
Girl has baby and is stuck with a whining, crying baby while the guy leaves to another time and place.
See a theme here? Its like the best possible scenario for the guy. Gets what he wants (from Rachel McAdams nonetheless), then leaves to a place where she can NEVER find and nag the life out of him. Sure, they probably kill the ending with some sappy love story but go to your happy place and imagine
the guy going back to live the awesome life of a bachelor playing the field..
This idea, in the hands of the right director, would be awesome..
It's been done time and time again jack_tors. It's called 'The NBA'
And there was a sequel titled "The Travis Henry Story" that utilized pro football as the back drop.![]()
by idoctribefan » Tue Aug 11, 2009 6:35 pm

by swerb » Tue Aug 11, 2009 8:03 pm
idoctribefan wrote:In addition, you've avoided the absolute worst part of going to the theater to see the chick flick: other people at the theater seeing you being dragged by your balls to see the film.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Tue Aug 11, 2009 8:08 pm
by BruceK » Tue Aug 11, 2009 8:31 pm

by e0y2e3 » Tue Aug 11, 2009 8:50 pm

by peeker643 » Tue Aug 11, 2009 8:55 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:3 chicks spotted on the subway at various times today reading this book.
If you saw the notebook you will be seeing this, don't mock JB too much here.
by Erie Warrior » Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:25 pm
Peeker643 wrote:
Haven't seen 'The Notebook'. Mock I must.


by jordan kramer » Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:03 am
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Who cares about this crap?
WE GOT A MUTHA FUCKIN EARTHQUAKE MACHINE!
by aoxo1 » Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:11 am
by hermanfontenot » Wed Aug 12, 2009 2:07 am
aoxo1 wrote:You can get out of it. Just remark how Eric Bana seems to be playing a pedophile. He meets this woman while she is a small child and he is fully grown, and plans to sleep with her and marry her later? And he tells her (from what I saw in the trailers)? Gross.

by Bill the Butcher » Wed Aug 12, 2009 3:17 am

4thQtrGlory wrote:If we got all that, i would hang a browns flag from my boner for 2 weeks straight...
by e0y2e3 » Fri Aug 14, 2009 10:26 am

by rawdawgexpress » Fri Aug 14, 2009 11:03 am
by HoodooMan » Fri Aug 14, 2009 1:30 pm
by Lubber » Fri Aug 14, 2009 4:51 pm
by jb » Fri Aug 21, 2009 4:48 pm
by peeker643 » Fri Aug 21, 2009 4:51 pm
JB wrote:A happy eneding.
So I had to travel for work and stalled and stalled. I avoided the subject like as if I owed money.
She's decided her fascination has come and gone and wants to pass in favor of Inglorious Basterds.
Just when your patience gets tested you know why you have a keeper.
Return to Movies, Music, TV, Books, Pop Culture
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests
