Moderators: peeker643, swerb, pup, papacass
by noles1 » Tue Jun 09, 2009 11:16 pm

by jb » Wed Jun 10, 2009 12:11 am
by noles1 » Wed Jun 10, 2009 12:29 am
JB wrote:Just as a drive by, if we can land West and Posey, and then a real swing man to go along with James who can drain from out trey like dude from Toronto, this was a DAMN good off season and we have a legit championship shot. SSB can just go away. Camby would be a bonus.
Then again, we could just stay put and get less rest between series. Because after game 2 when I told you ALL there was a talent / matchup differential Ray Charles could see that was dooming us real-time, you all told me I was fucked in the head, esp Peeker & Madre. Now it's all "Chris Bosh or we have no shot".
I await the coming of the correct that will never come my way. :-)
"I know you are, but what am I?"
- Pee Wee Herman
Fery better not screw the pooch and make excuses or sign dooshbags.

by FUDU » Wed Jun 10, 2009 2:45 am
by aoxo1 » Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:08 am
FUDU wrote:Guys Walton was a quality center, but he went exactly where he should have in this type of draft. Hell he never averaged 20ppg. You guys are confusing his greatness in college with his pro days.
by FUDU » Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:13 am
aoxo1 wrote:FUDU wrote:Guys Walton was a quality center, but he went exactly where he should have in this type of draft. Hell he never averaged 20ppg. You guys are confusing his greatness in college with his pro days.
No, we aren't.
If you want to argue that injury-proneness should be included in evaluating guys for these teams, then it is a fair point. But if we are considering the players when they were healthy in the NBA, Walton was absolutely in the top 10 C's ever. And even there he gets docked. If he had been healthy for more than a few seasons, he would definitely be in the top 5.
Two seasons in which he was MODERATELY healthy, and would have been considered unhealthy for most players, he was absolutely dominant. Even then he only managed to play 65 and 58 games. Yet, he was still an all star both years, one first and one second team All NBA, one regular season MVP, one finals MVP, two first team all defense. One championship.
Greatest passing big man ever. One of the greatest defensive big men ever. ~18.5 ppg in his two "healthy" seasons... in ~34 mpg @ 52.5% FG% with almost 15 RPG, 4.5 APG, and nearly 3 BPG.
And we aren't the only ones. http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/dailydime ... estCenters
Take the time to watch some of those Blazers games on ESPN Classic. If you love basketball, there is almost nothing sadder than Bill Walton's feet.
by aoxo1 » Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:23 am
FUDU wrote:My point was only to validate where he went in this process, lots of better big men than him to take in this thing. No way he should have went top 3-5 rounds. his best healthy years were nothing compared to other great 5's average years in SOME cases. Plus when you take into account having to fill by position, taking a Walton over a much better player at another position is almost insane. Rd 6 is probably where he should have been picked maybe 5?
by aoxo1 » Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:25 am
by FUDU » Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:37 am
aoxo1 wrote:FUDU wrote:My point was only to validate where he went in this process, lots of better big men than him to take in this thing. No way he should have went top 3-5 rounds. his best healthy years were nothing compared to other great 5's average years in SOME cases. Plus when you take into account having to fill by position, taking a Walton over a much better player at another position is almost insane. Rd 6 is probably where he should have been picked maybe 5?
You're telling me a healthy Bill Walton was worse than Willis Reed, Robert Parish, Patrick Ewing, Zo, Artis Gilmore, Bob Lanier, and Dikembe Mutombo?
by e0y2e3 » Wed Jun 10, 2009 8:49 am

by FUDU » Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:25 am
e0y2e3 wrote:IOW: you are telling me that if your lineup lends itself to a defensive center your center should only be a good defensive player, that if he is well rounded there is no place for him?
by e0y2e3 » Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:34 am

by CP » Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:40 am
e0y2e3 wrote:No it is, when considering the other centers.
Look, guy slipped through the cracks, no big deal. These excuses are silly though. The guy was one of the top all time and went after centers that weren't. He also was an incredible all around player, so your specialist argument doesn't hold.
Guy slipped, it happens.
But don't try and rationalize it with "some people picked scorers because of BPA" when other not as good centers went later.
by Bayou Tribe » Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:44 am
by CP » Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:56 am

by FUDU » Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:59 am
CP wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:No it is, when considering the other centers.
Look, guy slipped through the cracks, no big deal. These excuses are silly though. The guy was one of the top all time and went after centers that weren't. He also was an incredible all around player, so your specialist argument doesn't hold.
Guy slipped, it happens.
But don't try and rationalize it with "some people picked scorers because of BPA" when other not as good centers went later.
Before I make my last picks, Walton didn't fit with what I wanted. I wanted a dominating defensive presence off the bench and Mutombo fit that want better than Walton. Walton was surely a better all-around player but I decided to go with Mutombo because he fit my team. Walton was a good shot-blocker but is not the shot-blocker that Mutombo is, nor the interior defensive presence that Mutombo provides. Walton was an all-time great but I chose the 4-time defensive player of the year to come off the bench.
I'm loving this, fwiw.
by CP » Wed Jun 10, 2009 11:23 am

''I stressed defense -- pressure defense,'' he once said. ''And team basketball. And, on offense, moving the ball to hit the open man.'' In huddles he would sometimes let his players devise plays to create baskets. As for defense, however, he was the sole voice.
by aoxo1 » Wed Jun 10, 2009 12:12 pm
by FUDU » Wed Jun 10, 2009 12:17 pm
aoxo1 wrote:Look, you're putting together a team of all time greats. You need a big man who can fit in well with a bunch of guys who can score. He's gotta shoot efficiently on offense, but doesn't need the ball in his hands to be effective. Now you've got Bill Walton available. He has all the tools. He can shoot, post up, rebound at a high rate, and blocks shots. He is an all defense level performer on the other end. But more importantly, he gets you out in transition because he gets so many rebounds and blocks and is a great, great passer. He is as skilled a big man as we have in the game today, he does it all. And on top of that, he is a champion. You know he will be there in crunch time. And you know he can come off the bench, if need be. This is a guy who in only one and a half healthy seasons won a championship, two first team all defense, MVP, and Finals MVP. He was the sixth man of the year. He can do it all. He could play in the slow down grind it out style of the 90s or the uptempo fast breaking game of the 80s. You will not go wrong with Bill Walton.
/Hubie
by jfiling » Wed Jun 10, 2009 12:20 pm
by CP » Wed Jun 10, 2009 12:25 pm
aoxo1 wrote:Look, you're putting together a team of all time greats. You need a big man who can fit in well with a bunch of guys who can score. He's gotta shoot efficiently on offense, but doesn't need the ball in his hands to be effective. Now you've got Bill Walton available. He has all the tools. He can shoot, post up, rebound at a high rate, and blocks shots. He is an all defense level performer on the other end. But more importantly, he gets you out in transition because he gets so many rebounds and blocks and is a great, great passer. He is as skilled a big man as we have in the game today, he does it all. And on top of that, he is a champion. You know he will be there in crunch time. And you know he can come off the bench, if need be. This is a guy who in only one and a half healthy seasons won a championship, two first team all defense, MVP, and Finals MVP. He was the sixth man of the year. He can do it all. He could play in the slow down grind it out style of the 90s or the uptempo fast breaking game of the 80s. You will not go wrong with Bill Walton.
/Hubie
by noles1 » Wed Jun 10, 2009 12:29 pm
CP wrote:aoxo1 wrote:Look, you're putting together a team of all time greats. You need a big man who can fit in well with a bunch of guys who can score. He's gotta shoot efficiently on offense, but doesn't need the ball in his hands to be effective. Now you've got Bill Walton available. He has all the tools. He can shoot, post up, rebound at a high rate, and blocks shots. He is an all defense level performer on the other end. But more importantly, he gets you out in transition because he gets so many rebounds and blocks and is a great, great passer. He is as skilled a big man as we have in the game today, he does it all. And on top of that, he is a champion. You know he will be there in crunch time. And you know he can come off the bench, if need be. This is a guy who in only one and a half healthy seasons won a championship, two first team all defense, MVP, and Finals MVP. He was the sixth man of the year. He can do it all. He could play in the slow down grind it out style of the 90s or the uptempo fast breaking game of the 80s. You will not go wrong with Bill Walton.
/Hubie
I think people are forgetting or minimizing how great a defender Mutombo actually was and how his presence literally altered the offensive games of everyone he faced. No one is disagreeing on Walton's effectiveness. But as an interior defender and someone who protects the rim, he's not on Mutombo's level. He is a better scorer and passer, yes.
Ultimately, this is the argument I have to push in defense of my team. We are picking guys out of decades of NBA basketball. Surely we can come up with 100+ guys who had no problem putting the ball in the hole. All 16 teams here aren't going to have that problem. That said, if you want stops, you need ELITE defensive players, not just very good defensive players. You don't get to pad your stats against the worst teams in the league or showcase your defensive skills against a bunch of stiffs. Look at the 16 teams; how many of them have 3+ elite defenders on their team who can matchup with the other teams? Realistically, how many of these teams can actually get a stop at some point? I maintain that my team has elite defenders all over the place. I can stop teams in the post and at the rim with Defensive Players of the Year in the Mailman, Admiral and Mutombo. I can stop the ball at the point of attack with Payton. I can stop a slasher (with plenty of help) with Sidney Moncrief. My team's style of play (with Holzman running the show) will allow me to get more stops than any other team in this draft and is the reason why I think my team can win games.
We really need to put this in a whatifsports.com type simulator because that would be fun. Take out injuries and play one season with this and see what happens.

by CP » Wed Jun 10, 2009 12:42 pm
noles1 wrote:Agree to an extent but with great players, great offense always beats great defense. That's been proven time and again in basketball.
I agree there is a balance there but you have to put the ball in the hole to win and a team that is able to present matchups issues (ala Orlando) is more likely to come away than a dominant defensive team in this format.
by e0y2e3 » Wed Jun 10, 2009 1:01 pm

by pup » Wed Jun 10, 2009 2:15 pm
CP wrote:aoxo1 wrote:Look, you're putting together a team of all time greats. You need a big man who can fit in well with a bunch of guys who can score. He's gotta shoot efficiently on offense, but doesn't need the ball in his hands to be effective. Now you've got Bill Walton available. He has all the tools. He can shoot, post up, rebound at a high rate, and blocks shots. He is an all defense level performer on the other end. But more importantly, he gets you out in transition because he gets so many rebounds and blocks and is a great, great passer. He is as skilled a big man as we have in the game today, he does it all. And on top of that, he is a champion. You know he will be there in crunch time. And you know he can come off the bench, if need be. This is a guy who in only one and a half healthy seasons won a championship, two first team all defense, MVP, and Finals MVP. He was the sixth man of the year. He can do it all. He could play in the slow down grind it out style of the 90s or the uptempo fast breaking game of the 80s. You will not go wrong with Bill Walton.
/Hubie
I think people are forgetting or minimizing how great a defender Mutombo actually was and how his presence literally altered the offensive games of everyone he faced. No one is disagreeing on Walton's effectiveness. But as an interior defender and someone who protects the rim, he's not on Mutombo's level. He is a better scorer and passer, yes.
Ultimately, this is the argument I have to push in defense of my team. We are picking guys out of decades of NBA basketball. Surely we can come up with 100+ guys who had no problem putting the ball in the hole. All 16 teams here aren't going to have that problem. That said, if you want stops, you need ELITE defensive players, not just very good defensive players. You don't get to pad your stats against the worst teams in the league or showcase your defensive skills against a bunch of stiffs. Look at the 16 teams; how many of them have 3+ elite defenders on their team who can matchup with the other teams? Realistically, how many of these teams can actually get a stop at some point? I maintain that my team has elite defenders all over the place. I can stop teams in the post and at the rim with Defensive Players of the Year in the Mailman, Admiral and Mutombo. I can stop the ball at the point of attack with Payton. I can stop a slasher (with plenty of help) with Sidney Moncrief. My team's style of play (with Holzman running the show) will allow me to get more stops than any other team in this draft and is the reason why I think my team can win games.
We really need to put this in a whatifsports.com type simulator because that would be fun. Take out injuries and play one season with this and see what happens.
by rebelwithoutaclue » Wed Jun 10, 2009 2:35 pm
CP wrote:Hate to skip Swerb but it's been since nearly 4 pm yesterday when noles made a pick, so here are my final picks:
With the last pick in the 7th round of the draft, I select Mr. Big Shot:
Chauncey Billups, G
Billups is a NBA Finals MVP, a four-time All-Star, a perennial entrant into the Conference Finals, and is one of the most underrated players in the league. Great teammate and one of the guys who you'd most want handling the ball when the game was on the line. Dynamic 3-point shooter, can get shots for himself and for his teammates and just plain comes up big in big games.
Fits my theme on both ends of the floor, too.
Q. How long do you think I can keep milking this "Mr. Big Shot" gimmick without anyone pointing out my nasty habit of disappearing in deciding games?
-- C. Billups, Denver
SG: Chauncey! You're alive! I thought you had died after Game 4 of the Lakers series; what a relief! Anyway, I give you credit for bringing this up. You no-showed in Games 5 and 6 of the 2003 Eastern finals (playing injured, but still); the entire 2004 Eastern finals (Detroit still won); Game 7 of the 2005 NBA Finals; Games 5 and 6 of the 2006 Miami series; and Game 6 of the 2007 Cavs series. You inexplicably disappeared for the first four games of the 2008 Boston series. And I mistakenly thought you had passed away after Game 4 of the 2009 Lakers series. That's an inordinate amount of no-shows, no? I vote that we change your nickname back to "Chauncey."
by jordan kramer » Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:33 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Who cares about this crap?
WE GOT A MUTHA FUCKIN EARTHQUAKE MACHINE!
by swerb » Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:34 pm
by jfiling » Wed Jun 10, 2009 4:09 pm
Swerb wrote:Ron Artest and Tony Parker for my bench to finish my team.
PG - Steve Nash
SG - Jerry West
SF - Elgin Baylor
PF - Pau Gasol
C - Dwight Howard
bench - Tony Parker
bench - Ron Artest
Coach - The Zen Master
by e0y2e3 » Wed Jun 10, 2009 4:33 pm
jordan kramer wrote:you have to take into account injury-proneness, so Walton went about where he should have. maybe he was a bargain in rd. 6, but he probably wasn't the steal of the draft

by jfiling » Wed Jun 10, 2009 4:50 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:jordan kramer wrote:you have to take into account injury-proneness, so Walton went about where he should have. maybe he was a bargain in rd. 6, but he probably wasn't the steal of the draft
I was under the impression teams were compared by considering players at their peak and without injury.
At least, IIRC that was the established criteria.
by Bayou Tribe » Wed Jun 10, 2009 4:53 pm
However, I wonder: can Swerb have both Tony Parker and Ron Artest on his bench? I thought one had to be a F/C.
by Ziner » Wed Jun 10, 2009 4:54 pm
jfiling wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:jordan kramer wrote:you have to take into account injury-proneness, so Walton went about where he should have. maybe he was a bargain in rd. 6, but he probably wasn't the steal of the draft
I was under the impression teams were compared by considering players at their peak and without injury.
At least, IIRC that was the established criteria.
I just looked at the first page, and the criteria seems somewhat vague at best.
However, I wonder: can Swerb have both Tony Parker and Ron Artest on his bench? I thought one had to be a F/C.

by jfiling » Wed Jun 10, 2009 4:58 pm
by noles1 » Wed Jun 10, 2009 6:00 pm

by swerb » Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:31 pm
Bayou Tribe wrote:However, I wonder: can Swerb have both Tony Parker and Ron Artest on his bench? I thought one had to be a F/C.
I think we decided just to leave it to the discretion of the picker. He's got two great bench guards, but when people vote they'll also look at his lack of a big on the bench. It's all strategery as ol Dubyah would say.
Also, if noles and Larvell could go ahead and pick I wouldn't hold it against them. I'm ready for them to no doubt take at least one of the 2 coaches I'm looking at.
by Bayou Tribe » Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:21 pm

by swerb » Wed Jun 10, 2009 11:32 pm
Bayou Tribe wrote:noles picked well over 3 hours ago, so I'm jumping Larvell.
“Don’t ever underestimate the heart of a champion."
Rudy Tomjanovich as the coach
by Bayou Tribe » Wed Jun 10, 2009 11:46 pm
I draw you first round, I'm adding Kermit Washington to my bench.
by jordan kramer » Thu Jun 11, 2009 1:10 am

With Krzyzewski at the helm, Team USA reclaimed the gold medal at the 2008 Beijing Summer Olympics with a 118-107 victory over Spain. Krzyzewski guided the U.S. squad to a perfect 8-0 record in the Olympics as the team averaged 106 points per game while winning by an average margin of 27.9 points per contest. In the summer of 2007, he guided the USA squad to a gold medal victory and an unblemished 10-0 record in the FIBA Americas Championship.
"[Coach K] is everything I thought he would be and more. I have been excited and waiting for this opportunity for a long time. Playing for him now, you realize why he is such a great coach. He communicates extremely well with his players. He’s very intense and has a passion for what he does and he has a great sense of humor."
— Kobe Bryant
"The first thing is communication, which he does very well because he likes to teach. He makes things easy because he gives you what he wants to see out there, which makes it easy for a point guard. I think he would do great in the NBA, but we all know that he has a great gig at Duke."
— Jason Kidd
"Getting to know him off the floor means more than anything to me. Everyone knows Coach K as a basketball coach, but not everyone knows how good he is as a person. It’s all about comfort level with me. I feel comfortable around him, and that allows me to open up a little bit more. That’s good for me."
— LeBron James
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Who cares about this crap?
WE GOT A MUTHA FUCKIN EARTHQUAKE MACHINE!
by FUDU » Thu Jun 11, 2009 2:51 am
e0y2e3 wrote:jordan kramer wrote:you have to take into account injury-proneness, so Walton went about where he should have. maybe he was a bargain in rd. 6, but he probably wasn't the steal of the draft
I was under the impression teams were compared by considering players at their peak and without injury.
At least, IIRC that was the established criteria.
by FUDU » Thu Jun 11, 2009 3:03 am
by pup » Thu Jun 11, 2009 7:35 am
by Larvell Blanks » Thu Jun 11, 2009 9:19 am

by FUDU » Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:52 am
by FUDU » Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:53 am
by British_Pharaoh » Thu Jun 11, 2009 12:18 pm


by hermanfontenot » Thu Jun 11, 2009 12:30 pm


by Bayou Tribe » Thu Jun 11, 2009 3:25 pm
by jfiling » Thu Jun 11, 2009 3:27 pm
Bayou Tribe wrote:The Coach K pick brings up an interesting question? Did we not have to pick players that played in the NBA? Could I have picked a non-NBA player? Cause if so I have a change to my roster I'd like to make.
Return to Cleveland Cavaliers & The NBA
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest