Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by SoulDawg74 » Sun Apr 26, 2009 8:49 pm
by jfiling » Sun Apr 26, 2009 8:57 pm
by yogi » Sun Apr 26, 2009 9:13 pm
by aoxo1 » Sun Apr 26, 2009 9:29 pm
by Commodore Perry » Sun Apr 26, 2009 9:32 pm
by jameseboy » Sun Apr 26, 2009 9:59 pm
by peeker643 » Sun Apr 26, 2009 10:19 pm
Commodore Perry wrote:The bitching needs to stop.
The Browns team philosophy has changed. This team is going to be based on smart, self-less, hardworking team players. Obviously, if you go in this direction, you have to pass on talent that doesn't meet your requirements.
Mulauaga wasn't going to fit this team concept. So they passed on him.
The old browns were about having big name players at 7 key positions, and the old drafts reflected that. So did the win loss records.
The new browns are about having hard working talent spread over ALL positions. A star QB and WR do you no good if you're center is lying on his ass.
Notice how everyone they drafted was a senior and most were academically gifted?
This team will value a guy like Mack or Veikune higher then ESPN will. Its a different approach. I'm not saying you have to be on board with the new philosophy, but you should understand it. Its how things are going to be for a while.
by jack_tors » Sun Apr 26, 2009 10:31 pm
Peeker643 wrote:Commodore Perry wrote:The bitching needs to stop.
The Browns team philosophy has changed. This team is going to be based on smart, self-less, hardworking team players. Obviously, if you go in this direction, you have to pass on talent that doesn't meet your requirements.
Mulauaga wasn't going to fit this team concept. So they passed on him.
The old browns were about having big name players at 7 key positions, and the old drafts reflected that. So did the win loss records.
The new browns are about having hard working talent spread over ALL positions. A star QB and WR do you no good if you're center is lying on his ass.
Notice how everyone they drafted was a senior and most were academically gifted?
This team will value a guy like Mack or Veikune higher then ESPN will. Its a different approach. I'm not saying you have to be on board with the new philosophy, but you should understand it. Its how things are going to be for a while.
Well said.
I will say this: Either philosophy works IF you get the right guys. The old regime(s) didn't. Time will tell if this one did. And I think when people give it some thought and let it sink in they'll understand it a bit more. I certainly didn't understand the first two selections at the time. But when you look at what they did from a philosophy standpoint, it makes a lot of sense.
I'll still stand on the statement that someone on that roster needs to step up and be the guy that drives this team. Hopefully a kid like Quinn, who's exhibited some leadership characteristics in his couple years here, will be one of those guys.
Still interested to see who steps into that role, if anyone, on the defensive side of the ball.
by Mr. MacPhisto » Mon Apr 27, 2009 12:46 am
by contagious216 » Mon Apr 27, 2009 3:00 am
by fundamentals » Mon Apr 27, 2009 8:46 am

by mistero » Mon Apr 27, 2009 8:47 am
by Erie Warrior » Mon Apr 27, 2009 9:26 am


by bw » Mon Apr 27, 2009 9:56 am
by leadpipe » Mon Apr 27, 2009 10:03 am
Erie Warrior wrote:-1
Mack will be fine, but the rest of the draft is questionable, at best. Hopefully James Davis will be a hidden gem. Elam may start, but the other guys? Those guys are starters on only a few teams in the league, and it ain't the top ones. The Hawaiian Nightmare will challenge for a starting job because he bench presses a Buick? Really? Ask Mike Kudla. Better hips? Come on. That should be a huge, glaring, sign there is a problem. Your second round pick has good hips. HA!
Count me as one of the clueless motherless whinnin jackoffs who aint got the message yet. The O-line is improving, but there is no one to run or throw to. There is one decent linebacker, and he is old. Let's pray that Rogers doesn't disappear like he did with the Lions, odds are good he will.
If they land a RB and a LB through a trade, then my hopes will rise. Until then, the only thing they will contend for will be another top 10 pick next April.
by Erie Warrior » Mon Apr 27, 2009 10:52 am
Lead Pipe wrote:
Agreed they need RB and LB help, however, there isn't a position on the field they didn't need help at. Even with the extra picks, there is only so much you can do.
I'm not sure how all the players they got this weekend are going to workout, but I do know that they did NOT draft one guy at a position they DID NOT need help in.


by SoulDawg74 » Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:13 am
Erie Warrior wrote:Lead Pipe wrote:
Agreed they need RB and LB help, however, there isn't a position on the field they didn't need help at. Even with the extra picks, there is only so much you can do.
I'm not sure how all the players they got this weekend are going to workout, but I do know that they did NOT draft one guy at a position they DID NOT need help in.
It ain't the what, Pipe, it's the who. Specifically in the second round. They identified WR and LB as points of need. Fine with me.
36th- Never hidden my man love for Rey, so that's my pick. If not him, why not go Sintim or E. Brown as a pass rusher/ OLB?
50th- Still need a WR, Pat Turner. Better than either Robiskie or Massoqui. I would have gone RB with Greene or McCoy
52nd- McCoy and Greene still on the board, as I would bet Massoqui and maybe Robiskie would be (no other WRs taken during that stretch)
For my money, I go Malauga/ Sintim, Turner, McCoy.
by rebelwithoutaclue » Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:15 am
50th- Still need a WR, Pat Turner. Better than either Robiskie or Massoqui. I would have gone RB with Greene or McCoy
by yogi » Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:19 am
It ain't the what, Pipe, it's the who. Specifically in the second round. They identified WR and LB as points of need. Fine with me.
36th- Never hidden my man love for Rey, so that's my pick. If not him, why not go Sintim or E. Brown as a pass rusher/ OLB?
50th- Still need a WR, Pat Turner. Better than either Robiskie or Massoqui. I would have gone RB with Greene or McCoy
52nd- McCoy and Greene still on the board, as I would bet Massoqui and maybe Robiskie would be (no other WRs taken during that stretch)
For my money, I go Malauga/ Sintim, Turner, McCoy.
by Erie Warrior » Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:25 am
SoulDawg74 wrote:
The draft is real time , picked on Saturday and Sunday in minutes and seconds , not the next day in your easy chair picked at your leisure when you
get around to pulling your thumbs outta your ass.
SoulDawg


by JCoz » Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:29 am
rebelwithoutaclue wrote:50th- Still need a WR, Pat Turner. Better than either Robiskie or Massoqui. I would have gone RB with Greene or McCoy
Pat Turner, the USC WR billed as inconsistent and not living up to his talent at USC? Just what this team would need. Gimme the guy who can run routes and catch, we already got an inconsistent WR.
by Erie Warrior » Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:31 am
yogi wrote:
Bold words indeed for your opinion.
I understand liking your guy. But why blast the picks we did make as not as good as what you wanted? Dontcha think that these guys have seen a wee bit more film than you? No benefit of doubt even for our braintrust? You know better?


by davemanddd » Mon Apr 27, 2009 12:01 pm
SoulDawg74 wrote:8 Draft picks and three experienced veteran NFL players from the Savage leftovers.
Yet the bitchin and wailin has been an endless ceaseless torrent of blabberin suck.
Just goes to prove you morons don't know football players from your own pieholes.
Yeah we got some prospects at safety corner linebacker and running back , who didn't .
But net we landed four starters with our first pick
ROBO Mack Elam and the former Jet DE will start.
Ratcliff the QB will push either starting QB for playing time and make sure if we ever get to our third QB we'll never get Dorseyed again.
All of which came on the draft day trades from five to 21.
and
JB just shut the Fuck up about Veikune.
He's the same sort of prospect the inbred have deveolped against us nonstop for Years.
Dude is a football player benched more reps than every lineman in the draft ten more reps than Mulauaga has better hips than Orpako at the same size and we're paying him #52 money instead of top five jack.
Wimbleys puppy ass is gonna have to fight him off for playing time , and he's gonna lose.
oh
and for the rest of you clueless motherless whinnin jackoffs who aint got the message yet.
The Cleveland Browns will challenge for the divison this year.
Out
SoulDawg
by Erie Warrior » Mon Apr 27, 2009 12:09 pm
rebelwithoutaclue wrote:Pat Turner, the USC WR billed as inconsistent and not living up to his talent at USC? Just what this team would need. Gimme the guy who can run routes and catch, we already got an inconsistent WR.


by JCoz » Mon Apr 27, 2009 12:13 pm
Erie Warrior wrote:rebelwithoutaclue wrote:Pat Turner, the USC WR billed as inconsistent and not living up to his talent at USC? Just what this team would need. Gimme the guy who can run routes and catch, we already got an inconsistent WR.
Guess who:
Negatives: Simply drops too many passes. Prone to lapses in concentration or not looking the pass into his hands before trying to make a defender miss. Allows passes into his frame too often, resulting in some ugly bounce-backs. Bit of a long-strider with build-up speed. Lacks elite foot quickness and agility to consistently gain separation from NFL-caliber cornerbacks. Tends to disappear for long stretches.
If you love Robo or Massoqui, fine, I'm pretty sure they would have been there. I'll take the bigger guy who still runs good routes, can get off of bump n' run coverage and has good hands. I think Turner compares better to JJ than the guys that were drafted.
by Bill the Butcher » Mon Apr 27, 2009 1:17 pm
4thQtrGlory wrote:If we got all that, i would hang a browns flag from my boner for 2 weeks straight...
by SoulDawg74 » Mon Apr 27, 2009 2:04 pm
by Erie Warrior » Mon Apr 27, 2009 2:46 pm


by JCoz » Mon Apr 27, 2009 3:01 pm
Erie Warrior wrote:Fair enough, erase 3rd and insert 4th. Still a huge stretch in the second.
by SoulDawg74 » Mon Apr 27, 2009 3:23 pm
Erie Warrior wrote:Fair enough, erase 3rd and insert 4th. Still a huge stretch in the second.
by Erie Warrior » Mon Apr 27, 2009 3:33 pm
SoulDawg74 wrote:SD:
See this is what makes you a second guessing 20/20 hindsight mumbling mutha fuckin Jackasswho can't dicern real time decisions from monday morning Quarterbacking.
Who in the fourth which was our next earliest pick had his talent that we could have replaced him with .
Further you have not one shred of credible evidence , other than repeating the same dribble from the jaw jackin fools like yourself that Viekune could had made it past either the Pats or the inbred in the second let alone the other 11 teams converting to the 34.
His pick in, fact triggered defensive players going off the board in mass in the second , with both Chicago and Dallas poised and ready to make a splash in the third.
Real time you'd have been shut out had the team followed your bullshit script on what they should have done.
SoulDawg


by Danny Tanner » Mon Apr 27, 2009 3:45 pm
by Lubber » Mon Apr 27, 2009 3:55 pm
Erie Warrior wrote:SoulDawg74 wrote:SD:
See this is what makes you a second guessing 20/20 hindsight mumbling mutha fuckin Jackasswho can't dicern real time decisions from monday morning Quarterbacking.
Who in the fourth which was our next earliest pick had his talent that we could have replaced him with .
Further you have not one shred of credible evidence , other than repeating the same dribble from the jaw jackin fools like yourself that Viekune could had made it past either the Pats or the inbred in the second let alone the other 11 teams converting to the 34.
His pick in, fact triggered defensive players going off the board in mass in the second , with both Chicago and Dallas poised and ready to make a splash in the third.
Real time you'd have been shut out had the team followed your bullshit script on what they should have done.
SoulDawg
Says you. Your guess is as good as mine, or from what I've read in some of you're previous posts, worse. I hope the dude is LT junior. I don't think he is.
by SoulDawg74 » Mon Apr 27, 2009 4:07 pm
Danny Tanner wrote:SD you need to shut the fuck up and instead of always calling names and trying to prove what other think wrong come up with your own ideas and opinions of things. I guess you agreed with every single move the Browns made in this draft?
by jb » Mon Apr 27, 2009 4:09 pm
and for the rest of you clueless motherless whinnin jackoffs who aint got the message yet.
The Cleveland Browns will challenge for the divison this year.
by jb » Mon Apr 27, 2009 4:11 pm
Danny Tanner wrote:SD you need to shut the fuck up and respect peoples opinions you are acting like a 3rd grader with all the name calling.
by Ziner » Mon Apr 27, 2009 4:12 pm
SoulDawg74 wrote:Danny Tanner wrote:SD you need to shut the fuck up and instead of always calling names and trying to prove what other think wrong come up with your own ideas and opinions of things. I guess you agreed with every single move the Browns made in this draft?
SD:
Heres my position again , just in case you were too dumb to read it the first time .
""8 Draft picks and three experienced veteran NFL players from the Savage leftovers.
Yet the bitchin and wailin has been an endless ceaseless torrent of blabberin suck.
Just goes to prove you morons don't know football players from your own pieholes.
Yeah we got some prospects at safety corner linebacker and running back , who didn't .
But net we landed four starters with our first pick
ROBO Mack Elam and the former Jet DE will start.
Ratcliff the QB will push either starting QB for playing time and make sure if we ever get to our third QB we'll never get Dorseyed again.
All of which came on the draft day trades from five to 21.
and
JB just shut the Fuck up about Veikune.
He's the same sort of prospect the inbred have deveolped against us nonstop for Years.
Dude is a football player benched more reps than every lineman in the draft ten more reps than Mulauaga has better hips than Orpako at the same size and we're paying him #52 money instead of top five jack.
Wimbleys puppy ass is gonna have to fight him off for playing time , and he's gonna lose.
oh
and for the rest of you clueless motherless whinnin jackoffs who aint got the message yet.
The Cleveland Browns will challenge for the divison this year.
Out """
Further I was on record that Sanchez was the swing
vote which put three NFL QB's on the clock with our pick .
Nobody real time expected the Browns to fill all their glaring holes with 5 picks moir included.
But to step away with the something not seen since hershel walker rickey williams and it being done by the Browns is unprecedented in our history.
we netted Four starters in exchange for our 5 spot,
plus a developmental linebacker who will contribute on special teams rush the passer in nickel packages and may push Wimp to the bench and a develpmental QB which kicked our ass last preseason .
You got something better than that ,
bring it with your bad ass and shut me up,
otherwise step the fuck off with the other second guessing limp dick jackoff pseudo wannabee GM's
who come in here picking Sundays games with mondays newspaper, like they bad as all that.
SoulDawg
by jb » Mon Apr 27, 2009 4:14 pm
Lubber wrote: Erie, I think you might need to step back and look at big picture, and not just one or two guys. I do not think the Browns are looking for LT jr. Rather, they are looking for 22 pieces of a puzzle that will connect together and play as one cohesive unit.
by Danny Tanner » Mon Apr 27, 2009 4:20 pm
by jb » Mon Apr 27, 2009 4:23 pm
Ziner wrote:SoulDawg74 wrote:Danny Tanner wrote:SD you need to shut the fuck up and instead of always calling names and trying to prove what other think wrong come up with your own ideas and opinions of things. I guess you agreed with every single move the Browns made in this draft?
SD:
Heres my position again , just in case you were too dumb to read it the first time .
""8 Draft picks and three experienced veteran NFL players from the Savage leftovers.
Yet the bitchin and wailin has been an endless ceaseless torrent of blabberin suck.
Just goes to prove you morons don't know football players from your own pieholes.
Yeah we got some prospects at safety corner linebacker and running back , who didn't .
But net we landed four starters with our first pick
ROBO Mack Elam and the former Jet DE will start.
Ratcliff the QB will push either starting QB for playing time and make sure if we ever get to our third QB we'll never get Dorseyed again.
All of which came on the draft day trades from five to 21.
and
JB just shut the Fuck up about Veikune.
He's the same sort of prospect the inbred have deveolped against us nonstop for Years.
Dude is a football player benched more reps than every lineman in the draft ten more reps than Mulauaga has better hips than Orpako at the same size and we're paying him #52 money instead of top five jack.
Wimbleys puppy ass is gonna have to fight him off for playing time , and he's gonna lose.
oh
and for the rest of you clueless motherless whinnin jackoffs who aint got the message yet.
The Cleveland Browns will challenge for the divison this year.
Out """
Further I was on record that Sanchez was the swing
vote which put three NFL QB's on the clock with our pick .
Nobody real time expected the Browns to fill all their glaring holes with 5 picks moir included.
But to step away with the something not seen since hershel walker rickey williams and it being done by the Browns is unprecedented in our history.
we netted Four starters in exchange for our 5 spot,
plus a developmental linebacker who will contribute on special teams rush the passer in nickel packages and may push Wimp to the bench and a develpmental QB which kicked our ass last preseason .
You got something better than that ,
bring it with your bad ass and shut me up,
otherwise step the fuck off with the other second guessing limp dick jackoff pseudo wannabee GM's
who come in here picking Sundays games with mondays newspaper, like they bad as all that.
SoulDawg
Dude, once you remove your mouth from the ManKok, why dont you check out the bolded section and then bitch to more of us how we dont know dick about football. All your credibility left the forum with that sentence.
Thanks for coming.
Ratcliff the QB will push either starting QB
by SoulDawg74 » Mon Apr 27, 2009 4:32 pm
JB wrote:and for the rest of you clueless motherless whinnin jackoffs who aint got the message yet.
The Cleveland Browns will challenge for the divison this year.
Wow.
Just wow.
Is this after the Steelers and Ravens complete filming for We Are Marshall II and III ?
Maybe some nice, safe, building blocks, but did you watch the AFC Championship game?
by jb » Mon Apr 27, 2009 4:36 pm
We have a solid Oline with depth,
by bw » Mon Apr 27, 2009 4:40 pm
by Danny Tanner » Mon Apr 27, 2009 4:41 pm
by SoulDawg74 » Mon Apr 27, 2009 4:47 pm
Danny Tanner wrote:As long as the Steelers and Ravens draft the way they do and are two of the best ran teams in the NFL year in an year out. Winning the divison is a pipe dream right now. The Steelers just won 2 super bowls in the spead of 4 years with two different coaches. If the Browns are trying to copy them it is going to take a better draft then what they gave us this year.
Also Jamal Lewis is done and he is not a 1,000 yard rusher anymore he got 1002 yards last year. Being a 1,000 is worth nothing anymore. If that is what a 1000 yard season looks like. Lewis is slow and can't even hit the holes anymore. I am just shocked when I seen he got 1000 yards last season. I did not know he got like 800 carries last year.
by bw » Mon Apr 27, 2009 4:47 pm
JB wrote:We have a solid Oline with depth,
nah. Not even close at RT .
by SoulDawg74 » Mon Apr 27, 2009 4:50 pm
Danny Tanner wrote:SD you need to shut the fuck up and respect peoples opinions you are acting like a 3rd grader with all the name calling.
The two WR were a hung reach in my mind and anything is going to change that. With the other talent left on the board and we take two average WR is not going to cut it for me.
by HoodooMan » Mon Apr 27, 2009 4:50 pm
Is this after the Steelers and Ravens complete filming for We Are Marshall II and III ?
by antikryct » Mon Apr 27, 2009 4:54 pm
Danny Tanner wrote:The Browns were the team to trade with in the draft and every team knew it. They were way over there heads with what they wanted to do. I am so sick of hearing we got 5 starters. Give me a break Coleman and Elam would not be starters on more then half the teams in the NFL. Same with the two WR we got. Plain and Simple they did not get enough for a top 5 NFL pick that gave another team in the AFC a franchise QB.
They could have found WR in FA when players get cut or could have drafted 2 WR just as good in the later rounds.
Mangini acts like he has already won something all we are is the Jets from last year pretty much now. I don't know about you but that does not excite me at all.
by Lubber » Mon Apr 27, 2009 4:55 pm
Danny Tanner wrote:As long as the Steelers and Ravens draft the way they do and are two of the best ran teams in the NFL year in an year out. Winning the divison is a pipe dream right now. The Steelers just won 2 super bowls in the spead of 4 years with two different coaches. If the Browns are trying to copy them it is going to take a better draft then what they gave us this year.
Also Jamal Lewis is done and he is not a 1,000 yard rusher anymore he got 1002 yards last year. Being a 1,000 is worth nothing anymore. If that is what a 1000 yard season looks like. Lewis is slow and can't even hit the holes anymore. I am just shocked when I seen he got 1000 yards last season. I did not know he got like 800 carries last year.
Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests