Moderators: peeker643, swerb, pup, papacass
by Triple-S » Fri Apr 03, 2009 11:12 pm
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by Chris » Fri Apr 03, 2009 11:19 pm
by Ziner » Fri Apr 03, 2009 11:21 pm
Triple-S wrote:This is not mean't to sound like a ledge post, and I'm admittingly a novice, but just watching the last two games with us getting dominated by the Magic and the Whiz in the inside, we're not winning the NBA Title with the current roster. Hate saying it, but without a Dominant Big, we're sort of stuck behind Boston and Orlando. This isn't a diss towards Ben, Z or Andy as I think all three are great, but they just cannot get it done against the Dwight Howard, Leon Powe or Garnett.
My question is there anyway we can make a move in 2009-2010 for a player that fits that mold?
by Bill the Butcher » Fri Apr 03, 2009 11:40 pm
4thQtrGlory wrote:If we got all that, i would hang a browns flag from my boner for 2 weeks straight...
by buckeye319 » Fri Apr 03, 2009 11:43 pm
Bill the Butcher wrote:LOL, I think the Cavs are one great big man away from being virtually invincible. Can we agree on that?
We're dominant right now. You cannot deny that. Our 61-15 record isn't a joke. Today's game was a joke. LOL. Boy o boy, yes it was.
by Chris » Fri Apr 03, 2009 11:56 pm
by ProgRocker » Sat Apr 04, 2009 12:09 am
by Chris » Sat Apr 04, 2009 12:13 am
by Ziner » Sat Apr 04, 2009 12:18 am
Chris wrote:We are now a jump shooting team too.
by buckeye319 » Sat Apr 04, 2009 12:26 am
ProgRocker wrote:EVERYONE OFF. THE. LEDGE. NOW.
The Wiz won because the Cavs got bored and decided to try to win the game by hitting 3s - and the Wiz used it as their Super Bowl. The Magic won because the Cavs got in at 4 a.m., the Magic wanted to make a point, and they played a game that you can GUARAN-DAMN-TEE they will NEVER. EVER. EEEEEEE-VER. repeat. It was their Perfect Game and they hit the Cavs at the right moment for them.
But, the Celtics are hurting beyond Garnett, the Magic haven't proven they can win playoff series consistently, and the Lakers have a Hell of a gauntlet to run just to get to the Finals -- you do realize that if the Suns were in the East they'd be pushing to be the 4 seed, right? -- and the Cavs have the MVP, will have motivation, and will at the very least have home court through the Eastern finals if not longer.
61-15 is as dominant as you're going to get in the regular season, and the home court will be big, but the Cavs have shown in the last three seasons they know how to turn it up several notches, especially on defense. The Magic are gonna be tough but they still haven't shown they can play that kind of defensive-minded basketball (and teams that rely on jump shooting -- especially long-range jump shooting like the Magic does -- generally don't do as well come playoff time).
So again, OFF. THE. LEDGE. NOW. It's a whole different game in three weeks, and the Cavs can play that game.
by Chris » Sat Apr 04, 2009 12:30 am
Ziner wrote:Chris wrote:We are now a jump shooting team too.
Only when we are lazy. They got over confident... and now got their comeuppance. They will be a different team on Sunday and for sure when the playoffs start.
by ProgRocker » Sat Apr 04, 2009 1:30 am
buckeye319 wrote:I don't see much ledging going on here. Too say we need to shore up the interior (see our record vs. ORL, Boston, LAL, and Houston) or that we match up poorly with Orlando isn't ledging, its just the reality of the situation. This was evident many times during the 13 game win streak, but the Cavs overcame it with stellar play by LeBron and the team as a whole in the clutch.
It certainly doesn't mean we can't win the title, and I fully expect us to be very focused come playoff time.
by aoxo1 » Sat Apr 04, 2009 1:34 am
by buckeye319 » Sat Apr 04, 2009 1:39 am
ProgRocker wrote:buckeye319 wrote:I don't see much ledging going on here. Too say we need to shore up the interior (see our record vs. ORL, Boston, LAL, and Houston) or that we match up poorly with Orlando isn't ledging, its just the reality of the situation. This was evident many times during the 13 game win streak, but the Cavs overcame it with stellar play by LeBron and the team as a whole in the clutch.
It certainly doesn't mean we can't win the title, and I fully expect us to be very focused come playoff time.
No, it's ledging. NBA playoff history tells you that. The Celtics are old and hurting. The Lakers won't have an easy series, even against an 8. And the Magic simply haven't shown they can run the playoff gauntlet -- and the NBA is the one league where it's all but impossible to win a title without losing several times in the playoffs first. (You could argue the Celtics did that, but only because Garnett/Pierce/Allen did their losing in the playoffs before they got to Boston - they still went through that baptism).
The Magic are 1-2 in playoff series the last two years. The Cavs are 4-2. I'll take the team with the proven record and the young superstar over the unproven team with the younger (by playoff record) superstar in any playoff -- IF, that is, the Magic make it that far. (And the Cavs, too, of course.)
by e0y2e3 » Sat Apr 04, 2009 1:53 am

by OSU819903 » Sat Apr 04, 2009 2:01 am
e0y2e3 wrote:Thank gawd aoxo is posting here.
Honestly?
Did you guys just wake up?
I thought we were so good we were taking fake pictures before the game and just rolling opponents because we needed to loosen up?
This team has been flawed all year. Joe helped a little, but that flaw is still very real. I don't care how much fun they have, they have a lot of work to do.
In the words of Denny Green (paraphrased) "this team is, who we thought they were." I was hoping we'd get killed by 60 tonight, b/c tonight was a wake up call. It don't matter when you're getting your asses handed to you and I think they needed to feel that. Especially after loafing around last night, then tying it at 86, only to have another team run away on them. Two nights in a row that should inspire humility (as well as flat pissing them off) could pay dividends in the playoffs.
by buckeye319 » Sat Apr 04, 2009 2:13 am
e0y2e3 wrote:Thank gawd aoxo is posting here.
Honestly?
Did you guys just wake up?
I thought we were so good we were taking fake pictures before the game and just rolling opponents because we needed to loosen up?
This team has been flawed all year. Joe helped a little, but that flaw is still very real. I don't care how much fun they have, they have a lot of work to do.
by Triple-S » Sat Apr 04, 2009 4:14 am
e0y2e3 wrote:Thank gawd aoxo is posting here.
Honestly?
Did you guys just wake up?
I thought we were so good we were taking fake pictures before the game and just rolling opponents because we needed to loosen up?
This team has been flawed all year. Joe helped a little, but that flaw is still very real. I don't care how much fun they have, they have a lot of work to do.
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by alexp » Sat Apr 04, 2009 8:08 am
by ProgRocker » Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:55 am
alexp wrote:Having flaws does not equate to not good enough to win the whole thing.
Every team in the L has flaws. The Lakers cant even seem to beat the Bobcats, a team im confident we would roast in the playoffs. Shit happens.
I agree that we shoot too many jumpers. I also think things will change a bit when you get into a 7 game series, and can gameplan for one team. This team, this coach has always shown an ability to play above their heads in crunch time. Well this year, we are one of thebig dogs. Lets see what happens.
We are beatable enough that winning a title isnt a foregone conclusion. We are good enough that winning one wouldn't be a big surprise at all. Just like the Lakeshow, The C's and the Spurs. (Still dont see Orlando as a championship team...they gotta prove it to me when it counts.)
It used to be that around this time, the team would have ALOT less wins, and we would go into the playoffs hopeful, just knowing that somehow, some way LeBron would help take us to where we wanted to go. If only we had a supporting cast in place...
Now, the pieces are there. Whether we win the title or not, this is a championship level team. Moreso than any team in the LeBron era. Yet I see alot of that hope replaced with pessimism when the Cavs take a loss. When we were the underdogs, we believed that a miracle was possible. Now when we are the favorites, our faith seems to waver much more easily. Life as a Cleveland fan I guess?
by FUDU » Sat Apr 04, 2009 2:31 pm
by jamesownsdet » Sat Apr 04, 2009 2:43 pm
by DrPoove » Sat Apr 04, 2009 5:31 pm
jamesownsdet wrote:Tha Cavs are pretty fucking good. No team is truly dominant this season. At least not in the Chicago Bulls sense. But I do believe we can and will win the championship this year. It's going to be a long road. Full of ups and downs, highs and lows. But hey, this is Cleveland. You KNOW it won't be easy. And it won't be for the faint of heart.
Go Cavs!!!
by jordan kramer » Sat Apr 04, 2009 6:34 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Who cares about this crap?
WE GOT A MUTHA FUCKIN EARTHQUAKE MACHINE!
by jamesownsdet » Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:44 pm
jordan kramer wrote:i'm completely fine with all the pre-game picture taking, and the little half court horse games with superman, but you can't do that shit and then go out and get waxed. believe me i've learned, when your winning you ca fuck around a whole lot, but when you get embarrassed like that 2 nights in a row, its time to buckle down and focus. no more pre-game jerking off till the playoffs
lets go Cavs!
by Juannieboy » Sat Apr 04, 2009 8:18 pm
Chris wrote:If by some chance we get Amare or Bosh (I doubt it happens) this team is freakin invincible. Man, that'd be amazing...I wonder what is in store for us this offseason. I'd like to think Ferry will do SOMETHING even coming off a 60+ win season, it's LeBron's final year and he has to put all the money in to make sure LBJ has no reason to leave because the team is not only stacked for present but for the future too.

by Chris » Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:29 pm
Juannieboy wrote:Chris wrote:If by some chance we get Amare or Bosh (I doubt it happens) this team is freakin invincible. Man, that'd be amazing...I wonder what is in store for us this offseason. I'd like to think Ferry will do SOMETHING even coming off a 60+ win season, it's LeBron's final year and he has to put all the money in to make sure LBJ has no reason to leave because the team is not only stacked for present but for the future too.
Bosh or Amare is very unlikely. Acquiring O'Neil from Phoenix this off season is alot closer to reality and somewhat likely to happen. If it happens and the Big Diesel plays as well next year as he has this year, I think the Cavs would be a dominate team maybe looking at 70 wins.
by ProgRocker » Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:34 pm
Chris wrote:Juannieboy wrote:Chris wrote:If by some chance we get Amare or Bosh (I doubt it happens) this team is freakin invincible. Man, that'd be amazing...I wonder what is in store for us this offseason. I'd like to think Ferry will do SOMETHING even coming off a 60+ win season, it's LeBron's final year and he has to put all the money in to make sure LBJ has no reason to leave because the team is not only stacked for present but for the future too.
Bosh or Amare is very unlikely. Acquiring O'Neil from Phoenix this off season is alot closer to reality and somewhat likely to happen. If it happens and the Big Diesel plays as well next year as he has this year, I think the Cavs would be a dominate team maybe looking at 70 wins.
So acquire more 35+ year old guys? That's is pretty much the opposite of what we want to do.
No thanks.
by aoxo1 » Sat Apr 04, 2009 10:47 pm
by Chris » Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:33 pm
ProgRocker wrote:Chris wrote:Juannieboy wrote:Chris wrote:If by some chance we get Amare or Bosh (I doubt it happens) this team is freakin invincible. Man, that'd be amazing...I wonder what is in store for us this offseason. I'd like to think Ferry will do SOMETHING even coming off a 60+ win season, it's LeBron's final year and he has to put all the money in to make sure LBJ has no reason to leave because the team is not only stacked for present but for the future too.
Bosh or Amare is very unlikely. Acquiring O'Neil from Phoenix this off season is alot closer to reality and somewhat likely to happen. If it happens and the Big Diesel plays as well next year as he has this year, I think the Cavs would be a dominate team maybe looking at 70 wins.
So acquire more 35+ year old guys? That's is pretty much the opposite of what we want to do.
No thanks.
It's a rental in the best sense: Shaq has a mega-expiring contract and will undoubtedly retire after next year, meaning the Cavs would then have LeBron and the ability to sign someone to replace Shaq at Shaq-like money.
Think Amare or Bosh would like to make as much as Shaq while playing for LeBron?
by jb » Sun Apr 05, 2009 11:29 am
by FUDU » Sun Apr 05, 2009 1:15 pm
JB wrote:The front line has some depth and matchup issues that keep us from being the 1985 Western Conference all star team, but I think we're nothing more than a day off from being "dominant", Homie.
What if in the playoffs were weretho put Bron defesnively on Howard? Think about it hard before you kneejerk LyAO at me.
by Triple-S » Sun Apr 05, 2009 1:26 pm
FUDU wrote:JB wrote:The front line has some depth and matchup issues that keep us from being the 1985 Western Conference all star team, but I think we're nothing more than a day off from being "dominant", Homie.
What if in the playoffs were weretho put Bron defesnively on Howard? Think about it hard before you kneejerk LyAO at me.
I've thought about that, even if LeBron stepped up and made a difference on Howard IMO the amount of energy it would take from LeBron to do so wouldn't be worth it. That would be a very draining match up for James.
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by aoxo1 » Sun Apr 05, 2009 1:43 pm
by jb » Sun Apr 05, 2009 1:45 pm
Triple-S wrote:FUDU wrote:JB wrote:The front line has some depth and matchup issues that keep us from being the 1985 Western Conference all star team, but I think we're nothing more than a day off from being "dominant", Homie.
What if in the playoffs were weretho put Bron defesnively on Howard? Think about it hard before you kneejerk LyAO at me.
I've thought about that, even if LeBron stepped up and made a difference on Howard IMO the amount of energy it would take from LeBron to do so wouldn't be worth it. That would be a very draining match up for James.
And that's the matchup I'm actually scared the most of, for that exact reason. Howard is a beast, and if given the choice to have anybody in the league to put on our roster w/lebron at this very moment, I'd take him in a heartbeat.
Boston granted is no picnic, but if we get home court and play them in the ECF we can maybe get it in 7.
Unless Roker has a plan to beat the Magic that he's hidden in Andy's hair, I'm pretty terrified of them at the moment.
Again, I'm praying to God I'm wrong, and this thread gets bumped up after game X of the ECF, when we clinch our spot, and you guys have a good laugh at me. I'd much rather be happy than right.
by jb » Sun Apr 05, 2009 1:47 pm
aoxo1 wrote:The problem with LeBron on Howard, which he could do, (in addition to DU's point about him getting worn out) is that he is really the only guy on the team that can guard Hedo or Lewis.
by aoxo1 » Sun Apr 05, 2009 1:54 pm
by aoxo1 » Sun Apr 05, 2009 2:02 pm
by FUDU » Sun Apr 05, 2009 4:08 pm
JB wrote:aoxo1 wrote:The problem with LeBron on Howard, which he could do, (in addition to DU's point about him getting worn out) is that he is really the only guy on the team that can guard Hedo or Lewis.
Didn't Lee tell us in November we sure could use S Jackson when we run into them?
by RC » Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:12 pm
by e0y2e3 » Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:16 pm

by FUDU » Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:22 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:SJax makes us worse on O? That's funny.
Today has been a great day on the Cavs board. FUDU has laid the ground work for at least two if not three classic F U Donny U's.
by e0y2e3 » Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:41 pm

by ProgRocker » Sun Apr 05, 2009 11:40 pm
aoxo1 wrote:The problem with LeBron on Howard, which he could do, (in addition to DU's point about him getting worn out) is that he is really the only guy on the team that can guard Hedo or Lewis.
Return to Cleveland Cavaliers & The NBA
Users browsing this forum: jerryroche and 1 guest
