Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by Barons-Force » Fri Jan 30, 2009 2:54 pm
by yogi » Fri Jan 30, 2009 3:23 pm
by Triple-S » Fri Jan 30, 2009 4:06 pm
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by pup » Fri Jan 30, 2009 4:16 pm

by cutty » Fri Jan 30, 2009 5:36 pm
by waz1313 » Fri Jan 30, 2009 6:14 pm
by Barons-Force » Fri Jan 30, 2009 6:16 pm
by hornet84 » Fri Jan 30, 2009 6:46 pm
alpalsucksunderwoodblows wrote:Bush league is the product that has been put on the field for ten seasons.
by Lubber » Fri Jan 30, 2009 8:53 pm
Triple-S wrote:I think Ben is the product of a great ground game, a awesome beyound belief defense and the fact that the Steeler organization is pretty solid from top to bottom in getting him recievers and weapons to work with, he's able to look like a super star.
I don't mean to sound like a hater, but I think he's a tad bit overrated, the 22.1 point rating in the super bowl sort of proved that.
If he went to Cleveland in 2004, he would look below average and would have gotten killed with no offensive line. think Tim Couch pt. 2 but worse, and IMO, if Timmy did have a better offensive line and wasn't just thrown onto an expansion team, I think he would've been a better QB, Maybe even a Pro-Bowler or Playoff contending one.
by aoxo1 » Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:05 pm
lubber wrote:Triple-S wrote:I think Ben is the product of a great ground game, a awesome beyound belief defense and the fact that the Steeler organization is pretty solid from top to bottom in getting him recievers and weapons to work with, he's able to look like a super star.
I don't mean to sound like a hater, but I think he's a tad bit overrated, the 22.1 point rating in the super bowl sort of proved that.
If he went to Cleveland in 2004, he would look below average and would have gotten killed with no offensive line. think Tim Couch pt. 2 but worse, and IMO, if Timmy did have a better offensive line and wasn't just thrown onto an expansion team, I think he would've been a better QB, Maybe even a Pro-Bowler or Playoff contending one.
You are saying Ben is worse than Timmy? How come Couch never latched onto to another team if he was so good. if there ever was a guy that was overrated due the system, it was Couch at Kentucky.
That being said, Ben with the Browns probably does not equate to playoffs every year, but definitely better off than they are now. IMHO, the Browns have had more talent on their offense the last two years (definitely a better O-Line). Unfortunately, the Browns also have more prima donnas (read K2 and BE)......
Big Ben has several 4th Quarter comebacks to his credit, and those are usually not due to defense nor a running game.
by leadpipe » Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:49 pm
aoxo1 wrote:lubber wrote:Triple-S wrote:I think Ben is the product of a great ground game, a awesome beyound belief defense and the fact that the Steeler organization is pretty solid from top to bottom in getting him recievers and weapons to work with, he's able to look like a super star.
I don't mean to sound like a hater, but I think he's a tad bit overrated, the 22.1 point rating in the super bowl sort of proved that.
If he went to Cleveland in 2004, he would look below average and would have gotten killed with no offensive line. think Tim Couch pt. 2 but worse, and IMO, if Timmy did have a better offensive line and wasn't just thrown onto an expansion team, I think he would've been a better QB, Maybe even a Pro-Bowler or Playoff contending one.
You are saying Ben is worse than Timmy? How come Couch never latched onto to another team if he was so good. if there ever was a guy that was overrated due the system, it was Couch at Kentucky.
That being said, Ben with the Browns probably does not equate to playoffs every year, but definitely better off than they are now. IMHO, the Browns have had more talent on their offense the last two years (definitely a better O-Line). Unfortunately, the Browns also have more prima donnas (read K2 and BE)......
Big Ben has several 4th Quarter comebacks to his credit, and those are usually not due to defense nor a running game.
The reason is that Couch's body and arm were completely destroyed even before he left Cleveland.
by Spin » Fri Jan 30, 2009 11:52 pm
by jfiling » Sat Jan 31, 2009 1:12 am
Spin wrote:Clevelanders would have never accepted him because he's a MAC quarterback. He would have led the league in sacks behind our semi-pro O lines, and shell shocked and broken, led out to pasture like countless qbs of the new Browns.
And everyone would say he sucked.
by Toxicadam » Sat Jan 31, 2009 8:47 am

by Hydra Melee » Sat Jan 31, 2009 10:23 am
by Lubber » Sat Jan 31, 2009 1:17 pm
by FUDU » Sat Jan 31, 2009 5:10 pm
by Guest » Mon Feb 02, 2009 1:26 am
by dleising » Mon Feb 02, 2009 1:29 am
by jb » Mon Feb 02, 2009 1:31 am
by e0y2e3 » Mon Feb 02, 2009 1:32 am
dleising wrote:Yeah it's possible we would have been better off. The bastard can't seem to get sacked, something the Brown's QB's can't seem to avoid. But I digress, and say at this point it is ridiculous to be talking about.

by jb » Mon Feb 02, 2009 1:34 am
e0y2e3 wrote:dleising wrote:Yeah it's possible we would have been better off. The bastard can't seem to get sacked, something the Brown's QB's can't seem to avoid. But I digress, and say at this point it is ridiculous to be talking about.
I will say this, the NFL needs to seriously evaluate roughing calls. When you have QBs who are monsters and impossible to take down like Ben and Tebow eventually you CANNOT handicap defensive players trying to sack them. If you slow down even a little bit coming at Ben as a defensive peep you are screwed, cripe half the time you are screwed even if you don't.
by reppination7 » Mon Feb 02, 2009 11:45 am

by Bill the Butcher » Mon Feb 02, 2009 11:55 am
4thQtrGlory wrote:If we got all that, i would hang a browns flag from my boner for 2 weeks straight...
by Toxicadam » Mon Feb 02, 2009 12:15 pm

by Triple-S » Mon Feb 02, 2009 12:20 pm
Toxicadam wrote:I made the analogy before, but we are the Kansas City Royals and the Steelers/Ravens are the Twins/Indians. They just have a culture and a management group that makes good moves overall.
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by Toxicadam » Mon Feb 02, 2009 12:26 pm
Triple-S wrote:Big Diff. is...Lerner has money to create a winner and in theory has the ability to compete with the Inbred...he just doesn't know how.

by Spin » Mon Feb 02, 2009 4:04 pm
Is that some Charlie Frye inspired bitterness?
by c11058 » Mon Feb 02, 2009 4:06 pm
by Lubber » Mon Feb 02, 2009 4:12 pm
c11058 wrote:While we're on this topic, why did our knucklehead team of Butch and Garcia pass on Ed Reed in 2003 in favor of William Green?? Butch probably recruited Reed to Miami, he knew what kind of impact player he was.
by just another fool » Mon Feb 02, 2009 5:17 pm
by Lubber » Mon Feb 02, 2009 5:19 pm
just another fool wrote:how many times could the browns have drafted tom brady in 2000? what's done is done.
Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
