Moderators: peeker643, jb, swerb, pup
by swerb » Sun Feb 12, 2006 12:11 pm
by Guest » Sun Feb 12, 2006 1:20 pm
by HoodooMan » Sun Feb 12, 2006 2:35 pm
Swerb wrote:And good riddance to all of them says Swerb ... would love to see Jurevicius brought in to replace Bryant.
by Lebowski » Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:42 am
by SpaZDawG » Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:40 am
Money says he has a 1000 yd season with Pitt, replacing El.
by bostondog » Tue Feb 14, 2006 11:44 am
by swerb » Tue Feb 14, 2006 11:52 am
by Lebowski » Tue Feb 14, 2006 12:57 pm
by bostondog » Tue Feb 14, 2006 1:55 pm
by pup » Tue Feb 14, 2006 2:09 pm
by swerb » Tue Feb 14, 2006 2:10 pm
Lebowski wrote:Too much risk for the cash he will end up getting.Who knows what he will be getting?What is the harm in offering him what you are willing to give him? If he signs elsewhere for more...so be it.And what happens if JJ, Lloyd, and the others sign elsewhere? Northcutt's skill set isn't served best when he is a starter...he's better in the alot as the third wideout. Frisman starts? Rideau? Cribbs? Yikes for Chuck.
by bostondog » Tue Feb 14, 2006 2:24 pm
by Lebowski » Tue Feb 14, 2006 4:44 pm
by Lebowski » Tue Feb 14, 2006 4:52 pm
by swerb » Tue Feb 14, 2006 5:01 pm
Do you really think that's what he is doing here? I think the clear signal from the PD article and from all the other innuendo from Crennel and Savage is that they don't want him back at all...at any price.
The bigger concern is that Phil gets too antsy on cutting bait with these guys. Warren and the rest of the d-line were tossed away like parking tickets. Was Anthony Henry even offered a contract? (I honestly can't remember) Swerb, I know you had contact with Henry's agent last offseason...was that after Savage was at the helm?A team without talent cannot just let talented players walk. Warren and Bryant have defiencies...no doubt...but they also have skills. (btw, Henry has a lot of skill...little deficiencies...but I cannot remember if Phil offered him) I'm not saying they should sign Bryant...just that they offer him what they would like to pay him.
by pup » Tue Feb 14, 2006 5:43 pm
by Lebowski » Tue Feb 14, 2006 6:29 pm
by pup » Tue Feb 14, 2006 6:42 pm
by Lebowski » Tue Feb 14, 2006 9:49 pm
by pup » Tue Feb 14, 2006 10:16 pm
by Lebowski » Tue Feb 14, 2006 11:18 pm
by pup » Tue Feb 14, 2006 11:37 pm
by bostondog » Wed Feb 15, 2006 12:46 pm
Happy? Don't know and don't care.
Productive? Certainly more than Brandon Ridau, Joshua Cribbs, and Frisman Jackson........................combined.
I just think Savage feels confident that Bryant will command much more than hes willing to ever pay him. And that what hes comfortable paying him would be an insult to Bryant.
The Browns need to improve overall talent, and do it quickly. Does that mean we should be in contact with T.O. though?
by Lebowski » Wed Feb 15, 2006 1:13 pm
by bostondog » Wed Feb 15, 2006 4:36 pm
by Lebowski » Wed Feb 15, 2006 6:18 pm
by swerb » Wed Feb 15, 2006 9:48 pm
It brings me back to my argument that no matter what your problem with AB is...his talent is undeniable, and on that alone, SOMETHING should be offered to him. If he doesn't take our offer, then we move on. At that point who gives a shit if he is "insulted" as Swerb said.
by bostondog » Thu Feb 16, 2006 12:26 pm
What do you mean by "seriously wrong?"
But they are unique to Dallas, unless you can provide evidence from his time in Cleveland.
I assume they would make some sort of offer....right?
It brings me back to my argument that no matter what your problem with AB is...his talent is undeniable, and on that alone, SOMETHING should be offered to him. If he doesn't take our offer, then we move on.
But saying he is a bad teammate is bogus...unless there is evidence of such in Cleveland that I am unaware of.
by Lebowski » Thu Feb 16, 2006 12:58 pm
by swerb » Thu Feb 16, 2006 2:38 pm
There is no evidence whatsoever that he was a poor teammate in Cleveland. Crennel criticized his play at that point in the season...not about any problems in the locker-room or the like.
by bostondog » Thu Feb 16, 2006 5:29 pm
Your basing your argument of assumptions.
There is no evidence whatsoever that he was a poor teammate in Cleveland.
You can't make such broad assumptions when you have zilch to back it up.
Actually, it is a the free market theory.
by swerb » Wed Feb 22, 2006 8:27 am
Return to Cleveland Browns & The NFL
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Love child of shawn kemp, pod2dawg and 1 guest