Moderators: peeker643, swerb, Ziner
by swerb » Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:15 am
by skatingtripods » Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:17 am
by Dozen » Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:17 am
SteelersStillSuck wrote:Dozen wrote:Swerb, any chance of a mini poll election on the front page? I'd love to see those stats since your fanbase is so large.
I'm shocked and rather pleasantly surprised to see so many conservatives here, myself.
by skatingtripods » Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:20 am
by waborat » Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:20 am
SteelersStillSuck wrote:Dozen wrote:Swerb, any chance of a mini poll election on the front page? I'd love to see those stats since your fanbase is so large.
I'm shocked and rather pleasantly surprised to see so many conservatives here, myself.
by waborat » Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:23 am
Swerb wrote:It's fair to make the argument that she isn't qualified to be Veep.
But bottom line, she is coming off tonight as smart, tough, and very likable. Before a huge audience.
Which she absolutely had to do.
My opinion? Obama was a very solid favorite to win the election before tonight.
And now its a coinflip.
Gonna be a fun next couple months.
by swerb » Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:24 am
waborat wrote:Swerb wrote:It's fair to make the argument that she isn't qualified to be Veep.
But bottom line, she is coming off tonight as smart, tough, and very likable. Before a huge audience.
Which she absolutely had to do.
My opinion? Obama was a very solid favorite to win the election before tonight.
And now its a coinflip.
Gonna be a fun next couple months.
Swerb, you sound like Tim Russert right there...God, I miss his commentary after these things
by SteelersStillSuck » Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:28 am

by Mr. MacPhisto » Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:33 am
BooyaCS wrote:Rudy Guliani's speech was a joke. What has McCain lead? What has McCain done? in 2004 McCain was a maverick going against his party.
by skatingtripods » Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:34 am
Mr. MacPhisto wrote:Obama and Biden haven't even run a lemonade stand.
by CP » Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:34 am
by Stu » Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:34 am
Swerb wrote:Even Olbermann and the other MSNBC hacks are ceding it was an incredible speech.
by Mr. MacPhisto » Thu Sep 04, 2008 1:00 am
Ziner wrote:Olberman is a smug asshole as I figured... Chris Mathews is giving some nice analysis though.... Olberman is questioning her tone. She is an attack dog for the rest of this election and she is damn good at it...
Several moderate-Democrat friends of mine have been emailing--few if any would ever vote for McCain--but all agree that Palin was very strong. The more liberal among them are a little panicked.
I completely misjudged how negative she would be. Her lines about Obama were brutally cutting and possibly over the top in places. But she's a far better messenger than an angry white man. (Note, by the way, how both Rudy and Huckabee employed a tone that was more bemused than angry. That's the modern GOP's favorite trick--comedic ridicule in place of outright nastiness.)
by projectmayhem » Thu Sep 04, 2008 1:00 am
by Mr. MacPhisto » Thu Sep 04, 2008 1:04 am
Skating Tripods wrote:
Come on now. Obama's probably led a community bake sale.
by Mr. MacPhisto » Thu Sep 04, 2008 1:05 am
projectmayhem wrote:
Is it just me?
edit: trying to figure out how to embed this... bbcode isn't being nice to me
by projectmayhem » Thu Sep 04, 2008 1:11 am
Mr. MacPhisto wrote:Skating Tripods wrote:
Come on now. Obama's probably led a community bake sale.
But he can't list it because they were selling "magic" brownies.
I heard a comment on radio today about them attack Palin's husband for a DUI 22 years ago. Someone said that it was an unfair attack and that if we wanted to go back 22 years then it needs to be compared to the time when Obama was coked out of his mind.
Obamaites would say that would be an unfair and I don't disagree, but if the media wants to be the surrogate and swing hard then Obama's camp better be prepared for a nasty right hook back at them.
by idoctribefan » Thu Sep 04, 2008 1:12 am
Skating Tripods wrote:
Amazing how her husband and eldest son are Democrats.

by Mr. MacPhisto » Thu Sep 04, 2008 1:15 am
idoctribefan wrote:
I may be mistaken, but I read that her husband and son are independents.
22 years ago a DUI wasn't the same thing it is now... Plus.. it's alaska... what's he gonna do? crash into a moose?
by idoctribefan » Thu Sep 04, 2008 1:16 am

by Mr. MacPhisto » Thu Sep 04, 2008 1:22 am
by peeker643 » Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:36 am
by SteelersStillSuck » Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:43 am

by swerb » Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:47 am
I think the dems underestimated her though. Horribly underestimated her in regard to that toughness, spirit and poise.
by CP » Thu Sep 04, 2008 10:22 am
by Mr. MacPhisto » Thu Sep 04, 2008 10:31 am
Swerb wrote:And really, and as I mentioned as soon as she was announced, therein lies the problem the Democrats. They can't really snipe back at her. Because their only argument is the experience thing. Which is, by far, Obama's biggest flaw. And one they don't want to remind the American populace about.
The Palin pick was genius. She'll be the perfect attack dog for McCain down the stretch, and look cute and likable doing it. And she's teflon like Gatti.
by jjgmyers » Thu Sep 04, 2008 10:39 am
The Palin pick was genius.

by Stu » Thu Sep 04, 2008 11:17 am
jjgmyers wrote:The Palin pick was genius.
Genius? It just reeks of desperation. You really think a 72 y/o war hero wanted to pick a "cute" 44 y/o female as his running mate?
He had no chance, so he had to try to do something to get people talking about the rep party
by swerb » Thu Sep 04, 2008 11:18 am
jjgmyers wrote:The Palin pick was genius.
Genius? It just reeks of desperation. You really think a 72 y/o war hero wanted to pick a "cute" 44 y/o female as his running mate?
He had no chance, so he had to try to do something to get people talking about the rep party
by Orenthal » Thu Sep 04, 2008 11:55 am
Swerb wrote:jjgmyers wrote:The Palin pick was genius.
Genius? It just reeks of desperation. You really think a 72 y/o war hero wanted to pick a "cute" 44 y/o female as his running mate?
He had no chance, so he had to try to do something to get people talking about the rep party
I don't disagree. He had little to no chance. He needed to energize the base and do something dynamic to shoot a bolt of energy through the campaign.
And he did. She was the perfect selection, on a number of different levels.
And the Republican Party, moreso than at any point in my lifetime, was in desperate need of new young talent and a fresh face.
Get back to me when the new polls come out in a couple days.
by Naxos » Thu Sep 04, 2008 11:59 am
waborat wrote:SteelersStillSuck wrote:
I'm shocked and rather pleasantly surprised to see so many conservatives here, myself.
Not me.
It's really amazing how many people live a conservative life and then go to the polls and vote for liberal politicians though?
by fundamentals » Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:04 pm
by Madre Hill, Superstar » Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:13 pm
Swerb wrote:And the Republican Party, moreso than at any point in my lifetime, was in desperate need of new young talent and a fresh face.

by consigliere » Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:16 pm

by swerb » Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:50 pm
Consigliere wrote:Palin was awesome last night. But, the question now is, was she too awesome? I mean, McCain DOES have to speak tonight. Gonna be hard to top that performance.
by waborat » Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:59 pm
Naxos wrote:waborat wrote:SteelersStillSuck wrote:
I'm shocked and rather pleasantly surprised to see so many conservatives here, myself.
Not me.
It's really amazing how many people live a conservative life and then go to the polls and vote for liberal politicians though?
Great question which boggles my mind as well. What person really does not want less taxes and a less invasive government?
by BooyaCS » Thu Sep 04, 2008 2:25 pm
by swerb » Thu Sep 04, 2008 2:39 pm
BooyaCS wrote:So we have had 3 days of RNC and not one issue was ever discussed. Hmmm Seems like usual politics come out and attack your opponent to give the nation a false sense that your going to change something.
I will give you that Obama is inexperienced but at least he has a platform to fix this crap that Bush, McCain and Palin are buying into.
Also by voting Present you are basically trying to kill a bill. Why? If you get enough votes infavor it passes, if you get enough against it doesn't. If you get enough people to vote something other than yeah or nay then you can gain a tie. In that case the bill comes off the floor and needs to be revised. This is a good situation so that the people that voted present can filabuster the hell out of it until it is dead.
by peeker643 » Thu Sep 04, 2008 3:03 pm
BooyaCS wrote:So we have had 3 days of RNC and not one issue was ever discussed. Hmmm Seems like usual politics come out and attack your opponent to give the nation a false sense that your going to change something.
I will give you that Obama is inexperienced but at least he has a platform to fix this crap that Bush, McCain and Palin are buying into.
Also by voting Present you are basically trying to kill a bill. Why? If you get enough votes infavor it passes, if you get enough against it doesn't. If you get enough people to vote something other than yeah or nay then you can gain a tie. In that case the bill comes off the floor and needs to be revised. This is a good situation so that the people that voted present can filabuster the hell out of it until it is dead.
Also Palin said we are in this war to do god's bidding? So does she talk to god? What makes her so special that she said God has told me we are in this war to do his bidden. When God tells the pope that he is against this war?
Sounds like an ultra elitiest view point by her basically saying nah nah I am better than you nah nah.
Also they are running the same campaign that was run in 2004 the war on terror is the most important. Hmmm so who is going to protect the US from these terrorists if the army is fighting in Iraq for another 100 years?
Also IMO Libertarian is 1 step away from a dictatorship. Hmm Palin gets in and as president of the Senate disbands the senate so when "she" takes over it is permenant.
At least she will get the man hating lesbians on her side though.
Good speech to rile up people but it had no substance behind it just more nah nah I am better than you which we have heard for a while.
Also just some thought every recession in US history except for 1 happened under a Republican and ended under a democrat.
by Ziner » Thu Sep 04, 2008 3:05 pm
BooyaCS wrote:Also IMO Libertarian is 1 step away from a dictatorship. Hmm Palin gets in and as president of the Senate disbands the senate so when "she" takes over it is permenant.
by CP » Thu Sep 04, 2008 3:32 pm
BooyaCS wrote:So we have had 3 days of RNC and not one issue was ever discussed. Hmmm Seems like usual politics come out and attack your opponent to give the nation a false sense that your going to change something.
Also IMO Libertarian is 1 step away from a dictatorship. Hmm Palin gets in and as president of the Senate disbands the senate so when "she" takes over it is permenant.
by CP » Thu Sep 04, 2008 3:36 pm
Madre Hill, Superstar wrote:Very true, but she was also repeating the same GOP lines of the past twenty-some years. Its telling that Obama's response was basically "There you go again." New face, old politics. I don't think that's gonna fly outside the base, not this year.
She does have the base excited - just look at this board the past week - so at least McCain has that going for him.
by Madre Hill, Superstar » Thu Sep 04, 2008 3:51 pm
CP wrote:That response was written before the speech was given and the details were known. Both parties do that, there is nothing to read into the response. Based on Biden's trip around the morning talk shows, I'm not sure they really have a response.
Obama can thank the bloggers and media for turning Palin into a rock star. Now that they put her there, like Obama for the past 18 months, every point she wants to get across to the American people will be on national TV and the local news on a daily basis since reporters will be following her all over the place trying to see if she screws up.

by BooyaCS » Thu Sep 04, 2008 5:11 pm
by mswerb » Thu Sep 04, 2008 5:17 pm
Mr. MacPhisto wrote:projectmayhem wrote:
Is it just me?
edit: trying to figure out how to embed this... bbcode isn't being nice to me
Not a bad comparison. Tina Fey is also a dead ringer - and I always thought Tina Fey was pretty hot.[/img]

by WarAdmiral » Thu Sep 04, 2008 6:08 pm

by Ziner » Thu Sep 04, 2008 6:14 pm
WarAdmiral wrote:She is a star at the moment, and this has been well played by the Publicans. Time will tell if she is a Robert Dinero, or a Val Kilmer.
She caused me to donate more to Obama today.
by WarAdmiral » Thu Sep 04, 2008 7:35 pm
Ziner wrote:WarAdmiral wrote:She is a star at the moment, and this has been well played by the Publicans. Time will tell if she is a Robert Dinero, or a Val Kilmer.
She caused me to donate more to Obama today.
That is like the 3rd time you said that... since you are made of money I figured you would be a Republican... isnt that what you Democrats always say? Only rich people are Republicans???

by CP » Thu Sep 04, 2008 8:08 pm
Madre Hill, Superstar wrote:Um, they do have a response: "Same old politics, different day." Even if it was prepared prior to Palin's speech, she didn't disappoint.
Assuming they let her out: Six days since the announcement and that was only Palin's second public speaking appearance? Your 'rock star' is too busy being kept backstage memorizing old Newt Gingrich covers to try more of her act in public.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests