Moderators: peeker643, swerb, Ziner
by jack_tors » Thu Feb 18, 2010 10:48 pm
by jfiling » Thu Feb 18, 2010 11:01 pm
by exiledbuckeye » Fri Feb 19, 2010 10:56 am
by exiledbuckeye » Fri Feb 19, 2010 11:15 am
jfiling wrote:At risk of being called a conspiracy theorist, at first glance this story seems awfully similar to the census worker who was "lynched". The details are all too pat for the narrative that this was some anti-government kook.

by jfiling » Fri Feb 19, 2010 12:08 pm
by Orenthal » Fri Feb 19, 2010 12:16 pm
by exiledbuckeye » Fri Feb 19, 2010 12:24 pm
by exiledbuckeye » Fri Feb 19, 2010 12:43 pm
by hermanfontenot » Fri Feb 19, 2010 1:55 pm

by Rat_Tail » Fri Feb 19, 2010 2:08 pm
by municipalmutt » Fri Feb 19, 2010 8:13 pm
Rat_Tail wrote:I'm just glad he didn't hit Cowboys Stadium.
And how are they saying it's not an act of terrorism?
by jordan kramer » Fri Feb 19, 2010 9:03 pm
Rat_Tail wrote:I'm just glad he didn't hit Cowboys Stadium.
And how are they saying it's not an act of terrorism?
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Who cares about this crap?
WE GOT A MUTHA FUCKIN EARTHQUAKE MACHINE!
by municipalmutt » Fri Feb 19, 2010 9:14 pm
by FUDU » Fri Feb 19, 2010 9:21 pm
by jfiling » Fri Feb 19, 2010 9:27 pm
municipalmutt wrote:Burning your house down and flying a plane into a federal building seems pretty extreme to me. His goal was to scare the shit out of the IRS. Isn't that the definition of terror?
by FUDU » Fri Feb 19, 2010 9:32 pm
by municipalmutt » Fri Feb 19, 2010 9:37 pm
jfiling wrote:municipalmutt wrote:Burning your house down and flying a plane into a federal building seems pretty extreme to me. His goal was to scare the shit out of the IRS. Isn't that the definition of terror?
Crazy Alabama professor was just as much of a terrorist as this guy. I think the definition of "terrorist" has been stretched so far that it's meaningless at this point. 9/11 = terror. McVeigh = criminal, with a small side of terror. Austin aviator = crazy nutcase.
by jfiling » Fri Feb 19, 2010 9:47 pm
municipalmutt wrote:jfiling wrote:municipalmutt wrote:Burning your house down and flying a plane into a federal building seems pretty extreme to me. His goal was to scare the shit out of the IRS. Isn't that the definition of terror?
Crazy Alabama professor was just as much of a terrorist as this guy. I think the definition of "terrorist" has been stretched so far that it's meaningless at this point. 9/11 = terror. McVeigh = criminal, with a small side of terror. Austin aviator = crazy nutcase.
I know we're splitting semantic hairs here and I agree with your premise. The real joke is the war on terror. How can you declare war on an emotion or strategy? They should have declared war on religious wack jobs of middle eastern decent. I guess that's not PC enough.
by Orenthal » Sat Feb 20, 2010 12:06 pm
HermanFontenot wrote:I have no particular problem with this. As long as he was trying to take out actual IRS employees and not kids in a day-care center... no biggie.
by Fire Marshall Bill » Sat Feb 20, 2010 6:30 pm
FUDU wrote:The only way to scare the shit out of the IRS would be for most of us to refuse to pay our federal income tax.
by FUDU » Sat Feb 20, 2010 6:42 pm
Fire Marshall Bill wrote:FUDU wrote:The only way to scare the shit out of the IRS would be for most of us to refuse to pay our federal income tax.
Nobody scares the shit out of the IRS. Nobody...
There is only "Pay up sucker"
The IRS can however ruin and destroy anyone it desires at any time if it suits their pleasure
One way to clean up DC, in fact, would be to turn the IRS loose on congressmen and senators prior to their getting a name plate for their desks
The IRS itself is a terrorist organization, as well as the ATF, which should be a convenience store
I'd be interested to know if the guy was a good enuff pilot that he took out the very person who he had to deal with
by davemanddd » Sat Feb 20, 2010 8:24 pm
by exiledbuckeye » Sat Feb 20, 2010 10:42 pm
by Orenthal » Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:20 pm
exiledbuckeye wrote:"The IRS" are just a bunch of humps going to work so they can put food on the table. The people who write the tax laws are in D.C. The IRS isn't the problem; they're just regular people doing their jobs. They're applying the rules within the framework that someone way above their pay grade gives them. I have friends who work in that building. One of them is also a 10-year Army vet who served in Iraq and then joined the National Guard.
This is like blowing up a Blockbuster because they had the audacity to charge you a late fee.
And, in the ultimate fuckup, this guy hit the only floor in the building that was essentially empty. He planned everything else out so meticulously (like taking seats out of the plane and adding fuel drums), you think he would've done a bit more recon. Thank god he didn't.
by jordan kramer » Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:34 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Who cares about this crap?
WE GOT A MUTHA FUCKIN EARTHQUAKE MACHINE!
by jfiling » Sun Feb 21, 2010 5:29 pm
Orenthal wrote:exiledbuckeye wrote:"The IRS" are just a bunch of humps going to work so they can put food on the table. The people who write the tax laws are in D.C. The IRS isn't the problem; they're just regular people doing their jobs. They're applying the rules within the framework that someone way above their pay grade gives them. I have friends who work in that building. One of them is also a 10-year Army vet who served in Iraq and then joined the National Guard.
This is like blowing up a Blockbuster because they had the audacity to charge you a late fee.
And, in the ultimate fuckup, this guy hit the only floor in the building that was essentially empty. He planned everything else out so meticulously (like taking seats out of the plane and adding fuel drums), you think he would've done a bit more recon. Thank god he didn't.
Thank you exiled. The two of us agreeing on something doesn't happen often but this is an obvious common sense take. Some in this thread do not seem to have a problem calling for the death of IRS agents. I had the opportunity to join their ranks at one point but decided to go private sector, would I have an acceptable loss if I hadn't? I am the same person either way...
Again just humps enforcing a code our elected officials have passed through legislation.
Barry: Every now and then, when I write my annual tax column, some ex-IRS agent will complain, "There you go IRS bashing again." They're always saying that they're just doing their job. Someone I know once said, "You could get another job."
by jfiling » Sun Feb 21, 2010 5:34 pm
FUDU wrote:Fire Marshall Bill wrote:FUDU wrote:The only way to scare the shit out of the IRS would be for most of us to refuse to pay our federal income tax.
Nobody scares the shit out of the IRS. Nobody...
There is only "Pay up sucker"
The IRS can however ruin and destroy anyone it desires at any time if it suits their pleasure
One way to clean up DC, in fact, would be to turn the IRS loose on congressmen and senators prior to their getting a name plate for their desks
The IRS itself is a terrorist organization, as well as the ATF, which should be a convenience store
I'd be interested to know if the guy was a good enuff pilot that he took out the very person who he had to deal with
That's kind of my point, nothing changes if nothing changes. If you don't pay your fed. income tax you're in deep shit. However if you, me and 95 million others don't there is virtually nothing the IRS can do about it.
Seriously, what would the IRS, or our federal government do to all of us?
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness
by exiledbuckeye » Sun Feb 21, 2010 5:46 pm
by FUDU » Sun Feb 21, 2010 5:54 pm
by jfiling » Sun Feb 21, 2010 6:13 pm
FUDU wrote:jfiling, I have a very strong opinion on the federal income tax. Done lots of reading on the subject. IMO it is a prime example of a counter argument to the POV that "one person can make a difference". I don't believe in federal income tax, & the validity of it, yet it is completely asinine of me to stick to my guns 100% and go about refusing to pay it. The risk/reward factor is completely out of balance.
One person cannot make a difference on this, it would take a massive effort of the people to oppose it.
by Orenthal » Sun Feb 21, 2010 7:38 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sun Feb 21, 2010 9:08 pm
Can't justify flying a plane into innocent people... No matter what Herm thinks.
by FUDU » Sun Feb 21, 2010 9:40 pm
CDT terrorism isn't inherently connected to size or mass. Terrorism doesn't require a following either. I could terrorize you with a single act of some sort and it would still be considered terrorism. You're just looking at terrorism through the eyes of how the media in world you're living in right now presents it. We usually only hear about terrorizing when it relates to acts that effect a population anymore.Cerebral_DownTime wrote:It's not a terrorist attack. It was a suicidal revenge act. Terrorism is supposed to make a whole population scared. This was just one bat shit crazy guy. He has no followers or organization backing him.Can't justify flying a plane into innocent people... No matter what Herm thinks.
+100
If he was serious (I doubt he was) it was a epic king hell shit take.
by hermanfontenot » Sun Feb 21, 2010 10:01 pm
exiledbuckeye wrote:BTW, the man who was killed in this act was a 68-year old father of 6. Someone's grandfather. A 20 year Army vet who served two tours in Vietnam. This is not the type of person who's death we should be calling for or applauding.

by peeker643 » Sun Feb 21, 2010 10:22 pm
HermanFontenot wrote:exiledbuckeye wrote:BTW, the man who was killed in this act was a 68-year old father of 6. Someone's grandfather. A 20 year Army vet who served two tours in Vietnam. This is not the type of person who's death we should be calling for or applauding.
Nobody is calling for anything or applauding anything. But I'm not going to wring my hands or pretend to be outraged because some guy employed by the biggest thief in the world got taken out. Nor do I have a problem with people taking a shot at the state from time to time.
As Peek might say... pass the beer nuts.

by Cerebral_DownTime » Sun Feb 21, 2010 10:41 pm
CDT terrorism isn't inherently connected to size or mass.
I could terrorize you with a single act of some sort and it would still be considered terrorism.
Terrorism doesn't require a following either.
You're just looking at terrorism through the eyes of how the media in world you're living in right now presents it.
We usually only hear about terrorizing when it relates to acts that effect a population anymore.
Outside of OK I am not too sure there were too many people that were scared after the bombing of the federal building or the school shooting.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sun Feb 21, 2010 11:10 pm
HermanFontenot wrote:exiledbuckeye wrote:BTW, the man who was killed in this act was a 68-year old father of 6. Someone's grandfather. A 20 year Army vet who served two tours in Vietnam. This is not the type of person who's death we should be calling for or applauding.
Nobody is calling for anything or applauding anything. But I'm not going to wring my hands or pretend to be outraged because some guy employed by the biggest thief in the world got taken out. Nor do I have a problem with people taking a shot at the state from time to time.
As Peek might say... pass the beer nuts.
by FUDU » Sun Feb 21, 2010 11:17 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sun Feb 21, 2010 11:30 pm
FUDU wrote:Damn CDT I'd hate to imagine your opinion of me if I told you my long held opinion: that if I woke up tomorrow and half of our politicians were erased from the planet I wouldn't lose a second's sleep over it.
by mistero » Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:56 pm
by exiledbuckeye » Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:38 pm
by hermanfontenot » Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:37 pm
mistero wrote:I just don't get the bitching. Pay your taxes. Move on with your life.

by Fire Marshall Bill » Tue Feb 23, 2010 7:49 pm
exiledbuckeye wrote:And now some guy in Ohio bulldozed his house because the IRS had liens on it and was going to foreclose? Genius move. Now he's homeless and still owes about $160,000.
by FUDU » Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:32 pm
mistero wrote:The government does things like provide for a military, create a publc highway system, keep law and order..ect ect.
We all know how messed up politicians are from both sides but really, no fed taxes? Where would the govt get the money to function?
Why don't we just disolve the fed government and go back to fuedalism?
I just don't get the bitching. Pay your taxes. Move on with your life.
by Fire Marshall Bill » Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:56 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:07 am
HermanFontenot wrote:mistero wrote:I just don't get the bitching. Pay your taxes. Move on with your life.
I would consider this a tax, mistero. Every time a cop gets shot, a federal judge gets blown up by a car bomb or an IRS flunky gets wiped out by a mad pilot, it's sort of a tax.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:48 am
FUDU wrote: How many billions are spent each month in Iraq, and there is not one damn thing about our military being entrenched in Iraq that is benefiting ANY U.S citizens. Our rights and freedoms are not being fought for in Iraq, plain and simple. Hell you can argue our presence in Iraq doesn't even benefit Iraqi's.
by Fire Marshall Bill » Wed Feb 24, 2010 8:59 am
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:You're one whacky pothead, Herm. Maybe it's the stuff you're getting, it's like the polar opposite of the shit the Vietnamese gave our guys in 'Nam to make all passive and shit. (Allegedly)
by Orenthal » Wed Feb 24, 2010 9:31 am
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:HermanFontenot wrote:mistero wrote:I just don't get the bitching. Pay your taxes. Move on with your life.
I would consider this a tax, mistero. Every time a cop gets shot, a federal judge gets blown up by a car bomb or an IRS flunky gets wiped out by a mad pilot, it's sort of a tax.
So that's what you really think....... Nice.
You're one whacky pothead, Herm. Maybe it's the stuff you're getting, it's like the polar opposite of the shit the Vietnamese gave our guys in 'Nam to make all passive and shit. (Allegedly)
by exiledbuckeye » Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:03 pm
Fire Marshall Bill wrote:exiledbuckeye wrote:And now some guy in Ohio bulldozed his house because the IRS had liens on it and was going to foreclose? Genius move. Now he's homeless and still owes about $160,000.
What's your point?
You trying to say if he doesn't bulldoze the house the IRS is going to let him live there anyway?
LOFL
What's next? Them being reasonable when you DO owe them money?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest