Moderators: peeker643, swerb, Ziner
by aoxo1 » Tue Oct 06, 2009 12:56 am
by StewieG » Tue Oct 06, 2009 9:15 am
by Triple-S » Tue Oct 06, 2009 12:56 pm
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.
by jfiling » Tue Oct 06, 2009 4:05 pm
Triple-S wrote:Conservapedia is satire ran by democrats/liberals correct?I've seen a couple people debate whether it was or not on another forum I lurk at.
by aoxo1 » Tue Oct 06, 2009 8:22 pm
by Triple-S » Tue Oct 06, 2009 11:55 pm
In April 2007, Peter Lipson, a doctor of internal medicine, attempted to edit the article on breast cancer to include evidence against Conservapedia's statement naming abortion as a major cause of the disease, but found his medical credentials being questioned by Schlafly and other Conservapedia administrators, all of whom ended the debate by deleting Lipson's edits and blocking Lipson's account.
Third Example - SocialismSocialistic terminology permeates English translations of the Bible, without justification. This improperly encourages the "social justice" movement among Christians.For example, the conservative word "volunteer" is mentioned only once in the ESV, yet the socialistic word "comrade" is used three times, "laborer(s)" is used 13 times, "labored" 15 times, and "fellow" (as in "fellow worker") is used 55 times.
by Mr. MacPhisto » Tue Oct 13, 2009 10:36 pm
Return to No Holds Barred
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests