Moderators: peeker643, swerb, Ziner
by CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! » Fri Sep 25, 2009 11:13 am

by CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! » Fri Sep 25, 2009 11:41 am

by Guest » Fri Sep 25, 2009 12:20 pm
CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! wrote: If the Israelis hadnt blown up Iraq's nuclear reactor in '83 this world would be much worse off, yet we allow this monster to advocate an agenda of terrorism, openly threatening America and Israel. The world has gone so liberal as to allow people to mock the idea of freedom with no repercussions.
by CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! » Fri Sep 25, 2009 1:01 pm
So you recommend what?
Going to war with Iran?
Brilliant idea! I'm sure we have all the money and soldiers needed for that.
Israel is never going to let Iran have a working nuke.
Iran is being watched closely by EVERYONE...including Russia and China
As far as that loon once again spouting of his Holocaust denials? Sticks and stones.
Do you share as much hatred towards Pat Buchanan and other Hitler appologists and Holocaust deniers in America?

by Guest » Fri Sep 25, 2009 2:50 pm
CAVSTRIBEBROWNSin07! wrote:So you recommend what?
Going to war with Iran?
YES!
by hermanfontenot » Fri Sep 25, 2009 2:56 pm
YES!
Please tell me, how is Israel supposed to stop them? Their hands are tied - by the UN, by the EU, by the lefties within Israel itself.

by Guest » Fri Sep 25, 2009 3:12 pm
HermanFontenot wrote:Please tell me, how is Israel supposed to stop them? Their hands are tied - by the UN, by the EU, by the lefties within Israel itself.
You think the Israelis would be worried about the UN if Iran constructs a functioning nuclear program? They're going to strike and take their obligatory UN horsewhipping in stride. Militarily there is nothing Iran can do if the Israelis decide to blow up their nuclear facilities. That's all that matters, not the UN.
by Mr. MacPhisto » Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:55 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Fri Sep 25, 2009 7:03 pm
by dmiles » Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:22 pm

by hermanfontenot » Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:39 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Israel does not have the ability to "take out" Iran's nuclear program. Their sites are spread out all over the country and ringed with sophisticated Russian SAM and radar sites. Could they they damage it? Sure, but at the expense of valuable aircraft and pilots. Israel can't suffer big losses to their airforce and still be ready for the retaliation that would likely come from the Muslim world.

by Cerebral_DownTime » Fri Sep 25, 2009 8:53 pm
HermanFontenot wrote:Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Israel does not have the ability to "take out" Iran's nuclear program. Their sites are spread out all over the country and ringed with sophisticated Russian SAM and radar sites. Could they they damage it? Sure, but at the expense of valuable aircraft and pilots. Israel can't suffer big losses to their airforce and still be ready for the retaliation that would likely come from the Muslim world.
I'm not so sure the Israelis would face any large-scale retaliation from Muslims for bombing Iranian nuclear sites. First off, Iran is minority Shi'ite, not majority Sunni. Secondly, Iran is not an Arab country. Third, I doubt the Arab countries in the region- particularly Iraq and Saudi Arabia- want the Iranians to have a nuclear arsenal any more than the Israelis do. I think if the Israelis decide on military action, they'd do so with the tacit permission of the Arab countries they would necessarily have to overfly.
I'm not necessarily advocating an Israeli strike, although I wouldn't condemn them if that's the approach they take. Just that I don't think there'd be much in the way of blowback. Sure, the usual suspects would perform the usual tub-thumping at the UN, the usual fanatics would use the same soundbytes, fly the same banners, burn the same flags- but that's about it.
by peeker643 » Fri Sep 25, 2009 9:15 pm
by Bayou Tribe » Fri Sep 25, 2009 10:34 pm
by Mr. MacPhisto » Fri Sep 25, 2009 11:55 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:
Maybe. But there will be blowback, make no mistake, Iran will retaliate. Our guys would be caught in the middle.
All that aside, Israel still cannot carry out such an attack without suffering heavy losses to an already small defense oriented Air Force.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sat Sep 26, 2009 12:20 am
by dem425 » Sat Sep 26, 2009 11:42 am
by jfiling » Sat Sep 26, 2009 4:37 pm
Peeker643 wrote:That's a country smaller than New Jersey with a population less than NYC. Their military is made up of the same people who man their police force, , drive their buses, run their banks, teach, raise crops and produce electricity in the country.
Quick, surgical strikes are their only option as they cannot withstand a drawn out affair. And they're fucking good at it too. They are in the middle of the hell in that region but they're extremely well-prepared, mobile and violent when it comes to their military.
Their special ops and intelligence units are amongst the very best in the world. Those jobs are some of the only full-time military jobs in the country.
The reason that Netanyahu hasn't been prime minister for 10 years is tied to the above. Their form of government needs to be as mobile and effective as their military. They cannot afford a hawk or a dove for etended period of time and daily events often change the need from one to the other.
They can make those moves and they often have to.
Leave them alone, they're fine. They can and do facilitate effective means of preserving themselves. They do so knowing when the shit hits the fan they will have the support and forces of the US behind them.
by peeker643 » Sat Sep 26, 2009 5:13 pm
jfiling wrote:Peeker643 wrote:That's a country smaller than New Jersey with a population less than NYC. Their military is made up of the same people who man their police force, , drive their buses, run their banks, teach, raise crops and produce electricity in the country.
Quick, surgical strikes are their only option as they cannot withstand a drawn out affair. And they're fucking good at it too. They are in the middle of the hell in that region but they're extremely well-prepared, mobile and violent when it comes to their military.
Their special ops and intelligence units are amongst the very best in the world. Those jobs are some of the only full-time military jobs in the country.
The reason that Netanyahu hasn't been prime minister for 10 years is tied to the above. Their form of government needs to be as mobile and effective as their military. They cannot afford a hawk or a dove for an extended period of time and daily events often change the need from one to the other.
They can make those moves and they often have to.
Leave them alone, they're fine. They can and do facilitate effective means of preserving themselves. They do so knowing when the shit hits the fan they will have the support and forces of the US behind them.
I have never seen such a concise, informative, and dead-on explanation of Israel ever. That is great work, Peek, and I hope everyone reading this thread paid attention to this post.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sat Sep 26, 2009 10:38 pm
Peeker643 wrote:jfiling wrote:Peeker643 wrote:That's a country smaller than New Jersey with a population less than NYC. Their military is made up of the same people who man their police force, , drive their buses, run their banks, teach, raise crops and produce electricity in the country.
Quick, surgical strikes are their only option as they cannot withstand a drawn out affair. And they're fucking good at it too. They are in the middle of the hell in that region but they're extremely well-prepared, mobile and violent when it comes to their military.
Their special ops and intelligence units are amongst the very best in the world. Those jobs are some of the only full-time military jobs in the country.
The reason that Netanyahu hasn't been prime minister for 10 years is tied to the above. Their form of government needs to be as mobile and effective as their military. They cannot afford a hawk or a dove for an extended period of time and daily events often change the need from one to the other.
They can make those moves and they often have to.
Leave them alone, they're fine. They can and do facilitate effective means of preserving themselves. They do so knowing when the shit hits the fan they will have the support and forces of the US behind them.
I have never seen such a concise, informative, and dead-on explanation of Israel ever. That is great work, Peek, and I hope everyone reading this thread paid attention to this post.
Thanks J.
Always found their methods intriguing and interesting.
by peeker643 » Sat Sep 26, 2009 10:56 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Peeker643 wrote:jfiling wrote:Peeker643 wrote:That's a country smaller than New Jersey with a population less than NYC. Their military is made up of the same people who man their police force, , drive their buses, run their banks, teach, raise crops and produce electricity in the country.
Quick, surgical strikes are their only option as they cannot withstand a drawn out affair. And they're fucking good at it too. They are in the middle of the hell in that region but they're extremely well-prepared, mobile and violent when it comes to their military.
Their special ops and intelligence units are amongst the very best in the world. Those jobs are some of the only full-time military jobs in the country.
The reason that Netanyahu hasn't been prime minister for 10 years is tied to the above. Their form of government needs to be as mobile and effective as their military. They cannot afford a hawk or a dove for an extended period of time and daily events often change the need from one to the other.
They can make those moves and they often have to.
Leave them alone, they're fine. They can and do facilitate effective means of preserving themselves. They do so knowing when the shit hits the fan they will have the support and forces of the US behind them.
I have never seen such a concise, informative, and dead-on explanation of Israel ever. That is great work, Peek, and I hope everyone reading this thread paid attention to this post.
Thanks J.
Always found their methods intriguing and interesting.
IMO, their military is overrated. They're good urban warfare fighters and their Intel Services are solid. They don't really fight a strong enemy. They fight guys throwing rocks at tanks. They beat unskilled militia and terrorist fighters who lack any type of advanced equipment. It doesn't prove much when you can shoot a missle into a crowd of people to kill one guy. Irsael uses gunships, fighter jets, and tanks on people that have none of the above. Palestine has long been on it's knees.
As for Netanyahu, the real reason he isn't the leader of Israel has nothing to do with having a mobile goverment, It's because he's a corrupt douche bag that alot of Israelis can't stand. Their politicians make Boss Tweed and Tammany Hall look like Eagle Scouts.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sat Sep 26, 2009 11:25 pm
Peeker643 wrote:He must be a conservative.![]()
It's his second term. A probable case of relying on the evil you know as opposed to that which you don't.
We certainly have no monopoly on shady politicians in the US.
I think you dislike him because Clinton did.
by peeker643 » Sat Sep 26, 2009 11:35 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Peeker643 wrote:He must be a conservative.![]()
It's his second term. A probable case of relying on the evil you know as opposed to that which you don't.
We certainly have no monopoly on shady politicians in the US.
I think you dislike him because Clinton did.
Heh. Not a big Clinton fan. I dislike Netanyahu because he's A) corrupt as shit and B) He has no interest in pursuing peace or a 2 state solution. He wants no part of the "Roadmap to peace", one of the things Bush promoted that I agree with. Benny boy also loves the idea of Israeli settlements in what is clearly Palestinian lands. He wants the whole region for Israel. He's a douche.

by Cerebral_DownTime » Sat Sep 26, 2009 11:54 pm
Peeker643 wrote:
I don't have enough interest in American politics to argue sensibly CDT, and I certainly have less in regard to the Israeli political machine. I do know enough to tell ya that the average PM in Israel serves less than two years because of the varying 'peace plans' and corruption. The sentiment there ebbs and flows depending on what transgressions one side takes that the other counters.
Netanyahu is a hawk. Clearly of "the best defense is a great offense" mind. If he postures for or takes what is not his that's further that someone has to encroach to get to what is actually Israel. If he were an American he'd be a high rolling plaintiff injury attorney- "Start ridiculously high and settle for the upper end of reasonable".
As to their military, quick, overwhelming and unforgiving as to who is in the blast radius is demoralizing to an enemy. It's a sd way to have to live (or die) but it's not changing any time soon. As an aside, many people would argue that rocks and RPGs are all the US is facing in Afghanistan as well.
Tip a Turkey for me sir.
by peeker643 » Sun Sep 27, 2009 12:04 am
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Peeker643 wrote:
I don't have enough interest in American politics to argue sensibly CDT, and I certainly have less in regard to the Israeli political machine. I do know enough to tell ya that the average PM in Israel serves less than two years because of the varying 'peace plans' and corruption. The sentiment there ebbs and flows depending on what transgressions one side takes that the other counters.
Netanyahu is a hawk. Clearly of "the best defense is a great offense" mind. If he postures for or takes what is not his that's further that someone has to encroach to get to what is actually Israel. If he were an American he'd be a high rolling plaintiff injury attorney- "Start ridiculously high and settle for the upper end of reasonable".
As to their military, quick, overwhelming and unforgiving as to who is in the blast radius is demoralizing to an enemy. It's a sd way to have to live (or die) but it's not changing any time soon. As an aside, many people would argue that rocks and RPGs are all the US is facing in Afghanistan as well.
Tip a Turkey for me sir.
Already tipped serveral. OT: Thos bastards at the game today too my 3rd favorite flask.
As for Afghanistan, the Taliban and AQ are well trained and funded compared to what Palestine has. Israel has just about complete control over everything that leaves and enters Gaza and the West Bank. All i'm sayin is I were a Palestinian, i'd probably hate Israel too. most Americans don't care to look at it from that point of view, because we don't like the notion of being little guy. Israel has a policy of demolishing the homes of the family of suicide bombers and terrorists. What would be the response here if we destroyed the homes of McVeigh and Nichols' family after the OKC Bombing?
Going through the demands and rigors of army life on a totally egalitarian basis forges a common identity that totally transcends social and economic groupings. With a handful of exceptions, every senior officer has worked up through the ranks. Israel does not produce officers through academies, rather commanders rise through the ranks solely on the basis of their leadership and command capabilities.

by Cerebral_DownTime » Sun Sep 27, 2009 12:23 am
People here would be more prone to support such things if their city buses were being blown up by the McVeigh or Nichols family
by aoxo1 » Sun Sep 27, 2009 1:27 am
by peeker643 » Sun Sep 27, 2009 1:47 am
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sun Sep 27, 2009 2:15 am
by dmiles » Sun Sep 27, 2009 5:32 am


by fundamentals » Mon Sep 28, 2009 11:49 am
Peeker643 wrote:That's a country smaller than New Jersey with a population less than NYC. Their military is made up of the same people who man their police force, , drive their buses, run their banks, teach, raise crops and produce electricity in the country.
Quick, surgical strikes are their only option as they cannot withstand a drawn out affair. And they're fucking good at it too. They are in the middle of the hell in that region but they're extremely well-prepared, mobile and violent when it comes to their military.
Their special ops and intelligence units are amongst the very best in the world. Those jobs are some of the only full-time military jobs in the country.
The reason that Netanyahu hasn't been prime minister for 10 years is tied to the above. Their form of government needs to be as mobile and effective as their military. They cannot afford a hawk or a dove for etended period of time and daily events often change the need from one to the other.
They can make those moves and they often have to.
Leave them alone, they're fine. They can and do facilitate effective means of preserving themselves. They do so knowing when the shit hits the fan they will have the support and forces of the US behind them.
)
by hermanfontenot » Mon Sep 28, 2009 2:38 pm
killing thousands of innocents
The Palestinians are no threat to overrun and conquer Israel
Israel makes me ashamed to be a Jew. It would seem that we have learned nothing over the past 3000 years except how to be vicious and treat those weaker than us the same way we were treated.

by Cerebral_DownTime » Tue Sep 29, 2009 2:05 am
Besides, the Arabs are a garbage civilization. If they weren't, they could have kept a bunch of pasty-faced European Jews from coming along and ganking their country right out from under them in the first place. Israel is a superior society to Palestine, they should have the upper hand.
by hermanfontenot » Tue Sep 29, 2009 2:30 am
Right, because Israel was founded by European Jews alone, it's not like there were Western Powers backing them or anything. Without the British (who had been begging for a Jewish state since 1917) aid and training the Haganah would've been slaughtered. They've never been superior to shit, only lucky to have powerful friends. Without Western money they'd be nothing. If the US cut them off from their yearly $3 Billion dollars in aid, their economy would collapse, they aren't self sufficient. It's like an international welfare state. Shit.... Talk about a garbage civilization, too weak to survive without other peoples' money.
What about all those groups throughtout history that had the "upper hand" on the Jews? Were they right in what they did? Alot of them thought they had the "superior society", and used it to enslave and murder Jews.

by Cerebral_DownTime » Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:04 am
But I do like how your reflexive liberal anti-Westernism kicks in, CDT. I figured it would for someone. NOOOOO!!!!! BROWN PEOPLE GOOD!!!!! WHITE PEOPLE BAD!!!!! ARAB GOOD!!!!! ISRAEL BAD!!!! You guys just can't help yourselves.
by hermanfontenot » Tue Sep 29, 2009 11:52 am
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I still think if you give Palestine their own state and let them get out from under Israeli domination, support of Hamas and their tactics will disappear. Especially now that Arafat is rotting in a hole.

by Cerebral_DownTime » Wed Sep 30, 2009 2:16 am
HermanFontenot wrote:.And no, never read Dore Gold. Heard of Dore Gold, never read Dore Gold. I do have some titles on the conflict from varying perspectives.
by jack_tors » Wed Oct 07, 2009 11:26 am
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest