Moderators: peeker643, swerb, Ziner
by Ziner » Mon Jul 20, 2009 1:27 pm
by skatingtripods » Mon Jul 20, 2009 1:30 pm
by peeker643 » Mon Jul 20, 2009 1:31 pm
by Ziner » Mon Jul 20, 2009 1:34 pm
Peeker643 wrote:At the risk of stepping in it, what exactly are you talking about?
by British_Pharaoh » Mon Jul 20, 2009 1:37 pm
Ziner wrote:Can't believe this hasnt been started yet. As one who regularly goes to websites like With Leather and What Would Tyler Durden Do, I cant help but be disgusted at the freak that pulled this crap off. I cant even bring myself to search for it. I have had it emailed to me by friends and I just cant pull the trigger to watch it, its just awful that someone did this. A nip slip is one thing when you are wearing some trashy dress at a movie premier, this is unbelievably over the line. Someone is going to jail for a long time over this one and going to get slapped with more lawsuits than they know how to deal with. Disney/ABC is going to pull out all the stops.
I was actually suprised Rizzo and Hammer were even talking about it. I figured the ESPN gustapo would squash this internally and forbid their affiliates to even discuss it.
Any of you pervs watch this thing?


by skatingtripods » Mon Jul 20, 2009 1:37 pm
by peeker643 » Mon Jul 20, 2009 1:41 pm
Ziner wrote:Peeker643 wrote:At the risk of stepping in it, what exactly are you talking about?
http://www.associatedcontent.com/articl ... tml?cat=14
Sorry Tripods, no link to a video.
1. Swerb would probably boot me in about 3 seconds after posting it
2. Even I can't endorse spreading that any farther. From what I hear you can still find it but ESPN is out in full force to shut it down.
by e0y2e3 » Mon Jul 20, 2009 1:53 pm
Peeker643 wrote:Ziner wrote:Peeker643 wrote:At the risk of stepping in it, what exactly are you talking about?
http://www.associatedcontent.com/articl ... tml?cat=14
Sorry Tripods, no link to a video.
1. Swerb would probably boot me in about 3 seconds after posting it
2. Even I can't endorse spreading that any farther. From what I hear you can still find it but ESPN is out in full force to shut it down.
Christ- Who wrote that article you linked? Can they say Erin Andrews or Peep Hole Video one more time? That's awful. Not only will I never look at that site again but I have to wonder about the veracity of anything they write.
I do thank you for filling me in on the buzz though Z.

by BDFD » Mon Jul 20, 2009 2:29 pm

by exiledbuckeye » Mon Jul 20, 2009 2:36 pm
Peeker643 wrote:Christ- Who wrote that article you linked? Can they say Erin Andrews or Peep Hole Video one more time? That's awful. Not only will I never look at that site again but I have to wonder about the veracity of anything they write.
I do thank you for filling me in on the buzz though Z.
by Ziner » Mon Jul 20, 2009 2:39 pm
exiledbuckeye wrote:Peeker643 wrote:Christ- Who wrote that article you linked? Can they say Erin Andrews or Peep Hole Video one more time? That's awful. Not only will I never look at that site again but I have to wonder about the veracity of anything they write.
I do thank you for filling me in on the buzz though Z.
They were pretty clearly aiming to be on the first page of Google results for those particular words. It's like Rain Man was the author.
by e0y2e3 » Mon Jul 20, 2009 2:43 pm
Ziner wrote:exiledbuckeye wrote:Peeker643 wrote:Christ- Who wrote that article you linked? Can they say Erin Andrews or Peep Hole Video one more time? That's awful. Not only will I never look at that site again but I have to wonder about the veracity of anything they write.
I do thank you for filling me in on the buzz though Z.
They were pretty clearly aiming to be on the first page of Google results for those particular words. It's like Rain Man was the author.
It worked, that is exactly where I got it... didnt really filter it to find the best written story.

by Cerebral_DownTime » Mon Jul 20, 2009 2:51 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:It was like someone with tourettes wrote that article.
I could barely read it without wanting to jump out my office window.
by stonepm » Mon Jul 20, 2009 3:01 pm
by rebelwithoutaclue » Mon Jul 20, 2009 3:31 pm
by jfiling » Mon Jul 20, 2009 3:36 pm
by rebelwithoutaclue » Mon Jul 20, 2009 3:57 pm
jfiling wrote:Am I the only one who has seen it? Rizzo gave all the info one needed to find it on his show today. About as exciting as watching scrambled cable pr0n IMHO.
by idoctribefan » Mon Jul 20, 2009 4:08 pm

by Lubber » Tue Jul 21, 2009 11:31 am

by jfiling » Tue Jul 21, 2009 11:34 am
Lubber wrote:Does anyone else think this is a little fishy? Aside from Kramer/Newman's reverse peepholes, you cannot see that well through a peephole from the outside. And EA just happens to be totally nude (no robe, tank, panties) in a fully lit hotel room? After seeing the video, it just seems a little bit staged to me.
by Bill the Butcher » Tue Jul 21, 2009 11:47 am
4thQtrGlory wrote:If we got all that, i would hang a browns flag from my boner for 2 weeks straight...
by rebelwithoutaclue » Tue Jul 21, 2009 12:50 pm
Bill the Butcher wrote:I've seen it. Like a 6 second video. Yawn.
It sure sucks though. For her.
by British_Pharaoh » Tue Jul 21, 2009 2:02 pm
Lubber wrote:Does anyone else think this is a little fishy? Aside from Kramer/Newman's reverse peepholes, you cannot see that well through a peephole from the outside. And EA just happens to be totally nude (no robe, tank, panties) in a fully lit hotel room? After seeing the video, it just seems a little bit staged to me.
Her sister Kendra (seen below with Dan Patrick and EA) might be even cuter.

by Cerebral_DownTime » Tue Jul 21, 2009 3:12 pm
Graham Cluley, who writes a blog for the antivirus software maker Sophos, wrote that several links purporting to send Internet users to the Andrews video actually sent them to sites with malicious software and computer viruses.
He said some of the hackers actually include a portion of the video on their sites, apparently hoping that the malware gets passed along as users share the link with friends.
by OldDawg » Tue Jul 21, 2009 3:39 pm
Ha, ha. I was just surprised that actaully he has a job. Dude is either posting here or searching other sites for information to post here 24/7. His boss must have a loose "internet usage" policy... or is self-employed.Cerebral_DownTime wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:It was like someone with tourettes wrote that article.
I could barely read it without wanting to jump out my office window.
What floor do you work on?

by WarAdmiral » Wed Jul 22, 2009 11:23 am


by rebelwithoutaclue » Wed Jul 22, 2009 12:38 pm
WarAdmiral wrote:They now have a suspect in the case.
by Bayou Tribe » Wed Jul 22, 2009 1:39 pm
WarAdmiral wrote:They now have a suspect in the case.
by jfiling » Thu Jul 23, 2009 3:13 pm
by idoctribefan » Thu Jul 23, 2009 4:06 pm
jfiling wrote:I wouldn't trust anything Nik Richie says, but he's putting his ass on the line with his new update regarding the Andrews video.
http://thedirty.com/2009/07/23/breaking ... -a-victim/

by bks92II » Tue Aug 25, 2009 9:33 pm
by mattvan1 » Tue Aug 25, 2009 11:56 pm
bks92II wrote:I just heard about this and didn't watch the movie. If some one that has tell me what happens or why not to see it. If its to bad to reply for the public to read send me a PM or email telling me why not to watch or what happens. Don't send me the link of the video just telling me what happnens. Got my attention and still kinda confused on it. Thanks
by bks92II » Wed Aug 26, 2009 8:35 am
by idoctribefan » Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:29 pm
Winfrey's interview with Andrews will air Friday, Sept. 11, as part of a "Summer Headlines" show that previews the 24th season of "The Oprah Winfrey Show." Andrews also tells Winfrey she "opened up the computer (and) could feel my heart pounding."

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
