Moderators: peeker643, swerb, mitch
by jb » Wed Jan 13, 2010 2:20 pm
by e0y2e3 » Wed Jan 13, 2010 2:26 pm

by jb » Wed Jan 13, 2010 2:32 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Single chicks start prowling for VD lock ups in mid Jan. Ain't rocket science.
by e0y2e3 » Wed Jan 13, 2010 2:38 pm
JB wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:Single chicks start prowling for VD lock ups in mid Jan. Ain't rocket science.
But dude, is there an annual run of this sap every year?
Am I just too playoff obsessed and drunk to recognize?

by Guest » Wed Jan 13, 2010 3:09 pm
JB wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:Single chicks start prowling for VD lock ups in mid Jan. Ain't rocket science.
But dude, is there an annual run of this sap every year?
Am I just too playoff obsessed and drunk to recognize?

by jb » Wed Jan 13, 2010 3:56 pm
Mitch wrote:JB wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:Single chicks start prowling for VD lock ups in mid Jan. Ain't rocket science.
But dude, is there an annual run of this sap every year?
Am I just too playoff obsessed and drunk to recognize?
Yes (to both questions)
Last year...Confessions of a Shopaholic, He's Just Not That Into You, and the worst one, Renee PotatoFac Zellwegger in "New In Town".
2008: "Definitely, Maybe" (which I got drug to see...needed to be drugged to see it), "Fools Gold", and "Over Her Dead Body".
2007: "Music and Lyrics" (another Clarissa 'favorite') and "Because I Said So".
So yeah...every year they start cranking out god-awful romantic comedies...usually in late January...and run them all the way up to Valentine's Day. "Leap Year" I think was just so exceptionally bad that they decided to dump it earlier, but then we've got "When In Rome", "Dear John", and what may be the worst (as Clarissa wants me to go) "Valentine's Day"...co-staring Taylor Swift.
by HoodooMan » Wed Jan 13, 2010 4:28 pm
by Hi Oktane » Wed Jan 13, 2010 5:15 pm


by FUDU » Wed Jan 13, 2010 6:54 pm
I wish taylor Swift would find Jesus
by jb » Wed Jan 13, 2010 7:52 pm
FUDU wrote:I wish taylor Swift would find Jesus
Well I was born on Christmas.
by That_Guy™ » Thu Jan 14, 2010 4:15 am
JB wrote:...She's a child. Body of a 19 year old with the mind of a 15 years old...

by jb » Thu Jan 14, 2010 10:44 am
That_Guy™ wrote:JB wrote:...She's a child. Body of a 19 year old with the mind of a 15 years old...
You say that like its a bad thing...
by mrburns » Thu Jan 14, 2010 2:13 pm
HoodooMan wrote:What's the last Jan/Feb movie of any genre that didn't suck?
Tis the season for cramming all of your studio's shitty movies into the first couple months of the year.
(Should be interesting to see if Shutter Island is an exception to the rule)

by e0y2e3 » Thu Jan 14, 2010 2:16 pm
HoodooMan wrote:What's the last Jan/Feb movie of any genre that didn't suck?
Tis the season for cramming all of your studio's shitty movies into the first couple months of the year.
(Should be interesting to see if Shutter Island is an exception to the rule)

by HoodooMan » Thu Jan 14, 2010 4:45 pm
Gran Torino, FTW.
by HoodooMan » Thu Jan 14, 2010 4:46 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Fuck Shutter Island.
I hate that movie due to sheer over saturation at this point. I've never been bombarded by the same preview for damn near a year at every single movie like I have this flick. I have the freaking lines memorized at this point. They really screwed up letting said preview run for as long as they did after they pussed out of releasing in 2009.
I may wait for the DVD just out of protest.
by mrburns » Thu Jan 14, 2010 5:33 pm
HoodooMan wrote:Gran Torino, FTW.
Disqualified.
It opened in limited release in December, in time for Award Season.

by Guest » Thu Jan 14, 2010 6:11 pm
Mr. Burns wrote:HoodooMan wrote:Gran Torino, FTW.
Disqualified.
It opened in limited release in December, in time for Award Season.
Alright, I'll play again. Taken. That was solid. Wasn't that February?
by Lebowski » Thu Jan 14, 2010 8:28 pm
by Cease » Thu Jan 14, 2010 8:42 pm


by mistero » Fri Feb 12, 2010 1:20 pm
by Triple-S » Fri Feb 12, 2010 2:40 pm
Cease wrote:Courtesy of Mike Burns, comedian
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by hermanfontenot » Fri Feb 12, 2010 3:01 pm

by Larvell Blanks » Fri Feb 12, 2010 3:01 pm
Triple-S wrote:I always love how they know market movies with this as "The Hangover's Bradley Cooper" and him involved in some chick flick.
.
by Guest » Fri Feb 12, 2010 4:00 pm
by Fire Marshall Bill » Fri Feb 12, 2010 4:17 pm

by cozmeesah » Fri Feb 12, 2010 5:52 pm
"Valentine's Day" is being marketed as a Date Movie. I think it's more of a First-Date Movie. If your date likes it, do not date that person again. And if you like it, there may not be a second date.

by jb » Fri Feb 12, 2010 6:16 pm
Fire Marshall Bill wrote::lmfao:
Unless you're single and out to get laid yir a fucking hen-pecked nancy boy if you went to see any of that boo-fucking-hoo tripe
Hell, I never even heard of half of those P'sOS till they ran on Showtime or HBO. Now I get you leave my wife to watch them alone while I tune in the Military Channel or Movies That Don't Suck etc etc etc
Here's how it works 'chiles...
Spend 10 yrs denegrating V-day then one day surprise her at work with roses in a vase to make all the other women jealous
She comes home happy.
Get her cleaned up and take her out to dinner ...then home to get busy
Fuck all that movie drama shit that requires tears, conversation and meaningful fucking dialog
If it doesn't get her hot enuff to take your dick out of your pants on the ride home so you don't have to hear her talk you wasted both time and money and have given up your manhood
May as well wear pink sneakers to the theater
'juss sayin', sissies
...and here's a movie tip for every visit. Take a flask of Jack to pour into your Coke
by jb » Fri Feb 12, 2010 6:17 pm
cozmeesah wrote:Ugh. You couldn't pay me to go see this movie (well... depends on how much you'd be paying) and I'm a woman.
It just looks really really bad and I thought that back when they were still filming the thing. Now I'll like a rom com if it's pretty funny, done in an at-least-kind-of-original way, and they actually make me give a crap about the characters.
For instance, I liked Notting Hill, Love Actually, The Proposal, Hitch and Runaway Bride. You guys here will probably look at those five and think " *barf* She has horrible taste in movies". But I found them funny and done at least somewhat well.
Valentine's Day seems to be the type I do not like. Cramming as many stars and clichés into 1.5-2 hours as they possibly can without any actual character development or even somewhat engaging story. It looks to me like they were trying to do the American version of Love Actually and failed miserably.
I love this quote from Roger Ebert's review of this film:"Valentine's Day" is being marketed as a Date Movie. I think it's more of a First-Date Movie. If your date likes it, do not date that person again. And if you like it, there may not be a second date.
by Guest » Fri Feb 12, 2010 6:20 pm
JB wrote: I cn never understand why fat Ebert didn't have the coronary and thin Siskle did.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Fri Feb 12, 2010 6:22 pm
by jb » Fri Feb 12, 2010 6:58 pm
Mitch wrote:JB wrote: I cn never understand why fat Ebert didn't have the coronary and thin Siskle did.
Siskel died of brain cancer...but there ya go.
by Fire Marshall Bill » Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:59 am
by Erie Warrior » Sun Feb 14, 2010 11:36 am
Lebowski wrote:"Valentine's day" looks like an ensemble cluster fuck of the highest proportions.
She's already planting the seed for us to see this one. Ugh.


by Cerebral_DownTime » Sun Feb 14, 2010 5:23 pm
by mistero » Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:40 pm
by Guest » Wed Feb 17, 2010 9:09 pm
Larvell Blanks wrote:Triple-S wrote:I always love how they know market movies with this as "The Hangover's Bradley Cooper" and him involved in some chick flick.
.
Quick, off the top of your head, name me 3 Bradley Cooper movies.....
waiting...
waiting...
now you see why they preface his name w/ "The Hangover"
by HoodooMan » Thu Feb 18, 2010 7:38 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Fuck Shutter Island.
I hate that movie due to sheer over saturation at this point. I've never been bombarded by the same preview for damn near a year at every single movie like I have this flick. I have the freaking lines memorized at this point. They really screwed up letting said preview run for as long as they did after they pussed out of releasing in 2009.
I may wait for the DVD just out of protest.
by mattvan1 » Thu Feb 18, 2010 9:31 pm
HoodooMan wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:Fuck Shutter Island.
I hate that movie due to sheer over saturation at this point. I've never been bombarded by the same preview for damn near a year at every single movie like I have this flick. I have the freaking lines memorized at this point. They really screwed up letting said preview run for as long as they did after they pussed out of releasing in 2009.
I may wait for the DVD just out of protest.
Looks like that might not even be necessary.
65% says this movie blows.
by HoodooMan » Thu Feb 18, 2010 9:57 pm
It's the opposite. 65% fresh.
But a sample size way too small (71 reviews) to draw any conclusions one way or the other.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Thu Feb 18, 2010 10:28 pm
by e0y2e3 » Thu Feb 18, 2010 10:51 pm
mattvan1 wrote:BTW, e0y2e3, it's a Paramount release produced and directed by Martin Scosese - did you think they were going to down play it?

by mattvan1 » Thu Feb 18, 2010 11:18 pm
I meant that 65% positive reviews for this movie = shitty movie.
That has nothing to do w/ it. Starting the advertising campaign mad early, delaying the crap out of the movie, then keeping the advertising amped up during the entire delay is why it went from typical advertising to ridiculously annoying.
They pussed out and kept pushing it back (probably because as the reviews indicate it sucks and they knew it so they wanted to release against the remnants of Valentines day movies)
by Guest » Fri Feb 19, 2010 1:52 am
by e0y2e3 » Fri Feb 19, 2010 3:55 am

by Guest » Fri Feb 19, 2010 11:26 am
by e0y2e3 » Fri Feb 19, 2010 11:34 am

by Cerebral_DownTime » Fri Feb 19, 2010 4:44 pm
by HoodooMan » Fri Feb 19, 2010 6:36 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:What a dumb take. "There's too many previews so i'm going to hate the movie without seeing it." Just take your ball and go home, brah.
Return to Movies, Music, TV, Books, Pop Culture
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests