Moderators: peeker643, swerb, mitch
by OldDawg » Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:06 pm

by aoxo1 » Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:28 pm
by dem425 » Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:33 pm
by hebner20 » Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:51 pm
by swerb » Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:54 pm
by Erie Warrior » Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:25 pm


by OldDawg » Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:26 pm
hebner20 wrote:That is like asking who is your favorite child? How do you even come up with less than 20 and then narrow it down from there? Once they began writing all their own stuff it was rare to have a dud per album. In my opinion, they really did not have a free bird or stairway to heaven that defined who they were - I don't think they have a "signature song".

by swerb » Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:41 pm
by aoxo1 » Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:47 pm
Swerb wrote:Forgot Here Comes the Sun ... definitely one of my favorites. Also Its My Life.
by Doc » Wed Sep 09, 2009 11:24 pm
Swerb wrote:Forgot Here Comes the Sun ... definitely one of my favorites. Also Its My Life.
by peeker643 » Wed Sep 09, 2009 11:32 pm
by yogi » Thu Sep 10, 2009 8:40 am
by Larvell Blanks » Thu Sep 10, 2009 9:39 am
by British_Pharaoh » Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:01 am

by Cease » Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:44 am

by OldDawg » Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:49 am
British_Pharaoh wrote:I had no idea about the beatles Guitar hero


by OldDawg » Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:54 am
Cease wrote:I heard Maxwell play some old/remasters yesterday on-air. Very different songs when converting those monos to stereo. Be ready for deeper sounds and balanced lead & background vocals. Very cool.

by Cease » Thu Sep 10, 2009 11:00 am
OldDawg wrote:Cease wrote:I heard Maxwell play some old/remasters yesterday on-air. Very different songs when converting those monos to stereo. Be ready for deeper sounds and balanced lead & background vocals. Very cool.
I was just reading about their monos. Its funny. When you listen to their original stereo music, it was not "mixed" like we are now used to. Much of the sound is literally split into two... certain parts/voices coming out of one speaker, others out of the other. I have listened to all those tunes turning one side of speakers completely down. Interesting. At that time, stereo was a new toy and they really hadn't figured out how to "mix" songs.

by jfiling » Thu Sep 10, 2009 12:48 pm
by hermanfontenot » Thu Sep 10, 2009 1:08 pm

by BruceK » Thu Sep 10, 2009 2:10 pm

by Cease » Thu Sep 10, 2009 2:35 pm

by OldDawg » Thu Sep 10, 2009 3:47 pm
Cease wrote:It's Beatles in 3-D. Now approaching must have status. Kid's first birthday party budget be damned.


by OldDawg » Thu Sep 10, 2009 3:49 pm
Wow. Our wives are different. Mine multiplies what I spent by the sum of the date and time of day of the purchase to figure out how much she is going to spend in "retaliation." You are getting off easy!BruceK wrote:I'm just trying to figure out how to get that $199 box set in the house without my wife knowing about it - because then she'll feel the need to spend $199 on clothes, effectively doubling the cost of the CDs.

by RC » Thu Sep 10, 2009 5:11 pm
by OldDawg » Thu Sep 10, 2009 5:38 pm

by jack_tors » Thu Sep 10, 2009 7:17 pm
OldDawg wrote:hebner20 wrote:That is like asking who is your favorite child? How do you even come up with less than 20 and then narrow it down from there? Once they began writing all their own stuff it was rare to have a dud per album. In my opinion, they really did not have a free bird or stairway to heaven that defined who they were - I don't think they have a "signature song".
Yup. +1
Almost impossible to pick a favorite.
Even moreso to identify a "signature song" as you suggest. You can't.
Best group ever??? I think so.
by Doc » Thu Sep 10, 2009 7:32 pm
RC wrote:I will be playing it when I get back from my business trip on Saturday. My wife has already been playing the Beatles:Rock Band. She says the story line about their history is fantastic especially with the actual recordings in the studios between songs.
I was thinking about writing a review about it after I play it a bunch this weekend.
Oh and one quick thing. It's not Beatles Guitar Hero, it's Beatles:Rock Band. I understand from someone that doesn't play those games that they look the same but the details are VERY different between Guitar Hero and Rock Band.
It would be like saying that college football and the NFL are the same because they both play football.
by yogi » Thu Sep 10, 2009 11:04 pm
Back to the game...it's a beautiful game. 8 different sets of music...the first 4 are set at the Cavern Club (Germany IIRC, where they got their start), The Ed Sullivan Show, Shea Stadium, and the Budoken in Japan. All are really nice to look at. The best part is the next 3 sets, which is basically set in a studio (as they didn't play live at this time). All songs begin in the studio, and all morph into "dreamscapes", sort of a visual representation of maybe their states of mind, or other things representing the drug-influenced Beatles era. It's certainly not all like that, but a lot of it is psychadelic-looking. It's really nice...actually, it's almost more fun to sit back and watch this as opposed to playing and not being able to take in the visuals. Hello Goodbye is nice as it sort of replicates the music video...
by TIMMAH » Fri Sep 11, 2009 1:52 pm

by Bill the Butcher » Sat Sep 12, 2009 5:24 pm
4thQtrGlory wrote:If we got all that, i would hang a browns flag from my boner for 2 weeks straight...
by OldDawg » Sat Sep 12, 2009 7:55 pm

by Bill the Butcher » Sat Sep 12, 2009 8:13 pm
4thQtrGlory wrote:If we got all that, i would hang a browns flag from my boner for 2 weeks straight...
by Orenthal » Sat Sep 12, 2009 8:53 pm

by RC » Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:18 pm
by Mr. MacPhisto » Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:58 am
by Bill the Butcher » Wed Sep 16, 2009 1:00 pm
4thQtrGlory wrote:If we got all that, i would hang a browns flag from my boner for 2 weeks straight...
by Bill the Butcher » Wed Sep 16, 2009 6:44 pm
4thQtrGlory wrote:If we got all that, i would hang a browns flag from my boner for 2 weeks straight...
by Doc » Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:54 am
Bill the Butcher wrote:Honorable mention for songs not on any albums...
-She's a Woman
-I'm Down
It's official; Paul McCartney was the most talented of the group.
by Bill the Butcher » Thu Sep 17, 2009 12:58 pm
4thQtrGlory wrote:If we got all that, i would hang a browns flag from my boner for 2 weeks straight...
by papacass » Thu Sep 17, 2009 1:15 pm
Bill the Butcher wrote:I was never a big fan of Lennon's solo work after the Beatles, but I still give him his credit he deserves.
by Bill the Butcher » Fri Sep 18, 2009 2:10 pm
4thQtrGlory wrote:If we got all that, i would hang a browns flag from my boner for 2 weeks straight...
by Cease » Fri Sep 18, 2009 2:26 pm

by Bill the Butcher » Fri Sep 18, 2009 2:32 pm
4thQtrGlory wrote:If we got all that, i would hang a browns flag from my boner for 2 weeks straight...
by Bill the Butcher » Fri Sep 18, 2009 11:08 pm
No stereo mixes exist for the 1963 single "She Loves You" and its flipside "I'll Get You" or the 1962 single "Love Me Do" and its flipside "P.S. I Love You". The master two-track session tapes were wiped, as was common practice at Abbey Road studios, once they were mixed down to mono for single release.[3] Every release of these four songs has been in mono (or fake stereo) and they appear in mono on the stereo version of Past Masters and Please Please Me. This is also the case for the single version of "Love Me Do" with Ringo on drums but at some point even the mixed down mono tape of this version of the song was lost. Since the 1980s, a new mono transfer sourced from a reasonably clean 45rpm from a private collector has been used as the master for this version of the song.
4thQtrGlory wrote:If we got all that, i would hang a browns flag from my boner for 2 weeks straight...
by OldDawg » Tue Sep 22, 2009 12:44 am

by rebelwithoutaclue » Tue Sep 22, 2009 4:15 pm
Damn, the stars, planets, and galaxies really aligned for The Beatles, didn't they? Oooweeee.
by hebner20 » Wed Sep 30, 2009 8:30 pm
Cease wrote:So, I picked up The Beatles remastered in stereo (the white album) last night and have listened to it 2 or 3 times. I've always loved that album for it's layering and song textures and it did a ton open my ears to music.
...And now it's even better. All of the backing vocals are brought to the front, with unmuddied clarity. Cases in point: Back in the USSR. A song I might typically skip to get right to Dear Prudence and the meat of disc one. On the remasters, that Airplane in USSR moves from ear to ear with clarity throughout the song and plays a more understandable role. The guitar parts on Blackbird are cleaner, twangier, more life-like. Revolution 9 is even more bizarre, My Guitar Gently Weeps has even more feel.
Sorry to drool in public, but when it comes to these remasters, IMO, you can believe the hype.
by Cease » Thu Oct 01, 2009 11:35 am
hebner20 wrote:Cease wrote:So, I picked up The Beatles remastered in stereo (the white album) last night and have listened to it 2 or 3 times. I've always loved that album for it's layering and song textures and it did a ton open my ears to music.
...And now it's even better. All of the backing vocals are brought to the front, with unmuddied clarity. Cases in point: Back in the USSR. A song I might typically skip to get right to Dear Prudence and the meat of disc one. On the remasters, that Airplane in USSR moves from ear to ear with clarity throughout the song and plays a more understandable role. The guitar parts on Blackbird are cleaner, twangier, more life-like. Revolution 9 is even more bizarre, My Guitar Gently Weeps has even more feel.
Sorry to drool in public, but when it comes to these remasters, IMO, you can believe the hype.
OK, I am considering getting 1 of the remastered CD's. If you were to pick 1 remastered CD which one would it be? I have about all of them on "old" CD's already. I heard on a previous post that Abbey Road was no different than the prior CD release. I am partial to the later stuff starting with about rubber soul/revolver. Any thoughts would be appreciated.

by hebner20 » Thu Oct 01, 2009 2:15 pm
Cease wrote:hebner20 wrote:Cease wrote:So, I picked up The Beatles remastered in stereo (the white album) last night and have listened to it 2 or 3 times. I've always loved that album for it's layering and song textures and it did a ton open my ears to music.
...And now it's even better. All of the backing vocals are brought to the front, with unmuddied clarity. Cases in point: Back in the USSR. A song I might typically skip to get right to Dear Prudence and the meat of disc one. On the remasters, that Airplane in USSR moves from ear to ear with clarity throughout the song and plays a more understandable role. The guitar parts on Blackbird are cleaner, twangier, more life-like. Revolution 9 is even more bizarre, My Guitar Gently Weeps has even more feel.
Sorry to drool in public, but when it comes to these remasters, IMO, you can believe the hype.
OK, I am considering getting 1 of the remastered CD's. If you were to pick 1 remastered CD which one would it be? I have about all of them on "old" CD's already. I heard on a previous post that Abbey Road was no different than the prior CD release. I am partial to the later stuff starting with about rubber soul/revolver. Any thoughts would be appreciated.
Hebs- make like Ray Kinsella and "Go the Distance." Walk in to the store and pull the trigger on Rubber Soul. Sounds like you are leaning toward it anyway. With Norwegian Wood, it's Low risk/high reward, right?
I never thought I would ever give anyone shopping advice, maybe I should do so professionally.

Return to Movies, Music, TV, Books, Pop Culture
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests