Moderators: peeker643, swerb, danwismar, furls
by FUDU » Sun Sep 04, 2011 2:39 pm
by danwismar » Sun Sep 04, 2011 3:24 pm
by leadpipe » Sun Sep 04, 2011 4:12 pm
danwismar wrote:No question Meyer and Spielman were over the top talking about how Miller's fragile psyche was going to be damaged somehow by not being put back in the game immediately after what?...a dropped pass and a bad snap spoiled his first series?
But on balance, watching the game late last night after getting home, I thought Meyer and Spiels were excellent in analysis...far better than what we're used to watching CFB on TV.
by danwismar » Sun Sep 04, 2011 4:28 pm
by motherscratcher » Sun Sep 04, 2011 4:37 pm
by danwismar » Sun Sep 04, 2011 4:40 pm
motherscratcher wrote:Take your giant pile of money, shut your face, and go back to Akron.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sun Sep 04, 2011 6:15 pm
motherscratcher wrote:peeker643 wrote:Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I thought Braxton looked really good. I watched the game on DVR after I got back and was really annoyed by the moronic "Oh Braxton needs to be with the other QBs and have a head set on" drivel from the announce team.
He does need to be over there. He can learn more hearing the play, checking the defense and watching the play evolve than he can by simply watching the game with his boys.
That kid's important because Bauserman is mediocre. Anything a raw freshman can do to learn more quickly, well, he should be doing it.
No doubt this is all true. And I would like to see that Braxton is involved, even when not in the huddle.
But they beat that shit to absolute death. Then they gave it a shot of epi to the heart, revived it, and beat it to death again. Then they made sweet love with the corpse.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sun Sep 04, 2011 6:21 pm
peeker643 wrote:motherscratcher wrote:peeker643 wrote:Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I thought Braxton looked really good. I watched the game on DVR after I got back and was really annoyed by the moronic "Oh Braxton needs to be with the other QBs and have a head set on" drivel from the announce team.
He does need to be over there. He can learn more hearing the play, checking the defense and watching the play evolve than he can by simply watching the game with his boys.
That kid's important because Bauserman is mediocre. Anything a raw freshman can do to learn more quickly, well, he should be doing it.
No doubt this is all true. And I would like to see that Braxton is involved, even when not in the huddle.
But they beat that shit to absolute death. Then they gave it a shot of epi to the heart, revived it, and beat it to death again. Then they made sweet love with the corpse.
I'll be interested in seeing what adjustments Fickell makes between now and Miami. To an extent they can probably out-physical Miami on the OL-DL matchup but at some point the QB is going to have to make plays.
I personally think Miller already throws a better ball than Bauserman and that he's much more dangerous keeping it (obviously). I'm begging to avoid a Germaine-Jackson redux.
If this was Fickell's job for the next 4 years I truly believe Miller would be handed the reins and permitted to learn on the job. But Fickell probably needs ten wins to keep the job and getting that out of a freshman QB, regardless of how talented, is a tough road.
by Triple-S » Sun Sep 04, 2011 6:21 pm
motherscratcher wrote:I had heard something about Ianello complaining after the game about sportsmanship or something. Didn't know exactly what he had said, though.
Yeah, he can kiss Fickell's ass. Crybaby.
Take your giant pile of money, shut your face, and go back to Akron.
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by Cerebral_DownTime » Sun Sep 04, 2011 6:24 pm
danwismar wrote:don't know if you guys saw this...UA coach Rob Ianello's comments after the game to Fickell..."I don't think that's real good sportsmanship, but good luck the rest of the year"
http://www.chicagonow.com/daily-chicago ... ame-video/
By several accounts (and it looked that way to me too) Fickell is seen on camera just afterward, pretty clearly mouthing the word "dick". (not seen at the linked video) I love it.
Reminds me of the remark attributed to Bobby Knight, I think..."want a closer game, get a better team"
by danwismar » Sun Sep 04, 2011 7:09 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Glad to see you survived the heat. People were dropping like flies during that game, glad to see you weren't among them.
How hot was C-Deck, like sitting on the surface of the sun?
by danwismar » Tue Sep 06, 2011 12:05 am
by JCoz » Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:39 am
by Spin » Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:43 am
Triple-S wrote:motherscratcher wrote:I had heard something about Ianello complaining after the game about sportsmanship or something. Didn't know exactly what he had said, though.
Yeah, he can kiss Fickell's ass. Crybaby.
Take your giant pile of money, shut your face, and go back to Akron.
Ianello from what my buds up at Hilltop High have said is himself kind of a dickhead.
None of them are too keen on the hire and are really questioning the school's decision.
by furls » Tue Sep 06, 2011 7:46 pm
JCoz wrote:Well that was a decent start.
Sweat looks like the guy I thought he would be last season. He is just a completely different animal playing WILL instead of SAM. The WR's looked really good, the RB's looked ok. I think it is a good thing the secondary looks strong because we are going to need to send 5 quite a bit this season if the goal is pressure on every pass play.
Bauserman looked better than I thought possible, even given the opponant. Show me the same vs toledo and I'll find it hard to fault the choice of having him take the majority of snaps against Miami.
Shazier looks phenominal. The future of this team is off the charts. I really dont know the last time there was this much youth looking this good.
by danwismar » Thu Sep 08, 2011 1:19 am
by danwismar » Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:23 pm
furls wrote:I think our D had most of its issues in years past due to lack of pressure. tOSU only have 23 sacks last year is ridiculous, that is less that 2 per game. I would expect tOSU to have 4+ sacks per game against crap competition and 2+ against real competition for a total of 35-45 per year. This defense is going to feel a lot like 2005, the last time tOSU blitzed with any regularity.
Return to College Sports Arena
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests