Moderators: peeker643, swerb, danwismar, furls
by rebelwithoutaclue » Mon Jul 11, 2011 4:17 pm
by e0y2e3 » Mon Jul 11, 2011 5:00 pm

by Kingpin74 » Mon Jul 11, 2011 6:15 pm
by furls » Mon Jul 11, 2011 6:36 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Allegedly started recruiting for scUM before even signing his verbal.
Same bitch that declared he was staying at OSU and going to bust his ass to recruit for them then decommited three days later.
Dunn the top RB recruit is also a concern.
by e0y2e3 » Mon Jul 11, 2011 6:53 pm

by fairvis » Mon Jul 11, 2011 7:58 pm
by Symbolic47 » Mon Jul 11, 2011 8:43 pm
by furls » Mon Jul 11, 2011 9:04 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:IMO, Green would have committed as soon as he got his offer if not for Tressel's cheating.
Hopefully as soon as the sanctions are dropped he does verbal.
I mean christ, the kid practicly packed up and sent Grant here last year, which is weird on a lot of levels but who am I to bitch.
And the only thing about Kalis that bothers me is that he claimed days before his decommitment that he was going to go all in working to recruit for OSU, then he pulls that shit. If he had kept his mouth shut and/or just decommited the first time he called Fickle it would have been much more of a "well that sucks."
Now I think the kid is a bit of a bitch.
Lied in public then starting recruiting against the team he is a fan of because of concern over sanctions that haven't been handed out? That's pretty lame.
Frankly unless someone in the NCAA is sitting on deposited checks made out to TP this thing is going to wrap up fine. TP and his authographs for money is OSU's baby Cam Newton and will always be out there, but there is just no way to do anything about it w/ Pryor flicking off the NCAA.
by Symbolic47 » Mon Jul 11, 2011 9:07 pm
by rebelwithoutaclue » Tue Jul 12, 2011 9:15 am
Symbolic47 wrote:Im gonna be laugh my ass off so HARD when we dont get a bowl ban. I think the NCAA may add a schollie reduction, but thats it. Dont listen to the media. No school has EVER been banned from the postseason without being charged with LOIC. Which we clearly have not. It wont happen.
by e0y2e3 » Tue Jul 12, 2011 10:02 am

by mattvan1 » Tue Jul 12, 2011 11:11 am
rebelwithoutaclue wrote: Well considering the charges are still pending, are you psychic? Frankly, the way I see it, the only thing tOSU can be charged with is a lack of institutional control. This isn't just about Pryor. This was systemic violations from multiple team members and multiple graduating classes. This has been going on for a looooong time. If that's not lack of institutional control, I don't know what is.
VIOLATIONS THAT DO NOT RESULT FROM A LACK OF INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL.
An institution cannot be expected to control the actions of every individual who is in some way connected with its athletics program. The deliberate or inadvertent violation of a rule by an individual who is not in charge of compliance with rules that are violated will not be considered to
be due to a lack of institutional control:
• if adequate compliance measures exist;
• if they are appropriately conveyed to those who need to be aware of them;
• if they are monitored to ensure that such measures are being followed; and
• if, on learning that a violation has occurred, the institution takes swift action.
by Love child of shawn kemp » Tue Jul 12, 2011 12:50 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Like I said, I think plenty of shit went down. I think plenty of it will remain hidden and w/ how hard new entities ranging from the Dispatch to ESPN worked to prove the shit I would be shocked if the NCAA found proof that hasn't surfaced yet for any of the other allegations.
by JCoz » Tue Jul 12, 2011 2:24 pm
rebelwithoutaclue wrote:Symbolic47 wrote:Im gonna be laugh my ass off so HARD when we dont get a bowl ban. I think the NCAA may add a schollie reduction, but thats it. Dont listen to the media. No school has EVER been banned from the postseason without being charged with LOIC. Which we clearly have not. It wont happen.
Well considering the charges are still pending, are you psychic? Frankly, the way I see it, the only thing tOSU can be charged with is a lack of institutional control. This isn't just about Pryor. This was systemic violations from multiple team members and multiple graduating classes. This has been going on for a looooong time. If that's not lack of institutional control, I don't know what is.
by furls » Tue Jul 12, 2011 5:07 pm
JCoz wrote:rebelwithoutaclue wrote:Symbolic47 wrote:Im gonna be laugh my ass off so HARD when we dont get a bowl ban. I think the NCAA may add a schollie reduction, but thats it. Dont listen to the media. No school has EVER been banned from the postseason without being charged with LOIC. Which we clearly have not. It wont happen.
Well considering the charges are still pending, are you psychic? Frankly, the way I see it, the only thing tOSU can be charged with is a lack of institutional control. This isn't just about Pryor. This was systemic violations from multiple team members and multiple graduating classes. This has been going on for a looooong time. If that's not lack of institutional control, I don't know what is.
There is actually very little in this that could be construed as LOIC. I think you need to look into the NCAA's definition instead of your own.
by DrPoove » Tue Jul 12, 2011 5:14 pm
fairvis wrote:Of course he went to Michigan. He's an Ed's guy, you can never trust those people.

by gnati » Tue Jul 12, 2011 5:52 pm
DrPoove wrote:fairvis wrote:Don't tell JB I said that.
by Symbolic47 » Tue Jul 12, 2011 6:32 pm
by JCoz » Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:11 pm
by motherscratcher » Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:21 pm
by e0y2e3 » Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:37 pm
motherscratcher wrote:Agree JCoz
At the end of the day, very little has been proven, and nothing new has emerged in months. But, it's the NCAA and I'm still nervous. I think with the evidence at hand there SHOULD be no LOIC, FTM, loss of scholies, or a bowl ban. But you never know.
One thing I do know with almost absolute certainty...If the NCAA comes back and accepts OSUs self imposed sanctions and doesn't add anything on...well, it is very possible that the internet might explode.
I just hope that if it does, motherscratcher is standing at ground zero.


by furls » Wed Jul 13, 2011 4:05 pm
JCoz wrote:To be clear, it is in fact possible to both lose schollies and receive a post season ban without a LOIC or FTM, it's just extremely unlikely.
by motherscratcher » Wed Jul 13, 2011 4:42 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:motherscratcher wrote:Agree JCoz
At the end of the day, very little has been proven, and nothing new has emerged in months. But, it's the NCAA and I'm still nervous. I think with the evidence at hand there SHOULD be no LOIC, FTM, loss of scholies, or a bowl ban. But you never know.
One thing I do know with almost absolute certainty...If the NCAA comes back and accepts OSUs self imposed sanctions and doesn't add anything on...well, it is very possible that the internet might explode.
I just hope that if it does, motherscratcher is standing at ground zero.
by e0y2e3 » Wed Jul 13, 2011 5:37 pm

by FUDU » Thu Jul 14, 2011 6:34 pm
by FUDU » Thu Jul 14, 2011 6:37 pm
gnati wrote:DrPoove wrote:fairvis wrote:Don't tell JB I said that.
Fuck JB.
I think the best part is when Kalis said he didnt want to be punished for things he didn't do.
Fair enough.
I am sure he knows that Michigan is on probation.
What's that?
Shit.
Nevermind.
It seems the standards at Ed's have gone down in the last 25 or so years.
And you can tell JB I said that.
by c11058 » Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:52 pm
by motherscratcher » Fri Jul 15, 2011 2:35 am
e0y2e3 wrote:You are pretty much the worst person ever.
I like FUDU better than you.
by Symbolic47 » Fri Jul 15, 2011 5:38 pm
c11058 wrote:I've been debating about posting anything about this kid, but since he made his tsun choice, hell with the fact that he's only 17.
I watched the Ed's O-line in last year's state championship game, with a focus on Kalis. I was curious to see what kind of ability he had as a 5-Star OSU commit. I was disappointed. I expected a strong performance but didn't see it. The kid got pushed around, didn't show much leg drive on run plays and he had trouble staying on his blocks. His pass blocking was adequate but he was not even close to being the best on their O-line. Granted he was only a junior last year, but he did not play up to the hype, IMO. Alex Boone came to mind...great size, average performance at OSU.
I can understand him not wanting to commit to OSU; too many unknowns at this time. Why Michigan though? Why not wait until December to commit? He should have a dominating senior year at Ed's and maybe he'll improve in time. We'll know a lot more in three years as to what kind of college player he becomes.
Return to College Sports Arena
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests
