Ok guys I keep reading about how what Tressel did was not "moral" and I need some assistance in trying to understand the basis of this claim as it relates to what he did and modern day society.
I'm trying to envision a real world situation where one would cry "immoral" for what Tressel did outside of say Salt Lake City? I understand the digs, I just think the "moral" rationale is absurd.
What is the basis for these claims?
It's a conceptual issue that is driving me crazy and I've heard it enough that I'd like to craft a proper response for it. Not to be combative, but rather to point out the absurdity of using language like that to describe what happened in this situation.

