Moderators: peeker643, swerb, danwismar, furls
by swerb » Mon Apr 25, 2011 11:52 am
by jb » Mon Apr 25, 2011 12:02 pm
by motherscratcher » Mon Apr 25, 2011 12:10 pm
by danwismar » Mon Apr 25, 2011 12:27 pm
by FUDU » Mon Apr 25, 2011 12:28 pm
by e0y2e3 » Mon Apr 25, 2011 12:31 pm

by danwismar » Mon Apr 25, 2011 12:38 pm
by e0y2e3 » Mon Apr 25, 2011 12:44 pm

by danwismar » Mon Apr 25, 2011 12:58 pm
by FUDU » Mon Apr 25, 2011 1:14 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:Uhm there is plenty of new stuff coming out:
http://deadspin.com/#!5795313/jim-tress ... fect-coach
He should quit at this point and spare the program this investigation
by uncle junior » Mon Apr 25, 2011 1:34 pm

by Kingpin74 » Mon Apr 25, 2011 1:47 pm
The best news is this statement: "The allegations are largely consistent with what the university self-reported to the NCAA...", presumed to mean that what we already know is about all there is to know...no "other shoe" to drop.
by Spin » Mon Apr 25, 2011 1:49 pm
by peeker643 » Mon Apr 25, 2011 1:59 pm
by pup » Mon Apr 25, 2011 2:37 pm
by FUDU » Mon Apr 25, 2011 2:43 pm
by danwismar » Mon Apr 25, 2011 2:45 pm
peeker643 wrote:If the players committed these infractions before the season then they would have been ineligible for the season (at worst). The NCAA then knew of the infractions before the Sugar Bowl and signed off on them playing.
peeker643 wrote:The heat comes when they find something else or something new with the program. And they will be looking.
peeker643 wrote:I think Tressel sits out 2011 and is back for 2012 IF this is it. The NCAA knows everything that's out there now already.
by danwismar » Mon Apr 25, 2011 2:54 pm
FUDU wrote:Still waiting after all these months to hear the significant pros to JT leaving the program, now, in regards to this.
The pros to the program and to the on the field performance of the football team.
by fairvis » Mon Apr 25, 2011 3:04 pm
by FUDU » Mon Apr 25, 2011 3:07 pm
danwismar wrote:FUDU wrote:Still waiting after all these months to hear the significant pros to JT leaving the program, now, in regards to this.
The pros to the program and to the on the field performance of the football team.
Haven't you heard, FUDU? It's a "dirty fucking program".
Meanwhile, Auburn is the NCAA's National Champion!
Many of the people calling for JT's head are perfectly OK with bringing in Urban Meyer, fresh from the SEC, to run the program next.
Funny.
by daddywags » Mon Apr 25, 2011 3:21 pm
by pup » Mon Apr 25, 2011 3:31 pm
danwismar wrote:peeker643 wrote:If the players committed these infractions before the season then they would have been ineligible for the season (at worst). The NCAA then knew of the infractions before the Sugar Bowl and signed off on them playing.
Makes it a little awkward and hypocritical for the NCAA now, doesn't it? They knew about everything in December when they cleared the Tat5 for the Sugar Bowl. Now they have to come back and say..."it was OK for you ineligible guys to play a bowl game, but we're going to vacate the 12 games you played in before that"
They are not vacating the season because dudes sold their shit. When they were allowed to play in the bowl game, nobody else knew Tress knew the entire time and was covering it up. They are vacating the season for the cover up.
by StewieG » Mon Apr 25, 2011 3:52 pm
daddywags wrote:Honestly, I've never understood quite why they don't just pay these kids, admit this is professional sports, and be done with the charades. I'm having a tough time figuring out why we're paying FBI agents to investigate 20 year old college kids trading memorabilia for tats. We don't give enough taxpayer money to these colleges, we have to pay the FBI to supervise their sports programs, too? Are they trying to make sure the gamblers don't get cheated?
by danwismar » Mon Apr 25, 2011 4:00 pm
by jb » Mon Apr 25, 2011 4:09 pm
daddywags wrote:Honestly, I've never understood quite why they don't just pay these kids, admit this is professional sports, and be done with the charades. I'm having a tough time figuring out why we're paying FBI agents to investigate 20 year old college kids trading memorabilia for tats. We don't give enough taxpayer money to these colleges, we have to pay the FBI to supervise their sports programs, too? Are they trying to make sure the gamblers don't get cheated?
by daddywags » Mon Apr 25, 2011 4:13 pm
StewieG wrote:daddywags wrote:Honestly, I've never understood quite why they don't just pay these kids, admit this is professional sports, and be done with the charades. I'm having a tough time figuring out why we're paying FBI agents to investigate 20 year old college kids trading memorabilia for tats. We don't give enough taxpayer money to these colleges, we have to pay the FBI to supervise their sports programs, too? Are they trying to make sure the gamblers don't get cheated?
Allowing these schools to pay kids opens up a major pandora's box. Is it only D1 schools that can pay their kids? What about the schools that can't afford to pay them (which is most non-major conference schools)? Should we then move the major schools into a separate division? What about the other sports? Do schools pay basketball players too? Baseball players? What about the track teams, or swim teams? What about field hockey that has no chance to ever make money for a university? For most schools, the revenue from football and basketball games makes up nearly all of the revenue for the athletic department, and is what even allows those other sports to exist.
I'm not even saying I disagree with you, necessarily. I do think they should be compensated in some manner more than a scholarship (which is nice, but doesn't feed anyone, nor do many of these players make any use of it). But if it's, say, $1000/game then what happens when Florida comes by and offers a wink-wink deal of $5000/game? Then we're right back here doing this same song and dance. Maybe there's a good way of doing this, but I don't see it.
by daddywags » Mon Apr 25, 2011 4:25 pm
by danwismar » Mon Apr 25, 2011 4:59 pm
by gnati » Mon Apr 25, 2011 5:05 pm
Haven't you heard, FUDU? It's a "dirty fucking program".
Meanwhile, Auburn is the NCAA's National Champion!
Many of the people calling for JT's head are perfectly OK with bringing in Urban Meyer, fresh from the SEC, to run the program next.
Funny.
by Fire Marshall Bill » Mon Apr 25, 2011 5:24 pm
FUDU wrote:At this point the NCAA is simply using this opportunity to save face and make themselves look good in the midst of scrutiny that these stories bring to them (in large part due to themselves).
NCAA = Detective Alonzo Harris
by JacksonDysonJackson » Mon Apr 25, 2011 5:25 pm
by furls » Mon Apr 25, 2011 5:27 pm
by peeker643 » Mon Apr 25, 2011 5:31 pm
by hermanfontenot » Mon Apr 25, 2011 5:51 pm
daddywags wrote:Honestly, I've never understood quite why they don't just pay these kids, admit this is professional sports, and be done with the charades.

by hermanfontenot » Mon Apr 25, 2011 5:56 pm

by daddywags » Mon Apr 25, 2011 5:57 pm
by Kingpin74 » Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:26 pm
by furls » Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:53 pm
by Spin » Mon Apr 25, 2011 7:12 pm
StewieG wrote:daddywags wrote:Honestly, I've never understood quite why they don't just pay these kids, admit this is professional sports, and be done with the charades. I'm having a tough time figuring out why we're paying FBI agents to investigate 20 year old college kids trading memorabilia for tats. We don't give enough taxpayer money to these colleges, we have to pay the FBI to supervise their sports programs, too? Are they trying to make sure the gamblers don't get cheated?
Allowing these schools to pay kids opens up a major pandora's box.
by fundamentals » Mon Apr 25, 2011 7:33 pm
by Madre Hill, Superstar » Mon Apr 25, 2011 8:33 pm
Kingpin74 wrote:Take this with a shaker of salt because I'm a Michigan grad, but what am I missing here? Why would you guys even want Tressel to keep his job at this point?




by danwismar » Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:03 pm
gnati wrote:
As someone who has said, if not exactly, pretty damn close, that it is a "dirty fucking program", let me weigh in...
1) It is possible and not mutually exclusive that tVest is running a dirty fucking program - and Auburn is as well....and more important to me at least...I don't want to have to compare tOSU to fucking Auburn in any way shape or form other than we each are places that have buildings, sports teams, hot undergrads and dying trees.
2) I think it is hi-larious that any tOSU fan would get on any horse, high or otherwise, about any other school or confernce given our recent (and by recent I say last two decades or so) track record with the NCAA...I mean, when was the last hoops coach to leave tOSU under anything other than an NCAA cloud? Even if you don't think what tVest has done with this is the end of the world, you have to admit the amount of paper cuts he is accumulating are hard to keep explaining away. I mean, one Troy Smith is one thing, but a Troy Smith and a Mo Clarrett and a Tat 5 and a track record at YSU and...well, it does sort of paint a picture.
3) I don't particularly want Urban, for reasons not important for this discussion, but his record with the NCAA is better than tVest's...
I'm just sayin.
JT should go...it would be best for all involved...he can no longer be taken seriously selling his brand of aw shucks "honesty"....
by danwismar » Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:27 pm
peeker643 wrote:I do wonder how the book is selling:
The Winners Manual: For the Game of Life
by hermanfontenot » Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:32 pm
daddywags wrote:BTW: Your (correct) assertion that most of these kids don't belong on a college campus as real students cuts directly against those who claim the academic scholarship is "payment" for what they give to the school in return.

by hermanfontenot » Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:33 pm
danwismar wrote:What it might show you is why he just might deserve to survive this serious mistake, and why his value to the university and the program goes way beyond the football team's record.

by danwismar » Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:37 pm
hermanfontenot wrote:danwismar wrote:What it might show you is why he just might deserve to survive this serious mistake, and why his value to the university and the program goes way beyond the football team's record.
Dan, I think Coach Tressel would be the first person to say that the Ohio State football program is bigger than any one man.
by peeker643 » Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:51 pm
danwismar wrote:peeker643 wrote:I do wonder how the book is selling:
The Winners Manual: For the Game of Life
Have you read the book? It might be worth looking at. (They had the Kindle version available for free a couple months ago, and I grabbed it then)
Not because I'd suggest you need lessons for life, Peeks. You're a proven success in life, from all I can gather.
I only suggest it because the book is derived from the working program that every player in JT's football program "lives" every day of his time on campus...from the journaling every day their expressions of gratitude...the focus on living outside themselves...the caring for others...taking concrete actions on that concern...the balancing and prioritizing of the important things in life....all of it.
It might prove to you what seems to me the opposite of what you imply in your post....that it's all just words on a page...and now meaningless, if not hypocritical, in light of events.
But it's not. Seeing how the contents of the book are implemented in the daily lives of his players as he tries his best to mold them into responsible men and citizens would demonstrate to you that they are way more than words on a page, and that he does more than "talk the talk".
I don't recommend it as a fun or even an interesting read. It's kind of boring and repetitive in spots. What is striking is how he "lives" it with his players every day. Participation in the program is not optional. He doesn't expect, nor get, perfection from his players...obviously (this is in anticipation of the inevitable responses about individual players' misdeeds), just as he doesn't claim or attain it himself...just as obviously.
What it might show you is why he just might deserve to survive this serious mistake, and why his value to the university and the program goes way beyond the football team's record.
by Schruted it » Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:53 pm
by danwismar » Mon Apr 25, 2011 11:01 pm
by Spin » Tue Apr 26, 2011 9:32 am
danwismar wrote:And the Amelia Erhart analogy was priceless.

Return to College Sports Arena
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
