Moderators: peeker643, swerb, danwismar, furls
by peeker643 » Thu Mar 10, 2011 10:52 am
by fundamentals » Thu Mar 10, 2011 11:21 am
by jb » Thu Mar 10, 2011 11:27 am
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:peeker643 wrote:Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Because this whole thing is stupid and a waste of time.
I'm going to test my man CDT here: If you were in a room with a rattlesnake and you closed your eyes and just kept repeating, "Everything is okay, everything is okay" would that make the rattlesnake disappear?
/Jeopardy theme
And i'm going to put you in a room with a molehill and see how it takes to turn into a moutain.
by jb » Thu Mar 10, 2011 11:34 am
mattvan1 wrote:BTW, do I take this book off of my kid's shelf?
by jb » Thu Mar 10, 2011 11:41 am
gnati wrote:While flipping the finger at the man and eating leftover donuts a day late...which is what this post is...
I consider myself to be a cynical bastard, but damn if I didn't see this one coming...I watched the presser and actually found myself sort of calm, thinking, yeah that was a tough situation he was in, not sure it was the best response but damn that was tough...then I read the emails...epic fail...I don't see how he recovers from this, others yeah, but the very core of his "brand" has just been plunger raped...I don't think or necessarily want him to be fired, but I actually wouldn't mind if he came back later this week and said on reflection I screwed the pooch and the "message" I have sought to deliver will no longer be taken seriously because the messenger experienced self inflicted wounds that will no longer allow it to carry on....Gee can hire him as some sort of University ambassador because after taking that sword his rep get fixed, so to speak...and the program moves forward with the barnacles that will continue to collect as everything they do gets examined at much closer levels...all of that being said, I firmly believe every revenue sport at every college engages in cheating of some sort - the only difference is degree and intent...I always took Tressel for the type of guy who might look the other way, might not ask the tough question - which is consistent with what he did, up until December when he went all in...I do sort of laugh at those who thought he was above the fray, I mean to think that he was clean would dictate that you employ the Lance Armstrong view of sports...not only is Tressel so awesome that he can win when others can't...but he does it by not cheating when everyone else does...sorry, that is some mental gymnastics I ain't able to comprehend...oh, and ap-rah-po of nothing, I have a feeling that if TP was from Iggy and not western PA...well, Nasdaq might think differently...I'm just saying...
by pup » Thu Mar 10, 2011 11:41 am
by jb » Thu Mar 10, 2011 11:43 am
Ziner wrote:This is where I stand on the whole thing as well. I am not a Buckeye honk by any stretch, but I just don't really give a shit about any of this because the entire thing stems from something that I think is stupid.
by peeker643 » Thu Mar 10, 2011 11:54 am
pup wrote:Maybe I missed it the first time through, but I thought it was said Tress reported this to tOSU after the Sugar Bowl on his own.
Now I see the lawyers actually "found" them looking for other stuff.
Wonder how AD Smith feels knowing his coach does not trust him to pass along this type of info and get his opinion on the right course of action.
Also, I still have not heard what it was that tipped of tOSU to increase their teachings on compliance back in November, 6 months before Tress was alerted to potential violations. Is it another occurrence? Has to be something totally unrelated, right?
by Cerebral_DownTime » Thu Mar 10, 2011 11:56 am
jb wrote:How many moles, and how much time?
And peeker, pretty sure TPeezy has a single room and doesn't bunk with the coach.
...and CDT likely doesn't have a career, that's why he fails to understand e0's point
jb wrote:Ziner wrote:This is where I stand on the whole thing as well. I am not a Buckeye honk by any stretch, but I just don't really give a shit about any of this because the entire thing stems from something that I think is stupid.
Which is why you supported Bubba through the impeachment, right? ;-)
by jb » Thu Mar 10, 2011 11:59 am
by Cerebral_DownTime » Thu Mar 10, 2011 12:02 pm
jb wrote:No, I don't know moles. Not even shrews. I am fairly ignorant when it comes to all burrowing small mammels, and small mammels in general. I don't experiment with gerbils, neither. (There's your 6 degrees of speration OSU FB tie )
Now pizza? I know pizza.
by motherscratcher » Thu Mar 10, 2011 12:14 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:jb wrote:No, I don't know moles. Not even shrews. I am fairly ignorant when it comes to all burrowing small mammels, and small mammels in general. I don't experiment with gerbils, neither. (There's your 6 degrees of speration OSU FB tie )
Now pizza? I know pizza.
Aquatic rodents aren't allowed inside the city limits.
by motherscratcher » Thu Mar 10, 2011 12:19 pm
by Ziner » Thu Mar 10, 2011 12:20 pm
jb wrote:Ziner wrote:This is where I stand on the whole thing as well. I am not a Buckeye honk by any stretch, but I just don't really give a shit about any of this because the entire thing stems from something that I think is stupid.
Which is why you supported Bubba through the impeachment, right? ;-)
by Ziner » Thu Mar 10, 2011 12:22 pm
motherscratcher wrote:Just because he can be fired doesn't necessarily mean that he should be fired. I'm often amazed at how nonchalantly people call for the termination of someone else's employment. As if it's no big deal.
by peeker643 » Thu Mar 10, 2011 12:24 pm
motherscratcher wrote:One thing I've seen brought up repeatedly is the fact that Tressel is in breech of contract and should therefore be fired. That Tressel can be fired is not in dispute. But it seems like a lot of people are assuming that just because he can be fired, he is some how being let off the hook if he is not. I don't get that. There are appropriate punishments other than firing.
Just because he can be fired doesn't necessarily mean that he should be fired. I'm often amazed at how nonchalantly people call for the termination of someone else's employment. As if it's no big deal.
by e0y2e3 » Thu Mar 10, 2011 12:44 pm

by danwismar » Thu Mar 10, 2011 12:49 pm
pup wrote:Also, I still have not heard what it was that tipped of tOSU to increase their teachings on compliance back in November, 6 months before Tress was alerted to potential violations. Is it another occurrence? Has to be something totally unrelated, right?
by motherscratcher » Thu Mar 10, 2011 12:51 pm
e0y2e3 wrote:2 FWIWs:
1) I am closest to Peeks reading on the situation, just makes the most sense and ties the closest to what we read. That said who knows and it doesn't really matter
2) I'm not calling for Tress to be fired per say, more so pissed about being duped by Dudly Do Right for the last 20 years.
by peeker643 » Thu Mar 10, 2011 1:00 pm
danwismar wrote:pup wrote:Also, I still have not heard what it was that tipped of tOSU to increase their teachings on compliance back in November, 6 months before Tress was alerted to potential violations. Is it another occurrence? Has to be something totally unrelated, right?
I remain curious about this too, pup. It has not been explained.
Peeks, the self-report letter of March 8 (pdf linked in my article) does a pretty good job of laying out the timeline. Even after the Sugar Bowl and the Dec, 2010 player suspensions, Tressel didn't come clean. At that point he had to figure his prior knowledge might just slip under the radar.
by waborat » Thu Mar 10, 2011 1:03 pm
motherscratcher wrote:
I'm often amazed at how nonchalantly people call for the termination of someone else's employment. As if it's no big deal.
by pup » Thu Mar 10, 2011 1:04 pm
motherscratcher wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:2 FWIWs:
1) I am closest to Peeks reading on the situation, just makes the most sense and ties the closest to what we read. That said who knows and it doesn't really matter
2) I'm not calling for Tress to be fired per say, more so pissed about being duped by Dudly Do Right for the last 20 years.
I agree that Peek's interpretation makes a lot of sense. But, we will know who killed Kennedy before we ever know for sure what actually happened here.
Why do you feel duped? I mean, why is it easier to assume that Tressel is a bad guy who's honorability/good deeds whatever is just a front? It's it just as easy, easier in fact, to assume that Tressel is a good dude who the vast majority of the time tries to do the right thing and just epically fucked up this time?
by motherscratcher » Thu Mar 10, 2011 1:07 pm
pup wrote:motherscratcher wrote:e0y2e3 wrote:2 FWIWs:
1) I am closest to Peeks reading on the situation, just makes the most sense and ties the closest to what we read. That said who knows and it doesn't really matter
2) I'm not calling for Tress to be fired per say, more so pissed about being duped by Dudly Do Right for the last 20 years.
I agree that Peek's interpretation makes a lot of sense. But, we will know who killed Kennedy before we ever know for sure what actually happened here.
Why do you feel duped? I mean, why is it easier to assume that Tressel is a bad guy who's honorability/good deeds whatever is just a front? It's it just as easy, easier in fact, to assume that Tressel is a good dude who the vast majority of the time tries to do the right thing and just epically fucked up this time?
Because it isn't the first time?
by pup » Thu Mar 10, 2011 1:10 pm
by Fire Marshall Bill » Thu Mar 10, 2011 1:49 pm
jb wrote:No, I don't know moles. Not even shrews. I am fairly ignorant when it comes to all burrowing small mammels, and small mammels in general. I don't experiment with gerbils, neither.
by danwismar » Thu Mar 10, 2011 2:05 pm
motherscratcher wrote:I've heard of a similar transgression at YSU alluded to but am unfamiliar with it. Any details on this or other transgressions?
by danwismar » Thu Mar 10, 2011 2:10 pm
peeker643 wrote:Tell me the timing doesn't seem strange.
by peeker643 » Thu Mar 10, 2011 2:47 pm
danwismar wrote:peeker643 wrote:Tell me the timing doesn't seem strange.
Again, I refer you to the self-report letter of March 8, in which the timing is explained. This was not a "routine" email review. This was discovered in the course of a separate investigation, as I understand it.
by SoulDawg74 » Thu Mar 10, 2011 3:11 pm
pup wrote:YSU put on probation as Tress left. QB making more than QB coach or something like that.
There is another rumor out there, that I will admit I have not seen proof of that there was an incident where someone tipped of Tressel that someone was up to no good. He did nothing and that player was later proven to be up to that exact no good. Awful sketchy rumor at this point, but in light of current situation it sounds at least plausible.
by SoulDawg74 » Thu Mar 10, 2011 3:20 pm
peeker643 wrote:danwismar wrote:peeker643 wrote:Tell me the timing doesn't seem strange.
Again, I refer you to the self-report letter of March 8, in which the timing is explained. This was not a "routine" email review. This was discovered in the course of a separate investigation, as I understand it.
And again, I tell you I think it's strange and coincidental that this occurred (and I quote from that report) "while reviewing information on an unrelated legal issue".
What a fortuitous break that they happened to come across one of these emails while looking at something else (that they don't discuss further from what I can tell).
Look, I'm not a conspiracy theorist. But this whole thing is flimsy in that regard.
by danwismar » Thu Mar 10, 2011 3:41 pm
SoulDawg74 wrote:SD:
Just because a booster pays a kid $10.000.00 alledgedly is that Tressels Fault ?
SoulDawg
by peeker643 » Thu Mar 10, 2011 3:50 pm
by peeker643 » Thu Mar 10, 2011 3:59 pm
danwismar wrote:SoulDawg74 wrote:SD:
Just because a booster pays a kid $10.000.00 alledgedly is that Tressels Fault ?
SoulDawg
Mickey Monus, the Phar-Mor millionaire, strikes me as a small time Bobby Lowder of Youngstown. A member of the university board, overzealous booster, and obviously both a benefactor and a problem child for the program. I guess you have to be pretty credulous to think that when Tressel sent his QB Issac to meet Monus, it was simply because he wanted Monus to arrange for the kid to have a job. It's a stretch, for sure. A touch of willful blindness. It would be so satisfying if this sport we love were pristine.
The fact that this occurred on JT's watch is, for some people, apparently strike one and strike two against Tressel. YMMV. As I said upthread, there was never any kind of coverup even hinted at in either the Troy Smith episode of the Clarett hijinx. Both were caught and punished in short order, Clarett expelled.
Summing up the position of the "off with his head" crowd...."how dare this man besmirch the reputation and integrity of the university whose football games I watch on TV in the fall?"
by pup » Thu Mar 10, 2011 4:08 pm
danwismar wrote:SoulDawg74 wrote:SD:
Just because a booster pays a kid $10.000.00 alledgedly is that Tressels Fault ?
SoulDawg
Mickey Monus, the Phar-Mor millionaire, strikes me as a small time Bobby Lowder of Youngstown. A member of the university board, overzealous booster, and obviously both a benefactor and a problem child for the program. I guess you have to be pretty credulous to think that when Tressel sent his QB Issac to meet Monus, it was simply because he wanted Monus to arrange for the kid to have a job. It's a stretch, for sure. A touch of willful blindness. It would be so satisfying if this sport we love were pristine.
The fact that this occurred on JT's watch is, for some people, apparently strike one and strike two against Tressel. YMMV. As I said upthread, there was never any kind of coverup even hinted at in either the Troy Smith episode of the Clarett hijinx. Both were caught and punished in short order, Clarett expelled.
Summing up the position of the "off with his head" crowd...."how dare this man besmirch the reputation and integrity of the university whose football games I watch on TV in the fall?"
by General » Thu Mar 10, 2011 4:20 pm


by peeker643 » Thu Mar 10, 2011 4:23 pm
"This letter will review the institution's inquiry and also define the corrective and punitive actions, which include suspending him from coaching several games during the 2011 football season, reducing his salary, and precluding Coach Tressel from having any involvement with spring practice or summer camps in 2011."
But in an e-mail to ESPN.com Thursday morning, athletic department spokeswoman Shelly Poe said Tressel would participate in spring practice and summer camps, pending the NCAA's decision on the case.
Poe said the paragraph outlining Tressel's punishment in the original self-report "outlined the scope of options that Ohio State considered but the specific sanctions are the ones outlined."
An updated NCAA self-report was published on Ohio State's website Thursday morning. The paragraph referenced above was edited to:
"This letter will review the institution's inquiry and also detail the corrective and punitive actions, which include suspending him from coaching two games during the 2011 football season and reducing his salary."
by danwismar » Thu Mar 10, 2011 4:33 pm
by danwismar » Thu Mar 10, 2011 4:39 pm
pup wrote:
How dare this man sit around and preach all that he does, while sitting on a time bomb because he has a chance to win another national title. And taking the chance that when the detonator goes off, the near future of the "university whose football games I watch on TV in the fall" is compromised.
How dare this man sit in judgement of mistakes by others, while hiding his own mistakes.
How dare this man talk about all the positive virtues he extols on the young men under his watch, while his skeletons continue to pile up.
Trips to the hospital : Tressel :: Boys and Girls Club of America : LBJ
by FUDU » Thu Mar 10, 2011 6:42 pm

by peeker643 » Thu Mar 10, 2011 6:54 pm
FUDU wrote:His past track record and rep most certainly allow for the BOD on any other speculation regarding violations and significant illegal activity, as it should for anyone with such a long history of integrity.

by FUDU » Thu Mar 10, 2011 7:04 pm
by peeker643 » Thu Mar 10, 2011 7:13 pm
FUDU wrote:Benefit of the doubt, you're right BotD would be better, since when did you get all hip on anagram's?
I thought the picture was kind of cute in regards to all the talk about his, not singling out anyone in this thread just all the talk in general. People are almost fishing for reasons now to completely discredit JT's past, and their jumping to conclusions in doing so. So yeah I thought the jpg was rather appropriate.
As far as that other thing, the next time you play me it will be single elimination, so pack light.
by gnati » Thu Mar 10, 2011 9:38 pm
Was wondering if you'd drive by. Wish you would more.
- way to bring in an Abner Luima reference. Just don't see many of those since the 90's. Ur getting old, BH.
by danwismar » Thu Mar 10, 2011 11:14 pm
by danwismar » Thu Mar 10, 2011 11:44 pm
gnati wrote:OK then....
after sleeping on it a day, I am more pissed then yesterday. to paraphrase herb brooks (how is that for old school?) I am getting more pissed each day and right now it feels like the middle of next week...
So right now I am of the mind that unless:
1) There was some sort of explicit or implicit head nod from the feds that he couldn't act on the info in some way shape or form
or
2) He did forward it to (perhaps) legal and they advised him to keep quiet - for whatever reason...
or some variation of outside mitigating circumstances that a reasonable person could see there is a legit reason to feel conflicted in some way and make the decision he made given the hand he was dealt....
Short of that...
I see no reason he should keep his job. If this was a unilateral decision based on the facts that we currently understand and he just screwed the pooch and decided to keep it to himself, play the guys he knew/should have known would be ineligible, decided not to go forward with it during the investigation in December...basically the facts as we think we know them now...
Dude should be fired or resign...or if possible both (after being beaten with a wet noodle)- way to bring in an Abner Luima reference. Just don't see many of those since the 90's. Ur getting old, BH.
the bitch of it all is it seems to only be happening to me.
by motherscratcher » Thu Mar 10, 2011 11:45 pm
danwismar wrote:Very interesting and detailed Dispatch article from 2009 listing OSU violations along with much other info. They have more violations than any other school, but as the article explains, it's because a)they maintain a culture of self-reporting and b) they have more sports than most schools. Lots of good stuff here...
http://bit.ly/b040Ve
Peeks, the player from NC I was thinking about earlier (though I was way off on the dates...it was 2002), was Derek Morris, and his whole story is included at the link.
by mattvan1 » Fri Mar 11, 2011 12:23 am
danwismar wrote:...and what I keep hearing from them is disappointment that the school wasn't tougher on JT, and much more serious, contrite and on topic at their press conference. Can't disagree at all.
One common suggestion was a full year suspension without pay for Tressel. These people love the guy, but they also love the school's integrity, and they wish OSU people had taken the initiative to preempt the NCAA action with some more serious action of their own. Again, hard to disagree.
by e0y2e3 » Fri Mar 11, 2011 2:22 am

by pup » Fri Mar 11, 2011 9:48 am
e0y2e3 wrote:Geezes christ this thread is gross.........
Mo-Clar's cousin played with me know. Know the family and all that shit well.... don't mean a thing,
And now I get Mickey Monus being rolled around?
I'll show you Ed Muransky's dick before any of ya'll have a clue a bout Y-town.
Don't talk about what you don't know.
Dan a shill but ya'll blood thirsty.
by pup » Fri Mar 11, 2011 9:50 am
danwismar wrote:
I've talked and emailed with a bunch of serious OSU fans today...including half a dozen strangers who emailed on my article, and what I keep hearing from them is disappointment that the school wasn't tougher on JT, and much more serious, contrite and on topic at their press conference. Can't disagree at all.
One common suggestion was a full year suspension without pay for Tressel. These people love the guy, but they also love the school's integrity, and they wish OSU people had taken the initiative to preempt the NCAA action with some more serious action of their own. Again, hard to disagree.

Return to College Sports Arena
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests