Moderators: peeker643, swerb, danwismar, furls
by fundamentals » Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:19 pm
by peeker643 » Thu Dec 30, 2010 5:35 pm
fundamentals wrote:Apparently the Vest got all the fellas that were suspended to tell him they were coming back for next season..................
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/bowls10/s ... id=5970169
by dpdad » Thu Dec 30, 2010 5:45 pm
by Love child of shawn kemp » Thu Dec 30, 2010 5:51 pm
by danwismar » Thu Dec 30, 2010 9:17 pm
by Fire Marshall Bill » Fri Dec 31, 2010 4:29 pm
fundamentals wrote:Apparently the Vest got all the fellas that were suspended to tell him they were coming back for next season..................
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/bowls10/s ... id=5970169
by fairvis » Fri Dec 31, 2010 4:45 pm
by furls » Fri Dec 31, 2010 5:39 pm
by bucknutz94 » Sun Jan 02, 2011 6:51 pm
by FUDU » Sun Jan 02, 2011 6:56 pm
by leadpipe » Sun Jan 02, 2011 7:23 pm
FUDU wrote:My questions are these, let's say we start off 5-0 next season (with Pryor on the bench due to suspension) does he get inserted as the starter upon his return? What if B. Miller is the starter with that 5-0 record, seeing as he is the future, what happens? Does JT possibly use TP as something other than a QB next season? Do we really believe all those kids are going to come back as they "promised" JT?
by pup » Sun Jan 02, 2011 8:10 pm
leadpipe wrote:FUDU wrote:My questions are these, let's say we start off 5-0 next season (with Pryor on the bench due to suspension) does he get inserted as the starter upon his return? What if B. Miller is the starter with that 5-0 record, seeing as he is the future, what happens? Does JT possibly use TP as something other than a QB next season? Do we really believe all those kids are going to come back as they "promised" JT?
Just alluded to this in the other thread, but peruse TP's numbers against the top five or six teams he played against, that is, anyone with a clue.
Hard to believe they are gonna get much worse QB play next year with Miller, or anyone else.
by motherscratcher » Sun Jan 02, 2011 8:55 pm
leadpipe wrote:FUDU wrote:My questions are these, let's say we start off 5-0 next season (with Pryor on the bench due to suspension) does he get inserted as the starter upon his return? What if B. Miller is the starter with that 5-0 record, seeing as he is the future, what happens? Does JT possibly use TP as something other than a QB next season? Do we really believe all those kids are going to come back as they "promised" JT?
Just alluded to this in the other thread, but peruse TP's numbers against the top five or six teams he played against, that is, anyone with a clue.
Hard to believe they are gonna get much worse QB play next year with Miller, or anyone else.
by leadpipe » Sun Jan 02, 2011 9:28 pm
motherscratcher wrote:leadpipe wrote:FUDU wrote:My questions are these, let's say we start off 5-0 next season (with Pryor on the bench due to suspension) does he get inserted as the starter upon his return? What if B. Miller is the starter with that 5-0 record, seeing as he is the future, what happens? Does JT possibly use TP as something other than a QB next season? Do we really believe all those kids are going to come back as they "promised" JT?
Just alluded to this in the other thread, but peruse TP's numbers against the top five or six teams he played against, that is, anyone with a clue.
Hard to believe they are gonna get much worse QB play next year with Miller, or anyone else.
I haven't seen the stats, but I have no doubt they are as bad as you say they are. I'm just wondering, then, what you think would have happened with Bauserman under center instead of Pryor? This is a one loss team with Pryor taking the snaps and accounting for most of the offense. And the team they lost to is pretty damn good. I just don't think they would have been near as good with any of the other QBs on the roster starting.
by FUDU » Sun Jan 02, 2011 10:18 pm
by jb » Mon Jan 03, 2011 3:07 pm
pup wrote:leadpipe wrote:FUDU wrote:My questions are these, let's say we start off 5-0 next season (with Pryor on the bench due to suspension) does he get inserted as the starter upon his return? What if B. Miller is the starter with that 5-0 record, seeing as he is the future, what happens? Does JT possibly use TP as something other than a QB next season? Do we really believe all those kids are going to come back as they "promised" JT?
Just alluded to this in the other thread, but peruse TP's numbers against the top five or six teams he played against, that is, anyone with a clue.
Hard to believe they are gonna get much worse QB play next year with Miller, or anyone else.
Stop it. Check the other thread. No way can Miller play as well as Pryor Conviction.
by jb » Mon Jan 03, 2011 3:08 pm
by skatingtripods » Mon Jan 03, 2011 3:45 pm
jb wrote:I used to have respect for tSV. Ebing away daily. He missed one hell of a chance to make a program statement.
by danwismar » Mon Jan 03, 2011 4:48 pm
by jb » Mon Jan 03, 2011 8:03 pm
by jb » Mon Jan 03, 2011 8:07 pm
skatingtripods wrote:jb wrote:I used to have respect for tSV. Ebing away daily. He missed one hell of a chance to make a program statement.
See, I felt this way, too. Until I read about how much pressure the Sugar Bowl CEO put on NCAA to let these kids play the game.
I have to think that if Tressel then went and sat all these kids, their chances at an at-large BCS bid in the future would be compromised.
Just a hypothesis, can't prove it. But he'd piss off some influential people in terms of BCS games.
You can interpret that any way you want, and I think you'll be on the side of personal character over the money and prestige of a BCS game, but it's something to consider.
by fairvis » Mon Jan 03, 2011 9:18 pm
by danwismar » Mon Jan 03, 2011 9:53 pm
jb wrote:Dan, I admit to being a Pryor hater. I think the kid represents everything that is wrong with college sports.
by jb » Mon Jan 03, 2011 11:12 pm
danwismar wrote:jb wrote:Dan, I admit to being a Pryor hater. I think the kid represents everything that is wrong with college sports.
Really? Up until this relatively trivial incident, what in the world would make you say that?
What has he ever done outside displaying some of the entirely normal and expected teenage immaturity, and a penchant for saying stupid shit on his Twitter account? He shows the arrogance one might expect from having his ass kissed since he was in grade school, but holy hyperbole!
His "game", or lack of it, at the QB position is obviously a legit subject for OSU fan criticism, but..."Everything that is wrong with college sports"?
Wow.
What does that make Reggie Bush and Cecil Newton and Bobby Lowder?
by noles1 » Tue Jan 04, 2011 1:25 am

by danwismar » Tue Jan 04, 2011 2:32 am
by FUDU » Tue Jan 04, 2011 5:57 am
by jb » Tue Jan 04, 2011 10:16 am
by jb » Tue Jan 04, 2011 10:34 am
danwismar wrote:One thing all OSU fans can I think agree on...as talented as he is, he's not as good we wanted him to be. No national championships, after all. So he gets blamed for our disappointment. Funny that.
by fundamentals » Tue Jan 04, 2011 1:14 pm
by danwismar » Tue Jan 04, 2011 2:25 pm
jb wrote:danwismar wrote:One thing all OSU fans can I think agree on...as talented as he is, he's not as good we wanted him to be. No national championships, after all. So he gets blamed for our disappointment. Funny that.
Ironically, I see it differently. I think Pryor is a mess when it comes to being a pro prospect. I think he is one hell of a college player and if he improved more and fans were more patient, he could be even more.
But IMO there are no NC's becasue the defense is incredibly overrated the past two years and despite being proven wrong about Dane the skilled position players are positively pedestrian. And don't get me started on the OL.
Its not all on TP.
BTW - I still think in terms of the athlete they pursue they need to swing he pendulum back some from the focus oon the spread. Worked well vs Oregon last January but ironically that was the only match up that mattered.
I do not have great expectations for tonight with this D vs Kniles and Mallett.
by danwismar » Tue Jan 04, 2011 2:33 pm
fundamentals wrote:For some reason I see TP out of Cbus after this game. Too many things out there now including usage of a car, etc.... that leads me to believe that if the NCAA wants to really dig, they could unearth a bunch of things to hurt tOSU. Pryor might be, kind of, sort of, asked, to leave when it's all said and done. JMO
by jb » Tue Jan 04, 2011 3:23 pm
danwismar wrote:jb wrote:danwismar wrote:One thing all OSU fans can I think agree on...as talented as he is, he's not as good we wanted him to be. No national championships, after all. So he gets blamed for our disappointment. Funny that.
Ironically, I see it differently. I think Pryor is a mess when it comes to being a pro prospect. I think he is one hell of a college player and if he improved more and fans were more patient, he could be even more.
But IMO there are no NC's becasue the defense is incredibly overrated the past two years and despite being proven wrong about Dane the skilled position players are positively pedestrian. And don't get me started on the OL.
Its not all on TP.
BTW - I still think in terms of the athlete they pursue they need to swing he pendulum back some from the focus oon the spread. Worked well vs Oregon last January but ironically that was the only match up that mattered.
I do not have great expectations for tonight with this D vs Kniles and Mallett.
I don't have great expectations either...I picked Arkansas to win in my preview.
I do think Pryor will be a starting quarterback in the NFL within two years, however. On that I would be willing to make a small wager.
No argument whatsoever on the OL being overrated. Harder to make the case that the defense is overrated when they are #2 or #3 in the nation out of 120 FBS programs in both total defense (yards allowed) and scoring defense. What else is there? Winning? 11-1.
by FUDU » Tue Jan 04, 2011 4:18 pm
by danwismar » Tue Jan 04, 2011 4:31 pm
jb wrote: I've been know to wager a pizza, but strating QB by year 2 doesn't do it for me. If he's a starter in 2015 should he come out after tonite, that would impress me.
by noles1 » Tue Jan 04, 2011 6:08 pm

by Fire Marshall Bill » Tue Jan 04, 2011 7:52 pm
FUDU wrote:Ark doesn't impress me, no reason OSU cannot win this much like the game they were supposed to lose against the Ducks last year.
If Pryor plays like he can and did in last year's Rose Bowl, this should be a comfortable win.
IMO 30-19 us.
by jb » Wed Jan 05, 2011 2:39 pm
danwismar wrote:jb wrote: I've been know to wager a pizza, but strating QB by year 2 doesn't do it for me. If he's a starter in 2015 should he come out after tonite, that would impress me.
To clarify, I'd be willing to bet the pizza of your choice, that within two years of his entering the NFL...whenever that is...he'll become a starter. No bets on how long that lasts...just that he is named the starter of the moment for his NFL team. Deal?

by danwismar » Wed Jan 05, 2011 4:00 pm
jb wrote:danwismar wrote:jb wrote: I've been know to wager a pizza, but strating QB by year 2 doesn't do it for me. If he's a starter in 2015 should he come out after tonite, that would impress me.
To clarify, I'd be willing to bet the pizza of your choice, that within two years of his entering the NFL...whenever that is...he'll become a starter. No bets on how long that lasts...just that he is named the starter of the moment for his NFL team. Deal?
Nahh. Deal if he starts 16 for one season if he's healthy.
In this day and age, almost everyone gets a look. Shoot, I'd have to pay up on Dennis Dixon and Troy Smith using this criteria, leyt alone Joe Webb.
Edit: or I could have just + 1'd noles.
by gnati » Wed Jan 05, 2011 10:48 pm
jb wrote:Never had respect for TP. came in like a doosh, acted the part, will leave jan 5th as a doosh.
I used to have respect for tSV. Ebing away daily. He missed one hell of a chance to make a program statement.
by swerb » Wed Jan 05, 2011 10:56 pm
by peeker643 » Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:02 pm
by jb » Thu Jan 06, 2011 5:16 pm
gnati wrote:jb wrote:Never had respect for TP. came in like a doosh, acted the part, will leave jan 5th as a doosh.
I used to have respect for tSV. Ebing away daily. He missed one hell of a chance to make a program statement.
JB, I will stipulate for the court that what you say about Pryor here and in other threads I am largely in agreement with - as usual, you take it too far - but your basic message isn't one I wouldnt disagree with.
That being said, and even accounting for your Nasdaqian and Hyperbolic Ways (TM), I think you are all wet on your Vest take.
Let's leave aside that the "rule" these guys broke is complete bullshit...I mean, these guys get to walk into a room at each Bowl game they go to and fill up bags with watches, IPAD's and gawd gknows what else, all with the blessing of the NCAA, but if they sell something that is theirs - well, we can't have that now can we? They would be making a profit and that wouldn't be sporting and they might as well be pros...or something.
But I digress.
Even if you lay that aside, what you have is a 5 game suspension that tOSU clearly thinks is unwarranted and, to use the parlance of our times, fucked. They have said as much by stating that they are going to appeal it and hope to get the suspensions reduced.
So basically what you are asking the Vest to do is Unilaterally Disarm...that is, go ahead and increase the punishment on these guys, voluntarily increasing a penalty which your administration is on record as saying is too long in the first place...with no guarantee that the penalty will be reduced because you did this.
What The Fuck?
Sorry JB...I get the Pryor stuff...but what you are asking the Vest to do makes no sense at all.
Return to College Sports Arena
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
