Moderators: peeker643, swerb, danwismar, furls
by bac5665 » Mon Nov 29, 2010 6:05 pm
by pup » Mon Nov 29, 2010 6:23 pm
by swerb » Mon Nov 29, 2010 6:34 pm
by bac5665 » Mon Nov 29, 2010 6:42 pm
pup wrote:I think it is great to be Boise. Lessens the number of teams that they have to fight off to be the non-Auto Qualifier to get a BCS bid. Pretty much them, Utah on occasion and maybe Notre Dumb at some point.
by Madre Hill, Superstar » Mon Nov 29, 2010 11:30 pm

by mattvan1 » Mon Nov 29, 2010 11:53 pm
swerb wrote:Texas Christian to the Big East. Right in their footprint. Big Ten has 12 teams. Big 12 has 10. Getting ridiculous at this point.
As long as they've already trampled tradition and the geographic footprints of these conferences, they may as well just rename the conferences and make four 16 team mega-conferences. Throw Boise and Notre Dame in there somewhere. Just be done with it and get the bastardization of the system over with in one fell swoop.
by StewieG » Tue Nov 30, 2010 1:33 am
by jb » Wed Dec 01, 2010 11:56 am
mattvan1 wrote:swerb wrote:Texas Christian to the Big East. Right in their footprint. Big Ten has 12 teams. Big 12 has 10. Getting ridiculous at this point.
As long as they've already trampled tradition and the geographic footprints of these conferences, they may as well just rename the conferences and make four 16 team mega-conferences. Throw Boise and Notre Dame in there somewhere. Just be done with it and get the bastardization of the system over with in one fell swoop.
Follow the money.
I can't blame TCU who has now been passed over twice by the UT/A&M axis of power. Once in the mid 90's when the SWC imploded, and again recently with the re-shaping of the Big 12.
by jb » Wed Dec 01, 2010 11:58 am
StewieG wrote:Man, what could've been for the MWC. Utah, Boise, TCU and Nevada is a pretty good big 4. Better than the Big East, and better than the ACC (currently). Could've built themselves into a BCS conference.
by mattvan1 » Wed Dec 01, 2010 1:08 pm
jb wrote:mattvan1 wrote:swerb wrote:Texas Christian to the Big East. Right in their footprint. Big Ten has 12 teams. Big 12 has 10. Getting ridiculous at this point.
As long as they've already trampled tradition and the geographic footprints of these conferences, they may as well just rename the conferences and make four 16 team mega-conferences. Throw Boise and Notre Dame in there somewhere. Just be done with it and get the bastardization of the system over with in one fell swoop.
Follow the money.
I can't blame TCU who has now been passed over twice by the UT/A&M axis of power. Once in the mid 90's when the SWC imploded, and again recently with the re-shaping of the Big 12.
Is that the scoop? I wondered why they wouldn't make the logical move to repopulate the decreased Big 12 and it's proper Texas-centric history, possibly bringing with them another ex-SWC school that wanted a return to prominance, like a Houtson or SMU. Is it really that political? Do they really hate on the Disciples of Christ that much in the Lone Star state? They are a pretty liberal group compared to the southern baptisists. ;-)
On the other hand, I give them TONS or credit. They are solving their own problem ASAP, albeit choosing the most expedient conference, the weak sis of the BCS. But still, rather than whining and law suit saber rattling, they are sacking up and putting money where mouth is, unlike Boise State. They were told by Gee and his ilk put up or shut up an dtheir assumed the stance rther than assuming the position. I like it.
by jb » Wed Dec 01, 2010 2:21 pm
As an aside, I would politely and respectfully ask Dr. Gee to stfu about athletics and stick to what he knows.
by Triple-S » Wed Dec 01, 2010 3:10 pm
Supposedly, Pitt’s athletic department officials held closed door meetings with all student-athletes this past week to speak with them about the impending move to the Big Ten. That led to Panther athletes posting this information on their Twitter pages and the like, though those messages quickly disappeared.
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by Cerebral_DownTime » Wed Dec 01, 2010 3:11 pm
by pup » Wed Dec 01, 2010 4:15 pm
by mattvan1 » Wed Dec 01, 2010 4:38 pm
pup wrote:Pitt? F Pitt.
by jb » Wed Dec 01, 2010 7:07 pm
mattvan1 wrote:pup wrote:Pitt? F Pitt.
Indeed. Why the hell would the Big 10 want another Purdue?
by pup » Wed Dec 01, 2010 8:04 pm
jb wrote:mattvan1 wrote:pup wrote:Pitt? F Pitt.
Indeed. Why the hell would the Big 10 want another Purdue?
Too harsh to both. Very good basketball schools that have potential in football.
by Triple-S » Wed Dec 01, 2010 9:52 pm
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by mattvan1 » Wed Dec 01, 2010 11:59 pm
jb wrote:mattvan1 wrote:pup wrote:Pitt? F Pitt.
Indeed. Why the hell would the Big 10 want another Purdue?
Too harsh to both. Very good basketball schools that have potential in football.
by Triple-S » Thu Dec 02, 2010 12:09 am
mattvan1 wrote:Tongue-in-cheek attempt to bait SSS, who is obvisouly more mature or simply has me on ignore.
Should have used smiley thingys to convey the intended subtle humor which was either not appreciated or simply wasn't funny.
Swerb wrote:Go start a blog if you want to tell the world your incomprehendible ramblings.
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:I have a big arm and can throw the ball pretty damn far...... maybe even over those moutains. The Browns should sign me, i'll let you all in locker room to drink beer. Then we can all go out the parking lot to watch me do motorcycle stunts.

by pup » Mon Dec 13, 2010 2:59 pm
Return to College Sports Arena
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests