Moderators: peeker643, swerb, danwismar, furls
by JCoz » Fri Jan 08, 2010 6:44 pm
by JCoz » Fri Jan 08, 2010 6:46 pm
by Erie Warrior » Fri Jan 08, 2010 7:58 pm


by noles1 » Sat Jan 09, 2010 12:22 am

by dmiles » Sat Jan 09, 2010 12:24 am

by Cease » Sat Jan 09, 2010 12:25 am

by furls » Sat Jan 09, 2010 2:27 am
For you guys that know the recruiting game at what point are commitments binding? Say if Pete is gone is there a time recruits can back out?
by danwismar » Sat Jan 09, 2010 2:40 am
by danwismar » Sat Jan 09, 2010 2:45 am
Furls wrote:For you guys that know the recruiting game at what point are commitments binding? Say if Pete is gone is there a time recruits can back out?
Nothing is binding at all until NLOI day, Feb 3rd. and it is only binding then if and only if the kid signs. There is still time for all those USC commits to back out and get one of OSU's 4-6 remaining scholarships. They had better hurry though, spaces will be filling up fast.
by JCoz » Sat Jan 09, 2010 3:29 am
wiz1001 wrote:Furls wrote:For you guys that know the recruiting game at what point are commitments binding? Say if Pete is gone is there a time recruits can back out?
Nothing is binding at all until NLOI day, Feb 3rd. and it is only binding then if and only if the kid signs. There is still time for all those USC commits to back out and get one of OSU's 4-6 remaining scholarships. They had better hurry though, spaces will be filling up fast.
This could affect Seantrel Henderson for sure...maybe tilt him toward OSU, if he's not tilted there already. Who else, Furls, Coz? Anyone we can realistically get? or want? Shaw maybe? or was he a UF commit? I forget.
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sat Jan 09, 2010 3:44 am
by leadpipe » Sat Jan 09, 2010 9:30 am
by furls » Sat Jan 09, 2010 10:03 am
by furls » Sat Jan 09, 2010 10:06 am
This could affect Seantrel Henderson for sure...maybe tilt him toward OSU, if he's not tilted there already. Who else, Furls, Coz? Anyone we can realistically get? or want? Shaw maybe? or was he a UF commit? I forget.
by peeker643 » Sat Jan 09, 2010 1:28 pm
by pod2dawg » Sat Jan 09, 2010 2:22 pm
by jb » Sat Jan 09, 2010 2:40 pm
noles1 wrote:Pete is going to leave USC and they everything is going to explode. The have been a powder keg for sanctions and issues for about 5+ years now and it is going to be fun to see what is going to remain in 2-3 years...
Expect a mass exodus and major issues relating to probations, etc.
by jb » Sat Jan 09, 2010 2:41 pm
pod2dawg wrote:The time is right for Pete to head north and cash in again. He feels the heat from an upcoming deposition RE: Bush"s percs and USC is ranked 20th preseason next year.
The rest of the PAC 10 has finally caught up to him.
< He is a Pirate. Ego and timing have himswitching to Sundays. Don't worrow he'll be able to get by.
by JCoz » Sat Jan 09, 2010 4:43 pm
JB wrote:pod2dawg wrote:The time is right for Pete to head north and cash in again. He feels the heat from an upcoming deposition RE: Bush"s percs and USC is ranked 20th preseason next year.
The rest of the PAC 10 has finally caught up to him.
< He is a Pirate. Ego and timing have himswitching to Sundays. Don't worrow he'll be able to get by.
Realy?
I see epic fail for Pete on Sunday.
Again.
He's a college coach.
by peeker643 » Sat Jan 09, 2010 4:55 pm
JCoz wrote:JB wrote:pod2dawg wrote:The time is right for Pete to head north and cash in again. He feels the heat from an upcoming deposition RE: Bush"s percs and USC is ranked 20th preseason next year.
The rest of the PAC 10 has finally caught up to him.
< He is a Pirate. Ego and timing have himswitching to Sundays. Don't worrow he'll be able to get by.
Realy?
I see epic fail for Pete on Sunday.
Again.
He's a college coach.
A while ago I might have agreed, now I think he will succeed. Read up on some of his old NFL stuff.

by JCoz » Sat Jan 09, 2010 5:48 pm
Peeker643 wrote:JCoz wrote:JB wrote:pod2dawg wrote:The time is right for Pete to head north and cash in again. He feels the heat from an upcoming deposition RE: Bush"s percs and USC is ranked 20th preseason next year.
The rest of the PAC 10 has finally caught up to him.
< He is a Pirate. Ego and timing have himswitching to Sundays. Don't worrow he'll be able to get by.
Realy?
I see epic fail for Pete on Sunday.
Again.
He's a college coach.
A while ago I might have agreed, now I think he will succeed. Read up on some of his old NFL stuff.
Dude, you're deserving of both getting and giving some respect here. You can't drive by with a "read up on..." blast without something more specific than that.
Comes off a little 'Fergusy' is all I'm saying and I know you didn't mean it to be.
by JCoz » Sat Jan 09, 2010 6:00 pm
by peeker643 » Sat Jan 09, 2010 6:31 pm
by Cerebral_DownTime » Sun Jan 10, 2010 12:38 am
by Bayou Tribe » Mon Jan 11, 2010 11:35 am
by jb » Mon Jan 11, 2010 12:27 pm
JCoz wrote:JB wrote:pod2dawg wrote:The time is right for Pete to head north and cash in again. He feels the heat from an upcoming deposition RE: Bush"s percs and USC is ranked 20th preseason next year.
The rest of the PAC 10 has finally caught up to him.
< He is a Pirate. Ego and timing have himswitching to Sundays. Don't worrow he'll be able to get by.
Realy?
I see epic fail for Pete on Sunday.
Again.
He's a college coach.
A while ago I might have agreed, now I think he will succeed. Read up on some of his old NFL stuff.
by DrPoove » Mon Jan 11, 2010 12:49 pm
Cerebral_DownTime wrote:Peek is still mad Jamey Carroll WITH ONLY A COFFEE MUG wasn't under his Christmas tree.
by furls » Mon Jan 11, 2010 1:23 pm
by pup » Mon Jan 11, 2010 1:25 pm
Furls wrote:JB,
I tend to agree with you about Pete. He strikes me as more of a father figure/mentor type than the kind of guy that works well with million dollar egos. I think Pete will probably regret this choice, and my goodness, this my cause a major shift in power in the PAC-10. Pete Carroll's hollywoodness and name was a big part of that recruiting success. I am not saying that the program will fall to hell in a hand basket, but there is now some very serious opportunity for someone to step in. I don' think this hurts USC in local/regional recruiting, but it will definitely put a dent in national recruiting in the next year or two unless USC can find another sexy name to dangle out there to put these kids minds at ease.
by jb » Mon Jan 11, 2010 1:53 pm
Furls wrote: I am not saying that the program will fall to hell in a hand basket, but there is now some very serious opportunity for someone to step in.
by peeker643 » Mon Jan 11, 2010 2:33 pm
JB wrote:Furls wrote: I am not saying that the program will fall to hell in a hand basket, but there is now some very serious opportunity for someone to step in.
Furls, us guys with a little gery on th etemples (or in peeker's case......)
by fabs227 » Mon Jan 11, 2010 7:53 pm
by furls » Mon Jan 11, 2010 8:03 pm
by dmiles » Tue Jan 12, 2010 2:59 am

by JCoz » Tue Jan 12, 2010 9:43 am
Furls wrote:I am not so naive as to think that no one on the OSU roster has ever received an illegal benefit, so I will refrain from throwing that stone. I will just say that I like the world in which there are great programs. The demise of USC is a bad thing for the NCAAF that I love. I love it when college football is dominated by elite NATIONAL programs, and I long for the days when Nebraska (near future), Miami, FSU, USC, ND, OSU, and even scUM are great. Parity in college football = mediocrity.
by jb » Tue Jan 12, 2010 10:31 am
by JCoz » Tue Jan 12, 2010 12:36 pm
JB wrote:Looks like del Rio is ocming per Bristol CN.
Not exactly a sign that the walls of Troy are coming down by the NCAA.
by jb » Tue Jan 12, 2010 12:50 pm
The meeting will be the apex in the ... probe
Return to College Sports Arena
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests